Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB? A prospective longitudinal study

Pełen tekst

(1)Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657.

(2)

(3) g i n e kol og i a. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB? A prospective longitudinal study Czy założenie taśmy podcewkowej jednoczasowo z korekcją zaburzeń statyki dna miednicy zwiększa częstość występowania de novo OAB? – prospektywne badanie obserwacyjne

(4) !"#$%&' "#$% 1 2. Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, 2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland. Abstract Objectives: Approximately 20% of women suffer from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Furthermore, POP and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms often coexist. Midurethral slings and mesh surgeries are both considered to be risk factors for de novo OAB symptoms. The aim of our study was to determine whether simultaneous midurethral sling insertion at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery further increases the risk of de novo OAB. Materials and methods: The study group consisted of 234 women who underwent surgery in our department between August 2007 and October 2009 (114 patients underwent surgery because of coexisting POP and SUI, and 120 underwent surgery because POP alone). The patients were evaluated at follow-up visits scheduled after 6-8 weeks and after 12 months. All women underwent surgery using the Gynecare Prolift® Pelvic Floor Repair System, whereas in women with additional overt or occult SUI after restoration of the pelvic anatomy, monofilament midurethral slings were simultaneously inserted. The chi-squared test was used to compare the study groups. Results: De novo OAB symptoms were significantly more pronounced among women in the Prolift® only surgery group (23.3%) compared to the Prolift® with IVS04M group (10.5%; p=0.0093).. Corresponding Author: Konrad Futyma Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland Tel.: +48 81 7244268; Fax.: +48 81 7244849 e-mail: futymakonrad@mp.pl. 652. Otrzymano: 12.02.2014 Zaakceptowano do druku: 15.04.2014. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 9/2014.

(5) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E g i n e kol og i a. Konrad Futyma et al. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB?. Conclusions: Midurethral sling insertion at the time of pelvic organ prolapse surgery significantly decreases the rate of postoperative de novo OAB symptoms. The lack of anatomical success of the mesh-based reconstructive surgery is a risk factor for the development of de novo OAB symptoms.. Key words: anti-incontinence surgery / lower urinary tract symptoms / mesh surgery / / overactive bladder / pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence /. Streszczenie Cel pracy: Około 20% kobiet uskarża się jednocześnie na zaburzenia statyki dna miednicy i nietrzymanie moczu. Wykazano również, że występowaniu objawów OAB towarzyszą istotne klinicznie zaburzenia statyki. Z drugiej strony zarówno slingi podcewkowe jak też operacje rekonstrukcyjne z użyciem siatek niosą ze sobą ryzyko wystąpienia de novo objawów OAB. Celem naszego badania było ustalenie, czy jednoczasowe zakładanie slingu podcewkowego podczas operacji rekonstrukcyjnej niesie ze sobą podwyższenie ryzyka wystąpienia de novo pooperacyjnych objawów OAB. Materiał i metody: Grupa badana obejmowała 234 pacjentki leczone w klinice pomiędzy sierpniem 2007 a październikiem 2009 (u 114 pacjentek wykonano operację korygującą statykę dna miednicy oraz wysiłkowe nietrzymanie moczu, a u 120 kobiet korygowano jedynie zaburzenia statyki). Pacjentki były oceniane 6-8 tygodni oraz 12 miesięcy po zabiegu. Wszystkie pacjentki operowano z użyciem monofilamentowych siatek polipropylenowych (Gynecare Prolift® Pelvic Floor Repair System), natomiast u pacjentek z objawowym bądź ukrytym nietrzymaniem moczu jednoczasowo zakładano sling podcewkowy. Obie grupy porównano wykorzystując test chi2. Wyniki: De novo objawy OAB wystąpiły częściej u pacjentek, u których korygowano jedynie statykę dna miednicy (23.3%) w porównaniu do pacjentek, u których dodatkowo zakładano sling podcewkowy (10,5%; p=0,0093). Wnioski: Jednoczasowe zakładanie slingu podcewkowego podczas operacji rekonstrukcyjnej dna miednicy nie zwiększa ryzyka wystąpienia pooperacyjnych objawów nadreaktywności mięśnia wypieracza. Jednocześnie niepowodzenie anatomiczne operacji rekonstrukcyjnej jest czynnikiem ryzyka wystąpienia de novo pooperacyjnych objawów OAB.. Słowa kluczowe: chirurgia rekonstrukcyjna dna miednicy / siatki polipropylenowe / /

(6) / /. Introduction ()# )#$#

(7) %#

(8) $ %#

(9) # # * (+ $ # # *

(10) (+ % $ $ ,- #

(11) # ./0 '$ 1)# , )# )

(12) 1 1

(13)

(14) $ ,, #

(15) 1 $ $ ,

(16) ,,# ) .&!2/0 3) $ $

(17) 1 # $ ( %4#

(18) # $ 1 5 -

(19) , , 1#4# 1$

(20) # # 1

(21) #$%# 6 0 ##% 1 %# ) ,# , $ # $) #%0 '$ #

(22) 4 # ) ( ,# )%$

(23) #

(24) 1) (78 %

(25) % #,, #$ # 1 .9/0

(26) $ $ (

(27) 1 %$ #

(28) # 4 % $1 $ 0'$

(29) 1

(30) ##: $) ##

(31) %, 1) ), 1% # .;/0 $# $ )#%% $ 1 1 # , % # ,# , #1

(32) (0 " #4 % $ % # 1#

(33) #

(34) 1 * 8'7+ # % ( $) 1 , #1

(35) $#% 1)

(36) .< =/0 '$ % #!# )

(37) , 8'7#$ ,7$ &>?@9

(38) ,%*A@&2<&+. Nr 9/2014. , $ 7$ ' "%

(39) 1) % )# , % # B # #1

(40) 8 ,- #

(41) # .>/0' % $ $ %

(42) , ( ,# : $) $ 1 # , $ % # ) ,# 1

(43) 0"#

(44) $ #4 $ (1 ,# , (

(45) 1 ./0( $ $$1)#%11 C

(46) # # %

(47)

(48) $ )1 ,

(49) # # %de novo(

(50) 1 1

(51) $ de novo(

(52) 1 )1 1 )

(53) &09D 1 $1)#B0 $)!

(54) , $ *6#1 $ $ + ## 1 $ $ % #$- ##1 #1$1$

(55) $) #1# .&/0( $ $$ $##,de novo (

(56) 1 116

(57) 2!9D $ %

(58) $ $ 1 $ , ( .E/0 ) ##% ) 1 $ % 1# , $ ,

(59) # #*78+

(60) # de novo( @=D &;D , .@ 2/0 1)

(61) de novo (

(62) 1 ) 90ED , 1 , 871# .9/0 $ 1$ $ de novo(

(63) 1 , $1# , $%## , %1 $;>

(64) $# 1 . © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 653.

(65) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E ginekolog i a. Konrad Futyma et al. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB?.

(66) % *0=D)0@0;D+.;/0'$1)#,de novo (

(67) 1 ) 2D&=D $$ *?E $ 1 1 )

(68) + >D E>D $ % .<=/03) $) #4 $ %

(69) ,(78

(70) %#(0G) $ )#, ) %$ $ $

(71) )B #, %# ,( 78 $##,de novo (

(72) 1 0 '$ ,

(73) ) $ $ 871# $ , $11 %

(74) # $, $1 1 )##, de novo(0. Materials and methods % &>>; (# &>>= @&; . %

(75) $H1 ,I

(76) #%

(77) # 8)

(78) , $ , ( 78 #6 % $ (0'$

(79) 11)

(80) $# J $#8)

(81) , 1 %, # 0 #

(82) , $7'"(% ,1 % $) .&>/0'$# , $

(83) ,K% 1!1 $78( #

(84) , ## 6 # % $ # $

(85) # 1 %

(86) #%# 6 $ # %$ 1)# 1, $ 1 %1 $# ,

(87) ,

(88) , 111 $ %1# :% 1!1 ,,%, (

(89) 1

(90) 0

(91) 1 $

(92) , ,

(93) $ %

(94) #%# $

(95) $)

(96) (

(97) 1 *

(98) ,- #

(99) %#

(100) # ##4

(101) E!

(102)

(103) +0 $ # &1 $(78*% 1+@E $ (*% 1+ $

(104) 0'$1 B #$ $ % 0 &E@ ) , ) $ %$ $ # 1 ,! 1 10 %

(105) $ $ I

(106) # , ® )# "17

(107) * $#L$ML$7 ) 3L87+$ $ ) ## 78 , , $1)#

(108) #)

(109) $ 4 % *N7! >@ J) #+0 ) , 9!< & $ 1 1 )

(110) 0 '$ 1 ## 1

(111) # $ $

(112) ,, O# ) (78

(113) 1 #4

(114) $ #$

(115) , . ##6 $# %$1 0'$1 # , , # # , $ 1 1 % % # ! 1 , $# %$ 1 1 )0 $% 1,1 $61# 1) $# %$ % ) $1 1 ##

(116) % $ 1 % ) $ # 1 %$ $% >%0 # #

(117) %#

(118) 1,E## )

(119) , $ ,? 1 ) 0 '

(120) $ ## # ,)1, # %%$ $ $ 11 , # 0 %$ # ## 1

(121) %#

(122) $ 1,# $# ,%%de novo(0 '$#$!- # 1 $,,# $

(123) % 10'#$)1,<>D $1) , $ 2D $ &>D ,de novo (, $ %

(124) 902D,de novo(

(125) 1 , 87 1# 0 $ 1 ## $ $ $

(126) % 1$ # , =E1 #$ 11 #

(127) 0# $1 $ $##,de novo(, ( $ 11 $87## $ 1,

(128) , #)% $ 0Post hoc ## $ $ $1, $

(129) #$>>D# $ ,,# de novo ( ##

(130) % 1 $%$ $ 61# 0 # &!0 '$ ) , %4## pP>0>20 7 #

(131) 1, %7 #1#%)<0>*7 7, ® +0. Results '$ 1 5 %1$# 1) ' 0 (1 C ,#

(132) # ## *> ##% (Q+ ) =; *<20D+ >9 *<<0@D+1 , % 11# )

(133) *R&A>0>E<p A>0<@2+$E*&09D+9*2D+ # ( )*R&A>0<&&p A>0E9@+0 ## # ## $ $ 4 9!< , $ 4 ,! 1 ) 0 , $ $ $ % 11 $

(134)

(135) 1 -

(136) %#1# 0De novo78## >1 *<0ED+. Table I. .OWYQ\KZRSM NK^K YP ^RO ZK^SOX^] P\YW LY^R ]^_Nc Q\Y_Z]. 654. Parameters. Group I POP and SUI (n=114). Group II POP (n= 120). p value. Age (years). 61.7±10,3. 64.2 ± 9.5. 0.0509. BMI (kg/m2). 27.7± 3.8. 27.3± 3.8. 0.480. Parity (n). 2.8 ± 1.3. 2.4 ± 0.9. 0.027. POPQ - 0 and I. 0. 0. NS. POPQ - II. 9. 17. NS. POPQ - III. 89. 70. NS. POPQ - IV. 16. 33. 0.04. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 9/2014.

(137) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E g i n e kol og i a. Konrad Futyma et al. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB?. 0SQ_\O 0VYa YP ZK\^SMSZKX^] ^R\Y_QR OKMR ]^KQO YP ^RO ^\SKV. Assessed for eligibility (n=427). Excluded (n=163). Enrollment (n=264). Not meeting inclusion criteria (n=108) 50", .&0"'!!",)

(138) 5&2"!/,&),3&) *).&)") ") 5,"0&*/-%3-."," .*(3) 5"#/-"!.*+,.& &+.") 5.%",,"-*)-). ,*/+). ,*/+) Allocation. " "&0"!''* ."!&).",0").&*) ). *-..*#*''*1/+) . Follow-Up. &!)*...")!#*''*1/+0&-&.-. Analysis. >KLVO 33 .O XY`Y 9+, ]cWZ^YW] SX \OVK^SYX ^Y ]^\O]] SXMYX^SXOXMO ]_\QO\c Y_^MYWO. SX ZK^SOX^] aS^R MYXMYWS^KX^ =?3 q WYX^R] PYVVYa_Z. Clinical outcome. Prolift® with IVS-04M (n=114) OAB free. de novo OAB. 14 (12.3%). 9 (7.9%). Improved. 12 (10.5%). 3 (2.6%). Cured. 76 (66.7%). 0. Failure. % 1$# 78)@*&0ED+# % 1*R&A>0<>2p A>0E9=+0$) 91 *20&D+% 1$2*@0&D+ , % 1*R&A>0@Ep A>0;>2+0 $ ##,

(139)

(140) 6#. % $#% 1 0De novo(

(141) 1 %4#

(142) 1 # % $(

(143) %

(144) % 1 *A&<:&E0ED+$# 1 $$ , ® $ 87 1# *A&: >02D: 1A>0>>=E+0 '$##,e novo(

(145) 1 4 ) $ #, # ## # $

(146) % 1 1) 0 Nr 9/2014. *-..*#*''*1/+) &!)*...")!#*''*1/+0&-&.-. Anal3zed () ). Procedure. " "&0"!''* ."!&).",0").&*) ) . )'34"!). Discussion '$

(147) 1 $ %% $

(148) % #$ ,( (

(149) $ # ,1

(150) 1 ./0(## # *((+ # , $ % % # B.&/0( $1 #$ 1 , (

(151) 1 #$% $ 1 # B6 #

(152) (( .&&/0 ()# )

(153) 1 % $ # , # # 1# , %# ,(

(154) # #0 '$

(155) 1 ### ,

(156)

(157) 1,# # $ # # ) %

(158) $

(159)

(160) %4#

(161) 1 $ 1 5-

(162) ,,0 $ $ ), ##, %### ,11 $) ,)1%(

(163) 1 0'$

(164) # $ )

(165) % , $ 11 ) #$% $ #) 11 )## ) 0 '$ #$ $ 1,de novo(

(166) 1 , ( %

(167) 1

(168) :$)) $

(169) 1 $#

(170) %#0 $) $ $ $ #1

(171) $ $ ) ,,# (

(172) 1 %$ $) . © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 655.

(173) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657. P R A C E O R Y G I N A L N E ginekolog i a. Konrad Futyma et al. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB?. Table III. .O XY`Y 9+, ]cWZ^YW] ]^\K^SºON KQKSX]^ KXK^YWSMKV Y_^MYWO KPÔ\ WO]R \OMYX]^\_M^SÒ ]_\QO\c K] \OVKÔN ^Y :9:; ]MKVO Post-op POP-Q STAGE. POP + SUI n=114 (%). POP n=120 (%). Stage 0 (optimal). 16 (14.0). 14 (11.7). Stage 1 (satisfactory). 81 (71.1). 92 (76.7). Stage 2. 14 (12.3). 8 (6,7). 6 (75%). Stage 3. 3 (2.6). 6 (5). 6 (100%). Stage 4. 0. 0. 16 (15.1%). ,, 1 $1$

(174) % $ % 1 $1# #, % #$ ## # 1)

(175) - 0 $ ( ## ) ## 78

(176) % %

(177) #% 1, % $ ,( %

(178) 0 G) $1 # # %

(179) 1, $ , )% 1

(180) , ##

(181) #

(182) 0'$11#$ $) $ CE,78 ,,# , 11 %

(183) .&E/0 (, #

(184) )

(185) 1 ## - , $ ( 78 $ $) 11$

(186) # #%S( $ $$ $ ,

(187) #

(188) $ $ ## ( # # %

(189) # 1)4, # # ,de novo1 ! 1(

(190) 1 0 $1

(191) $ $ ,de novo (

(192) 1 %1 , $ %

(193) ,)# ($%$&E0ED0'$# $ $% $ $ 1)# , de novo ( , $ # # ) %

(194)

(195) &D .&@/0 ( $ $ $ $ O

(196) , $1 $ %

(197) ,( # $

(198) 1 , (, $

(199) 1 , $ %

(200) 0'$1 1 )

(201) 1 , (

(202) ,- #

(203) %#

(204) %#

(205) # # # 1

(206) ) 9> ;> <&D , 1# )

(207) .&2/0

(208) # ) $1 ((#

(209) # % $ $( %

(210) , 1) ) # 1

(211) # (

(212) 1 %% ./0 ,#

(213) $ 1 !1 ) (

(214) 1 1 >>D , 1 $ # , ,# # ) %

(215) *(!Q %+0'$ 1

(216) $$, $ $ )% $ %

(217) , )%11# $) ,

(218) 1 # $)# )

(219) # .&9/0

(220) $ #

(221) # # $1 1 )%11(

(222) 1 0 $ 1 %# 1 , ( %4# 1) %#

(223) ,- #

(224) $ 1 1) 1) $ %#

(225) # # .&;/0J

(226) $4% ) % )

(227) #$ # .&</0 ( $ $ $ 1 $ (

(228) 1 #, ( %

(229) $ ,- #

(230) %#

(231) %

(232) 1)# 1 . %#

(233) # ## 0. 656. de novo OAB as related to post-op POP-Q staging. G) de novo (

(234) 1 11 2!9D , .9/07 , $ 116

(235) &>D , $ %

(236) , ( )1 ( , $ %

(237) 0 De novo ( % =0<D1 $ , ,de novo (

(238) 1 , %

(239) E $$#$ %$ %% $ 6#)4#

(240) $1 $ %$ )) %#,# .&=/0

(241) $##,de novo (

(242) 1 %1 $ %

(243) ,( ## 78>02D0'$1 ,de novo 1 1 )(, % %

(244) ##% ) %, 9D EED.9E>/0( $ $$ $ , de novo (

(245) 1 , ## 11 1 % 1# >D $#$ ### $ 4%.E/0 $ $ #

(246) $ # %% $ # , ## ! # # %

(247) % 1 $ %

(248) , (0

(249) $ # , $ J8H( 1) $4 ), $6

(250) 1 ## - 0 $) $ , $1 ,,% , 78% $1)#%11 % %1

(251) 1# 1 #$$%$, )1%de novo (01,1,#

(252) $ ,1 ,,, (

(253) 1 $ $1 # 1 $, # $ $%0 ( $ $ ## $

(254) $, 1

(255)

(256) %% %1

(257) 1# 0. Conclusions ### $ ## !# # %

(258) 1 $ % %

(259) ,)#( # # , de novo (

(260) 1 0 $ 1# %4#

(261) # $1

(262) 0 $ $#, # ##, $!# # ) %

(263) ,# , $)1 ,de novo(

(264) 1 0. Oświadczenie autorów 5YX\KN 0_^cWK q KXUSO^YaKXSO ZKMTOXÔU Z\dON S ZY YZO\KMTKMR. Z\dcQY^YaKXSO WKX_]U\cZ^_ S ZSĿWSOXXSMâK q K_^Y\ dQ¨K]dKT Mc S. YNZYaSONdSKVXc dK WKX_]U\cZ^ :KaO¨ 7SY^¨K q UY\OU^K S KUMOZ^KMTK Y]^KÔMdXOQY U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_. aO\cºUKMTK VSÔ\K^_\c. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Nr 9/2014.

(265) Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85, 652-657. P R A C E. O R Y G I N A L N E g i n e kol og i a. Konrad Futyma et al. Does a midurethral sling inserted at the time of pelvic organ prolapse mesh surgery increase the rate of de novo OAB?. . . . . !. +VOU]KXN\K ,K\^_dS q KXUSO^YaKXSO ZKMTOXÔU UY\OUK Y\Kd KU^_KVSdKMTK. VSÔ\K^_\c UY\OU^K S KUMOZ^KMTK Y]^KÔMdXOQY U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_ 3dKLOVK ASXUVO\ q KXUSO^YaKXSO ZKMTOXÔU UY\OU^K Y\Kd KUMOZ^KMTK. Y]^KÔMdXOQY U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_ /\XO]^ 6S] q KXUSO^YaKXSO ZKMTOXÔU UY\OU^K Y\Kd KUMOZ^KMTK Y]^KÔMdXOQY. U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_ ,OK^K 5_VSU<OMRLO\QO\ q a]Zé¨K_^Y\ ÔU]^_ Z\KMc UY\OU^K Y\Kd KUMOZ^KMTK. Y]^KÔMdXOQY U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_ >YWK]d <OMRLO\QO\ q K_^Y\ UYXMOZMTS 3 dKŸŞOĬ Z\KMc Z\dcQY^YaKXSO. WKX_]U\cZ^_ UY\OU^K Y\Kd KUMOZ^KMTK Y]^KÔMdXOQY U]d^K¨^_ WKX_]U\cZ^_. Źródło finansowania:. :\KMK XSO Lc¨K ºXKX]YaKXK Z\dOd ŞKNX SX]^c^_MT¤ XK_UYaYLKNKaMd . ]^YaK\dc]dOXSO KXS SXXc ZYNWSY^ K_^Y\dc XSO Y^\dcWKVS ŞKNXOQY Q\KX^_ Konflikt interesów:. +_^Y\dc XSO dQ¨K]dKT UYX»SU^_ SXÔ\O]éa Y\Kd XSO Y^\dcWKVS ŞKNXOQY. acXKQ\YNdOXSK daS dKXOQY d ZYa]^KaKXSOW Z\KMc. 17. Groutz A, Cohen A, Gold R, [et al.]. The safety and efficacy of the „inside-out” trans-obturator TVT in elderly versus younger stress-incontinent women: a prospective study of 353 consecutive patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011, 30, 380-383. 18. Tellez Martinez-Fornes M, Fernandez PC, Fouz LC, [et al.]. A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp. 2009, 33, 1088–1096. 19. Holmgren C, Nilsson S, Lanner L, Hellberg D. Frequency of de novo urgency in 463 women who had undergone the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for genuine stress urinary incontinence-a long-term follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007, 132, 121–125. 20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, [et al.]. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008, 61, 344-349. 21. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, [et al.]. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005, 112, 971–976. 22. Steers WD, Kolbeck S, Creedon D, Tuttle JB. Nerve growth factor in the urinary bladder of the adult regulates neuronal form and function. J Clin Invest. 1991, 88, 1709–1715. 23. Borstad E, Abdelnoor M, Staff AC, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010, 21, 179–186. 24. Takahashi S, Obinata D, Sakuma T, [et al.]. Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: A single-center experience of 310 cases with1-year follow up. Int J Urol. 2010, 17, 353–358. 25. Digesu GA, Salvatore S, Chaliha C, [et al.]. Do overactive bladder symptoms improve after repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007, 18, 1439–1443. 26. Ek M, Altman D, Falconer C, [et al.]. Effects of anterior trocar guided transvaginal mesh surgery on lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010, 29, 1419-1423. 27. Miedel A, Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, [et al.]. Symptoms and pelvic support defects in specific compartments. Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 112, 851–858. 28. Bradley CS, Nygaard IE. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 106, 759–766. 29. Diez-Itza I, Aizpitarte J, Becerro C, Sarasqueta C. Incidence of overactive bladder after vaginal hysterectomy and associated repairs for pelvic organ prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009, 68, 65-70. 30. Rodriguez L, Raz S. Polypropylene sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2001, 58, 783-785. 31. Walters MD, Karram MM. Sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence. In: Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Eds. Walters MD, Karram MM Philadelphia: Mosby-Elsevier; 2007, 196–121. Refe re nc e s 1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, [et al.]. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002, 21, 167-178. 2. Wennberg AL, Molander U, Fall M, [et al.]. A longitudinal population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Eur Urol. 2009, 55, 783-791. 3. Novara G, Galfano A, Secco S, [et al.]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2008, 54, 740-763. 4. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, [et al.]. Population based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006, 50, 1306-1314. 5. Coyne KS, Margolis MK, Kopp ZS, Kaplan SA. Racial differences in the prevalence of overactive bladder in the United States from the epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) Study. Urology. 2012, 79, 95-101. 6. de Boer TA, Slieker-ten Hove M, Burger C, Vierhout ME. The prevalence and risk factors of overactive bladder symptoms and its relation to pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J. 2011, 22, 569–575. 7. Anderson GG, Palermo JJ, Schilling JD, [et al.]. Intracellular bacterial biofilm-like pods in urinary tract infections. Science. 2003, 301, 105-107. 8. Fenner DE, Trowbridge ER, Patel DA, [et al.]. Establishing the prevalence of incontinence study: racial differences in women’s patterns of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2008, 179, 1455–1460. 9. Altman D, Forsman M, Falconer C, Lichtenstein P. Genetic influence on stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol. 2008, 54, 918–922. 10. Wennberg AL, Altman D, Lundholm C, [et al.]. Genetic influences are important for most but not all lower urinary tract symptoms: a population-based survey in a cohort of adult swedish twins. Eur Urol. 2011, 59, 1032–1038. 11. de Boer TA, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, [et al.]. Pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010, 29, 30-39. 12. Miedel A, Tegerstedt G, Mörlin B, Hammarström M. A 5-year prospective follow-up study of vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008, 19, 1593-15601. 13. de Boer TA, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, [et. al.]. Predictive factors for overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2010, 21, 1143-1149. 14. Bogusiewicz M, Monist M, Stankiewicz A, [et al.]. Most of the patients with suburethral sling failure have tapes located outside the high-pressure zone of the urethra. Ginekol Pol. 2013, 84, 334-338. 15. Alperin M, Abrahams-Gessel S, Wakamatsu MM. Development of de novo urge incontinence in women post sling: the role of preoperative urodynamics in assessing the risk. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008, 27, 407-411. 16. Rechberger T, Futyma K, Jankiewicz K, [et al.]. The Clinical Effectiveness of Retropubic (IVS-02) and Transobturator (IVS-04) Midurethral Slings: Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2009, 56, 24-30.. Nr 9/2014. © Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. 657.

(266)