• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc."

Copied!
74
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Choice Choice

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

(2)

Economic Rationality Economic Rationality

The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its

that a decisionmaker chooses its

most preferred alternative from those most preferred alternative from those available to it.

The available choices constitute the choice set.

choice set.

How is the most preferred bundle in

How is the most preferred bundle in the choice set located?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2

(3)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3

x1

(4)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 4

(5)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility xx22

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 5

(6)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

x x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 6

(7)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

x x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 7

(8)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 8

(9)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility Utility

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 9

(10)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 10

(11)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

Affordable, but not the most preferred the most preferred affordable bundle.

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 11

(12)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility The most preferred

of the affordable of the affordable bundles.

Affordable, but not the most preferred bundles.

the most preferred affordable bundle.

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 12

(13)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 13

(14)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

Utility Utility

x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 14

(15)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

Utility

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 15

(16)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

Utility

x

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 16

Utility

x1

(17)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 17

(18)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

Affordable bundles

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 18

bundles

(19)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

Affordable bundles

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 19

bundles

(20)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x x2

More preferred bundles

bundles

Affordable bundles

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. x1 20

bundles

(21)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 x2

More preferred bundles

bundles

Affordable bundles

bundles

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 21

x1

(22)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 x2

x * x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22

x1 x1*

(23)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 (x *,x *) is the most x2 (x1*,x2*) is the most

preferred affordable preferred affordable bundle.

x * x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 23

x1 x1*

(24)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

The most preferred affordable bundle is called the consumer’s ORDINARY is called the consumer’s ORDINARY DEMAND at the given prices and

DEMAND at the given prices and budget.

Ordinary demands will be denoted by x1*(p1,p2,m) and x2*(p1,p2,m).

x1*(p1,p2,m) and x2*(p1,p2,m).

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 24

(25)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

When x1* > 0 and x2* > 0 the

demanded bundle is INTERIOR.

1 2

demanded bundle is INTERIOR.

If buying (x *,x *) costs $m then the

If buying (x1*,x2*) costs $m then the budget is exhausted.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25

(26)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 (x *,x *) is interior.

x2 (x1*,x2*) is interior.

(x1*,x2*) exhausts the budget.

x *

1 2

budget.

x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 26

x1 x1*

(27)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 (x *,x *) is interior.

x2 (x1*,x2*) is interior.

(a) (x1*,x2*) exhausts the (a) (x1*,x2*) exhausts the budget; p1x1* + p2x2* = m.

x * x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 27

x1 x1*

(28)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

x2 (x *,x *) is interior . x2 (x1*,x2*) is interior .

(b) The slope of the indiff.

(b) The slope of the indiff.

curve at (x1*,x2*) equals the slope of the budget x *

the slope of the budget constraint.

x2*

constraint.

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 28

x1 x1*

(29)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

 (x *,x *) satisfies two conditions:

 (x1*,x2*) satisfies two conditions:

 (a) the budget is exhausted;

 (a) the budget is exhausted;

p1x1* + p2x2* = m

(b) the slope of the budget constraint,

 (b) the slope of the budget constraint, -p1/p2, and the slope of the

-p1/p2, and the slope of the

indifference curve containing (x1*,x2*) are equal at (x *,x *).

are equal at (x1*,x2*).

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 29

(30)

Computing Ordinary Demands Computing Ordinary Demands

How can this information be used to locate (x *,x *) for given p , p and

locate (x1*,x2*) for given p1, p2 and m?

m?

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 30

(31)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences.

Cobb-Douglas preferences.

U x( , x ) ==== x xa b U x( 1 , x 2 ) ==== x x1a b2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 31

(32)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences.

Cobb-Douglas preferences.

U x( , x ) ==== x xa b U x( 1 , x 2 ) ==== x x1a b2

U a −−−− 1 b

Then M U ∂∂∂∂ U

x a x a x b

1 1 1 1

==== ∂∂∂∂ ==== −−−− 2

∂∂∂∂ x 1

∂∂∂∂

M U U

b x xa b 1

==== ∂∂∂∂ ==== −−−−

M U U

x b x xa b

2

2 1 2 1

==== ∂∂∂∂ ==== −−−−

∂∂∂∂

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32

(33)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So the MRS is

d x ∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂U / x a x a −−−− 1 x b a x

M R S d x d x

U x

U x

a x x

b x x

a x b x

a b

==== 2 ==== −−−− ==== −−−− a b−−−− −−−− ==== −−−−

1

1 2

1 1

2

1 2 1

2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

/

/ .

d x 1 U x 2 b x x b x

1 2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂/

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 33

(34)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So the MRS is

d x ∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂U / x a x a −−−− 1 x b a x

M R S d x d x

U x

U x

a x x

b x x

a x b x

a b

==== 2 ==== −−−− ==== −−−− a b−−−− −−−− ==== −−−−

1

1 2

1 1

2

1 2 1

2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

/

/ .

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 so

d x 1 U x 2 b x x b x

1 2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂/

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 so

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 34

(35)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So the MRS is

d x ∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂U / x a x a −−−− 1 x b a x

M R S d x d x

U x

U x

a x x

b x x

a x b x

a b

==== 2 ==== −−−− ==== −−−− a b−−−− −−−− ==== −−−−

1

1 2

1 1

2

1 2 1

2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂

/

/ .

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 so

d x 1 U x 2 b x x b x

1 2 1

∂∂∂∂ ∂∂∂∂/

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 so

−−−− a x ==== −−−− p ====

x b p

2 1 1 x

* * *

−−−− a x ==== −−−− ==== .

b x

p

p x b p

a p x

2 1

1

2 2 1

2 1

*

* *

. (A)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 35

b x 1 2 2

(36)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

(x1*,x2*) also exhausts the budget so

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B) p x1 1 ++++ p x2 2 ==== m . (B)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 36

(37)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So now we know that

x b p

a p x

2 1

2

* ==== *1 (A)

2 a p

2

1

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B) p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37

(38)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So now we know that

x b p

a p x

2 1

2

* ==== *1 (A)

2 a p

2

1

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B) Substitute

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B)

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 38

(39)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So now we know that

x b p

a p x

2 1

2

* ==== *1 (A)

2 a p

2

1

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B) Substitute

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m . (B)

* b p *

and get

p x p b p

a p x m

1 1 2 1

2

* *1

++++ ==== .

and get

a p 2 This simplifies to ….

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 39

(40)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

x a m

a b p

*1

( ) .

==== ++++

x 1 ==== ( a b p) 1 . ++++

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 40

(41)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

x a m

a b p

*1

( ) .

==== ++++

x 1 ==== ( a b p) 1 . ++++

Substituting for x1* in

p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m p x1 1* ++++ p x2 *2 ==== m

then gives

x b m

*2

==== .

++++

then gives

x 2 ==== ( a b p) 2 . ++++

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 41

(42)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Computing Ordinary Demands - a

Cobb-Douglas Example.

So we have discovered that the most

preferred affordable bundle for a consumer preferred affordable bundle for a consumer with Cobb-Douglas preferences

with Cobb-Douglas preferences

U x( 1 , x 2 ) ==== x x1a b2 U x( 1 , x 2 ) ==== x x1 2

is

( )

is

( , )

( ) ,

( ) .

* *

( )

x x a m

a b p

b m

a b p

1 2

1 2

====

(

( a ++++ b p) ( a ++++ b p)

)

1 2

1 2

++++ ++++

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 42

(43)

Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example.

Cobb-Douglas Example.

x2 a b

x2 ====

U x( 1 , x 2 ) ==== x x1a b2

x * ====

x

b m

*2 ====

b m

a b p 2 ( ++++ )

x1

x * a m

====

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 43

x1

x a m

a b p

1

1

*

( )

==== ++++

(44)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

When x1* > 0 and x2* > 0

When x1* > 0 and x2* > 0

and (x1*,x2*) exhausts the budget, and indifference curves have no and indifference curves have no

‘kinks’, the ordinary demands are

‘kinks’, the ordinary demands are obtained by solving:

(a) p x * + p x * = y

 (a) p1x1* + p2x2* = y

 (b) the slopes of the budget constraint,

 (b) the slopes of the budget constraint, -p11/p22, and of the indifference curve

containing (x1*,x2*) are equal at (x1*,x2*).

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 44

(45)

Rational Constrained Choice Rational Constrained Choice

But what if x11* = 0?

Or if x2* = 0?

If either x * = 0 or x * = 0 then the

If either x1* = 0 or x2* = 0 then the ordinary demand (x1*,x2*) is at a ordinary demand (x1*,x2*) is at a corner solution to the problem of

maximizing utility subject to a budget maximizing utility subject to a budget constraint.

constraint.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 45

(46)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1 MRS = -1

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 46

(47)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1 MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 47

(48)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1 MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 48

(49)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1

x y

2 p

* ==== MRS = -1

x 2 ==== p 2

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

x1

x *1 ==== 0

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 49

x 1 ==== 0

(50)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1 MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 < p2.

x *2 ==== 0

x1

x y

*1 ====

x 2 ==== 0

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 50

x 1 ==== p 1

(51)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

So when U(x1,x2) = x1 + x2, the most

preferred affordable bundle is (x1*,x2*) preferred affordable bundle is (x1*,x2*) where

 y 

*

* 



 



====  ,0

p ) y

x , x (

1

* 2

*

1 if p1 < p2



 p 1 and

and



 



==== 

* 2

*

1 p

, y 0 )

x , x

(  if p1 > p2.

 

==== 

2 2

1 , x ) 0 , p x

( if p1 > p2.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51

(52)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

MRS = -1 MRS = -1

Slope = -p /p with p = p .

y

p Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 = p2.

p 2

x1

y p

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 52

p 1

(53)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- Examples of Corner Solutions --

the Perfect Substitutes Case

x2

All the bundles in the

constraint are equally the

y

p constraint are equally the

most preferred affordable when p = p .

p 2

when p1 = p2.

x1

y p

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 53

p 1

(54)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Examples of Corner Solutions -- the

Non-Convex Preferences Case

x2

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 54

(55)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Examples of Corner Solutions -- the

Non-Convex Preferences Case

x2

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 55

(56)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Examples of Corner Solutions -- the

Non-Convex Preferences Case

x2

Which is the most preferred affordable bundle?

affordable bundle?

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 56

(57)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Examples of Corner Solutions -- the

Non-Convex Preferences Case

x2

The most preferred affordable bundle affordable bundle

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 57

(58)

Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Examples of Corner Solutions -- the

Non-Convex Preferences Case

x2 Notice that the “tangency solution”

is not the most preferred affordable is not the most preferred affordable bundle.

The most preferred affordable bundle affordable bundle

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 58

(59)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

x = ax x2 = ax1

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 59

(60)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

x = ax

MRS = 0 x2 = ax1

MRS = 0 x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 60

(61)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2} MRS = -

MRS = -

x = ax

MRS = 0 x2 = ax1

MRS = 0 x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 61

(62)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2} MRS = -

MRS = -

MRS is undefined x = ax

MRS = 0 x2 = ax1

MRS = 0 x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 62

(63)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

x = ax x2 = ax1

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 63

(64)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

Which is the most

preferred affordable bundle?

x = ax

preferred affordable bundle?

x2 = ax1

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 64

(65)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

The most preferred affordable bundle

x = ax

affordable bundle

x2 = ax1

x1

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 65

(66)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

x = ax x2 = ax1 x *

x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 66

(67)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m

x = ax x2 = ax1 x *

x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 67

(68)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m (b) x * = ax *

x = ax (b) x2* = ax1*

x2 = ax1 x *

x2*

x1 x1*

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 68

(69)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 69

(70)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x22* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = m

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 70

(71)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x22* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = m

which gives * m x ====

which gives

2 1

1*

a p p

x m

==== ++++

2

1 a p

p ++++

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 71

(72)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x22* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = m

which gives

a m . x

m ;

x * ==== * ====

which gives

a p . p

x a m a p ;

p x m

2 1

2* 2

1

1* ==== ++++

==== ++++

a p p

a p

p 1 ++++ 2 1 ++++ 2

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 72

(73)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x22* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = m

which gives

a m . x

m ;

x * ==== * ====

which gives

a p . p

x a m a p ;

p x m

2 1

2* 2

1

1* ==== ++++

==== ++++

A bundle of 1 commodity 1 unit and a commodity 2 units costs p + ap ;

a p p

a p

p 1 ++++ 2 1 ++++ 2

a commodity 2 units costs p1 + ap2;

m/(p1 + ap2) such bundles are affordable.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 73

m/(p1 + ap2) such bundles are affordable.

(74)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions --

the Perfect Complements Case

x2 U(x1,x2) = min{ax1,x2}

x = ax

x * ==== x2 = ax1

x

a m

*2 ====

a m

p 1 ++++ a p 2

x1

x m

p a p

1

1 2

* ====

++++

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 74

p a p

1

1 ++++ 2

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

In mathematical logic, we don’t really bother with determining whether a given sentence has truth value 0 or 1 – instead we will be investigating truth values of sentences combined

Istotnym wnioskiem z badań jest również to, że pogarszająca się sytuacja fi nan- sów publicznych poszczególnych stanów USA nie wpływa w żadnym stopniu na wprowadzanie

We say that a bipartite algebra R of the form (1.1) is of infinite prin- jective type if the category prin(R) is of infinite representation type, that is, there exists an

In the SI system of units, distance is measured in metres (m), mass in kilograms (kg) and time in seconds (s).. The momentum of an object is given by the mass of the object

(i) Copy the tree diagram and add the four missing probability values on the branches that refer to playing with a stick.. During a trip to the park, one of the dogs is chosen

Show that the completion of a perfect field is

Note that we consider 0 to be a natural number, this is a convention, some textbook author may exclude 0 from the set of natural numbers.. In other words rational numbers are

(b) Find the probability that a randomly selected student from this class is studying both Biology and