• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Shaping competition policy in postal market : evaluation of using tools on the example of Poland and Denmark

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Shaping competition policy in postal market : evaluation of using tools on the example of Poland and Denmark"

Copied!
9
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Anna Drab-Kurowska

Shaping competition policy in postal

market : evaluation of using tools on

the example of Poland and Denmark

Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług nr 122, 197-204

(2)

IS S N : 1 8 9 6 -3 8 2 X | w w w .w n u s .e d u .p l/p l/e d u / DOI: 10.18276/epu.2016.122-18 | strony: 199-206

ANNA DRAB-KURO WSKA

U n i v e r s i t y o f S z c z e c i n 1

SHAPING COMPETITION POLICY IN POSTAL MARKET - EVALUATION OF USING

TOOLS ON THE EXAMPLE OF POLAND AND DENMARK

Summary

T h e a r t ic l e p r e s e n ts a n a n a ly s is o f t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t o n th e e x a m p le o f P o l i s h a n d D a n is h . I n p a r t ic u l a r , w e p r e s e n t a n a s s e s s m e n t o f th e d e v e lo p m e n t o f c o m p e t it io n i n th e s e m a r k e ts . T h e y p o in t e d to f a c t o r s s u c h a s th e le v e l o f in d e p e n d e n c e o f th e r e g u l a ­ to r s o f t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t, th e a r e a o f u n iv e r s a l s e r v ic e a n d a v a il a b il it y o f t h e in f r a s t r u c ­ tu r e b y a lt e r n a t iv e o p e r a to r s .

Keywords:

p o s t a l m a r k e t, c o m p e t it io n p o lic y , to o l s o f e c o n o m i c p o lic y .

Introduction

F o r m a n y y e a r s , t h e p o s t m a r k e t h a s b e e n c o n s i d e r e d s t r a t e g i c f o r t h e e c o n o ­ m y o f e v e r y s t a t e ( B u d z i e w i c z - G u z l e c k a 2 0 1 2 ) . T r e m e n d o u s t e c h n o l o g i c a l c h a n g e s f o r c e d t h e n a t i o n a l o p e r a t o r s t o a d j u s t t h e i r s e r v i c e s t o n e e d s o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n s o c i e t y , u s e e m e r g i n g b u s i n e s s o p p o r t u n i t i e s a n d p a y m o r e a t t e n t i o n t o a r a p i d l y g r o w i n g d i r e c t a n d i n d i r e c t c o m p e t i t i o n ( e .g . e l e c t r o n i c m a i l ) ( K o t y l a k 2 0 0 9 ; K u b i a k , B a d z i n s k a 2 0 1 3 ) . W i t h t h e g r o w i n g d i v e r s i f i c a t i o n o f p o s t a l s e r v i c e s , t h e v a l u e o f t h e m a r k e t i n c r e a s e d a t t r a c t i n g a d d i t i o n a l i n t e r e s t o f t h e s t a t e a s a p o t e n t i a l s o u r c e o f b u d g e t r e v e n u e . M a r k e t l i b e r a l i z a t i o n h a d a m a j o r i m p a c t o n t h e p o s t a l b u s i n e s s i n t h e E u r o p e a n U n i o n , a n d t h e p r o c e s s b r o u g h t s t e a d i l y g r o w i n g c o m p e t i ­ t i o n f r o m p r i v a t e o p e r a t o r s . T h i s n e c e s s i t a t e d h a r m o n i z i n g t h e n a t i o n a l l a w w i t h r e l e v a n t E U r e g u l a t i o n s a i m e d a t e n h a n c i n g c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s o n t h e m a r k e t l e a d i n g

(3)

198

Shaping competition policy in postal market - evaluation o f using tools...

t o i m p r o v e d f l e x i b i l i t y a n d c o n t i n u o u s i n n o v a t i o n i n t h e a r e a o f p o s t a l s e r v i c e s ( C h o r ó b 2 0 1 3 ) . G o a l s o f t h e a r t i c l e i n c l u d e : - p r e s e n t i n g t h e s i t u a t i o n o n t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t i n D e n m a r k a n d P o l a n d i n t h e c o n t e x t o f g r o w i n g c o m p e t i t i o n ; a n d - i n d i c a t i n g s e l e c t e d t o o l s o f t h e e c o n o m i c p o l i c y , w h i c h i n f l u e n c e t h e d e ­ v e l o p m e n t o f c o m p e t i t i o n o n t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t . I n t h e v i e w o f t h e g o a l s s p e c i f i e d a b o v e , t h e a r t i c l e m a k e s r e f e r e n c e s t o s p e c i f ­ ic r e g u l a t i o n s a s a b a s i s f o r e x a m i n i n g r e l e v a n t is s u e s . I t is t h e n f o l l o w e d b y a d e ­ s c r i p t i o n o f p o s t a l m a r k e t s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e a r t i c l e p r e s e n t s s e l e c t e d e c o n o m i c p o l i c y t o o l s t h a t h a v e d i r e c t i n f l u e n c e o n t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t .

1. Growing competition on the postal market

D e s p it e a c o m p l e te o p e n in g o f th e E U m a r k e t i n 2 0 1 3 , t h e c o m p e t it io n o n th e le t te r m a r k e t h a s b e e n s te a d il y g r o w in g i n th e m a j o r i t y o f E U m e m b e r s ta te s , w h e r e a s o p e r a t o r s p r o v i d in g a u n i v e r s a l s e r v ic e m a i n t a i n e d t h e i r m a j o r i ty s ta k e i n m o s t c o u n ­ tr ie s . O u t o f 15 m e m b e r s s ta te s t h a t c o m p l e t e l y o p e n e d t h e i r m a r k e ts b e f o r e 2 0 1 1 ( in c lu d i n g D e n m a r k ) , in 2 0 1 3 e i g h t h a d o v e r 5 p e r c e n t c o m p e t i t i o n o n t h e l e t te r m a r k e t (a s r e g a r d s n u m b e r o f le tte r s ) . I n t h e g r o u p o f c o u n tr ie s w h i c h o p e n e d t h a t m a r k e ts a f te r 2 0 1 1 , u n t i l th e m i d - 2 0 1 3 , c o m p e t it o r s e x c e e d e d t h e i r 5 % s ta k e o f th e l e t te r m a r k e t in f iv e o f th e m . I n c o u n tr ie s w h i c h a ll o w e d c o m p e t it io n o n th e l e t te r m a r k e t, o p e r a t o r s p r o v i d in g ‘d o o r - t o - d o o r ’ s e r v ic e w h i c h d e v e l o p e d t h e i r o w n d is tr i b u ti o n n e t w o r k d e l i v ­ e r le tte r s th e m s e l v e s . I n c o u n tr ie s w h e r e u n iv e r s a l s e r v ic e o p e r a t o r s u s e o t h e r b u s i n e s s e s f o r t h e f i n a l d e li v e r y , c o m p e t it io n r e g a r d in g a c c e s s to th e m a r k e t d e v e l o p e d i n S lo v e n ia , G r e a t B r it a in a n d G e r m a n y . I n s o m e E U m e m b e r s ta te s , d o m e s ti c c o m p e t it io n a u th o r i­ tie s a c c u s e d u n iv e r s a l s e r v ic e p r o v i d e r s o f a n ti - c o m p e ti ti o n b e h a v i o u r a n d m i s u s e o f a d o m i n a ti n g p o s i ti o n . S u c h i n s ta n c e s a p p lie d to il le g a l d is c o u n ts g i v e n to b u s i n e s s c lie n ts , n a r r o w m a r g i n a n d m a j o r p r i c e r e d u c t io n ( N a g a j 2 0 1 3 ) . T h e a b o v e m a y e n ti r e l y e x c lu d e c o m p e t it io n . E n tr y t o th e m a r k e t a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f c o m p e t it io n c a n b e h a m ­ p e r e d b y c e r t a in r e g u l a to r y p r a c t ic e s , s u c h a s r e s tr i c ti o n s o n p e r m is s io n s g i v e n to n e w b u s i n e s s e s , m u c h b e y o n d th e r a n g e d e f i n e d in t h e D ir e c tiv e .

2. Postal services market in Denmark and Poland - comparative analysis

T h e a n a l y s i s s h o u l d s t a r t f r o m d e f i n i n g r e g u l a t o r y is s u e s . T a b l e 1 p r e s e n t s k e y i s s u e s r e l a t e d t o p o s t a l m a r k e t r e g u l a t i o n i n D e n m a r k a n d P o l a n d .

A n o t h e r c o m p a r i s o n is m a d e b e t w e e n t h e s c o p e o f u n i v e r s a l s e r v i c e s ( t a b l e 2 ) , w h i c h i n D e n m a r k i s m u c h w i d e r f o r s p e c i f i c g r o u p s o f s e r v i c e s i n c o m p a r i s o n w i t h P o l a n d .

(4)

T a b le 1

I n s titu tio n a l F ra m e w o r k a n d N a tio n a l C o m p e titio n A u th o rity

Institutional Framework

Denmark Poland

M in istr y f o r p o s ta l p o lic y

Ministry o f Transport Ministry o f Administration and

Digital Affairs o f Poland.

National regulatory authority

Danish Transport Authority Office of Electronic Communi­

cations

National Competition Authority

Denmark Poland National competition

authority

Danish Competition and Consumer Authority

Office of Competition and Consumer Protection

Prim ary authority for competition rules

National competition authority (NCA) National regulatory authority

for postal affairs (NRA)

(N C A ) N R A /N CA cooperation

Share data: Yes Regular consult: No Coord agmt: No

Share data: Yes Regular consult: No Coord agmt: No S o u rce: M a in D e v e lo p m e n ts in th e P o s ta l S e c to r ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 3 ) C o u n try R e p o rts , W IK C o n ­ su lt, B a d H o o n e f 2 0 1 3 , p . 2 5 - 2 7 , 9 4 -9 7 . T a b le 2 T h e s c o p e o f u n iv e r s a l s e rv ic e s in D e n m a rk a n d P o la n d

Scope of Universal Service

Service Ensured Price regulated Service standards D K P L D K P L D K P L Single piece letter

post (F S C ) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes B u lk letters Yes No No No B u lk advertise­ ments Yes No Yes No Yes No Newspapers, maga­

zines, etc. Yes

No

No No No No

Non-priority corre­

spondence Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Single piece parcels Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

B u lk parcels Yes No Yes No Yes No

Delivery frequency for L P 6 days per week 5 days per week Delivery frequency for parcels 5 days per week 5 days per week Delivery point: Par­ cels must be delivered without charge to addressee Delivery point: Par­ cels must be delivered without charge to addressee

Source: M ain Developments in the Postal Sector (2010-2013) Country Reports, W IK C on­ sult, B ad H oonef 2013, p. 25-27, 94-97.

(5)

200

Shaping competition policy in postal market - evaluation o f using tools...

F r o m t h e p o i n t o f v i e w o f p o s t a l m a r k e t d e v e l o p m e n t , t h e a c c e s s t o t h e m a r k e t is p a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t . I n P o l a n d , o p e r a t o r s m a y s t a r t o p e r a t i n g b a s e d o n a n e n t r y t o a r e g i s t e r r u n b y t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t r e g u l a t o r . T h i s is c o n s i d e r e d a v e r y l i b e r a l s o l u t i o n . H o w e v e r , i n a n u m b e r o f E U m e m b e r s s t a t e s , i n c l u d i n g D e n m a r k , a p r o ­ s p e c t i v e p o s t a l o p e r a t o r n e e d s t o m e e t m o r e s t r i n g e n t r e q u i r e m e n t s , n a m e l y o b t a i n a l i c e n c e o r a p e r m i t ( t a b l e 3 ) . O p e r a t o r s d e l i v e r i n g l e t t e r s ( u p t o 1 k g ) a r e r e q u i r e d to h a v e i n d i v i d u a l l i c e n c e s i n s u c h c o u n t r i e s a s F i n l a n d , F r a n c e , S w e d e n a n d G e r ­ m a n y , w h e r e a s g e n e r a l p e r m i t s a r e m a n d a t o r y i n I t a l y a n d S p a in . I n o r d e r t o o b t a i n a l i c e n c e o r a p e r m i t , a n e n t i t y n e e d s t o p a y a f e e t o a s i n k i n g f u n d o r m e e t o t h e r o b l i g a t i o n s , e .g . m a i n t a i n s e r v i c e q u a l i t y o r m e e t c o m p e t i t i o n r u l e s . T a b le 3 L e g a l T re a tm e n t o f C o m p e titiv e S e rv ic e s

Le gal Treatment of Competitive Services

DK

PL

Special tariffs are trans­

parent and non­

discriminatory?

B u lk letters: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice

D ire c t m ail: R eq u ired by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice B u lk parcels: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice B u lk letters: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ractice D ire c t m ail: N o t re q u ire d b y la w o r v erifie d in p ractice B u lk parcels: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ractice

Special tariffs are availa­

ble to other postal opera­

tors?

B u lk letters: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice

D ire c t m ail: R eq u ired by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice B u lk parcels: R e q u ire d by la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ra c ­ tice B u lk letters: N o t re q u ire d by la w o r v erifie d in p ractice D ire c t m ail: N o t re q u ire d b y la w o r v erified in p ractice

B u lk parcels: R e q u ire d b y la w b u t n o t v erifie d in p ractice

Licence required within

US area

G en eral au th o risatio n re ­ q u ired fo r p ro v isio n o f som e serv ices w ith th e u n iv ersal service area

N o au th o risatio n req u ire d fo r p ro v isio n o f serv ices w ith th e u n iv ersal service area

Use of potentially restric­

tive authorisation condi­

tions

U niv. servs: N o Q uality co nditions: N o C om petence: N o

U niv. servs: N o

Q u ality conditio n s: Y es C o m p e­ tence: Y es

Access to postal infra­

structure by competitors

A ddr. database: Y es P o st office boxes: Y es D e ­ livery boxes: Y es A ddr. database: N o P o s t office boxes: Y es D eliv ery boxes: Y es

Source: M ain Developments in the Postal Sector (2010-2013) Country Reports, W IK C on­ sult, B ad H oonef 2013, p. 25-27, 94-97.

(6)

3. Selected economic policy tools on the postal service market

T h e g r o w t h o f c o m p e t i t i o n o n t h e p o s t a l s e r v i c e m a r k e t d e p e n d s o n s e v e r a l e c o n o m i c p o l i c y i n s t r u m e n t s ( m e n t i o n e d a b o v e ) w h i c h e i t h e r d i s c o u r a g e o r a t t r a c t n e w p o s t a l o p e r a t o r s . B e l o w p r e s e n t e d a r e t w o o f t h e t o o l s t h a t h a v e m a j o r i m p a c t o n t h e m a r k e t c o n c e r n e d . T h e s e i n c l u d e : - d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r , a n d - r e g u l a t i o n s o n a c c e s s t o t h e p o s t a l in f r a s t r u c t u r e . T h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r w a s i n t r o d u c e d t o m i t i g a t e n e g a t i v e s o c i a l c o n s e ­ q u e n c e s o f m a r k e t l i b e r a l i s a t i o n . I n D e n m a r k , P o s t D a n m a r k is t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p ­ e r a t o r . T h e c o m p a n y is a p a r t o f P o s t N o r d A B , i n w h i c h 6 0 % o f t h e s t a k e is o w n e d b y t h e S w e d i s h G o v e r n m e n t , w h e r e a s 4 0 % b y D e n m a r k . I n P o l a n d , s u c h a r o l e is p l a y e d b y P o c z t a P o l s k a S .A ., a S t a t e T r e a s u r y C o m p a n y . D e s p i t e c o m p l e t e l i b e r ­ a l i s a t i o n o f t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t , t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r g u a r a n t e e s t h a t a ll c i t i z e n s h a v e a c c e s s t o h i g h q u a l i t y a n d a f f o r d a b l e s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d i n v i r t u a l l y a n y l o c a ­ t i o n i n t h e c o u n t r y o n t h e s a m e c o n d i t i o n s . T h i s is p o s s i b l e a ls o b e c a u s e P o c z t a P o l s k a S .A . p r e p a r e d a l r e a d y i n 2 0 0 9 a s t r a t e g y f o r t h e n e x t y e a r s , c o n t a i n i n g i n i t i a ­ t i v e s a n d a c t i o n s i n o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n t h e c o m p a n y 's f i n a n c i a l s t a b i l i t y u n d e r f u l l c o m p e t i t i o n c o n d i t i o n s ( C z a p l e w s k i 2 0 1 1 , p . 4 0 ) . T h e f u l l o p e n i n g o f t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t b e n e f i t s t h e e n t i r e e c o n o m y o f t h e E U , a n d i m p r o v e s t h e q u a l i t y a n d r e d u c e s p r i c e s . H o w e v e r , p o s s i b i l i t i e s o f g e n e r a t i n g p r o f i t m a y l e a d t o r e s t r i c t i n g t h e a c c e s s t o p o s t a l s e r v i c e s f o r s p e c i f i c g r o u p s , in p a r t i c u l a r p e o p l e l i v i n g i n t h e m o u n t a i n s , a s w e l l a s r u r a l a n d s p a r s e l y p o p u l a t e d a r e a s . I t i s a l s o i m p o r t a n t t o e x a m i n e o b l i g a t i o n s o f t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r , w h i c h i n c l u d e c r e a t i n g a s u f f i c i e n t n e t w o r k o f p o s t o f f i c e s a n d p o s t o f f i c e b o x e s , a ls o in a r e a o f l o w p o p u l a t i o n . I n t h e l a t t e r , p o s t a l s e r v i c e s a r e p a r t i c u l a r l y i m p o r t a n t in e n s u r i n g c o m m u n i c a t i o n b e t w e e n p e o p l e , p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n e c o n o m i c l i f e a n d l a b o u r m a r k e t , w h i c h t r a n s l a t e s i n t o s o c i a l a n d t e r r i t o r i a l c o h e s i o n i n a c o u n t r y . A n o t h e r i m p o r t a n t o b l i g a t i o n o f t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r is t o e n s u r e f r e q u e n c y o f p o s t a l s e r v i c e s , e .g . d e l i v e r y a t l e a s t o n c e a d a y f o r f i v e d a y s a w e e k . Y e t a n o t h e r f a c t o r w h i c h p r e v e n t s e x c l u s i o n is a f f o r d a b l e p r i c e a n d s i n g l e t a r i f f a ll o v e r t h e c o u n t r y , r e g a r d l e s s g e o g r a p h i c l o c a t i o n o f a c l i e n t a n d c o s t f o r t h e p o s t . A t t h e s a m e t i m e , a g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e is t h a t p r i c e s o f u n i v e r s a l p o s t a l s e r v i c e s s h o u l d c o r r e s p o n d w i t h t h e c o s t i n c u r r e d b y t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r a n d d o n o t d i s t o r t t h e c o m p e t i t i o n . T o m e e t t h o s e r e q u i r e m e n t s , t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t is s u p e r v i s e d b y t h e p o s t a l m a r k e t r e g u ­ l a t o r . 2 A n o t h e r e c o n o m i c p o l i c y t o o l , h a v i n g a m a j o r i m p a c t o n t h e p o s t a l s e r v i c e m a r k e t , is t h e a c c e s s t o t h e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e . T h u s , a p p r o p r i a t e r e g u l a t i o n s e n s u r i n g

2 D esig n ated o p e ra to r in th e E u ro p e a n U nion. S o lu tio n s a p p lied in p ro v isio n o f p u b lic p o stal serv ices in 2 7 E U m e m b e r states.

(7)

202

Shaping competition policy in postal market - evaluation o f using tools...

a c c e s s t o t h e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e s t i m u l a t e c o m p e t i t i o n . A c c o r d i n g t o t h e T h i r d P o s t a l D i r e c t i v e , d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r s i n a l l E U m e m b e r s s t a t e s a r e r e q u i r e d t o p r o v i d e a c c e s s f o r o t h e r o p e r a t o r s t o s e l e c t e d p a r t s o f t h e i r o w n p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , e .g . s y s t e m o f p o s t c o d e s , d a t a b a s e o f a d d r e s s e s f o r r e d i r e c t i n g p o s t i n g s , p o s t o f f i c e b o x e s , a n d d e l i v e r y b o x e s . A s r e g a r d s o t h e r e l e m e n t s o f t h e i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , a c c o r d ­ in g t o a r t i c l e 11 o f t h e T h i r d P o s t a l D i r e c t i v e , m e m b e r s t a t e s s h o u l d a d o p t h a r m o n i ­ s a t i o n m e a s u r e s n e c e s s a r y t o e n s u r e t r a n s p a r e n t a n d n o n - d i s c r i m i n a t o r y a c c e s s t o t h e p o s t a l n e t w o r k f o r a l l u s e r s a n d p o s t a l o p e r a t o r s . T h e r e p o r t o n t h e ‘M a i n D e v e l o p m e n t s i n t h e P o s t a l S e c t o r ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 3 ) ’, d e v e l o p e d b y W I K C o n s u l t , a G e r m a n r e s e a r c h i n s t i t u t e , a n d c o m m i s s i o n e d b y t h e E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o n , p r o v i d e s a d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s o f t h e p o s t a l o p e r a t o r s ’ i n f r a ­ s t r u c t u r e i n p a r t i c u l a r c o u n t r i e s ( t a b l e 4 ). T a b le 4 A c c e s s p ro v id e d to p o s ta l in fra s tru c tu re in E U m e m b e r sta te s

Access to postal infrastructure in EU

High (7 states)

Average (10 states)

Low (11 states)

C zech R ep .,

Denmark

, F ran ce, L ith u an ia, L u x em ­ b o u rg , G erm an y , S lo v en ia

A u stria, C y p ru s, E sto n ia, G reece, M alta,

Poland

, P o rtu g al, H u n g ary , G reat

B ritain , Italy

B elg iu m , B u lg aria, C roatia, F in lan d , Spain, N eth erlan d s, Irelan d , L atv ia, R o m an ia, S lo­ vakia, S w ed en S o u r c e : W IK M a in D e v e lo p m e n ts in th e P o s ta l S e c to r 2 0 1 0 -2 0 1 3 . N o n e o f E u r o p e a n c o u n t r i e s d e c i d e d t o e n s u r e f u l l a c c e s s t o a l l p a r t o f t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r ’s n e t w o r k . S e l e c t e d c o u n t r i e s ( B e l g i u m , E s t o n i a , G e r m a n y , L a t v i a , L i t h u a n i a , M a l t a , P o r t u g a l , S l o v e n i a , G r e a t B r i t a i n a n d H u n g a r y ) p r o v i d e a c c e s s to t h e f i n a l s t a g e o f t h e s e r v i c e , n a m e l y t h e d e l i v e r y , a ls o k n o w n a s th e d o w n s t r e a m a c c e s s , w h i c h r e q u i r e s t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r t o d e l i v e r m a i l p r o v i d e d b y o t h e r u n i v e r s a l s e r v i c e o p e r a t o r s o r i n c l u d e d i n u n i v e r s a l s e r v i c e s . R e g u l a t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g t h e a c c e s s t o t h e p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e c a n b e d i v i d e d in t o t h r e e m a i n t y p e s ( P o l i s h P o s t a l I n s t i t u t e 2 0 1 5 ) : - P r o v i s i o n o f a c c e s s t o t h e p o s t a l n e t w o r k ( a c c o r d i n g t o d o m e s t i c l a w ) a n d p a r t s o f i t s i n f r a s t r u c t u r e . S u c h a s o l u t i o n h a s b e e n a p p l i e d f o r i n s t a n c e i n D e n m a r k . - O p e n i n g o f p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e c a t a l o g u e ( b y i n d i c a t i n g s a m p l e c a l c u l a ­ t i o n ) , a p p l i e d i n s u c h c o u n t r i e s a s B e l g i u m a n d E s t o n i a . - P r o v i d i n g a c c e s s to l i s t e d e l e m e n t s o f p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , a p p l i e d i n P o ­ la n d . P o i n t 3 4 o f t h e p r e a m b l e t o t h e T h i r d P o s t a l D i r e c t i v e r e f e r s t o t h e o b l i g a t i o n o f e n s u r i n g i n t e r o p e r a b i l i t y o f p o s t a l n e t w o r k s i n c a s e th e r e a r e s e v e r a l o p e r a t o r s

(8)

p r o v i d i n g a u n i v e r s a l s e r v i c e a n d h a v i n g t h e i r r e g i o n a l p o s t a l n e t w o r k s . S o f a r , D e n m a r k a n d P o l a n d d e c i d e d t o h a v e o n l y o n e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r . T h e f i n a l s c o p e o f t h e a c c e s s t o t h e p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e i n p a r t i c u l a r E U s t a t e s m a y v a r y s i g n i f i ­ c a n t l y d e p e n d i n g o n t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n o f a n i n d i v i d u a l p o s t a l m a r k e t , s e e t a b l e b e ­ lo w . T a b le 5 A c c e s s to p o s ta l in f ra s tru c tu re in D e n m a rk a n d P o la n d A c c e s s to : P o s t c o d e s P o s t o ffic e b o x e s D e liv e r y b o x e s A d d r e s s d a t a b a s e C h a n g e s in a d d r e s s d a t a b a s e R e t u r n s e r v ic e s D e n m a r k + + + + + + P o l a n d + + + S o u r c e : W IK M a in D e v e lo p m e n ts in th e P o s ta l S e c to r 2 0 1 0 -2 0 1 3 . A c c e s s t o p o s t a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e i n D e n m a r k i s w i d e r t h a n i n P o l a n d . T h i s c r e ­ a te s b e t t e r o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r a l t e r n a t i v e o p e r a t o r s i n t e r e s t e d i n o p e r a t i n g o n t h e D a n ­ i s h p o s t a l m a r k e t .

Conclusions

E a c h m e m b e r s t a t e r e g u l a t e s i t s p o s t a l m a r k e t a s p r e s c r i b e d b y P o s t a l D i r e c ­ ti v e s . T h e a n a l y s i s o f E u r o p e a n s o l u t i o n s ( i n c l u d i n g t h o s e i n D e n m a r k a n d P o l a n d ) i n d i c a t e s t h a t p r e v i o u s p u b l i c o p e r a t o r s b e c o m e d e s i g n a t e d o p e r a t o r s d u e t o t h e i r m u l t i p l e - y e a r e x p e r i e n c e . T h e r e f o r e , t h e r e w a s n o c o n c e r n t h a t t h e d e s i g n a t e d o p ­ e r a t o r w o u l d f a i l t o p r o v i d e u n i v e r s a l s e r v i c e s o f r e l e v a n t s t a n d a r d .

Literature

1. B u d z ie w ic z - G u ź l e c k a , A . ( 2 0 1 2 ) . M a n a g e m e n t o f C h a n g e s i n E n te r p r is e s a s a F o r m o f A d a p ta ti o n to E - E c o n o m y . Z eszyty N aukow e U niw ersytetu S zczecińskie­ go. S cien tific Journal. Service M a n a g e m e n t, 8, 1 9 9 - 2 0 7 .

2. C h o ró b , R . (2 0 1 3 ). Instytucjonalne determ inanty rozwoju innow acyjnych pow iązań integracyjnych. Zeszyty N aukow e Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. E konom iczne P ro ­ blem y Usług,(1 0 4 E u r o p e js k a p r z e s tr z e ń k o m u n ik a c ji e le k tro n ic z n e j. T . 1), 1 6 9 - 1 7 7 . 3. C z a p ie w s k i, M . ( 2 0 1 1 ) . B ehaviors o f the P olish P o st before the f u l l p o s ta l m a rket

lib era liza tio n, in : m a te r ia ły k o n f e r e n c ji I P o C C „ I n t e r n a t io n a l P o s t a l a n d e - C o m m u n ic a t io n C o n f e r e n c e ” , I n s tit u t J a n a P e r n e r a o .p .s ., P a r d u b i c e 2 0 1 2 .

(9)

204

Shaping competition policy in postal market - evaluation o f using tools...

4. K o ty la k , S. (2 0 0 9 ) . K o n tr o la s p o łe c z n a a d m in is tr a c ji w k o n te k ś c ie r o z w o ju s p o łe ­ c z e ń s tw a in f o r m a c y jn e g o . Zeszyty N aukow e Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, E kono­ m iczne P roblem y Usług ( S o c ia l c o n tr o l a d m in is tr a tio n i n th e c o n te x t o f th e d e v e ­ lo p m e n t o f th e in f o r m a tio n s o c je ty . Scientific P apers o f the U niversity o f Szczecin, Econom ic P roblem s Services),n r 3 5 , c z . 2: R ynki przesyłu i przetw arzania inform acji - stan obecny i p erspektyw y rozw oju (M arkets transm ission a n d p rocessing o f infor­ m ation - current state a n d developm ent prospects), 1 2 1 - 1 3 5 .

5. K u b ia k , K .; B a d z iń s k a , E . ( 2 0 1 3 ) . Z a s to s o w a n i e te c h n o l o g i i i n f o r m a t y c z n y c h w k o n te k ś c ie r o z w o ju w ie d z y w o r g a n iz a c ji. Z eszyty N aukow e U niw ersytetu S zcze­ cińskiego, E konom iczne P ro b lem y U sług n r 104: E uropejska p rzestrzeń ko m u n ika ­ cji elektronicznej, t. 1 ( T h e u s e o f in f o r m a t io n te c h n o l o g y i n th e c o n te x t o f th e d e v e lo p m e n t o f k n o w le d g e i n th e o r g a n iz a tio n . S cien tific P a p ers o f the U niversity o f Szczecin, E co n o m ic P ro b lem s o f the Services, N o . 1 0 4 : E u ropean area o f elec­ tronic com m unication,V o l. 1), 3 4 1 - 3 4 8 .

6 . M a in D evelo p m en ts in the P o sta l S ecto r (2 010-2013) C ountry R eports, W I K C o n ­ s u lt, B a d H o o n e f 2 0 1 3 .

7 . M ię d zy obow iązkiem a korzyścią biznesow ą - udostępnianie infrastruktury p o c z ­ tow ej (sieci p o czto w ej) p r z e z operatora w yznaczonego. P rze g lą d rozw iązań europejskich (B etw een o bligation a n d business p r o fit - p ro v id in g access to p o sta l infrastructure [p o sta l n etw ork] b y d e sig n a ted operators. E u ropean solutions), P o l i s h P o s t a l I n s titu te , O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 , 2 1 .

8. N a g a j, R . ( 2 0 1 3 ) . A n E c o n o m i c R e g u la t io n M e t h o d a n d th e D e v e lo p m e n t o f E n d ­ U s e r E le c t r ic i ty P r ic e s . A c tu a l P ro b lem s o f E conom ics, N o . 1 (V o l. 2 ), p . 9 0 - 9 9 .

KSZTAŁTOWANIE POLITYKI KONKURENCJI

W OBSZARZE RYNKU POCZTOWEGO - OCENA WYKORZYSTANIA

NARZĘDZI NA PRZYKŁADZIE POLSKI I DANII

Streszczenie

W a r t y k u le z a p r e z e n t o w a n o a n a liz ę r y n k u p o c z to w e g o n a p r z y k ł a d z ie P o ls k i i D a n ii. W s z c z e g ó l n o ś c i p r z e d s ta w io n o o c e n ę r o z w o ju k o n k u r e n c j i n a t y c h r y n k a c h . W s k a z a n o n a ta k i e c z y n n ik i j a k : p o z i o m n ie z a le ż n o ś c i r e g u l a to r ó w r y n k u p o c z to w e g o , o b s z a r u s ł u g p o w s z e c h n y c h o r a z p o z i o m d o s t ę p n o ś c i d o in f r a s t r u k tu r y p r z e z o p e r a t o ­ r ó w a lte r n a ty w n y c h .

Słowa kluczowe:

r y n e k p o c z to w y , p o li ty k a k o n k u r e n c ji, n a r z ę d z ia p o lity k i g o s p o d a r c z e j. T łum aczenie A n n a D rab-K urow ska

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Wskazana wyżej okoliczność sprawia, że – aczkolwiek w wąskim zakresie – możliwe jest zawieszenie postępowania karnego nie tylko na podstawie prze- szkody faktycznej, ale

przez przyznanie prawa do wydawania rozporządzeń wykonawczych przez Prezesa NBP lub Radę Polityki Pieniężnej oraz nadanie prawa inicjatywy ustawodawczej w zakresie

Jeszcze słów kilka o oral history w książce Cztery nazwiska, dwa imio- na… Autorka bazuje głównie (poza dokumentami archiwalnymi i opraco- waniami naukowymi dotyczącymi

szych pracowników Pañstwowego Instytutu Geologiczne- go (nastêpnie Instytutu Geologicznego Centralnego Urzê- du Geologii), wieloletni, zas³u¿ony kierownik Zak³adu Z³ó¿

The Tasks Performance Layer provides the computation business-processes model by split- ting the tasks into different nodes and each of it is considered as a final and

The aim of this feasibility study is to determine whether water jet drilling can be safely applied as an alternative for conventional microfracture awls by studying potential side

The first scenario with a synchronous generator shows that the distance protection function is able to detect the fault for fault impedances up to 1 : for any fault type and for

Base on the results of dual fused images analysis, the status of conveyor belt can be divided into six situations: longitudinal tearing (longitudinal tear is