• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

ARGUMENTATION & CRITICAL THINKING SYLLABUS FOR LECTURES FALL –

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ARGUMENTATION & CRITICAL THINKING SYLLABUS FOR LECTURES FALL –"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ARGUMENTATION & CRITICAL THINKING

SYLLABUS FOR LECTURES

FALL – WINTER 2019/2020

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS SYLLABUS IS A WORKING MATERIAL, FOR LECTURES ONLY. THIS IS NOT THE SYLLABUS FOR THE ENTIRE COURSE.

STUDIES PROGRAMME

Bachelor in Business and Administration Faculty of Law, Administration, and Economics University of Wrocław

LECTURER

Dr. Maciej Pichlak

Department of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

The course aims at providing students with practical skills in argumentation and critical thinking. It makes students familiar with general principles of rational argumentation and basic forms of arguments both in theoretical and practical discourse.

COURSE OBJECTIVES

1. To acquaint students with the general principles of correct reasoning and basic types of arguments.

2. To acquire skills in critical thinking, constructing and assesing arguments. 3. To develop students' analytical and communicational competences.

(2)

BASIC READING

Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale, Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking, 5th ed., Oxford University Press 2013. (Hereinafter as: GRM)

TOPICS AND LITERATURE

1. Recognizing arguments; distinguishing between argumentative and non-argumentative speech acts.

Reading: GRM 1.1; 1.2

2. The structure of argument; extracting premises and a conclusion Reading: GRM 4.1-4.3

3. Argument Diagramming Reading: GRM 5.1-5.6

4. Hidden elements in an argument (enthymematic arguments) Reading: GRM 6.1-6.3

ADDITIONAL READING

1. GRM: resting parts, particularly chapters 1-6

2. Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed., Walton D., Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2008

3. Practical Logic, Ziembiński Z., D. Reidel Publ.. Dordrecht, Boston, MA 1976

4. How to Win Every Argument. The Use and Abuse of Logic, Pirie M., Continuum. London, New York 2006

ECTS CREDITS

4 (for the whole course)

CONTACT

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

39 J.. A Theory of Argumentation: The Case of Ethical, Political, and Utopian Thinking Abstract: A relevant problem in political philosophy and political theory is the distinction

To calculate the required torque and motor power moment of resistance and the rotational speed of the mechanism are reduced to the moment and the rotational speed of the engine..

The professional experience of the court allows for a conclusion that a theft does not buy such a thing as a car radio, and even for a lower price, for he can steal

• In logic, we have an argument whenever we have reasons suggested as premises for a conclusion. Explanations can contain reasoning in this sense and can, therefore, be classified

[P1] Although the living room window is open, there are no footprints outside, despite the softness of the ground after yesterday's rain.. [P2] The clasp on the box was not broken

Conversational implicatures are the result of assumption that speaker observes principles of rational cooperation in conversation... Herbert Paul Grice: conversational

The world looks flat, the bottoms of clouds are flat, the movement of the sun; these are all examples of your senses telling you that we do not live on a spherical heliocentric

It makes students familiar with general principles of rational argumentation and basic forms of arguments both in theoretical and practical discourse!.