• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Remarks on operator-stable probability measuresIn this note we consider Borel probability measures on the Euclidean

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Remarks on operator-stable probability measuresIn this note we consider Borel probability measures on the Euclidean"

Copied!
4
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ANNALES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATICAL POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE XXI (1979) ROCZNIKI POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA MATEMATYCZNEGO

Séria I: PRACE MATEMATYCZNE XXI (1979)

Zbigniew Jurek

(Wroclaw)

Remarks on operator-stable probability measures

In this note we consider Borel probability measures on the Euclidean space Rp. For two probability measures p and v, we shall denote by p * v the convolution of p and v. Further, by p*n we shall denote the n-th power in the sense of convolution. <5X will denote the probability measure concen­

trated at the point x ( x e R p). The characteristic function Д of a probability measure p on Rp is defined by the formula

p{y) = j el(x'y) p {dx) (y e R p),

R p

where (•,•) denotes the inner product in Rp. We call a probability measure on Rp full if its support is not contained in any (p — l)-dimensional hyperplane of Rp. Given a linear operator A on Rp, by Ap we shall denote the proba­

bility measure defined by the formula Ap(F) = p ( A ~ 1(F)) for every Borel subset F of R p.

Let |X„} be a sequence of independent identically distributed Kp-valued random variables. If there exist sequences {An} and {a„} of non-singular linear operators on Rp and elements of Rp, respectively, such that the limit distribution p of normed sums

П

An X Xj + an (n = 1, 2 ,...) j= i

exists, then /л is called operator-stable. This concept is due to M. Sharpe, who obtained in [3] a characterization of full operator-stable measures.

In particular, he proved the following statements:

(*) Every full operator-stable probability measures p is infinitely divisible,

i.e. for every positive integer n there exists a probability measure p„ with

the property p*n = p. Hence it follows that for any positive real number t

the t-th power of p in the sense of convolution, in symbols p*{, is well

defined.

(2)

72 Z. J urek

(**) A full probability measure /i is operator-stable if and only if there exist a linear operator В on Rp and a collection {at : t > 0} of elements of Rp such that for every positive real number t the equation

holds. Here tB denotes the operator eB]ogt. Moreover, the spectrum of В is then contained in the half-plane Re z ^ \ and all eigenvalues lying on the line Re z = -2 are simple, i.e. the elementary divisors of В associated with these eigenvalues are of first degree.

(***) Every full operator-stable probability measure p on R p can be decomposed into a convolution p = * p 2 of probability measures p x and p 2 concentrated on subspaces P x and P 2 respectively, Rp = P 1@ P 2, p l being a full Gaussian measure on P l and ц2 being a full operator-stable probability measure on P 2 without a Gaussian component. Moreover, both subspaces P x and P 2 are invariant under B, the real part of all eigenvalues of the restriction of В to P x is equal to 2, and the real parts of eigenvalues of the restriction of В to P 2 are greater than

Recently, J. Kucharczak obtained in [1] a representation of the charac­

teristic function of full operator-stable probability measures. Namely, using the extreme point method he proved the following theorem.

Theorem

1. A full probability measure p on R p is operator-stable if and only if

where a e R p, Sp~1 is the unit sphere in R p, Q is a non-negative symmetric operator on Rp, the kernel o f Q is invariant under B, the real parts of eigenvalues of the restriction of В to Ker Q are greater than \ and m is a finite Borel measure on Sp~ l n Ker Q.

The aim of this paper is to give a simple proof of Kucharczak representation theorem. By Sharpe decomposition theorem (***) it suffices to establish the representation of the characteristic function for operator- stable measures without a Gaussian component, i.e. to prove the following theorem.

Theorem 2.

A full probability measure p on R p is operator-stable and has no Gaussian component if and only if

( 1)

P*' = tBp * S at

^-m (dx)V,

sp

- 1 о

(3)

Operator-stable probability measures 73

where a e R p, the real parts o f eigenvalues of В are greater than \ and m is a finite Borel measure on Sp~ 1.

P roof. By a simple calculation we can check that each measure p with the characteristic function of the form (2) satisfies equation (1) for all t > 0. Hence, by Sharpe theorems (**) and (***), we get the sufficiency of condition (2).

In order to prove the necessity we assume that p is a full operator- stable probability measure without a Gaussian component. By (**) and (***), p satisfies equation (1) for a certain operator В whose eigenvalues have real parts greater than Since, by (*), p is infinitely divisible, its characteristic function can be written in the Lévy-Khinchine form

(3) p(y) = e x p \ i ( a , y ) + j ( e i{x'y)- \ — ) M (dx) \ ,

{ R p\ ! 0 | \ 1 + N I / J

where a e R p and M is a cr-finite Borel measure on К ^|0] finite outside every neighborhood of 0 with the property J \\x\\2 M ( d x ) <

oo

([2],

IWI«i p. 181). Moreover, by Proposition 5 in [3],

(4) tBM = t M

for every t > 0. Since the real parts of eigenvalues of В are greater than

2

, each orbit {tBy: t > 0} (у Ф 0) intersects the unit sphere Sp~ 1. Let ~ be a continuous relation in Sp_1 defined as follows: x x ~ x 2 iff there exists t > 0 such that хл = tBx 2. By [2], Theorem 2.4, p. 23, there exists a Borel subset Sg_1 of Sp_1 such that every element x from Rp\ { 0} has a unique representation x = tBu, where t > 0 and ueSfi- 1 . Moreover, this represen­

tation defines a homeomorphism between Rp\ { 0} and 1 x (0,

oo).

Hence it follows that the cr-field generated by the collection on the sets {tBu:

t e f u e E ] , where / and E are closed intervals on the half-line (0,

oo)

and Borel subsets of respectively, consists of all Borel subsets of Rp\ { 0).

Put f ( h , E ) = M( { t Bu : t ^ h , u e E }) (h > 0). Taking into account (4) we have the equation f ( h/ g, E) — gf ( h, E) . Now setting h = g and m0 (E) - f ( 1, E) we get f ( h, E) = /i_1 m0 (E) which implies the formula

M( { t Bu: t e l ,

u g

E}) = m(E) j t ~2 dt, i

where m(E) = m0 ( £ n S g _1) for any Borel subset E of Sg- 1 . This formula can be extended to all Borel subsets F of Яр\{0} as follows:

O O

M (F) = J j cF(tB u) t ~2 dtm(du),

S P - 10

where cF denotes the indicator of F. Setting this expression for M into

(3), we get the required representation (2) which completes the proof.

(4)

74 Z. Jurek

References

[1] J. K u c h a rc z a k , Remarks on operator-stable measures, Colloq. Math. 34 (1976), p. 109-119.

[2] K. R. P a r th a s a r a th y , Probability measures on metric spaces, New York, London 1967.

[3] M. S h a rp e , Operator-stable probability distributions on vector groups, Trans. Amer. Math.

Soc. 136 (1969), p. 51-65.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

metric infinitely divisible random variables into a product of independent symmetric infinitely divisible factors.. We denote by P the set of all probability measures defined on

Assuming that the characteristic function ip of the distribution function F in K'* is square integrable, we derive from Levy's inversion the­.. orem a formula for probability

We point out some errors in Kokoszka and Taqqu (1994) leading to a wrong asymptotic behavior of the dependence structure for stable ARMA processes and demonstrate this in the

Although the Target Estimator Method is both accurate and simple to use, it's range of practical application is restricted by the amount of simulation time required to

Tamano by showing that the union of a Maˇr´ık space and a compact space is Maˇr´ık, that under “c is real-valued measurable”, a Baire subset of a Maˇr´ık space need not

In this note we present necessary and sufficient conditions charac- terizing conditionally weakly compact sets in the space of (bounded linear) operator valued measures M ba (Σ, L(X,

In the next two sections, we discuss how we can deduce the explicit estimates (Corollaries 1 and 2) from the above theorem, in the case of Dedekind zeta-functions.. Now we prove

The analysis of the relation (2), which shows how the correlation coefficient be- tween variables is related to the Euclidean distance between these variables in the case of