MEDDELANDEN
FRAN
STATENS SKEPPSPROVNINGSANSTALT
(PUBLICATIONS OF THE SWEDISH STATE SHIPBUILDING EXPERIMENTAL TANK)
Nr 35
GOTEBORG
1955
FURTHER TESTS WITH MODELS
OF COASTERS
BY
HANS LINDGREN AND AXEL 0. WARHOLM
GUMPERTS FORLAG
GOTEBORG
1. Introduction
An earlier publication of the Swedish St ate
Shipbuild-ing Experimental Tank, viz. No. 24 Tests with Models
of
Coasters,
describes a series
of experiments carried out with
systematically varied models
of
coasters.
These investigations
comprised resistance tests with a family of seventeen models in
which the length-breadth and breadth-draught ratios, the block
coefficient and the longitudinal position of the centre of buoyancy
were systematically varied. The dimensions, coefficients and ratios
for the different models are given herein in Table I.
The results
of the above tests were expressed in terms of
dimensionless ratios and they thus make it possible to calculate the
resistance of similar forms and other forms of the coaster type.
The present pa,per deals with a systematic investigation of the
propulsive qualities of coasters. Four models with the same block
coefficient
(a = 0.65)
but
different 'breadth and
length-displacement ratios were tested at both full load and light draughts.
The form coefficients and ratios of the models were the same as in
Series A: 2 of the earlier tests (see Table I). The models in question
were selected as being, in the authors' opinion, those most interesting
to study from the aspect of their propulsive characteristics.
Self-propulsion tests have been carried out with each model using
four different propellers in turn, in order to determine the effect
of propeller revolutions on the propulsive characteristics.
The primary results of the model tests have all been worked out
for ships of the same displacement, namely V = 816 m3 at load
draught on an even keel and V = 408 m3 at light draught with a
trim by the stern. The range of revolutions covered by the four
V = 816 m3 No. .L
L"
B TS
L4
L
B B T 6 6pp t P13 (14100)3L
PP 2 %Series A: 1.
Varying LIB, 6 = 0.60
318 46.22 45.19 8.404 3.502 494 4.95 23 5.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 388 51.67 50.52 7.949 3.313 522 5.53 168.9 6.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 0
390 56.84 55.57 7.578 3.158 549 6.08 127.1 7.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 0 Series A: 2.
Varying LIE, 6 = 0.65
313 39.3-7 38.49 8.748 3.645 458 4.21 382.7
45
2.4 0.650 0.665 0314 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0
315 50.31 49.19 7.740 3.225 517 5.38 183.4 6.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0 342 55.33 54.10 7.377 3.074 543 5.92 137.7 7.5 2.4 0.650 0.665
'Series A: 3.
Varying LIB, 6 = 0.70
_319 43.90 42.92
7.901 3.326
486 4.70 275.1 5.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0 389 49.08 47.99 7.550 3.147 515 5.25 197.4 6.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0391 53.98 52.78 7.197 2.999 540 5.78 151.0 7.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0
Series B. Varying BIT
316 42.35 41.41 I 7.700 3.850 480 4.53 307.2 5.5 2.0 0.650 0.665 343 43.72 42.75 7.949 3.613 482 4.68 278.6 5.5 2.2 0.650 0.665 0
314 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0
317 47.38 46.33 8.615 3.077 501 5.07 219.1 5.5 2.8 0.650 0.665 0 Series C: 1.
Varying 6, LIB = 5.5
'318 46.22 45.19 8.404 3.502 494 4.95 235.5 5.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 314 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 319 43.90 42.92 7.982 3.326 486 4.70 275.1 5.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0 344 42.91 41.96 7.802 3.251 482 4.59 295.3 5.5 2.4
0.7j
Series C: 2.
Varying 6, LIB -= 6.5
388 51.67 50.52 7.949 3.313 522 5.53' 168.9 6.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 0 315 50.31 49.19 7.740 3.225 517 5.38 183.4 6.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0
389 49.08 47.99 7.550 3.147 515 5.25 197.4 . 6.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0
Series C: 3. Varying 6, LIB = 7.5
390 56.84 55.57 7.578 3.158 549 6.08 127.1 7.5 2.4 0.600 0.614 0
342 55.33 54.10 7.377 3.074 543 5.92 137.7 7.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0 391 53.98 52.78 7.197 2.999 540 5.74 151.0 7.5 2.4 0.700 0.716 0
Series D. Varying tILpp
'320 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650
0.665 +1
314 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 0 321 45.00 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.6500.665 -1
322_ 45.00 _ 44.00 8.182 3.409 489 4.82 255.0 5.5 2.4 0.650 0.665 2 .Propeller Dimensions
= propeller diameter
= propeller pitch
A0
= propeller disc area
(
D2)4
Ad
= developed blade area
1
= blade width at 0.7 D/2
= maximum blade thickness referred to centre of propeller
Kinematic and Dynamic Symbols and Ratios
= speed in general
ve
= speed of advance
V
= ship's speed in Metric knots
= resistance
T
= propeller thrust
Q
= propeller torque
= rate of revolution (revs, per unit time)
Pe effective powerP8
= shaft power (at tail end of shaft)
v vewake fraction (TAYLOR)
T R
thrust deduction factor
= density of water
/
(102.0 kg sec.2/m4 for fresh water)(104.5 kg sec.2/m4 for sea water)
5
2. Symbols, Units and Methods of Calculation
The symbols have been chosen in accordance with the recommendations made by
the Sixth International Conference of Ship Tank
Super-indendents.
Ship Dimensions
= length on waterline
Lpp
= length between perpendiculars
B
= breadth on waterline
T
= draught
Am = immersed midship section area
S.
= wetted surface area (including wetted surface area of rudder and bossing)
V
= volumetric displacement
= distance of L. C. B. forward of midships (Lpp/2)
1/2 ate = half angle of entrance on waterline
= kiderhatiU itilcoitity of Water
C,
=- PI3 V3/P6 (m3, Metr. knots and HP)
C2 = V2/3 Val?, (m3, 1Vietr. knots and HP)
Fn rvi 1JT7= FEMME number, displacement
FILL
=
vi gL
FRO17DE number, length
-Vve2 (0.7 n D n)
REYNOLDS number for propellers
Dimensionless Coefficients and Ratios
V' 6PP LppLB -'T
1 17 T= block coefficients
midship section coefficient
prismatic coefficient
= lengthbreadth ratio
= breadth-draught ratio
= length-displacement ratio
-1,1-= L. C. B. forward of Lpp/2 as % of Lpp
Lpp= pitch ratio
Ad= disc area ratio
A,
= blade thickness ratio
K2'
thrust coefficient
D4 n2 x(;)=
= torque coefficient
e D5 n2 ye=
= advance coefficient
Dn Am=
BT
VKT
propeller efficiency in open water
KQ 2 n
Pe=
= propulsive efficiency
P,
Suffix m denotes model. The ship is referred to if no suffix is used.
Units and Conversion Factors
Metric units are throughout.
For g (acceleration due to gravity) the value 9.81 m/sec.2 has been used.
Methods of Calculation
The model-scale results from the resistance tests have been converted to the scale
of the full-sized ships in the conventional way in accordance with FROUDE'S method.The frictional resistance has been calculated using the formulae decided upon at the
Tank Superintendents' Conference in Paris in 1935. No length
correction has been employed.
All the self-propulsion experiments were carried out according to the so called
Continental method (GEBEas)') With the skin-friction correction applied as a towing
force. The results have been converted to full scale in the conventional manner.
In converting the measured values to ship scale, no corrections for scale effects,
air resistance, hull condition etc have been applied, since the experiments were only
concerned with comparisons between the different versions of the models.
Wake fractions have been calculated in the usual way, using the propeller as a
wake integrator. Values of wake fraction were worked out, both on the basis of
thrust identity and on the basis of torque identity, with the aid of the curves of the
results from the open water propeller tests. A mean between the two values so
obtained was then taken in each case. This method of calculating wake fraction is
the normal practice at the Tank.
3. Ship Models Tested
Four paraffin wax models were employed in these tests.
The
parent model, No. 618, was made in the scale 1 : 9 and was similar
in every respect to Model No. 314, referred to in Publ. No. 24. The
dimensionless form coefficients and ratios of the other models, as
mentioned in the Introduction, were the same as those of the
corres-ponding models of Series A: 2 (see Table I).
') See Congres International des Direeteurs des Bassin,s, Paris, 1935.
1 metre
= 3.281 ft.
1 metric ton
= 1000 kg
= 0.984 British tons
1 metric knot = 1852 m/hour = 0.999 British knots
1 metric HP = 75 m kg/sec. = 0.986 British HP
In order to enable tests to be carried out using the same propellers
on each of the different models, the draught (and breadth) of each
model was made the same, i. e., the variations in length-displacement
ratio and length-breadth ratio were achieved by corresponding
variations in length. This meant that each model had a different
displacement. Thus, as in the earlier tests described in Publ. No 24,
in converting the results to the scale of a ship having a displacement
of 816 m3 at full load draught, it was necessary to assume a different
scale for each model. The various model scales together with all
the ship data are given in Table II.
This table also includes the
data for the different forms at light draught (V = 408 m3).
Table II
Units
Ship ModelsModel No.
-
617 618 619 620 Model Scale-
1: 9.6221: 9
1 :8.514 1 : 8.115 17 = 816 n-13 17L
m 39.3.7 45.00 50.31 55.33 w PP 38.49 44.00 49.19 54.10B .... ... .
... . . .
m 8.748 8.182 7.740 7.377 a, A LIB-
3.6454.50 3.4095.50 3.2256.50 3.0747.50BIT ... .
.-
2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 .04
aoS
m2 465 495 522 548 gLIV"
4.21 4.82 5.38 5.92 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 -ci o# ... ...
-
0.971 0.971 0.971 0.971 .5 92-
0.670 0.670 0.670 0.670t/Lpp ... ...
% 0 0 o o '12 0,e degrees 25.9 21.7 18.6 16.3 z r...4 Di
V = 408 m3
,
./.., . .. . .. . T (forward) m m 36.82 1.184 42.23 1.107 47.31 1.047 52.11 0.998 = as 0 :., ....cT (aft)
m 2.790 2.610 2.469 2.353T (mean)
in 1.987 1.859 1.758 1.676 no 4.21 5.16 6.11 7.06 ',...4 .E BIT 4.40 4.40 4.40 4.40 E-4s
m2 330 351 370 387 LIV"3-
4.96 5.70 6.38 7.03LW L Model No. 618 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0;6 Length-unit (1111111111. 1/3 V Fig. 1.
The ships were systematically related in such a way that any one
of the forms could be obtained from the parent form by multiplying
all the longitudinal dimensions by a constant factor and dividing
all the transverse and vertical dimensions by the square root of the
same constant factor. This means that the block coefficient,
water-plane area coefficient, midship area coefficient, prismatic coefficient
and breadth-draught ratio were the same for all the ships of the
family.
Fig. 1 shows the body plan and Fig. 2 the waterlines and profile
of the parent form (corresponding to Model No. 618). As explained
above, the body plans, waterlines and profiles of the other forms in
the series were obtained by multiplying all the longitudinal dimensions
by a factor a and dividing all the transverse and vertical dimensions
by V a. The values of the factor a for the various forms are given
below.
IL9
n
IIIIIIIMINA
111111=11EIVAPINII
NI
111111MMIMIIIIIIIMMI
IMIMMIFIFIFMMIll
11111111MIE
11WWL.111ME
18NII
11111111111WINIIIIIIM
itt1BILILWMAWAVAN
6,fk
aligalrAIIIIIIIIIIIIIA17As
Parent form
Model No.
617
618
619
620
a
0.875
11.117
1.230
0.5 1 2. 3 4 m It Iv11 /.111 9 8 7 6 4 3 2MIIRMIIIIIIIIMMEMEIM MMIMIIIMMMIIPAFM,
WIN111116141-IiI1111=11IMIIN
IMMIIMIIIINIMINIMIIMIPIMIIIPIM/
WAINVANIIIMIMEMMIIMINIMIN1IMMIIMIENIMINE.11111111/AMEMMIAMF
1411L.' _mINIMIIIIIMI11111111IMMIIIIIi1MEMWMA41MIN'
I
1Mlia11111111=MMINIMMI11111111M1=1111MINMWAIIIWIEW
IMMENIO11111111111111111INIMMEINNIIMMIIIIIMINIMMMIIMIIMMIIIW
INIIIMMIENIIIMM
I1111%1IMPAINIIIPMEMII
_MEI=
-Wow_ mown=
9. 7 5 3 / 1 1 o 6 05 /0 /5' 20 2 Model No. 618 Fig. 2. 25 30 35 3. 4 I '3 57 9
40 Length-unit pg3-
-iAVYMIWIMP-0P--/MMItIrdM=
ff/MMIR3=-0=im
-111.- b.\
..7A_%7-1111Aib... 2 6 10 12 14 16 18 20Sectional-Area Curves
Fig. 3.
30 Model No. 617 Model No. 618 Model No. 619 Model No. 620 NN.
0 2 18 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 20 25 20 15 10 5 10 15 20 21.5m 1 Length-unit130.5
05 1 v.0inipdsions in bin)
Fig. 4.
In order to increase the scope of application of the diagrams and
facilitate the design of similar formed ships of different displacements,
dimensionless scales in terms of the unit of length divided by
I71/3have been added to Figs. 1 and 2. The length, breadth and draught
of any similar ship with a displacement of say Vz can be derived
by multiplying the values read from the dimensionless scales by
171/3.
Fig. 3 shows the sectional area curves for the family of ship forms
employed in this series of tests.
Each of the models was fitted with a rudder and propeller shaft
bossing (see Fig.
5).In the resistance tests, the propeller was replaced
by a dummy boss and cone. A 1 mm. tripwire was employed in all
the tests.
4. Propeller Data and Open Water Propeller Tests
Each of the models was tested in ebnjunction with four different
propellers, P616P619. These propellers were designed
SOthat,
with a ship of the parent form, a range of revolutions of about 190
to 370 r/min would be covered at a speed of 11 knots. Data for
the various propellers in the scales appropriate to the four ships in
question are given in Table III.
All the propellers were 3-bladed and conventionally designed as
regards blade form, shape of sections and pitch distribution. The
outline
of propeller No. P616 (dimensioned. assuming the model
Propeller. No.P6I6
Top of Aperture Atilatrom Pitch ...166-8 R11215 .2 1094 j 396\ 911=11111311IME1
729 e62±-1411 547 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 365mommisvimr,
203_.L._
Yscale 1
: 9) is shown in Fig. 4. The other propellers were similarly
shaped, but varied in diameter and piteh according to Table III.
The relative positions of the propellers in the aperture were the
same in each model and are illustrated in Fig. 5. This diagram also
shows the form of the rudder.
The propellers were all tested in open water and the results are
given in dimensionless form in Fig. 6.
5. Resistance and Self-Propulsion Tests
Resistance and self-propulsion tests with all the models were
carried out in smooth water both at the full load even-keel draught
(V = 816 m3) and at light draught with a trim by the stern (V =
408 m3) (see Table II).
1) Mean pitch.
Table
13 Ship Model Pr o-peller ModelDm Model
scale
D 13')PID
Num-her of BladesAd/A, (ID Rake
No. No. mm ram mm % % degrees
P616 270.0 2598 1948 0.750 P617 237.0 2280 1540 0.675 617 P618 212.0 1 : 9.622 2040 1295 0.635 45 4.8 7.50 P619 192.0 1847 1127 0.610 P616 270.0 2430 1823 0.750 P617 237.0 2133 1440 0.675 618 P618 212.0 1- 9 ' 1908 1211 0.635 3 45 4.8 7.50 P619 192.0 1728 1054 0.610 P616 270.0 2299 1724 0.750 P617 237.0 2018 1362 0.675 619 P618 212.0 1: 8.514 1805 1146 0.635 3 45 4.8 7.50 P619 192.0 1635 997 0.610 P616 270.0 2191 1643 0.750 P617 237.0 1923 1298 0.675 620 P618 212.0 1 : 8.115 1720- 1092 0.635 3 45 4.8 7.50 P619 192.0 1558 950 0.610
Model
No. 617
Model
No. 618
Model
No. 619
Model
No. 620
N.
Dimensions for ship in
corresponding to model scale 1:9
Fig. 5.
Resistance Testa
Resistance tests were Carried out at, load draught over a speed
range corresponding to 7
12.5 knots and at light draught over
a speed range corresponding to 8
13.5 knots. The experimental
results are shown in diagraminatic form in FigS. 7 and 8 and are
Propeller No. P616 Propeller No. P617 Propeller No. P618 Propeller No. P619
( 3-bladed)
Illpi
11!if/
:I! 17/ LWL AlrAV%
112510 Kr
100 K0.
Propeller No. P616 Propeller No. P617 Propeller No. P6I8 Propeller No. P619 Re 6-60.105 Rn77 5,9 -6,3-105 Re 4,7-4,9.105 Re 3,8-4,0-105 15 70 60 50 30 20 10
h.._
.Al
tat
--.4111111*111
giNgegm
.iiME
01
\ \ \E",
r"
-
il
74mi=
,..b[MM
\
\\
11
.
ssIL,
ME
it.,,..741
...
...,,,i
.,.
I
ra
ms.s.,.
s,..",,
sr,1 I Ns :Ili,
02 0 3 04 05 0.6 07 08 09/0
v D n Fig. 6.given numerically in Table VXII (Appendix). The results obtained
at load draught have been converted to another form in Section 8
(Fig. 19).
As mentioned in Section 3, all the models were fitted with 1 mm
tripwires. This was not the case in the tests described in the earlier
paper on coasters (Publ. No 24). Over the range of speeds in question
3-4 % greater resistance was recorded in the new tests in the case
of the three longest models, while the difference amounted to about
7 % at normal speeds and 10 % at low speeds in the case of the
shortest model (No. 617). These differences can be partly attributed
to the rudders and shaft bossings which were not fitted in the earlier
experiments. On the other hand, some of the discrepancies,
particul-arly in the case of the shortest model, must be due to the earlier
models (without tripwires) being affected to some extent by laminar
flow over the fore-body.
600 500 400 300 200 100 0
Ship Speed, V, in knots
, . 0.40 0.45
0.50055
0.60 0.65F -
nr 6-p73
Fig. 7.
0.70---Model
=trIbmJ tven Keel
"...c
No. 617 0=
4,50
900
Model No., 618
L/I3= 5,50
Model No. 619
LA=
6,50
- 800°
Model No.
620 .
L/8= 7,50
700I
--
I
600IFA
500 ..au
/
Mir
400/
i
,/ \
lis 's\
,s
\ /
\
. 300 ,rAf'7111
/
h.
200 ... ... .. ...-... ....-:-:.--- ..z.. 100 .1,...t:.,____500,._;,:::-'''' F1111-1Hi
0 7 8 10 It -12 --1.3
C.) 800 700 600 500 400 00 00 00
17
,lf
= 4(lei MJ
trim by the -tern
----Model No.677
L/B-- 4,21
Model No. 618
L/8-- 8,16
II
. Model No. 619
L/8=6,11
Model No. 620 L/8=7,06
..,A41
500 . GOONB
300IBUF N,,,,N' /11
./
'''.
-' IIIII1M111
./
MINIM
POO _=--.----0 iliiIIIII
8 10 11 12 13Ship Speed ,V , in knots
I , I I , I
0.45 0:50 0.5-5 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85
F
n17 073
=V.
Fig. 8.
Self-Propulsion Tests
As stated in Section 4, self-propulsion tests were carried out using
four different propellers in conjunction with each of the four models.
The results obtained from the tests at full load draught
are given
in Figs. 9-12 where the shaft power, P,, revolutions, n, and the
9 10 11
Ship Speed ,V , in knots
Fig. 9.
0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 aiei 045 0.70
F v
nI7 073
0
Propeller No. P6I6
ii
III/
gooiarif
PrOpeller No. P6I7
Ii!
-
moo1 II
i11
L.
=
Propeller No. P6I8Propeller No. P6I9 ,
800
/
700 ....- ,.. I _ ..-n ---..//
,...'/
yi
Ill
- 500MINI
lj
_ SOO - - 11 100 400 WOA
!,,ii
MEE_=_-:30C 20C.0
_ -,-.pp,,
_ ----.-' 7=,'
100 _-
WO - .-0 1111111.11Model No. 617 LA-4,50
17.---816 m3 Even Keelz
300
Model No. 618 LA=5,50
l7F: 816 m3 Even Keel
7 a 9 10 11
Ship Speed,V , in knots
0.40 045 0.50 0.55 am F ..
,--
v n? ye 1/3 Fig. 10. 0.65 0.70 0 0 -400 19 . . /. i , _. .s. ctPropeller No. P6I6
--
/
ll 110Propeller NO. P6I7
.
/
ilt/ .
ill/
ii ioi . ,tg
.i__
_ _
Propeller NO. P6I8.---_
Propeller No. P619/
'90/
z.
/.
,
4, .1,
,1 801 1 ../..
1 70(/
-n ..-'''... . ...----:..-----III .lif
1
60( .0/ 500piril
50( 400 ,A 40( 11016W11,11 300-
C274_
16..
-30( 200 WO,--
M EM
..,
20( 100 -Elill
.. -- -0 11111111I 300 200 166 0.19
Model No. 619
L/8=6,50
V=8/6m3
Even Keel
1.1 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 F ine
VI 3
Fig. 11. 0Propeller No P6/6
No. P617 No. P618 No. P6I91111
t .,.c I/
!/
ci:n Imo 1000 900 Propeller Propeller-- - . - - -
Propeller
1111
mir,
//,
111111111=111111
...
..__ 600_
111111di
11111
FA
_T-71r/
;AL300 200 100o-01.,"
poppr-
iff
_
-41.1.111111 -,._. ._ 7 9Ship Speed ,V, in knots
400 300 200 100 CX-' 500 4.00 30 20
Model No 620 1/. 8=7,50
'# 816%113 Even Keel 6:40 0.45 0.50 . 0.55F =
^7 V9P0
Fig. 12. 0.60 0.65 0.70900
-00 0 21Propeller No. P6I6
No. P6I7 No. P6I8 No. P6I9
---PropellerPropeller
PropellerIIIII
/
/
/
/
/
/
.1111111111,
1.
A
----.111E
,I
500 . /1 400Iftgliall
./
300 POO 100Ihrdli
..,'
111111.4
,,
..,
\,
-_
_
Val
_
_
8 9 10 1/ 12 13Ship Speed, V, in knots
600 400 00 - 300 00
-00 26600
-00 - /-0000
-00 - 0
coefficient C, have been plotted as functions of ship speed, V,
and
FROITDE number, F,,..
The corresponding results obtained at the smaller draught (V =
408 m3)
are shown in
Figs. 13-16.
The diagrams give an
indication of the way in which the propeller revolutions influence
the shaft horse-power required for the different ships. It should,
however, be borne in mind that a direct comparison of
the
experi-mental results for the different ships does not give a true picture
of the situation, for the reason that while the same propellers were
used for all the model hulls, they were in fact designed for the parent
form and were not therefore so suitable for the other models. This
problem is dealt with at greater length in Section 6. where the
analysis
of the experimental results is fully discussed.
In Tables V XII (Appendix), the values of the shaft
horse-power,
revolutions and C, are given, together with those of the
propulsive
factors
n,w and t at different speeds and
values of FROUDE number
(F.
and FL). The wake fraction, w, and the thrust
deduction
factor, t, are dealt with further in Section 8.
6. Correction of the Self-Propulsion Test Results to
Enable
Comparisons between the Different Models
As stated in Section 4, the same propellers were used
for each of
the four ship models. The propellers were designed
for the parent
ship, corresponding to Model No. 618. A direct
comparison of the
measured values of shaft horse-power, revolutions and speed for any
two ships is not therefore entirely fair, since
the propellers were
more suitable for one ship
than for the other. However, in order to
take account of this situation as far as possible, all the
experimental
results have been corrected in the manner described
below.
The method adopted was to maintain the diameter
and speed
constant and adjust the pitch until, in a Bp
6 diagram (see Fig.
17), the Bp values based on the corrected experimental values of
Ve, P, and n intersected with the a-values (involving n in addition
to D and Ve) on the line representing optimum
diameter. It was
assumed here that the wake fraction, w, and the thrust
deduction
factor,
t, were independent of revolutions and power (within the
tta.
8 9 10 11
Ship Speqd ,V , in knots
. 1 , 0.45 0.50 0,55 0.60 0.65
F =
v n0 irgfri73 Fig. 13. 12 0.70 0.75 0.80 23 . Propeller No. P616/.
/
.
ce 100 Propeller No. P617/
/
.. 90l/
-
-- -
Propeller No. P618 Propeller No. P619 80C-/
/
00 00 500El
r,./,
--.//PP
n,
-...--1
ill
. $00 AMINE
400 300VA
00 200litral
41&4.M
200--_
_
PSERIE
100 100_
0IIIIIIIII
- 0
Model No. 617 LA=4,21 7= 408 m3
Tr.
Trim by the Stern
z
0 - 400
300
200
Model No. 618 118=5,16
17408m3
Trim by the Stern
- 400 300 200 100 0 Propeller No. P616 No. P617 No.P618 No. P619
f
x
.c BOO PropellerPropeller
Propeller
III
.,
-.
id
600 500ilin',"/Fr
/
i
A
griA
IlhE206iiis
,
_
_
_
400 306 ,00 0 -....,. ...,_
,_,..iiii
_
9 10 11 12 13Ship Speed V, in hnois
, 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.55 0.70 0.75 0.80 . F v
n17 Iliff3
Fig. 14. Q." 400 300 2.00 100Model ,No. 6 19 L/8= 6,11
F. 408 m3
Trim by the Stern
IL
700 -00 0400
300 25 Propeller No. P616 No. P617 No. P6/8 No. P6I9,
,
Propeller
PropellerPropeller
./
.-/
/
/
/
,
.
..--
.
.
..-,
..-- . nEll/
El
ig
.,,
rattik
___
111111111 =. 9 10 /2 13Ship Speed ,V, in knots
. I I 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 aeo
F -
vgp/3
Fig. 15. 00 00 00-0-
0000
-oo 0 500 400 300 200 /00500 400 30o .200 100 0
Model No. 620 L/8=7,06 F. 408 m3
Trim by the Stern
Propeller No. P6I6
Fig. 16.
400
300
--
Propeller-No. P6I7--
=
Pr-opener NQ. P6/8
--- Propeller No:
P6I9
/
/
F._c
goo 400 30C 20C 100//.
/
/
./
.. ..
..
./
.
.
... ,--
.----
.
.11111
..
.
-..1-..
.
.
.
n---
-
__;.--- ..,11
IV
11.---./ll-
MN
Illiw. I
id
-...k..,
'i
radii
IIMP'
1-I11 I111-1_
_
7 9 10 1 i 12Ship Speed ,V, in knots
-0,45 0.50 0.55 0.60 045 0.70- 0.75 0.80
F - V
200
P/D 1.0 0.9 7: 0.8
(V=8
knots) l'--___
0 n P5 8 =PeZ5
.10 15 20 25 30 Fig. 17.also assumed that no correction to the relative rotative efficiency
was required.
The correction is illustrated schematically in Fig. 17, which shows
in principle part of a B
6-diagram (see Trans. North East Coast
Inst. of Eng. and Shipb:, Vol. 67, Open Water Test Series with Modern
Propeller Forms, by Prof. L. TRoon).
The experimental values are marked by open rings (only two
series, representing the extreme cases, are shown in -Fig. 17) while
the solid spots rdark the corresponding values after correction to the
optimum line.
It will be seen from the diagram that the correction applied to
the shaft horse-power, P,, is small. Moreover, the relation between
the corrected and uncorrected values of P,, by reason of the
above-mentioned assumptions, is similar to the relation between the open
water efficiency in the uncorrected case and the corresponding
corrected value. On the other hand, as is also evident from Fig. 17,
(the
correction to S =
n D
V,
considerably greater.
The values given in Table IV typify the relative magnitudes of
the various corrections and it will be observed that the correction
cr nD
'
. n in r/ min: ; Ps in HP .; V,
0 in Jeer; o test results corrected results
%
/
,/
\,,,.
/
/
',,,,=\
/
,,e./
,e
,,.v
, .
\ 'T,/
so
%0/
, .J./\
, \'-e \.,,e\ /
/ \ C8 Xe , ' , , O .\
/
\
t V''
97./ \
it, \/
%\
/
\
\
L"/
/
s ,/
\ /
A , CI./ \
%/
N/
/ \
%'
, e.. A/ ;Is/
b
/
_ Models No. 620cL iz /
.4'
0.5
% I I - 1 I O. OS A o\\
/
\ /
ModelYNo. 517 / (V ,11,5 knots) 0c)/ 15%s>/
5KU'leQf
z
and hence to
the revolutions is
s,;"/ ,
I
35 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
27
V =V(1w) in knots.Table IV
Model No. 618. Ship Speed V = 11 knots.
to the revolutions (and pitch) is large in comparison with power
correction.
The corrected results can thus be taken to represent the values
which would be obtained with each combination of model, propeller
diameter and speed,
if
the open-water optimum propeller was
employed in each case.
The implications of the test results, after being corrected in the
manner described above, are discussed in Section 8.
7. Dimensionless Presentation of the Results
The curves of C, and C2 plotted against F
are given in
Figs. 7-16, can be used for converting the results to apply to similar
ships of other displacements. Another dimensionless method of
presentation, analogous with that adopted in Publ. No
24,
is
employed in Section 8. In the second method, the effective and shaft
horse powers are made dimensionless by expressing them in terms
of Pe/ g g312 V 716 and Ps le g312 v7/6 respectively. The revolutions are
Vviia
in
expressed
terms 60 n , with n, V and g in consistent units,
9
while the speed is given in terms of the dimensionless FROUDE
number, F n r -= vlfg 171/3.
In order to simplify the use of the
diagrams, curves are given in Fig. 18 which can be employed for
re-converting the values of the dimensionless expressions and the
term 60
nV
into power in horse-power, speed in knots and
vi/3
9revolutions in r/min.
It should be observed that the diagrams are based on results
applying to a displacement of 816 m3 (only those results obtained
Propeller No. P616
Uncorrected Corrected IncreasePropeller diam.
D m 2.43 2.43Pitch.
P
m 1.82 1.649.9
Revolutions
n
r/rnin. 194.0 207.7 7.120 19 18 17 /6 15
EMI
1.1,111,1 1000 (Pe or P8) e Y31217716 Vgpis
60'n _pis
Expressions to
beevaluated
using consistentunits
e g3I2 17716 75x 1000 1 Vviisig
Values to be
read from the
abbve curves
at
thedis-placement in
question o 3600 g_ V P113= V in knots
1852P, or Pg in HP (Metr.)
in rimin.
/60 120 -'do 80 -1.25 140 -1,20 1.15 1.10 1.05 29 4019 600 800 1000 1200 Displacement P' in m3Fig. 18. Diagram for use in converting the values of the expressions employed in
Figs. 19-24 to P, and P, in HP, V in knots and n in rirnin
The method is
indicated below.
Cri
180
60 - 1.00 = /04.49 irg sec2 g=981 m/sec2
40 - 0.95
Model ND. 617 'L/B=4.5 9 8 7 1
F
a
=1-
ass
il/g p
1/3 Consistent throughout Units used. 1 .III
ir,41
iiim----
iiiimmi
NA.64
Ell
sr"
iiiiii
M
__
__ -.-._ 0.62 0.60LI.
----'"
___si
1,,
_...
0.58 -'----.
---
_ _
--215011111111jimim
4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 5.60 5.80L/71/3
Fig. 19.in the tests run at load draught have been used here). Therefore,
in converting the results to a displacement which differs widely
from this figure, some degree of error will be inevitable, due to the
fact that the frictional resistance does not obey the law of
compari-sons. As far as resistance and effective horse-power are
concerned,
it can be
' 13.own by calculation that at normal speeds the error
involved is less than 1 % for displacements between 400 m3 and
1200 m3.
In the self-propulsion
tests,
a frictional resistance correction
(applied as a towing force) appropriate to the displacement of 816 m3
was employed, and therefore the results can not be directly
applied
Model No. 618 Model No. .6/9 Model No. 620
12 10 E:". e-, a 1;:?) 14.."
§6
2 0Model No.6I7
L/B=4,5
"ts 31 -A': 0 0 (0 --.. tO 1 \ 9... Co Q. ..._ , '?) CZ 0.62 ' Q / 1.- //
/ / I/
I/
v I/
i .../....---=:10.60-F-
/
nv ,,v g F f1,3 1 1 __...---/
11I
/
1/
i i/
0.58
/ i/
, i,/
I/
....,-./0.56ii----1---4--
/
111111110
0.54. Consistent Units used
..,
A.4_,.stent throughout.,
0.46 0 100 200 300 400 500 60060n1
71/3Fig. 20.
to ships of other displacements. For this reason, further tests with
Model No. 618 were carried out using the frictional resistance
corrections corresponding to similar ships having displacements of
400
m3 and 1200 th.P. The differences between the values of
revolu-tions and power obtained in this way and those calculated on the
basis of the assumption that the dimensionless curves also apply to
these displacements Were insignificant (less than 1 %) in the case
of the greater displacement. At the smaller displacement (400 m3)
10 8
Model No.618
L/8=5,5
300 Fig. -21,60n/
-gand 2 % in revolttions, thus showing that the »dimenSionless» curves
should be employed with caution when calculating the power etc.
for ships Whose displacements differ widely from 816 m3.
8. Analysis of the Test Restilts
Resistance Tests
A comparison between the various models on the basis of resistance
(at a displacement of 816 m3) is made in Fig. 19. The dimensionless
parameters of this diagram have been explained in Section 7 and,
by using Fig. 18, the results can be readily transposed in terms of
Q
...---4---, 1 i 1 i--r-/
/
//
all
I
1 I 0.62--1---1
0.61)=F
-n17 -I/ 3//0:58
..10.56
0.54 Consistent throUghout Units used.A
IiNiiiiiiialWir
-.../__Y7C.046 -100 . 200 400 500 600I0 ".4 1:=4. c-) 6 4:11 ca.." 2
Model No. 6/9
L/86,5
33
o o 40 o N (C.-a.q
.,_ - cci 0.66a
.._/
./
/
/
/
_-10.64 /I.
//
./
v , 0.62 -F
/ ./
n17 vgp
/
-- --/-
0.60/
_-/----1
Consistent Units used
-,4 ---;
--eo.46 -.,-- - -7 throughout ---1--1 100 200 300 400 500 60060nirt; 73
Fig. 22.power in horse-power and speed in knots for any required
displace-ment.
It is apparent from Fig. 19 that L/
V"3
(and
LIB)
has a considerable
influence on the resistance, particularly at high speeds.
Self-Propulsion Tests
In the conaparison discussed below, all the self-proptilsion. teSt
results (obtained at a displacement corresponding to ,816
m3) hay:Et,been corrected in accordance with the method described in Section 6.
and expressed in dimensionless form as explained in Section 7.
Figs. 20-23 show the shaft power (in dimensionless form) plotted
v
F1/3against revolutions in the form 60 n = for different values of
8 2 0
Model No.620
L/3=7,5
... l. 0 kl
0 t., co.
lc ."% k: 0" c.. N .... to 0 c. cla ili Q...
§
0).
co .1 'S0.66 ...i
,,-,
/
i-- -
---1-,
- _...:0.6- -- ./
.AMMO
0.50---
0.46AZ=Zral:
.fiEnriganig
0.62 58- F,
' n17 v 9 I 3 -0 100 200 300 400 500 600 60n1/7-27
Fig. 23.
FROIIDE number, Env.
The values of
shaft horse-power and
revolutions corresponding to the dimensionless expressions can be
readily obtained by means of the curves in Fig. 18.
A comparison between the different ships on a basis of the required
shaft 'horse-power at various speeds and revolutions is illustrated in
Fig. 24. The curves therein are in fact cross curves to those in Figs.
20-23.
The influence of revolutions on the required shaft horse-power
can be seen in Fig. 25, where a percentage comparison is given. The
curve is based on the average values for all the models and speeds
and, since the scatter of spots is considerable, it should
only be
employed for approximate estimations.
Wake Fractions and Thrust Deduction Factors
As mentioned in Section 5, the calculated wake fractions and
thrust
deduction factors are given
in
the Appendix (Tables V XII).
length-1000 P P93/27 7/6 11 to 4 2 9 5
35
0 11,.1.\\
NV
I' \
nV v
7-
400
.350300
200
No. 629
Nil,,_
-_ 1L\
II
_Model No. 618 Model No. 619 Model
, Model No. 6/7
V'
L/8=4.5 I L/8=5.5 L/B=65 L/8= Z. 1 K.\
\ '
111
i\\\IL
\\\.\
N\
111
IConsistent Units used throughout I i
11611.1.
i.,
immum
.._
, fi, =0.50 I I I i I 4 440 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 VP 113 Fig. 24. 5.40 5.60 5.80I I I
300 250 1/ ii1/3 300
60 n
Fig. 25.
breadth ratio, LIB (or L/17113), and the propeller diameter
influence
both the wake and the thrust deduction.
An increase in speed causes a decrease in the wake fraction for
all the models at both fully loaded and light draughts.
The effect
of speed on the thrust deduction factor, on the other hand, is not
so clearly defined. At load draught, no definite tendency can be
discerned in the values for the two intermediate models (Nos. 618
and 619); in the case of the shortest model (No. 617), the thrust
deduction factor decreases with increasing speed
and in the case of
the longest model (No. 620) it has a tendency to
increase with
in-creasing speed. At light draught,
the thrust deduction factor in each
case is either constant or increases
with increasing speed.
A further investigation into the influence of length
breadthratio,
LIB, and propeller diameter (DIT) on wake fraction and thrust
deduction factor at load draught has also been undertaken.
In order
to avoid the effects of variations in the
recorded values due to
inaccuracy of measurement, in this instance the average values of
3
L/B
Fig. 26.
wake fraction and thrust deduction factor over the whole speed
range were calculated for each combination of model and propeller.
Fig. 26 shows the family of curves obtained from the mean values
of the wake fraction. It will be seen that both L/13 and DIT have
a considerable influence on the wake, and that the wake fraction
decreases as these two parameters increase.
A somewhat similar though less regular tendency is discernible in
the case of the thrust deduction factor (Fig. 27). It can, however,
be said that the thrust deduction factor tends to decrease with
increasing LIB, except within the range LIB -= 5.5
6.5 where it
remains more or less constant.
7
37
4CI 35 30 25 -DIT =0.507 -DIT =0.560 DIT =0.626 D/T = 0.7 Ia25 15
\
ss\
Propeller No. P516; D/T =0.713 PropellerNo. P6/7; D/T
=0.626 Propeller No. P6/8; D/T =0.560 Propeller No. P619; D/T=0.507%
1
.
/
_
-.. 6,5 7.5 L/t3 Fig. 27.9. Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank Mr. E. FREDIANIS, who carried out the
necessary design work and Mr. C. C. M. SCHNEIDERS who was
responsible for a large part of the calculations. Thanks are also due
to Mr. DACRE FRASER-SMITH, B. Sc., who has translated the paper
from the Swedish.
Appendix
Table V
39
Resistance Tests
Sell-Propulsion TestsV I Fn L Ps 17 R '
P,
C1T
P8n
w t I c2 nknots
tons
IHP
/
tons
HP
(Mar.)
(Metr.) I (Metr.) /
(Metr.) (Metr.) rimill.% 1/ 04
7 0.183 0.376 1.277
61.3 489
1.717 81.9 '101.9 32.4 25.6 366 74.8
7.5 0.196 0.403 1.47575.9 485
2.000 103109.3 33.2 26.3 358 73.7
8 0.209 " 0.430 1.70893.7 477
2.310 126117.0 33.0 26.1 355 74.4
r...-. 8.5 0.223 0.457 1.974 115 466 2.648 153125.1 32.3 25.5 351 75.2
CDco = p., 0 9 9.5 0.236 0.249 0.484 0.510 2.292 2.763 141 180 451 416 3.068 3.698 187 241 133.2 143.8 32.9 32.8 25.3 25.3 340 311 75.4 74.7 1 10 0.262 0.537 3.551 2,44 358 4.702 331157.0 33.4 24.5 264 73.7
4 :0
10.5 0.275 0.564 4.939 356 284 6.437 495176.4 33.0 23.3 204 71.9
11 0.288 0.591 6.807 514 226 8.556 731197.3 32.6 20.4 159 70.3
11.5 0.301 0.618 8.337 658 202 10.82 1027218.6 31.4 22.9 129 64.1
12 0.314 0.645 9.799 807 187 12.5 0.327 0.672 11.206 961 177 7 0.183 0.376 1.27761.3 489
1.707 79.5131.2 35.9 25.2 377 77.1
7.5 0.196 0.403 1.47575.9 485
1.963 101141.2 35.9 24.9 365 75.1
1
8 0.209 0.430 1.70893.7 477
2.255 124151.5 35.6 24.3 361 75.6
co t... 8.50.3
0.457 1.974 115 466 2.584 154162.5 35.2 23.6 348 74.7
CO 0 CO 9 0.236 0.484 2.292 141 451 3.022 192174.1 35.1 24.2 332 73.4
IIi N
o-,
9.5 0.249 0.510 2.763 180 416 3.671 248188.0 35.4 24.7 302 72.6
11. 0 cl' 10 0.262 0.537 3.551 244 358 4.648 340206.3 35.5 23.6 257 71.8
4 1
10.5 0.275 0:564 4.939 356 284 6.300 514232.8 35.0 21.6 197 69.3
o
X 11 0.288 0.591 6.807 514 226 8.446 774263.1 33.7 19.4 150 66.4
ko 11.5 0.301 0.618 8.337 658 202 10.72 1090291.8 32.9 22.2 122 60.4
4
12 0.314 0.645 9.799 807 187 II 12.5 0.327 0.672 11.206 961 171 Z1 6:1 7 0.183 0.376 1.27761.3 489
1.717 83.5160.6 38.7 25.6 359 73.4
7.5 0.196 0.403 1.47575.9 485
1.981 104172.8 38.4 25.5 35473.0
8 0.209 0.430 1.70893.7 477
2.264 127185.4 37.3 24.6 352
r- CO 8.5 0.223 0.457 1.974 115 466 2.602 156 198.3 37.3 24.1 344 73.7 PI 9 0.236 0.484 2.292 141 451 3.031 193212.5 37.3 24.4 330 73.1
713i
9.5 0.249 6.510 2.763 180 416 3.634 248228.9 37.8 24.0 302 72.6
o2-
10 0.262 0.537 3.551 244 358 4.684 349252.4 38.4 24.2 250 69.9
41 0 X 10.5 0.275 0.564 4.939 356 284 6.529 549290.8 36.2 24.4 184 64.8
a. 11 0.288 0.591 6.807 514 226 8.537 813328.2 34.1 20.3 143 63.2
.4 m 11.5 0.301 0.618 8.337 658 202 10.65 1124362.4 32.9 21.7 118 58.5
12 0.314 0.645 9.799 807 187 12.5 0.327 0.672 11.206 961 177 7 0.183 0.376 1.27761.3 489
1.717 83.4191.5 41.4 25.6 359 73.5
7.5 0.196 0.403 1.47575.9 485
1.981 105206.3 4L5 25.5 351 72.3
8 0.209 0.430 1.70893.7 477
2.264 130221.8 40.5 24.6 344 72.1
=
Co .. 8.5 0.223 0.457 1.914 115 466 2.602 159 237.9 39.3 24.1 337 72.3 CDCO 9 0.236 0.484 2.292 141 451 3.031 201254.7 40.3 24.4 317 70.1
Ti)124 o..--. 9.5 0.249 0.510 2.763 180 416 3.634 258275.0 40.9 24.0 29069.8
0 4
10 0.262 0.537 3.551 244 358 4.684 363303.7 42.6 24.2 241 67.2
41 0 X 10.511 0.2750.288 0.5640.591 4.9396.807 356514 284 6.529 573348.8 42.1 24.4 176 62.1
226 8.537 862394.6 41.1 20.3 135 59.6
11.5 0.301 0.618 8.337 658 202 10.65 1211 438.5 39.8 21.7 110 54.3 12 0.314 0.645 9.799 807 187 12.5 0.321 0.672 11.206 961 177Table TT
Resistance Tests
Self-Propulsion TestsV
F, L
F n p,R
Pe C1T
P8n
w t C2 nknots
tonsHP
/
tons
HP
.imin
(Metr.)
-
-
(Metr.)(Metr.) /
(Metr.) (Metr.) /0/o / %
7 0.171 0.376 1.11653.6 559
1.420 69.2108.7 30.9 21.4 433 77.5
8 0.196 0.430 L49782.1 545
1.898 106126.0 29.5 21.1 422 77.5
oo 8.5 0.208 0.457 1.730 101 531 2.227 134135.0 29.8 22.3 400 75.4
CD CO 9 0.220 0.484 1.989 123 518 2.578 163144.0 29.8 22.8 391 75.5
1 CLi 9.5 0.233 0.510 2.282 149 502 2.944 198153.3 29.6 22.5 378 75.3
o ..,04 5
10 10.5 0.245 0.257 0.531 0.564 2.649 3.228 182 480 232 436 3.340 4.050 238 305 163.0 175.3 28.8 20.7 29.0 20.3 367 331 76.5 76.1 X 11 0.269 0.591 4.608 325 358 5.410 447194.0 30.0 21.2 260 72.7
11.5 0.282 0.618 6.018 475 280 7.547 687219.0 29.2 20.3 193 69.1
12 0.294 0.645 8.197 675 224 10.16 1300245.3 29.5 19.3 147 65.5
12.5 0.306 0.672 10.336 886 192 7 0.171 0.376 1.11653.6 559
1.367 66.5140.0 32.8 18.4 450 80.6
8 0.196 0.430 1.49782.1 545
1.861 105162.3 32.5 19.6 426 78.2
co II 1--et ZE,' 78, 44 8.5 9 9.5 0.208 0.220 0.233 0.457 0.484 0.610 1.730 1.989 2.282 101 123 149 531 518 502 2.167 2.488 2.632 128 157 193 174.0 185.6 197.6 32.1 32.0 32.3 20.2 20.1 19.4 419 405 388 78.9 78.3 77.2 10 0.245 0.537 2.649 182 480 3.228 235210.0 32.0 17.9 372 77.4
o
..04 0
X 10.5 11 11.5 0.257 0.269 0.282 0.564 0.691 0.618 3.226 4.308 6.018 232 325 475 436 358 280 3.923 5.283 7.494 307 449 711 227.3 253.3 289.0 31.9 31.9 31.7 17.7 18.5 19.7 329 259 187 75.6 72.4 66.8 Id 12 0.294 0.645 8.197 675 224 10.16 1089 328.0 30.0 19.3 139 62.0 II 12.5 0.306 0.672 10.336 886 192 04 ;---1 7 0.171 0.376 1.11653.6 559
1.390 66.5171.0 34.5 19.7 450 80.6
8 0.196 0.430 1.497 82.1 545 1.816 101196.0 34.6 17.6 443 81.3
8.5 0.208 0.457 1.730 101 531 2.062 123209.3 33.7 16.1 436 82.1
9 0.220 0.484 1.989 123 518 2.384 152223.6 34.2 16.6 419 80.9
G _, a) A 40, a) 1:471:, 9.5 10 10.5 0.233 0.245 0.257 0.510 0.537 0.564 2.282 2.649 3.228 149 182 232 502 480 436 2.817 3.310 4.154 194 247 332 241.3 261.0 284.0 33.6 31.8 32.7 19.0 20.0 22.3 386 76.8 354 73.7 305 69.9 AP-ii
11 0.269 0.591 4.308 325 358 5.417 473314.6 32.9 20.5 24668.7
cs4 11.5 0.282 0.618 6.018 475 280 7.330 723355.0 33.3 17.9 184 65.7
:E m 12 0.294 0.645 8.197 675 224 9.938 1112404.6 31.5 17.5 136 60.7
12.5 0.306 0.672 10.336 886 192 7 0.171 0.376 1.11653.6 559
1.337 69.3201.6 39.8 16.5 432 77.3
8 0.196 0.430 1.49782.1 545
1.853 109234.6 39.1 19.2 410 75.3
co 8.5 0.208 0.457 1.730 101 531 2.130 135252.3 37.8 18.8 397 74.8
0 CO 9 0.220 0.484 1.989 123 518 2.443 164270.3 36.8 18.6 388 75.0
9.5 0.233 0.510 2.282 149 502 2.832 200290.9 35.4 19.4 374 74.5
a.-.
o c
10 0.245 0.537 2.649 182 480 3.303 249310.6 35.5 19.8 351 73.1
4 .81 X 10.5 11 0.257 0.269 0.564 0.591 3.228 4.308 232 325 436 358 4.027 5.342 333 487 337.3 375.3 36.4 37.8 19.8 19.4 304 69.7 239 66.7 11.5 0.282 0.618 6.018 475 280 7.330 762430.6 36.3 17.9 174 62.3
12 0.294 0.645 8.197 675 224 9.938 1154 489.3 35.3 17.5 131 58.5 12.5 0.306 0.672 10.336 886 192Table VLF
41
Resistance Tests
Self-Propulsion TestsV
FL
FThvR
I Pe C1T
P.
71 wt
Cy nknots
(Metr.)-tons
(Metr.) I- HP
I (Metr.)/
. /
tons
(Metr.) - HP (Metr.) , . rimin" 0, ic) 0, ic)/ CY0
7 0.162 0.376 1.01550.5 593
8 0.185 0.430 1.41977.9 574
1.784 103135.7 28.8 20.5 434 75.6
8.5 0.197 0.457 L62894.9 565
2043. 126145.0 28.7 20.3 426 75.3
,.. 4 o .CO 9 0208. 0.484 1.865 115 554 2.315 151154.2 28.2 19.4 422 76.2
71) N 9.5 0.220 0.510 2.106 137 546 2.600 180. _ 163.8_ _27.3 19.0 416 76.1
al
o _
10 0.232 0.537 2.383 163 536 2.967 216173.7 27.4 19.7 404 75.5
4
10.5 0.243 0.564 2.728 196 - 516 3.435 265185.1 27.4 20.6 382 74.0
11 0.255 0.591 3.189 241 482 4.093 336198.8 26.8 22.1 346 71.7
11.5 0.266 0.618 4.123 325 . 409 5.383 473218.6 27.0 23.4 281 68.7
12 0.278 0.645 5.712 470 321 7.180 686241.9 27.4 20.4 220 68.5
12.5 0.290 0.672 7.673 658 259 9.236 971267.0 27.5 16.9 176 67.8
7 0.162 0.376 1.01550.5 593
-1
8 0.185 ' 0.430 1.41977.9 574
1.746 102175.8 31.3 18.7 438 76.4
to ... 8.5 0.197 0.457 1.62894.9 565
2.012 125187.8 31.1 19.1 429 75.9
o ez 9 0.208 0.484 1.865 115 554 2.284 151200.5 30.3 18.3 422 76.2
To' 9.5 0.220 0.510 2.106 137 548 2.581 182213.5 29.7 18.4 411 75.3
o 12 10 0.232 0.537 2.383 163 536 2.929 217226.9 28.7 18.6 402 75.1
4 6. 10.5 0.243 0.564 2.728 196 516 3.365 264240.9 28.8 18.9 383 74.2
o
vz 11 11.5 0.255 0.266 0.591 0.618 3.189 4.123 241 325 482 409 3.960 5.206333 .257.7
470 .283.8
29.2 29.8 19.5 20.8 349 283 72.4 69.1ti
12 9.278 0.645 5.712 470 321 7.085710. '319.1 29.3 19.4 213 66.2
II 12.5 0.290 0.672 7.673 658 259 9.3941067 '358.5 29.0 18,3
160 61.7 0:1 N 7 0.162 0.376 1.01550.5 593
8 0.185 0.430 1.41977.9 574
1.721 102213.8 32.8 17.5 438 76.4
to 8.5 0.197 0.457 1.62894.9 565
2.012127 230M 32.2 19.1 422 74.7
9 0.208 0.484 1.865 115 554 2.309 156246.1 31.9 19.2 408 73.7
78A 4
o 9.5 0,220 0.510 2.106 137 546 2.613 189262.2 31.2 19.4 396 72.5
TD. Ts fa,g 2 -Es P" 10 10.5 0.232 0.243 0.537 0.564 2.3832.728 163 196 536 516 2.967 3.391 228 278.3 276 295.4 31.2 31.4 19.619.7 383 366 71.5 71.0 A A 11 0.255 0.591 3.189 241 482 3.979 345316.0 31.3 19.9 337 69.9
.o.. 11.5 0.266 0.618 4.123 325 409 5.080 475346.1 32.3 18.8 280 68.4
.O u2 12 0.278 0.645 5.712 470 321 6.927 723392.0 30.5 17.5 209 65.0
12.5 0.290 0.672 7.673 658_ 259 9.394 1110445.5 29.8 18.3 154 59.3
7 0.162 0.376 1.01550.5 593
8 0.185 0.430 1.41977.9 574
1.721 108 256.7 35.8 17.5 '414 72.1 et 8.5 0.197 0.457 1.62894.9 565
2.012 133275.2 35.9 19.1 403 71.4
CD CO 9 0.2080.44
1.865 115 554 2.309 161294.0 35.3 19.2 395 71.4
Tli III 9.5 0.220 0.510 2.106 137 546 2.613 193 312.5 34.6 19.4 -388 71.0 ci..., o .2 pr:: 4 10 10.5 0.232 0.243 0.537 0.564 2.383 2.728 163 196 536 516 2.967 3.391 231 331.0 283 353.3 34.9 34.5 19.7 19.6 378 357 70.6 69.3 11 0.255 0.591 3.189 241 482 3.979 357379.4 34.0 19.9 325 67.5
11.5 0.266 0.618 4.123 325 409 5.080 501418.8 34.6 18.8 265 64.9
12 9.278 0.645 5.712 470 321 6.927 753472.9 34.1 17.5 200 62.4
12.5 0.290 0.672 7.673 658 259 9.394 1136538.0 32.3 18.3 150 57.9
T able VIII
Resistance Tests
Self-Propulsion TeatsV Pn L
Fnr
R
P,
CI TP,
n
w t C2 nknots
(Metr.) tons (Metr.)HP
(Metr.)/
/
tons (Metr.)HP
(Metr.) , . ri 0//0 /0/ 0/0
7 0.155 0.376 1.02949.4 606
8 0.177 0.430 1.37575.4 593
1.621 95.2144.6 26.4 15.2 470 79.2
8.5 0.188 0.457 1.57191.6 585
1.884 119155.1 26.0 16.6 451 77.0
co 9 0.199 0.484 1.786 110 576 2.153 144165.3 25.9 17.0 442 76.4
= p.., a,73 2 1:1-1 0 9.5 10 10.5 11 0.210 0.221 0.232 0.243 0.510 0.537 0.564 0.591 2.032 2.294 2.617 2.982 132 157 188 225 567 556 538 516 2.432 2.750 3.166 3.659 173 206 251 308 175.9 186.0 197.6 211.0 25.3 25.1 25.2 24.4 16.4 16.6 17.3 18.5 433 424 403 377 76.3 76.2 74.9 73.1 11.5 0.254 0.618 3.388 267 497 4.273 379225.0 23.9 26.7 350 70.4
12 0.265 0.645 4.175 344 439 5.188 488241.1 24.5 19.5 309 70.5
12.5 0.276 0.672 5.618 482 354 6.891 704266.1 25.4 18.5 242 68.5
13 0.287 6.699 7.497 669 287 , 7 0.155 0.376 1.02949.4 606
ch 8 0.177 0.430 1.37575.4 593
1.594 95.9187.1 29.5 13.7 466 78.6
8.5 0.188 0.457 1.57191.6 585
1.852 119200.8 29.2 15.2 451 77.0
co r- 9 0.199 0.484 1.786 110 576 2.120 146214.8 28.4 15.8 436 75.3
a° CD co 9.5 0.210 0.510 2.032 132 567 2.405 177228.5 28.0 15.5 423 74.6
II 1 .i 44
n..-. o ,g 10 10.5 0.221 0.232 0.537 0.564 2.294 2.617 157 188 556 538 2.717 3.101 211 250 242.2 255.9 27.9 27.9 15.6 15.6 414 404 74.4 75.24 0
11 0.243 0.591 2.982 225 516 3.544 303272.0 27.4 15.9 383 74.3
o
to 11.5 12 0.254 0.265 0.618 0.645 3.388 4.175 267 344 497 439 4.103 5.127 372 501 290.6 315.9 26.5 26.9 17.4 18.6 357 301 71.8 68.7 r-: 12.5 0.276 0.672 5.618 482 354 6.815 723350.3 27.3 17.6 236 66.7
II al 13 0.287 0.699 7.497 669 287 )---4. 7 0.155 0.376 1.02949.4 606
8 0.177 0.430 1.37575.4 593
1.654 103231.7 30.7 16.9 434 73.2
8.5 0.188 0.457 1.57191.6 585
1.901 125247.8 30.3 17.4 429 73.3'
=
cc,
co,.., 9 0.199 0.484 1.786 110 579 2.158 150264.0 29.5 17.2 42473.3
= c., 9.5 0.210 0.510 2.032 132 567 556 2.421 2.717 179 214 280.1 296.6 28.9 28.7 16.1 15.6 418 73.7 408 73.4 Iii c4,_. 2 .,4, 10 10.5 0.221 0.232 0.537 0.564 2.294 2.617 157 188 538 3.079 256313.8 29.2 15.0 395 73.4
X 4-4 5 11 0.243 0.591 2.982 225 516 3.539 312 334.5 28.5 15.7 3-72 72.1 Oc 11.5 0.254 0.618 3.388 267 497 4.158 388357.3 28.3 18.5 342 68.8
.4..." m 12 0.265 0.645 4.175 344 439 5.073 511386.8 28.3 17.7 295 67.3
12.5 0.276 0.672 5.618 482 354 6.738 748432.1 28.2 16.6 228 64.4
13 0.287 0.699 7.497 669 287 7 0.155 0.376 1.02949.4 606
8 0.177 0.430 1.37575.4 593
1.654 104274.5 35.3 16.9 430 72.5
8.5 0.188 0.457 1.57191.6 585
1.901 128294.5 34.7 17.4 419 71.6
co 9 0.199 0.484 1.786 110 579 2.158 155314.5 33.7 17.2 411 71.0
ai CC) 9.5 0.210 0.510 2.032 132 567 2.421 187334.5 32.8 16.1 400 70.6
i PI
0,-0 0,-0
1010.5 0.221 0.232 0.537 0.564 2.294 2.617 157 188 556 538 2.717 3.079 222 267 354.5 375.6 32.3 32.515.6 393 70.7
15.0 379 70.4
1.1 RI ts4 0 11 0.243 0.591 2.982 225 516 3.539 326399.4 32.8 15.7 356 69.0
X 11.5 0.254 0.618 3.388 267 497 4.158 405427.9 32.5 18.5 328 65.9
12 0.265 0.645 4.175 344 436 5.073 543467.2 31.8 17.7 278 63.4
12.5 0.276 0.672 5.618 482 354 6.738 798. 525.1 30.4 16.6. 214 60.4
13 0.287 0.699 7.497 669 287Table IX
43
'
Resistance Tests
Self-Propulsion TestsV
FnL
Fnp
R Pe C,T
Pe 1n
i o t C2 nknots
(Metr.)
-
-
(Met r )tonsHP
(Metr )/
/
tons
HP
, i(Metr.) (Metr.) rim ri*
w lc' 0, /0
/
/
0/ . 8 0.217 0.482 1.34273.6 383
1.698 92.6106.4 36.4 21.0 304 79.5
8.8 0.230 0.513 1.53189.3 378
1.945 110113.5 35.7 21.3 307 81.2
9 6.244 0.543 1.773 109 368 2.237 132120.9 35.5 20.7 304 82.6
co 9.5 0.257 0.573 2.114 138 342 2.657 165129.6 35.4 20.4 286 83.6
15 G = 0.10 1010.5 0.2110.284 0.6030.633 2.590 3.403 178 245 309 260 3.315 4.365 218 309 140.9 155.1 34:8 35.4 21.9 22.0 252 206 '81.7 79.3 i.. In 11 0.298 6.663 4.313 325 225 5.506 429 171.2 33.6 21.7 171 75.8 tsI 0 11.5 0.311 0.694 5.223 412 203 6.666 559185.7 32.7 21.6 150 73.7
X 12 0.325 0.724 5.975 492 193 7.716 691198.6 31.9 22.6 138 71.2
12.5 0.338 0.754 6.698 574 187 8.656 828210.5 30.8 22.6 130 69.3
13. 0.352 0.784 7.526 671 180 13.5 0.365 0.814 8.619 798 170 ,..2 8 8.5 0.217 0.230 0.482 0.513 1.342 1.531 73.6 89.3 383 378 1.698 1.948 86.0 197 134.8 145.1 40.9 40.0 21.0 21.3 328 316 85.6 83.5 ao © -$4in-..-.
9 9.5 0.244 0.257 0.543 0.573 1.773 2.114 109 138 368 342 2.237 2.657 132 166 155.7 166.7 39.0 39.6 20.7 20.4 304 284 82.6 83.1 0 CO 10 0.271 0.603 2.590 178 309 3.242 219182.8 37:5 20.1 251 81.3
o 10.5 0.284 0.633 3.403 248 260 4.200 306202.5 36.1 19.0 208 80.1
2 -ci 11 0,298 0.663 4.313 325 225 5.387 427222.8 36.5 19.9 171 76.1
11.5 0.911 0.694 5.223 412 203 6.538 567 242.8 35.4 20.1 148 72.7 X 12 0.325 0.724 5.975 492 199 7.542 696259.5 34.2 20.8 137 70.7
CA .1.1 12.5 13 0.338 0.352 0.754 0.784 6.698 7.526 574 671 187 180 8.528 835275.3 33.4 21.5 129 68.7
II 13.5 0.365 0.814 8.619 798 170 Pq 8 0.217 0.482 1.34273.6 383
1.644 84.8161.2 45.3 18.4 332 86.8
;:-.--8.5 0.230 0.513 1.53189.3 378
. 1.890 103173.5 43.5 19.0 328 86.7
9 0.244 0.543 1.773 109 368 2.191 129 186.3 42.4 19.1 311 84.5r.
CO on t+ " o CO 9.5 10 0.257 0.271 0.573 0.603 2.114 2.590 138'1/8
309342 2.611 ,9.214 162 217 200.2 218.3 43.3 43.2 19.0 19.4 291 254 85.2 82.0 in T, Po 10.5 0.284 6.633 3.403 245 260 4.145 298240.2 43.4 17.9 214 82.2
o0 0
11 0.298 0.663 4.313 325 225 5.351 434 270.8 40.1 19.4 189 74.9 11.5 0.311 0.694 5.223 412 203 6.611 593300.2 37.0 21.0 141 69.5
...e 12 0.325 0.724 5.975 492 193 7.643 73632L4 36.3 21.8 129 66.8
u2 12.5 0.338 0.754 6.698 574 187 8.437 857337.9 35.7 20.6 125 67.0
13 0.352 0.784 7.526 671 180 13.5 6.365 0.814 8.619 798 170 8 0.217 0.482 1.34273.6 383
1.644 84.4191.2 48.4 18.4 334 87.2
8.5 0.230 0.513 1.53189.3 378
1.890 106206.7 47.1 19.0 319 84.2
9 0.244 0.543 1.773 109 368 2.191 133 222.1 46.5 19.1 302 82.0 co,t G
109.5 0.257 0.271 0.573 0.603 2.114 2.590 138 178 342 309 2.611 3.214 163 218 237.6 258.6 47.3 47.8 19.0 19.4 289 252 84.7 81.7 ta.- 10.5 0.284 0.633 3.403 248 260 4.145 318 291.1 46.0 17.9 200 77.0 o ,c4 11 0.298 0.663 4.313 325 225 5.305 456 326.9 43.3 18.7 161 71.34 5
X 11.5 0.311 0.694 5.223 412 203 6465 614 359.2 41.6 19.2 136 67.1 12 0.325 0.724 5.975 492 193 7.460 758385.6 40.0 19.9 125 64.9
12.5 0.338 0.754 6.698 574 187 8.364 895407.5 39.2 19.9 120 64.1
13 0.352 0.784 7.526 671 180 13.5 0.365 0.814 8.619 798 170Table X
Resistance Tests
Self-Propulsion TestsV Fn L Fn v R Pe C1 T .P8