• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

CRITICAL THINKING & ARGUMENTATION SYLLABUS FOR THE COURSE FALL –

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CRITICAL THINKING & ARGUMENTATION SYLLABUS FOR THE COURSE FALL –"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

CRITICAL THINKING & ARGUMENTATION

SYLLABUS FOR THE COURSE

FALL – WINTER 2019/2020

STUDIES PROGRAMME

Criminal Justice

Faculty of Law, Administration, and Economics University of Wrocław

LECTURERS

Dr. Maciej Pichlak | Department of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law (lectures)

Mgr. Jakub Łakomy | Department of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law (seminar classes)

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

The course aims at providing students with practical skills in argumentation and critical thinking. It makes students familiar with general principles of rational argumentation and basic forms of arguments both in theoretical and practical discourse.

COURSE OBJECTIVES

1. To acquaint students with the general principles of correct reasoning and basic types of arguments.

2. To acquire skills in critical thinking, constructing and assessing arguments. 3. To develop students' analytical and communicational competences.

4. To make students familiar with fundamental features of language and linguistic communication 5. To provide students with basic skills in building and understanding speech acts.

BASIC READING

Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale, Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking, 5th ed., Oxford University Press 2013. (Hereinafter as: GRM)

(2)

TOPICS AND LITERATURE

1. Recognizing arguments; distinguishing between argumentative and non-argumentative speech acts.

Reading: GRM 1.1; 1.2; EoR 1

2. The structure of argument; extracting premises and a conclusion Reading: GRM 4.1-4.3, EoR 1

3. Argument Diagramming Reading: GRM 5.1-5.6, EoR 2

4. Hidden elements in an argument (enthymematic arguments) Reading: GRM 6.1-6.3 5. Inductive Arguments Reading: GRM 9.1 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-inductive/ 6. Abductive arguments Reading: GRM 9.3 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/ 7. Analogy Reading: GRM 11.2, EoR 7 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-analogy/ 8. Argument from Authority

Reading: GRM 12.3 https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/download/2424/1866 9. Evaluating arguments GRM 3, 8, 13, EoR 3, 4 10. Fallacies in argumentation EoR 8, 10 ADDITIONAL READING

1. GRM: resting parts, particularly chapters 1-6

2. Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed., Walton D., Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 2008

3. Practical Logic, Ziembiński Z., D. Reidel Publ.. Dordrecht, Boston, MA 1976

4. How to Win Every Argument. The Use and Abuse of Logic, Pirie M., Continuum. London, New York 2006

ECTS CREDITS

5

CONTACT

Dr. Maciej Pichlak | https://prawo.uni.wroc.pl/user/12147 | maciej.pichlak@uwr.edu.pl

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The professional experience of the court allows for a conclusion that a theft does not buy such a thing as a car radio, and even for a lower price, for he can steal

• In logic, we have an argument whenever we have reasons suggested as premises for a conclusion. Explanations can contain reasoning in this sense and can, therefore, be classified

[P1] Although the living room window is open, there are no footprints outside, despite the softness of the ground after yesterday's rain.. [P2] The clasp on the box was not broken

Conversational implicatures are the result of assumption that speaker observes principles of rational cooperation in conversation... Herbert Paul Grice: conversational

The world looks flat, the bottoms of clouds are flat, the movement of the sun; these are all examples of your senses telling you that we do not live on a spherical heliocentric

Students will have developed a good understanding of the literature on public finances, taxes, financial market and law, building on the knowledge of the case-law acquired in

The professional experience of the court allows for a conclusion that a theft does not buy such a thing as a car radio, and even for a lower price, for he can steal

39 J.. A Theory of Argumentation: The Case of Ethical, Political, and Utopian Thinking Abstract: A relevant problem in political philosophy and political theory is the distinction