• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

dividing l, and b K the λ-adic completion of K. For α, β in K

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "dividing l, and b K the λ-adic completion of K. For α, β in K"

Copied!
42
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

LXXIII.2 (1995)

Norm residue symbol and cyclotomic units

by

Charles Helou (Media, Penn.)

Introduction. Let l be a prime number ≥ 5, ζ a primitive lth root of unity in C, K = Q(ζ), O

K

= Z[ζ] the ring of integers of K, λ = 1 − ζ, prime element of O

K

dividing l, and b K the λ-adic completion of K. For α, β in K

= K − {0}, denote by (α, β)

λ

the norm residue symbol (i.e. Hilbert symbol) as defined in [5] where it is written

α,β(λ)



, or in [2] where the symbol is the inverse of the one in [5] used here. Let [α, β] denote the element of the finite field F

l

= Z/lZ defined by

(α, β)

λ

= ζ

[α,β]

.

The symbol [α, β] is a bilinear skew-symmetric function of α, β, with respect to the multiplicative and additive structures of K

and F

l

respectively; and if [α, β] = 0, then α and β are said to be orthogonal.

The cyclotomic units, in O

K

, are u

n

= 1 − ζ

n

1 − ζ ,

for n ∈ Z not divisible by l (or 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1). They generate a subgroup C of the multiplicative group of all units of O

K

.

Let a ∈ Z and α

1

= a − ζ. Terjanian conjectured ([9]) that every prime number l ≥ 5 has the property (called LC) that the following two conditions are equivalent:

(i) α

1

is orthogonal to C, (ii) a ≡ 0, 1, or −1 (mod l

2

).

He showed that (ii) implies (i), and if (i) holds then a is divisible by l

2

or a

l−1

≡ 1 (mod l

2

). But the latter condition, in conjunction with the congruence a ≡ 0, 1, or −1 (mod l), implies a ≡ 0, 1, or −1 (mod l

2

). Thus, Terjanian’s conjecture amounts to the assertion that if α

1

is orthogonal to C then a ≡ 0, 1, or −1 (mod l).

In this paper, we use the Artin–Hasse explicit reciprocity law to give an

[147]

(2)

expression for [α

1

, u

n

], when a 6≡ 1 (mod l), involving the Fermat quotient q(x) = x

l−1

− 1

l (for x ∈ Z, l - x) and the polynomial sums in F

l

S

nr

(a) = X

1≤k≤l−1 k≡r (mod n)

a

k

k (for n, r ∈ Z, l - n).

Some properties of these sums are established, in order to simplify the ex- pression for [α

1

, u

n

]. This yields necessary and sufficient conditions for α

1

to be orthogonal to C, in the form of equations over F

l

.

Furthermore, we assume l ≡ 1 (mod 4) and consider the quadratic sub- field E = Q(

l) of K. When n is not a quadratic residue modulo l, the norm of u

n

in K|E is an element of C which, by Dirichlet’s class number formula, is equal to ε

2h

, where ε is the fundamental unit and h the class number of E. Also, by a result on real quadratic fields, h <

l, so that l - h.

Thus, if α

1

is orthogonal to C then it is orthogonal to ε. Upon using again the Artin–Hasse law, an expression is obtained for [α

1

, ε] in terms of ε and the polynomial

F (X) = X

l−1 k=1

 k l



2

X

k

, where

kl



2

is the Legendre symbol. It follows that, assuming the validity of a conjecture by Ankeny, Artin and Chowla ([1]) concerning ε, if α

1

is orthogonal to C, then a is a root of F in F

l

. This polynomial F has in F

l

the trivial roots 0, 1, −1 (with 1 of multiplicity (l − 1)/2) and takes in K as values for X = ζ

m

(1 ≤ m ≤ l − 1) the quadratic Gauss sums; it can also be written in terms of the polynomial

A(X) = Y

1≤k≤(l−1)/2

(X − ζ

k2

),

whose coefficients lie in O

E

. The polynomials F and A were studied by Jacobi ([6]) and Dirichlet ([4]) respectively.

1. Application of the Artin–Hasse law. Let a ∈ Z, a 6≡ 1 (mod l), α

1

= a−ζ and c ∈ Z such that (a−1)c ≡ 1 (mod l). For any n ∈ Z with l - n, let σ

n

be the element of the Galois group of K|Q defined by σ

n

(ζ) = ζ

n

. Denote by log α the λ-adic logarithm of any unit α in b K; in particular, for α = 1 + x with x ≡ 0 (mod λ),

log(1 + x) = X

k=1

(−1)

k−1

k x

k

.

(3)

Denote by Tr the trace from b K to the field Q

l

of l-adic numbers (whose restriction to K coincides with the trace from K to Q). Further notations will be introduced as needed.

Proposition 1. For a 6≡ 1 (mod l) and for any 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1,

1

, u

n

] = n(a

l

− a)

l(a − 1) n + 1

2 q(a − 1) + cq(c) − n l Tr

 log(1 + cλ) σ

n

(λ)

 . P r o o f. We have α

1

= a − 1 + λ ≡ (a − 1)(1 + cλ) (mod λ

l

), so that ([9], (R10) or [5], p. 54)

1

, u

n

] = [a − 1, u

n

] + [1 + cλ, u

n

].

For the first bracket, since u

n

=

n−1

X

k=0

ζ

k

n−1

X

k=0

(1 − kλ) ≡ n − n(n − 1)

2 λ (mod λ

2

), we have ([9], (R22) or [5], p. 110)

[a − 1, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1).

For the second bracket, since u

n

= σ

n

(λ)/λ, we have

[1 + cλ, u

n

] = [1 + cλ, σ

n

(λ)] − [1 + cλ, cλ] + [1 + cλ, c].

Moreover ([9], (R19) or [5], p. 54),

[1 + cλ, σ

n

(λ)] = n[1 + cσ

−1n

(λ), λ], and ([9], (R18) or [5], p. 55)

[1 + cλ, cλ] = [1 + cλ, 1] + [1, cλ] = 0, and ([9], (R23) or [5], p. 110)

[1 + cλ, c] = cq(c).

Therefore

(1)

1

, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1) + n[1 + cσ

n−1

(λ), λ] + cq(c).

By the Artin–Hasse reciprocity law ([2], Ch. 12, Th. 10, whose third part is missing a factor 1/λ of ζ log α; cf. [5], p. 94),

(2) [1 + cσ

n−1

(λ), λ] = − 1 l Tr

 ζ

λ log(1 + cσ

n−1

(λ))

 .

Let b σ

n

be the Q

l

-automorphism of b K extending σ

n

. For any α ∈ b K,

Tr(b σ

n

(α)) = Tr(α), and if α ≡ 1 (mod λ), then, by continuity of b σ

n

in

the λ-adic topology, b σ

n

(log α) = log(b σ

n

(α)). Therefore, in the right-hand

(4)

side of (2), the argument of Tr may be replaced by

σζn

n(λ)

log(1 + cλ), which gives, since ζ

n

= 1 − σ

n

(λ),

(3) Tr

 ζ

λ log(1 + cσ

n−1

(λ))



= Tr

 log(1 + cλ) σ

n

(λ)



− Tr(log(1 + cλ)).

Similarly, letting N be the norm in b K|Q

l

, and using the λ-adic continuity of the b σ

n

’s and the multiplicative-additive homomorphism property of log, we have, for α ≡ 1 (mod λ),

(4) Tr(log(α)) = log(N (α)) ≡ N (α) − 1 (mod l

2

).

In particular, for α = 1 + cλ = 1 + c − cζ, the norm is (1 + c)

l

− c

l

, so that

(5) 1

l Tr(log(1 + cλ)) ≡ (c + 1)

l

− c

l

− 1

l (mod l).

Moreover, in F

l

, we have c = 1/(a − 1) and (a − 1)

l

= a − 1, so that (6) (c + 1)

l

− c

l

− 1

l = 1

a − 1

 a

l

− a

l − (a − 1)q(a − 1)



, in F

l

. The result now follows from (1), (2), (3), (5) and (6).

Corollary. We have

1

, u

n

] = n(a

l

− a)

l(a − 1) n + 1

2 q(a − 1) + cq(c) + n l

X

l k=1

(−c)

k

k Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)

 . P r o o f. Let D be the different of the extension b K|Q

l

([8], Ch. 3). For x in K, if x ∈ (l b

2

)D

−1

then Tr(x) lies in the ideal (l

2

). Since the ring of integers of b K is Z

l

[ζ] and the irreducible polynomial of ζ over Q

l

is Φ(X) =

XX−1l−1

, we have

D = (Φ

0

(ζ)) = (lλ

−1

) = (λ

l−2

).

Thus x ≡ 0 (mod λ

l

) implies Tr(x) ≡ 0 (mod l

2

). Since log(1 + cλ)

σ

n

(λ) X

l k=1

(−1)

k−1

k c

k

λ

k

σ

n

(λ) (mod λ

l

), it follows that

Tr

 log(1 + cλ) σ

n

(λ)



X

l k=1

(−1)

k−1

k c

k

Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



(mod l

2

).

Hence the result follows by substitution into Proposition 1.

Notations. For k ∈ Z such that l - k, the element 1/k is well defined in

F

l

; by abuse of notation, it will also be used in congruences modulo l. By

contrast, the appearance of l in a denominator means that the factor of 1/l

is divisible by l and that we are considering the quotient. For an integer

(5)

1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1, we denote by n

0

the specific representative of (1/n) (mod l) contained in the same interval, i.e. 1 ≤ n

0

≤ l − 1 and nn

0

≡ 1 (mod l).

For a real number x, the greatest integer ≤ x is written [x]. For a positive integer n and any m ∈ Z, we denote by res

n

(m) the least residue ≥ 0 of m modulo n, i.e.

res

n

(m) = m − n[m/n].

Lemma 1. For any integers 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1 and 2 ≤ k ≤ l, Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



= l X

0≤s<kn0/l

 k − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

, while for k = 1,

Tr

 λ

σ

n

(λ)



= l − n

0

. P r o o f. For 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1 and 1 ≤ k ≤ l,

Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



= X

l−1 i=1

(1 − ζ

i

)

k

1 − ζ

in

.

The general term in the latter sum can be written in the form 1 − ζ

inn0

1 − ζ

in

(1 − ζ

i

)

k−1

= X

l−1

i=1

(1 − ζ

i

)

k−1

n

X

0−1 j=0

ζ

inj

. Moreover, for any m ∈ Z,

(7)

X

l−1 i=1

ζ

mi

=

 l − 1 if l | m,

−1 if l - m.

The case k = 1 now follows easily, and so we assume 2 ≤ k ≤ l. In view of what precedes, and after replacing (1 − ζ

i

)

k−1

by its binomial expansion, we get

(8) Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



=

n

X

0−1 j=0

k−1

X

t=0

 k − 1 t

 (−1)

t

X

l−1 i=1

ζ

(nj+t)i

.

The inner sum in (8) is equal to l − 1 or to −1 according as t ≡ −jn or t 6≡ −jn (mod l). Therefore the right-hand side of (8) splits into two sums obtained by replacing the inner sum respectively by −1 for all terms, and by l for those terms such that t ≡ −jn (mod l). The first sum is

(−1)

n

X

0−1 j=0

k−1

X

t=0

 k − 1 t



(−1)

t

= −

n

X

0−1 j=0

(1 − 1)

k−1

= 0,

(6)

and (8) is thus reduced to the second sum, i.e.

(9) Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



= l X

t∈T

 k − 1 t

 (−1)

t

,

where T is the set of integers t satisfying the two conditions: 0 ≤ t ≤ k − 1, and t ≡ −jn (mod l) for some 0 ≤ j ≤ n

0

− 1. The latter condition is equivalent to : tn

0

+ j = sl for some s ∈ N and 0 ≤ j ≤ n

0

− 1, i.e.

j = res

n0

(sl) and t = [sl/n

0

] for some s ∈ N. The former condition on t is then equivalent to 0 ≤ sl/n

0

< k. The result now follows by substitution for t in terms of s in (9).

Lemma 2. (a) For any integer 1 ≤ k ≤ l − 1, the binomial coefficient

kl

 is divisible by l and we have

1 k 1

l

 l k



(−1)

k−1

(mod l).

(b) For any algebraic integer α, we have the congruence (in any ring of algebraic integers containing α)

X

l−1 k=1

α

k

k (α − 1)

l

− α

l

+ 1

l (mod l).

(c) For any x, y ∈ Z not divisible by l, we have q(xy) ≡ q(x) + q(y) (mod l).

If x ≡ y (mod l), then

q(x) ≡ q(y) − 1

x · x − y

l (mod l).

If xy ≡ 1 (mod l), then

q(y) ≡ −q(x) − xy − 1

l (mod l).

(d) For any x ∈ Z not divisible by l, we have X

l−1

k=1

 kx l

 1

k ≡ xq(x) (mod l).

(e) For any integer 0 ≤ r ≤ l − 1, we have

 l − 1 r



≡ (−1)

r

 1 − l

X

r j=1

1 j



(mod l

2

).

P r o o f. (a) The divisibility of the binomial coefficient by l is clear, and we have

1 l

 l k



= (l − 1)(l − 2) . . . (l − (k − 1))

k! 1

k! (−1)

k−1

(k − 1)! (mod l).

(7)

Hence the result.

(b) It follows from (a) and the binomial formula that X

l−1

k=1

α

k

k ≡ − 1

l X

l−1 k=1

 l k



(−α)

k

≡ − 1

l ((1 − α)

l

+ α

l

− 1) (mod l).

(c) First,

q(xy) = x

l−1

− 1

l y

l−1

+ y

l−1

− 1

l ≡ q(x) + q(y) (mod l).

Next, if x ≡ y (mod l), let x = y + hl, with h in Z, then, by the binomial formula,

q(x) = (y + hl)

l−1

− 1

l y

l−1

+ (l − 1)hly

l−2

− 1

l ≡ q(y) − hy

l−2

(mod l).

The conclusion follows, since y

l−2

≡ (1/y) (mod l).

Now if xy ≡ 1 (mod l), then, by what precedes, q(x) + q(y) ≡ q(xy) ≡ q(1) − 1

xy · xy − 1

l (mod l), and the result follows.

(d) For every 1 ≤ k ≤ l − 1, we have

kx ≡ res

l

(kx) (mod l) and kx − res

l

(kx)

l =

 kx l

 , so that, by (c) above,

q(k) + q(x) ≡ q(kx) ≡ q(res

l

(kx)) − 1 kx

 kx l



(mod l).

Hence, by summation, X

l−1

k=1

q(k) + (l − 1)q(x) ≡ X

l−1 k=1

q(res

l

(kx)) − 1 x

X

l−1 k=1

 kx l

 1

k (mod l).

Since the map k 7→ res

l

(kx) induces a permutation of the set {1, . . . , l − 1}, then P

l−1

k=1

q(res

l

(kx)) = P

l−1

k=1

q(k), and the result follows.

(e) The property holds trivially for r = 0, so we assume 1 ≤ r ≤ l − 1.

In Z[X], we have the congruence

(X − 1)(X − 2) . . . (X − r) ≡ (−1)

r

r! + (−1)

r−1

 X

r j=1

r!

j



X (mod X

2

).

Hence we get the congruence in Z (l − 1)(l − 2) . . . (l − r) ≡ (−1)

r

r!

 1 −

 X

r

j=1

1 j

 l



(mod l

2

).

The result follows upon division of both sides by r!.

(8)

Proposition 2. For a 6≡ 1 (mod l) and for any 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1,

1

, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1) − q(n

0

) a − 1 + n

X

l−1 k=2

(−1)

k

k(a − 1)

k

X

1≤s<kn0/l

 k − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

.

P r o o f. Substituting the expressions for Tr(λ

k

n

(λ)), obtained in Lemma 1, into the sum that occurs in the expression for [α

1

, u

n

], established in the Corollary to Proposition 1, and separating the terms corresponding to k = 1 and to k = l from the others, we get, in F

l

,

(10) n l

X

l k=1

(−c)

k

k Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



= − nc + n X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k

X

0≤s<kn0/l

 k − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

+ n l



cn

0

− c

l

n

X

0−1 s=0

 l − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

 . By Lemma 2(e),

n

X

0−1 s=0

 l − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

n

X

0−1 s=0

 1 − l

[sl/n

X

0] j=1

1 j

 (11)

≡ n

0

− l

n

X

0−1 s=1

X

1≤j≤sl/n0

1

j (mod l

2

).

In the last double sum, every term 1/j (for 1 ≤ j ≤ l − 1) occurs as many times as there are integers jn

0

/l ≤ s ≤ n

0

− 1, i.e. n

0

− 1 − [jn

0

/l] times.

Hence

n

X

0−1 s=1

X

1≤j≤sl/n0

1 j =

X

l−1 j=1



n

0

− 1 −

 jn

0

l

 1 (12) j

= (n

0

− 1) X

l−1 j=1

1 j

X

l−1 j=1

 jn

0

l

 1 j .

Applying Lemma 2(b) and (d) to evaluate the last two sums in (12) modulo l,

then substituting the result into (11), we get

(9)

(13)

n

X

0−1 s=0

 l − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

≡ n

0

(1 + lq(n

0

)) (mod l

2

).

Substituting (13) into (10), we obtain, in F

l

, (14) n

l X

l k=1

(−c)

k

k Tr

 λ

k

σ

n

(λ)



= − cn − cq(c) − cq(n

0

) + n

X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k

X

0≤s<kn0/l

 k − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

. In the last double sum, we isolate the terms corresponding to s = 0 and we use Lemma 2(b) to evaluate the resulting sum, which is (in F

l

)

X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k = c − (c + 1)

l

− c

l

− 1

l = c − 1

a − 1

 a

l

− a

l − (a − 1)q(a − 1)

 . Rewriting (14) accordingly and then substituting it into the expression of

1

, u

n

] in the Corollary to Proposition 1 yields the desired result.

2. A formula for [α

1

, u

n

]

Lemma 3. For any integers 1 ≤ n, n

0

≤ l − 1 such that nn

0

≡ 1 (mod l) and 2 ≤ k ≤ l − 1, if d = (nn

0

− 1)/l, then

X

1≤s<kn0/l

 k − 1 [sl/n

0

]



(−1)

[sl/n0]

= X

d r=1

X

1≤j≤k−1 j≡[(rn−1)/d] (mod n)

 k − 1 j

 (−1)

j

.

P r o o f. If n = n

0

= 1 then d = 0 and the equality holds trivially. We may thus assume n, n

0

> 1, so that d ≥ 1. Let s = hd + r, with h, r ∈ N and 0 ≤ r ≤ d − 1 (euclidean division of s by d). We first prove that, for 1 ≤ s < kn

0

/l,

(15)

 sl n

0



= hn +

 rn − 1 d

 .

If r = 0 then one can easily see that both sides in (15) are equal to hn − 1, and (15) holds. Assume then 1 ≤ r ≤ d − 1. Since

sl

n

0

= (hd + r)ln

dl + 1 < hn + rn d , and rn/d is not an integer (d being prime to n), we have

 sl n

0



≤ hn +

 rn − 1 d



.

(10)

The inverse inequality is obtained as follows: since s < kn

0

/l, we have (hd + r)n < ld; hence

hn +

 rn d



< l ≤

 rn − d

 rn d



l, so that

hn +

 rn d



(hd + r)ln dl + 1 = sl

n

0

,

which implies the desired inequality and ends the proof of (15).

Now set j = [sl/n

0

], and note that 1 ≤ s < kn

0

/l if and only if 1 ≤ j ≤ k − 1. Moreover, since n

0

< l and d < n, the maps s 7→ [sl/n

0

] and r 7→ [(rn − 1)/d] are strictly increasing and therefore injective. Furthermore, any integer 1 ≤ j ≤ k − 1 satisfying j ≡ [(rn − 1)/d] (mod n), for some 0 ≤ r ≤ d − 1, is of the type j = [sl/n

0

] for a convenient 1 ≤ s < kn

0

/l (namely, if j = hn + [(rn − 1)/d], then s = hd + r). Therefore, in view of (15), the integers j = [sl/n

0

], for 1 ≤ s < kn

0

/l, are partitioned into the congruence classes j ≡ [(rn−1)/d] (mod n) (1 ≤ j ≤ k −1), for 0 ≤ r ≤ d−1 or, what is the same, for 1 ≤ r ≤ d. Hence the identity of the statement.

Lemma 4. Let m, n be positive integers, r ∈ Z and ζ

n

a primitive n-th root of unity in C. Then

X

0≤j≤m j≡r (mod n)

 m j



(−1)

j

= 1 n

n−1

X

k=1

ζ

n−kr

(1 − ζ

nk

)

m

.

P r o o f. For any k ∈ Z, writing the binomial expansion of (1−ζ

nk

)

m

, then partitioning the resulting sum according to the congruence classes modulo n of the exponent, we get

(1 − ζ

nk

)

m

=

n−1

X

t=0

 X

0≤j≤m j≡t (mod n)

 m j

 (−1)

j

 ζ

nkt

.

Multiplying this identity by ζ

n−kr

, for k = 0, 1, . . . , n − 1 respectively, then adding the resulting equalities, we get

(16)

n−1

X

k=0

ζ

n−kr

(1 − ζ

nk

)

m

=

n−1

X

t=0

 X

0≤j≤m j≡t (mod n)

 m j

 (−1)

j



n−1

X

k=0

ζ

nk(t−r)

.

Since P

n−1

k=0

ζ

nk(t−r)

is equal to n if t ≡ r (mod n) and equal to 0 if t 6≡ r (mod n), the right-hand side of (16) is equal to n P

0≤j≤m j≡r (mod n)

m j

 (−1)

j

.

Hence the result.

(11)

Proposition 3. For a 6≡ 1 (mod l) and 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1, letting d = (nn

0

− 1)/l (with 1 ≤ n

0

≤ l − 1 such that nn

0

≡ 1 (mod l)), we have

1

, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1) + q(n) a − 1 1

a − 1

n−1

X

t=1

f

n,a

nt

),

where f

n,a

(X) = g

n

(X)h

a

(X) is the product of the following two polynomials in Z[X]

g

n

(X) = X

d r=1

X

n−[(rn−1)/d]

, h

a

(X) = (X − a)

l

− (X − 1)

l

+ (a − 1)

l

l(X − 1) .

Also, ζ

n

is a primitive n-th root of unity in C, and P

n−1

t=1

f

n,a

nt

) is an element of Z independent of the choice of ζ

n

.

P r o o f. It follows from Proposition 2 and Lemmas 3 and 4 that

1

, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1) − cq(n

0

) (17)

+

n−1

X

t=1

X

d r=1

ζ

−t[(rn−1)/d]

n

X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k (1 − ζ

nt

)

k−1

. By Lemma 2(b), for 1 ≤ t ≤ n − 1, we have in Z[ζ

n

] the congruence (18) (1 − ζ

nt

)

X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k (1 − ζ

nt

)

k−1

(c(ζ

nt

− 1) − 1)

l

− c

l

nt

− 1)

l

+ 1

l − c(ζ

nt

− 1) (mod l).

Since (a − 1)c ≡ 1 (mod l) and c(ζ

nt

− 1) − 1 ≡ c(ζ

nt

− a) (mod l), so that (a − 1)

l

c

l

≡ 1 (mod l

2

) and (c(ζ

nt

− 1) − 1)

l

≡ c

l

nt

− a)

l

(mod l

2

), the fractional term in the right-hand side of (18) is

≡ c

l

nt

− a)

l

− (ζ

nt

− 1)

l

+ (a − 1)

l

l ≡ c(ζ

nt

− 1)h

a

nt

) (mod l).

Also, the right-hand side of (18) is an integral multiple of 1 − ζ

nt

, which is relatively prime to l. Therefore, we can divide (18) through by 1 − ζ

nt

to get (19)

X

l−1 k=2

(−c)

k

k (1 − ζ

nt

)

k−1

≡ −ch

a

nt

) + c (mod l).

Substituting (19) into (17), and taking into account that, by Lemma 2(c),

q(n

0

) ≡ −q(n) − d (mod l), we obtain

(12)

1

, u

n

] = n − 1

2 q(a − 1) + cq(n) + cd (20)

− c

n−1

X

t=1

 X

d

r=1

ζ

−t[(rn−1)/d]

n

 h

a

nt

)

+ c X

d r=1

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

−t[(rn−1)/d]

n

.

In the last double sum, P

n−1

t=1

ζ

−t[(rn−1)/d]

n

= −1, for 1 ≤ r ≤ d, since [(rn − 1)/d] is not divisible by n. Moreover, P

d

r=1

ζ

−t[(rn−1)/d]

n

= g

n

nt

), for any t. Hence the result by substitution into (20).

Note that the polynomial (X−a)

l

−(X−1)

l

+(a−1)

l

has all its coefficients divisible by l (by the binomial expansion), and admits 1 as a root, so that h

a

∈ Z[X]. Moreover, any element of the Galois group of Q(ζ

n

)|Q permutes the nth roots of unity ζ

nt

in the sum θ = P

n−1

t=1

f

n,a

nt

), and therefore it leaves θ invariant. Thus θ lies in Q, and since it is an integral element, it lies in Z.

Lemma 5. Let n be a positive integer.

(a) If ζ

n

is a primitive n-th root of unity in C, and m ∈ Z, then

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

nmt

ζ

nt

− 1 = n − 1

2 − res

n

(m − 1).

(b) If d is a positive integer relatively prime to n, then

d−1

X

j=1

 jn d



= (d − 1)(n − 1)

2 .

P r o o f. Both statements are trivially true if n = 1, since the sums in- volved, as well as the right-hand sides, are then equal to 0. We thus assume n ≥ 2.

(a) Let r = res

n

(m − 1), so that m ≡ r + 1 (mod n) and 0 ≤ r ≤ n − 1.

Then (21)

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

nmt

ζ

nt

− 1 =

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

n(r+1)t

− 1 ζ

nt

− 1 +

n−1

X

t=1

1 ζ

nt

− 1 . For the first sum in the right-hand side of (21), we have

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

n(r+1)t

− 1 ζ

nt

− 1 =

X

r j=0

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

njt

= n − 1 − r.

(13)

For the second sum, consider the polynomial f (X) =

n−1

Y

t=1

(X − ζ

nt

) = X

n

− 1 X − 1 =

n−1

X

j=0

X

j

. Then

f

0

(X) f (X) =

n−1

X

t=1

1 X − ζ

nt

, and thus

n−1

X

t=1

1

1 − ζ

nt

= f

0

(1) f (1) =

P

n−1

j=1

j

n = n − 1 2 . Hence the result, by substitution into (21).

(b) Note that, for a real number x 6∈ Z, we have [n − x] = n − [x] − 1.

Since d is prime to n, it follows that, for 1 ≤ j ≤ d − 1, jn/d 6∈ Z. Hence, for 1 ≤ j ≤ d − 1, we have

 (d − j)n d

 +

 jn d



= n − 1.

Therefore 2

d−1

X

j=1

 jn d



=

d−1

X

j=1

 jn d

 +

 (d − j)n d



= (d − 1)(n − 1).

Hence the result.

Lemma 6. In the notations and under the conditions of Proposition 3, we have

(a) For any integer 1 ≤ e ≤ n − 1,

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

net

h

a

nt

) ≡ (e − 1)

 a

l

− a

l − (a − 1)q(a − 1)



+

n−1

X

r=1

r X

1≤k≤l−1 k≡l+e−r−1 (mod n)

a

k

− 1

k (mod l).

(b) Also,

n−1

X

t=1

f

n,a

nt

) ≡ (d − 1)(n − 1) 2

 a

l

− a

l − (a − 1)q(a − 1)



+

d−1

X

j=0 n−1

X

r=1

r X

1≤k≤l−1 k≡l+[−jn/d]−r (mod n)

a

k

− 1

k (mod l).

(14)

P r o o f. (a) For any 1 ≤ t ≤ n − 1, using the binomial expansions of

nt

− a)

l

and (ζ

nt

− 1)

l

in the defining expression of h

a

, we have

nt

− 1)h

a

nt

) = (a − 1)

l

− a

l

+ 1

l

X

l−1 k=1

1 l

 l k



(−1)

k−1

(a

k

− 1)ζ

nt(l−k)

. Using Lemma 2(a), we convert this into a congruence modulo l in Z[ζ

n

];

then dividing by ζ

nt

− 1, which is relatively prime to l, we get, in the ring obtained by localization of Z[ζ

n

] at a prime ideal above l,

h

a

nt

) ≡ (a − 1)

l

− a

l

+ 1

l · 1

ζ

nt

− 1 X

l−1 k=1

a

k

− 1

k · ζ

nt(l−k)

ζ

nt

− 1 (mod l).

Hence, using Lemma 5(a), we deduce

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

net

h

a

nt

) ≡ (a − 1)

l

− a

l

+ 1 l

 n − 1

2 − (e − 1)



X

l−1 k=1

a

k

− 1 k

 n − 1

2 − res

n

(l − k + e − 1)



(mod l).

In view of Lemma 2(b), X

l−1 k=1

a

k

− 1

k (a − 1)

l

− a

l

+ 1

l (mod l),

so that (22)

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

net

h

a

nt

)

≡ (e − 1) a

l

− (a − 1)

l

− 1

l +

X

l−1 k=1

res

n

(l + e − k − 1) a

k

− 1

k (mod l).

The sum in the right-hand side of (22) can be rewritten in terms of r = res

n

(l + e − k − 1) which takes the values 0 ≤ r ≤ n − 1, each of which corresponds to those 1 ≤ k ≤ l − 1 such that k ≡ l + e − r − 1 (mod n). The result then follows immediately from (22).

(b) For every 1 ≤ j ≤ d, let e(j) = n − [(jn − 1)/d]. From the definitions, we have

n−1

X

t=1

f

n,a

nt

) = X

d j=1

n−1

X

t=1

ζ

nte(j)

h

a

nt

).

(15)

Thus, in view of (a) above,

n−1

X

t=1

f

n,a

nt

) ≡

 a

l

− a

l − (a − 1)q(a − 1)

 X

d

j=1

e(j) − d

 (23)

+ X

d j=1

n−1

X

r=1

r X

1≤k≤l−1 k≡l+e(j)−r−1 (mod n)

a

k

− 1

k (mod l).

Moreover, for 1 ≤ j ≤ d − 1, e(j) = n − [jn/d], while for j = d, e(d) = 1, so that, in view of Lemma 5(b), P

d

j=1

e(j) = (d − 1)(n − 1)/2 + d. Also, for 1 ≤ j ≤ d, −[(jn − 1)/d] − 1 = [−jn/d], so that in the triple sum in (23), the inner summation is for k ≡ l + [−jn/d] − r (mod n); furthermore, the latter congruence class (mod n) is the same for j = d as for j = 0, so that the summation may take place for 0 ≤ j ≤ d − 1. Hence the result.

Definition. For a, n, r ∈ Z, with n > 0, we introduce the polynomial sums in F

l

S

nr

(a) = X

1≤k≤l−1 k≡r (mod n)

a

k

k .

Proposition 4. For a 6≡ 1 (mod l) and 1 ≤ n ≤ l − 1, let d = (nn

0

− 1)/l (with 1 ≤ n

0

≤ l − 1 such that nn

0

≡ 1 (mod l)). Then

1

, u

n

] = d(n − 1)

2 q(a − 1) − (d − 1)(n − 1)

2(a − 1) · a

l

− a

l + q(n) a − 1

1

a − 1

d−1

X

j=0 n−1

X

r=1

r(S

l+[−jn/d]−r

n

(a) − S

l+[−jn/d]−r

n

(1)).

P r o o f. The result is derived from Proposition 3, by substituting for P

n−1

t=1

f

n,a

nt

) its expression from Lemma 6(b), and writing the latter in terms of the above defined sums S

nt

(a) and S

nt

(1) in F

l

.

3. The sums S

nr

(a) and the expression for [α

1

, u

n

]

Lemma 7. The sums S

nr

(a) have the following properties, for any a, n, r ∈ Z, with n > 0:

(a) If a 6≡ 0 (mod l), then

S

nl−r

(a) = −aS

nr

(a

0

),

where a

0

is an inverse of a modulo l in Z.

(16)

(b) For any a ∈ Z,

n−1

X

r=0

S

nr

(a) = (a − 1)

l

− a

l

+ 1 l

(the summation could be, instead, over any residue system modulo n in Z).

(c) For any integer e ≥ 1, S

nr

(a) =

e−1

X

h=0

S

enhn+r

(a).

(d) If l - n, then

a

r

S

n−rl

(a) = X

rl/n<j<(r+1)l/n

a

nj

nj , provided a 6≡ 0 (mod l) if r ≤ 0.

(e) If l - n and a

n

≡ 1 (mod l), then

n−1

X

r=1

ra

r

S

n−lr

(a) = q(n).

(f) If l - n and m ∈ Z, then

n−1

X

r=1

rS

nm−r

(a) = X

l−1 k=1

res

n

(m − k) a

k

k ,

n−1

X

r=1

rS

nr

(a) = X

l−1 k=1

res

n

(k) a

k

k . (g) For any a ∈ Z,

S

20

(a) = 1

2 · (a − 1)

l

− (a + 1)

l

+ 2

l , S

21

(a) = 1

2 · (a − 1)

l

− 2a

l

+ (a + 1)

l

l .

(h) If l - n and a 6≡ 1 (mod l), then

n−1

X

r=1

rS

n−lr

(a) = X

l−1 j=1

q(j)(a

j

− a

resl(nj)

) = −n X

l−1 k=1

 n

0

k l

 a

k

k

= X

l−1 k=1

res

n

(dk) a

k

k ,

where 1 ≤ n

0

≤ l − 1 satisfies nn

0

≡ 1 (mod l) and d = (nn

0

− 1)/l.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

[r]

As was shown by Reshetnyak, the theorem on almost everywhere differ- entiability is a simple consequence of a difficult theorem of Serrin [5] which asserts the H¨ older continuity

In the last period (2002–2006), tungsten, lead, tin, copper, nickel and crude petroleum recorded the highest price instability.. TOT of mineral commodities in the world market.. We

Large deviations results for particular stationary sequences (Y n ) with regularly varying finite-dimensional distributions were proved in Mikosch and Samorodnitsky [19] in the case

Wypisać wszystkie elementy ciała Z 3 (α) oraz obliczyć sumy i iloczyny wybranych elementów tego ciała.. (16) Zbudować ciało 4-elementowe oraz ciało 9-elementowe jako

3, 2} is the set of all real num- bers ` such that the following holds: every tree having an eigenvalue which is larger than ` has a subtree whose largest eigenvalue is `..

The classes of irreducible representations form an orthonormal basis of R(G) with respect to this product... 3. A crucial role is played by

Using the Kronecker class number relation for quadratic forms, Hartung [3] proved that there exist infinitely many imaginary quadratic fields k whose class numbers are not divisible