• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Spending by function (% of GDP)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Spending by function (% of GDP)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

National Defense Social Security Income Security Medicare Net Interest Health Commerce 'n House Employment 'n Social Transportation Veterans International Affairs Environment Justice Agriculture Science General Government Regional Development

Energy

2009

2000 1984

Spending by function (% of GDP)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Year

Social spending (% of GDP)

7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Barrack Obama Bill Clinton

George Bush junior

George Bush senior Ronald Reagan

Agencies by function

Function

Agency

Agriculture Commerce Defense−−Military Defense Civil Programs District of Columbia Energy General Administration Homeland Security Human Services Judicial Branch Justice Labor Legislative Branch Misc Agencies Presidents Office State the Interior Treasury Urban Development

Environment General Government Income Security Justice National Defense

No. transfers

20

40

60

● 80

100

120

140

Marcin Szumski

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

By using this (rather complicated) “full form” of Motohashi’s formula, it might be possible to improve the error estimate in Theorem 1.. Next we consider the mean square of R(1/2 +

We use only “Euler product” in the proof of Theorem 1 and so its analogue goes through for L-functions of algebraic number fields, Ramanujan’s zeta-function and so

The function ϕ(s) is a generalization of Dirichlet series attached to cer- tain cusp forms and also of the Dedekind zeta-function of algebraic number fields.. Limit theorems for

The difference between the number of partitions of n into an even number of parts from the multiset S and the number of partitions into an odd number of parts from S is bounded if

[r]

in which ^ M 6 is a diagonal matrix with one or more nonzero elements (e.g., for scalar diffusion or acoustic wave propa- gation in an attenuating medium with either real-valued ^ A

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, strategic approaches, organizing funds, spending patterns,

Daarvoor zijn meerdere redenen: hoge kosten, geen maatschappelijk draagvlak en grote (ge- zondheidslrisico's.. De twee andere opties hebben het