• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

International economics World economy: concept and economic dimensions Globalization Gravity model of international trade

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "International economics World economy: concept and economic dimensions Globalization Gravity model of international trade"

Copied!
18
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

World Economy: introduction; Jan J. Michalek

International economics

World economy: concept and economic dimensions

Globalization

Gravity model of international trade

Introduction

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

International economics distinguishes between:

• International monetary analysis

• International real analysis

International Trade & the World Economy focuses on real analysis.

Chapter 1 The World Economy discusses some key economic concepts, focusing on ‘important’ countries.

(2)

Development of world per capita income over the last 2000 years

World GDP per capita (1990 international $), logarithmic scale

5,709

444 435 667

1820 100

1,000 10,000

0 500 1000 1500 2000

(3)

Land area and population

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

Table 1.2 Top 15 population (millions), 1999

country size % of world sum %

1 China 1,254 21.0 21

2 India 998 16.7 38

3 USA 278 4.7 42

4 Indonesia 207 3.5 46

5 Brazil 168 2.8 49

6 Russia 146 2.4 51

7 Pakistan 135 2.3 53

8 Bangladesh 128 2.1 55

9 Japan 127 2.1 58

10 Nigeria 124 2.1 60

Income

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

To measure the value of all goods and services we distinguish:

• GDP = Gross Domestic Product (located in a country)

• GNP = Gross National Product (residents of a country) GDP + net receipts of factor income = GNP

To correct for the large differences in prices between countries (especially for non-traded goods and services) the United Nations International Comparison Project calculates:

• Purchasing Power Parity exchange rates

(4)

Income

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

GDP

GNP

Germany

UK, France

Italy China

GNP and GDP

Gross domestic and gross national product, 2008 ($ billion).

The dotted line is a 45º line, the axes use a logarithmic scale, and the circles are proportional to the size of GNI.

GDP and GNI, 2008 (billion current $)

10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000

10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000

Gross Domestic Product, GDP

Gross National Income, GNI

USA

China Germany

Japan

(5)

Gross domestic product, 2008; top 15, ranked according to ppp

GDP, 2008; top fifteen countries, ranked according to PPP

992 1,302 1,344 1,443

1,549 1,872

1,978 2,122

2,178 2,260

2,905 3,359

4,358

7,909

14,093

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000

Turkey Canada S. Korea Spain Mexico Italy Brazil France UK Russia Germany India Japan China USA

GDP; PPP GDP; current $

GDP per capita in EU (2005)

(6)

Exports and imports of goods and services, 2008 ($ billion)

The dotted line is a 45º line, the axes use a logarithmic scale, and the circles are proportional to the size of exports.

Exports and imports of goods and services, 2008 ($ bn)

1 10 100 1,000 10,000

1 10 100 1,000 10,000

export value

import value

USA

Germany China

Russia Saudi Arabia

Ethiopia

Brunei

Zmiany w handlu światowym 1947-2008

(7)

Rank Expor ter s Value Shar e Annual per centage

change Rank Impor ter s Value Shar e

Annual per centage

change

1 China 2209 11,7 8 1 United States 2329 12,3 0

2 United States 1580 8,4 2 2 China 1950 10,3 7

3 Germany 1453 7,7 3 3 Germany 1189 6,3 2

4 Japan 715 3,8 -10 4 Japan 833 4,4 -6

5 Netherlands 672 3,6 3 5 France 681 3,6 1

6 France 580 3,1 2 6 United Kingdom 655 3,5 -5

7 Korea, Republic of 560 3,0 2 7 Hong Kong, China 622 3,3 12

8 United Kingdom 542 2,9 15 retained imports 141 0,7 4

9 Hong Kong, China 536 2,8 9 8 Netherlands 590 3,1 0

domestic ex ports 20 0,1 -11 9 Korea, Republic of 516 2,7 -1

re-ex ports 516 2,7 10

10 Russian Federation 523 2,8 -1 10 Italy 477 2,5 -2

11 Italy 518 2,8 3 11 Canada a 474 2,5 0

12 Belgium 469 2,5 5 12 India 466 2,5 -5

13 Canada 458 2,4 1 13 Belgium 451 2,4 3

14 Singapore 410 2,2 0 14 Mex ico 391 2,1 3

domestic ex ports 219 1,2 -4 15 Singapore 373 2,0 -2

re-ex ports 191 1,0 6 retained imports 182 1,0 -9

15 Mex ico 380 2,0 3

Leading marchandise exporters and importers in 2013

Rank Expor ter s Value Shar e Annual per centage

change Rank Impor ter s Value Shar e Annual per centage

change

16 United Arab Emirates b379 2,0 9 16 Russian Federation a343 1,8 2

17 Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of 376 2,0 -3 17 Spain 339 1,8 0

18 Spain 317 1,7 7 18 Chinese Taipei 270 1,4 0

19 India 313 1,7 6 19 Turkey 252 1,3 6

20 Chinese Taipei 305 1,6 1 20 United Arab Emirates b251 1,3 11

21 Australia 253 1,3 -1 21 Thailand 251 1,3 0

22 Brazil 242 1,3 0 22 Brazil 250 1,3 7

23 Switzerland 229 1,2 1 23 Australia 242 1,3 -7

24 Thailand 229 1,2 0 24 Malaysia 206 1,1 5

25 Malaysia 228 1,2 0 25 Poland 205 1,1 3

26 Poland 202 1,1 9 26 Switzerland 201 1,1 2

27 Indonesia 183 1,0 -3 27 Indonesia 187 1,0 -2

28 Austria 175 0,9 5 28 Austria 182 1,0 2

29 Sweden 168 0,9 -3 29 Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of 168 0,9 8

30 Czech Republic 162 0,9 3 30 Sweden 160 0,8 -3

(8)

Leading exporters and importers of other commercial services, 2013

2013 2005 2013 2005-13 2011 2012 2013

Ex porters

European Union (28) 1200,8 50,3 47,1 9 14 -1 7

Ex tra-EU (28) ex ports 568,6 ... 22,3 ... 14 1 7

United States 403,0 16,5 15,8 9 10 4 4

China 115,5 2,4 4,5 19 13 11 14

India 113,6 3,1 4,5 14 15 10 7

Japan 90,7 4,8 3,6 5 8 -6 3

Switzerland 70,5 2,8 2,8 9 14 -4 6

Hong Kong, China 63,4 2,7 2,5 8 9 4 5

Korea, Republic of 60,8 1,5 2,4 16 20 24 10

Singapore a 58,9 ... 2,3 ... 19 12 8

Canada 48,0 2,5 1,9 6 11 -3 -1

Russian Federation 32,2 0,8 1,3 16 24 10 13

Chinese Taipei 28,6 1,2 1,1 9 15 9 6

Brazil 25,3 0,6 1,0 16 24 8 -3

Israel 20,9 0,7 0,8 11 16 16 7

Norway 19,3 0,8 0,8 8 2 4 -5

Above 15 2350,0 93,2 92,2 - - - -

Importers

European Union (28) 908,1 50,2 43,5 7 11 -1 6

Ex tra-EU (28) imports 370,3 ... 17,8 ... 12 -1 5

United States 239,9 11,4 11,5 9 7 3 2

China 106,5 3,2 5,1 16 13 10 15

Japan 93,4 5,2 4,5 7 10 3 2

Singapore 67,0 ... 3,2 ... 15 8 4

Korea, Republic of 55,6 2,2 2,7 11 9 7 3

Russian Federation 52,1 1,5 2,5 17 19 15 16

India 49,2 1,9 2,4 12 5 7 -2

Canada 47,3 3,1 2,3 5 7 -2 -1

Brazil 43,0 1,2 2,1 17 18 10 4

Switzerland 32,9 1,1 1,6 15 28 5 16

Norway 22,1 0,9 1,1 12 28 2 1

Hong Kong, China 21,5 1,0 1,0 10 7 5 2

Thailand 19,9 0,8 1,0 11 17 -9 12

Australia 19,6 0,8 0,9 12 21 5 6

Above 15 1780,0 86,7 85,3 - - - -

Annual per centage change

Value Shar e

Intra- and Inter-regional merchandise trade flows (% of world total)

Merchandise trade export by region, 2008 (% of total)

0.3 0.9 1.0 0.8

6.5

13.9

29.9

3.5 3.8 4.5

6.5

13.0

27.7

41.0

0 10 20 30 40

AFR SCA CIS mEAST NAM ASIA EUR

total intra-region

(9)

Exports and Imports as Percentages of National Income in 1994

Trade openness in major countries

(10)

Relative exports of goods and services, 2008 (% of GDP)

Relative exports of goods and services, 2008 (% of GDP)

88 90 91 92 97

110 131

179

212 234

0 50 100 150 200 250

Malta Macao United Arab Emirates Belgium Bahrain Malaysia Seychelles Luxembourg Hong Kong Singapore

Taxes on international trade, 2008 (% of government revenue)

Taxes on international trade, 2008 (% of revenue)

25 26

27 32 32

35 35

44

52 57

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Russian Federation Niger Bangladesh St. Kitts and Nevis Maldives Madagascar Cote d'Ivoire Namibia Bahamas, The Lesotho

(11)

Dynamics and globalization

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

 0

capital account balance balance

account current

outflow capital

net account

current

surplus

-8 0 8

1970 1980 1990 2000

Australia Netherlands

Current account surplus (% of GDP)

indicator of accumulation of financial claims on the Rest Of the World (ROW).

Global imbalances; current account balance (US $ bn), 1970-2009

Current account balance; selected countries / regions (US $ bn), 1970-2009

-161

-803 436

-900 -750 -600 -450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

USA China

Japan

Arab world

EU

(12)

Dynamics and globalization

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

0 100 200 300 400 500

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

index (1960 = 100)

population GDP

World GDP increases faster than world population

Dynamics and globalization

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

world exports (% GDP)

World exports increase faster than world GDP

(13)

Figure 1.8 Two waves of globalization in trade

Merchandise exports, % of GDP in 1990 prices

4.6

17.2

2.5

10.1

0.2

13.4

0 5 10 15

1870 1900 1930 1960 1990

world USA Japan

Foreign capital stocks; assets / world GDP

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

Foreign capital stocks; assets / world GDP 0.6

0.4

0.2

0

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

Foreign capital stocks; assets / world GDP

(14)

Trade connections in the world economy

International Trade & the World Economy;  Charles van Marrewijk

Exports in direction closed arrow (Exports in direction open arrow) South

Asia

Latin America

Sub-Sahara Africa

Middle East &

North Africa

Austral Asia North

America

East Asia

& Pacific West

Europe

East Europe

& C. Asia 28

6

1

1 1

4

1 (2) 1 (2)

4 (5) 2 (3)

3 (3) 3 (4)

1 (1)

1

1 (1) 1 (1)

3 (4)

3 (3) (1)

Intra-regional exports

Size Matters: The Gravity Model (cont.)

(15)

The Gravity Model

Other things besides size matter for trade:

1. Distance between markets influences transportation costs and therefore the cost of imports and exports.

Distance may also influence personal contact and communication, which may influence trade.

2. Cultural affinity: if two countries have cultural ties, it is likely that they also have strong economic ties.

3. Geography: ocean harbors and a lack of mountain barriers make transportation and trade easier.

The Gravity Model (cont.)

• In its basic form, the gravity model assumes that only size and distance are important for trade in the following way:

Tij = A x Yi x Yj /Dij

• where

Tij is the value of trade between country i and country j A is a constant

Yi the GDP of country i Yj is the GDP of country j

Dij is the distance between country i and country j

(16)

The Gravity Model (cont.)

• In a slightly more general form, the gravity model that is commonly estimated is

Tij = A x Yia x Yjb /Dijc where a, b, and c are allowed to differ from 1.

• Perhaps surprisingly, the gravity model works fairly well in predicting actual trade flows, as the figure above representing US–EU trade flows suggested.

Distance and Borders (cont.)

(17)

Global Economic Crisis: real world trade flows (index), 1970-2011

Real world trade flows; constant 2000 US dollar, index (2000 = 100)

0 40 80 120 160

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

annual data

monthly data 2

1 3 4

Global Economic Crisis

2.8%

decline

0.3%

decline

7.4%

decline

20.0%

decline

Trade volumes and the Global Economic Crisis; selected areas, 2004-2011

a. Import volume advanced economies 5-month moving av. (ind indices; pre-2009 peak=100)

60 80 100 120

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2007-2

USA Euro area

2008-3 2008-10

Japan

b. Import volume emerging markets 5-month moving av. (ind indices; pre-2009 peak=100)

60 80 100 120

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asia

Africa + Middle East

Latin America

Central + East Europe

2008-3 2008-8

(18)

Trade volumes and the Global Economic Crisis; selected areas, 2004-2011

c. Export volume advanced economies 5-month moving av. (ind indices; pre-2009 peak=100)

60 80 100 120

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 USA Euro area

2008-3 2008-6 Japan

d. Export volume emerging markets 5-month moving av. (ind indices; pre-2009 peak=100)

60 80 100 120

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asia

Africa + Middle East

Latin America

Central + East Europe

2008-2 2008-9

Extent, duration, and speed of trade volume decline during GEC

b. Extent, duration, and speed of exort volume decline during GEC

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

USA Japan Euro area Asia C&E Europe

Latin America

Africa & M extent duration speed East

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Il y a plusieurs raisons à cela : premièrement le fait qu’ils vivent profon dément ce qu’ils disent, que cela n’est pas une construction artificielle abstraite de leur raison,

Przyczynia się to do zwiększenia, bądź zm niejszenia uwilgotnienia gleby w m iejscu prac drogowych i na obsza­ rach sąsiadujących oraz może wywołać okresowe

tym określano w wodzie aktywność ogólnej fosfatazy zasadowej metodą Jonesa [8], polegającą na wykrywaniu barwnego p-nitrofenolu powstałego z fosforanu

Wed³ug dostêpnych materia³ów iloœæ wozów paszowych przyczepianych z poziomym mieszad³em jednoœlimakowym jest niewielka, natomiast znacznie szerzej ten system mieszania jest

[r]

Although as indioated the counties and dis- tricts are responsible for different aspects of public provision, and the dividing lines are fairly olearly drawn In legislation,

Widziałbym w tym jednak przede wszystkim „chwytanie” szansy, jak pojawiła się ostatnio, na spokojne badania ogromnych zasobów archiwów rosyjskich, które były do tej

Z ˙ ulin´ska, z˙ ˛adaj ˛ac od wychowaw- cy, by obdarzał miłos´ci ˛ a kaz˙dego wychowanka, nie robi ˛ ac róz˙nic, wskazuje na cechy tej miłos´ci: „Miłos´c´ ku