• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

The Radius of α-starlikeness in the Family of Close-to-convex Functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The Radius of α-starlikeness in the Family of Close-to-convex Functions"

Copied!
4
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN-POLOMA

VOL .XXXIX .20_____________ SECTIOA_________________________I960

Instytut Matematyki. Fizyki i Chemii Politechnika Lubelska

B.Ś WITONI AK, J.Z DERKI EWICZ

The Radlus ofa-starłikeness

ln the Family ofCloee-to-convox Functlons

Promień e-gwiażdzistośei funkcji prawie wypukłych

Радиус а-звездообразности семейства функций близких к выпуклым

1 Introduction. Let denote the ciassof all functions holomorphic inthe unit disk A = {z G C : jzj < 1}. The function / G ff(A) is said to be close-to- convex S’ if/(0) = /'(0)- 1 = 0 and Re /'(*)

/<-’) >0. z G A,fora certain univalent function g G H(A) that maps the disk A onto a convex domain. The class of close-to-convex functions will be denotedby A', According to the results of papers (1,4—6j the class K is identicalwith the classL of linearly accessible functions |2(, that is of such univalent functions f G A), /(0) = /*(0) -1=0 that C - /(A) is the union of closed half-lines suchthat the corresponding open half-lines have no points in common. Moreover. Z. Lewandowski in jot has proved that for

=/'(*) jzl < 4\z2 - 5 we have Re

/(*) > 0for any / G L and that this result is sharp.

This means that 4v'2 -5 is the radius of starlikeness of the class L. Theresult of ZXewandowski was establishedby makiXg use of the following theorem of M.Bie rnacki :2i:

zl ] =

(I (SI < r.itj < r (1)

.2>

where r = :z>.

I I /(*)

(2)

z

1*56 B.Switoniak, J.Zderkiewici

In this paper we shall determine min | Re :/ £ L | whence we shall obtain the radius of o-starlikeness of the class L — K. 2. Main result. Making useof (1)weshallprove:

Theorem. If z£ A and jxj = r, then for any f & L the following estimation holds true:

I - r

for 0 < r < 2v'3- 3 1 +r

—___ ---2 ' for 2V3 - 3 < r < I . V(l-r) 1-r 2

(2)

The result is sharp.

Proof. By (1) we have:

.min“K,)SR'W:'e£} =

( Re((l + .l2(2 + J))-j.||l+.|2 ,, )

= 1 ---

i(l - Re .)

--- = {.I = r| =

= min{w(x) :-1 < x < 1} , where

/ \ 1 “ p2 , « (1 + r)(l ~p2) w(x) = —- ---h 2rx +

rx— Re s, -I < x < 1.

If

2(1+rx)

=('4)^-h-.

then w'(x) > 0 for x £< -1,1 >, that is w(x) > w(-l) = (1 - r)2. For any r £ (0,1) we havex„ < 0. Ifx, > -1 then

/ x / x (1 - r)(4v1 ~ p +r — 3) w(x) > w(x„) = --- Itsufficesnow to solve the inequalities x„ < -1 and x0 > -1.

Definition. The number:

r(a) = inf sup $r: /ei I

Re > ° for ***< r}

is called the radius of o-starlikeness ofthe class L.

From (2) we directly obtain:

Corollary.

fora< vi - 1 r(O’) = (1 +v i

1 - a

• 1-r a for —--- < or < 1 . 2

(3)

The Radius of ft-starlikeness in the Family of Close-to-convex Function» 167

REFERENCES

|li В ielee к 1, A . , Le wan dowsk i.Z . , Set •» théorème concernent lee jonction» en,voient et linétirement erccaUce de M.Biemach, Ann. Poion. Math. 13, (1963) 61-63.

,3; Biernaeki. M. , S er le repruentetion conforme dea domamet linéairement acceaibiet, Praee Mat.Fix.

44 (1936), 393-314.

(8( Kaplan,W., Cio ее-to-convex tchlicnl fenctian», Michigan Math.J. 1 (1953), 169-185.

]4( Lewandowski,Z. , Ser l’identité de certain! ciattet de fond,ont enivatenlct I, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio A 13 (1958), 131-146.

[6] Lcv/undov/ib,,!. , Ser l’identité de certeint dattet de fonction! eruvelcnlct U, Ana. Univ. Mariae Curit-Sklodowska, Sectio A 14 (I960), 19-46.

|6| Pommerenke, Ch. , Univalent f'enctiona, Vandenhôeek and Ruprecht, Gottingen 1975.

STRESZCZENIE

W pracy xnaietiono dokładne ostacowanie od dołu funkcjonału Re prawie wypukłych i wyznaczono promień a-gwiazdristcśei tej klasy.

/(-’) w klasie L funkcji

РЕЗЮМЕ

В работе получено точную нижнюю оценку функционала Rc

-гм

в классе

функций близких к выпуклым и определено радиуса-эпеэдообразности этого класса.

!

(4)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

It would not be meaningful, however, to distinguish the class of Lu Qi-Keng domains without giving an example of bounded domain which does not belong to this class.. To this aim

£5 J Eenigenourg, P., Youhikawa, H., xn application 01 tne method of Zmorovic in geometric function theory, J. anal, and Appl. W pracy wyznaczono promień wypukłości spiralnej w

• On Properties of Certain Subclasses of Close-to-Convex Functions 0 własnościach pownych podklas funkcji prawie wypukłych.. Об свойствах

tute of Mathematics of M. Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland.. This lemma gives the extension of the family J^.p/H) up to the linear - invariant family H for an... On

From Theorem 2 one could deduce a condition which guarantees that an m -fold symmetric close-to-convex function of order p uas a quasiconforuial extension, a more precise

Normalized convex univalent functions, close-to-convex functions of order /?, and functions with boundary rotation bounded by Ten (denoted by Ffc) are linear invariant families

The Radius of Convexity and Starlikeness for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions with Fixed Second Coefficients.. Promień wypukłości i gwiaździstości dla pewnych

The region D(r, k) of variability oj log/' (z) for a fixed z, zeK,, and f ranging over the class Lk of k-symmetric close-to-convex functions is a closed, convex domain symmetric