• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

symmetry breaking the optical lattice

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "symmetry breaking the optical lattice"

Copied!
22
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)
(2)
(3)

outline

1. spontaneous

symmetry breaking the optical lattice

2.

3. orbital dance

(4)

- 1 -

Spontaneous Symmetry

Breaking

(5)

Example: Ising model

H = J X

i

z(i) (i+1)

z + h X

i

z(i)

The ground state of the system depends on external field

|Gi = |upi = | "" . . . "i, for h < 0

|Gi = |downi = | ## . . . #i, for h > 0

|Gi = |upi = | "" . . . "i, for h < 0

|Gi = |downi = | ## . . . #i, for h > 0

What will happen when the external field vanishes?

COMMON VIEW

the ground state is degenerate; the system has to decide and in given realization one of these two states is chosen

SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING

Z2

in

HALF-TRUTH

(6)

Example: Ising model

H = J X

i

z(i) (i+1)

z + h X

i

z(i)

FIRST OBSERVATION

any superposition of these two states can be chosen

|Gi = sin ✓|upi + cos ✓ei'|downi U(1) ⇥

U(1)

COMMON VIEW

the ground state is degenerate; the system has to decide and in given realization one of these two states is chosen

SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING

Z2

in

HA LF -TR UTH

(7)

Example: Ising model

H = J X

i

z(i) (i+1)

z + h X

i

z(i)

FIRST OBSERVATION

any superposition of these two states can be chosen

|Gi = sin ✓|upi + cos ✓ei'|downi U(1) ⇥

U(1)

SECOND OBSERVATION

Hamiltonian has additional symmetry of flipping all spins

[S, H] = 0

Common eigenvectors are:

|±i = 1

p2 (|upi ± |downi) S|±i = ±1|±i

in

(8)

Example: Ising model

H = J X

i

z(i) (i+1)

z + h X

i

z(i)

[S, H] = 0 |±i = 1

p2 (|upi ± |downi) S|±i = ±1|±i

decoherence-imposed selection

Chosen ground state should be as close to the product state as possible

Einselec(on  principle  

W.  H.  Żurek,  Rev.  Mod.  Phys.  75,  715  (2003)

… In this way symmetry operator is broken

|upi |downi

U (1) ⇥ U(1) ! Z2

or

in

(9)

- 2 -

The Optical

Lattice

(10)

2D optical lattice

V (x, y) = Vx sin2(kxx) + Vy sin2(kyy)

Square lattice

Vx = Vy kx = ky

Energy

s

px py

dxx dxy dyy

(11)

V (x, y) = Vx sin2(kxx) + Vy sin2(kyy)

1D chain

Energy

s

px py

dxx

dyy

dxy

Vx < Vy kx = ky

2D optical lattice

(12)

V (x, y) = Vx sin2(kxx) + Vy sin2(kyy)

1D chain

Energy

s

px py

dxx dyy

dxy

Vx < Vy

Vxkx2 = Vyky2

harmonic approximation

kx > ky

2D optical lattice

(13)

- 3 -

Orbital Dance

(14)

p-orbital physics

H =ˆ X

i

H(i)ˆ X

hiji

txaˆx(i)ˆax(j) + tyaˆy(i)ˆay(j) + h.c.

H(i) =ˆ Uxx

2 nˆx(i)(ˆnx(i) 1) + Uyy

2 nˆy(i)(ˆny(i) 1) + Uxy

2

nx(i)ˆny(i) + ˆax(i)2ˆay(i)2 + ˆay(i)2ˆax(i)2 local Hamiltonian

Nˆy = X

i

ˆ ny(i) Nˆx = X

i

ˆ nx(i)

additional symmetry of the system

S = exp(i⇡ ˆ ˆ N

y

)

hH, ˆˆ Nx + ˆNyi

= 0

total number of particles is conserved

(15)

role of contact interactions

|n, mi = (ˆax)nay)m|⌦i

local Fock basis

|0, 1i

|1, 1i

|1, 0i

|2, 0i

|0, 2i

energy of local states

Energy

?

(16)

role of contact interactions

|n, mi = (ˆax)nay)m|⌦i

Local Fock basis

|0, 1i |1, 0i |0, 2i |2, 0i |1, 1i

Energy of local states

Energy

H(i) =ˆ Uxx

2 nˆx(i)(ˆnx(i) 1) + Uyy

2 nˆy(i)(ˆny(i) 1) + Uxy

2

nx(i)ˆny(i) + ˆax(i)2aˆy(i)2 + ˆay(i)2ˆax(i)2

in

|0, 2i |2, 0i

Uxx = Uyy = 3Uxy

(17)

role of contact interactions

|n, mi = (ˆax)nay)m|⌦i

local Fock basis

|0, 1i

|1, 1i

|1, 0i

|2, 0i

|0, 2i

energy of local states

Energy

H(i) =ˆ Uxx

2 nˆx(i)(ˆnx(i) 1) + Uyy

2 nˆy(i)(ˆny(i) 1) + Uxy

2

nx(i)ˆny(i) + ˆax(i)2aˆy(i)2 + ˆay(i)2ˆax(i)2

|0, 2i

|2, 0i +

Uyy > Uxx > 3Uxy

(18)

p-orbital physics

|Goddi |Geveni

two-fold degeneracy

of the many-body ground state

hx = hG|ˆax(i + 1)ˆax(i)|Gi hy = hG|ˆay(i + 1)ˆay(i)|Gi

(19)

region of restored degeneracy

|Goddi |Geveni

two-fold degeneracy

of the many-body ground state

cos ✓

|Gi = + sin ✓ei'

many-body ground state in the thermodynamic limit

Chosen ground state should be as close to the product state as possible

Einselec(on  principle  

W.  H.  Żurek,  Rev.  Mod.  Phys.  75,  715  (2003)

S(✓, ') = X

i

i log i

|G±i = |Goddi ± i|Geveni p2

entanglement entropy for single lattice site

eigenvalues of the single-site reduced density matrix

(20)

|G±i = |Goddi ± i|Geveni p2

properties of the ground-state

local quasi-angular momentum operator

staggered angular momentum operator

Lˆz(j) = i ˆ

ax(j)ˆay(j) ˆay(j)ˆax(j)

Lˆz = X

j

( 1)jLˆz(j)

non-trivial correlations

C (j) = C (j) C (j) = hˆa(j)ˆa (j)i 6= 0

(21)

properties of the ground-state

positive staggered angular momentum negative staggered angular momentum

time-reversal symmetry is BROKEN

(22)

conclusions

in asymmetric lattices it is possible to obtain


degeneracy between the single-particle energies in given orbital (p-orbital)

this degeneracy is lifted by an anharmonicity when contact interactions are taken into account

the degeneracy between orbitals

is dynamically restored due to tunneling

BUT

In this region an additional symmetry of the system is spontaneously broken

The state which breaks the time-reversal symmetry becomes the true ground state of the system

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The idea of stability in Bayesian robust analysis was developed in M¸ eczarski and Zieli´ nski [5], with some additional results in M¸ eczarski [4] and in Boraty´ nska and M¸

Topological insulators (TI) are new remarkable materials that have band gap in the bulk but can conduct electricity on their surface via special surface electronic

The radius of the circle circumscribing this triangle is equal to:A. The centre of the circle

More- over, our results and methods used in the proof suggest that in the class of bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domains the symmetry of the Green function is equivalent

It is shown that in the fixed horizon case the game has a solution in pure strategies whereas in the random horizon case with a geometric number of observations one player has a

The difference in sign and magnitude of the tunneling amplitudes is a direct consequence of the fact that tunneling of a particle in p y (p x ) orbital is equal to the tunneling in

The basic rule of comparing tests is the following: for a given set of null and alternative hypotheses, for a given significance level, the test which is more powerful is

Stack-losses of ammonia Y were measured in course of 21 days of operation of a plant for the oxidation of ammonia (NH3) to nitric acid (HNO 3 ).. Discuss the