• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

False-positive episodes detected by an implantable loop recorder

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "False-positive episodes detected by an implantable loop recorder"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

C L I N I C A L V I G N E T T E False ‑positive episodes recorded by an ILR 1171 premises lead to this conclusion: the onset and the end of the supposed asystole (Figure 1A and 1C), the waveform after an episode (Figure 1C), and, fi- nally, completely asymptomatic episodes de- spite lasting for almost a minute. Such a long asystole is very unlikely to be asymptomatic.

Moreover, artifacts at the onset and the end of subcutaneous electrocardiogram (SECG) are suggestive of amplifier saturation by direct current flow. Unfortunately, in-depth inves- tigation did not clarify the cause of the event.

Despite those artifacts, the ILR was left in its previous location, and each episode was eval- uated in light of reported symptoms. In this aspect, implementing remote monitoring was crucial, because fast episode reporting facili- tates communication with the patient to con- firm the relationship between symptoms and an SECG finding. Previous studies have report- ed false arrhythmia detection by ILRs due to:

sudden reductions in the R wave signal ampli- tude, undersensing by loss of signal caused by device amplifier saturation, oversensing, myo- potential, and noises.2,3 However, case reports rarely describe such long -lasting false -positive asystole events found in Biotronik ILRs.4,5 In conclusion, episodes recorded by ILRs should be carefully interpreted considering the SECG waveform and clinical manifestations of de- tected events.

Article informAtion

conflict of interest None declared.

open Access This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms  of  the  Creative  Commons  Attribution ‑Non  Commercial ‑No  Derivatives  4.0  in‑

ternational License (CC BY ‑NC ‑ND 4.0), allowing third parties to download ar‑

ticles and share them with others, provided the original work is properly cited,  not changed in any way, distributed under the same license, and used for non‑

commercial purposes only. For commercial use, please contact the journal office  at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

The use of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) has gained increasing importance in the diagnos- tic workup of unexplained syncope. The cur- rent guidelines recommend ILR implantation in patients with recurrent syncope of uncer- tain origin and no high -risk factors (according to those guidelines) as well as in patients with high -risk factors in whom diagnostic workup did not indicate any cause of syncope.1 Implant- able loop recorders can detect and record epi- sodes of bradycardia, asystole, high ventricular rate, atrial fibrillation, and patient -triggered events. Data are either stored in device memo- ry until the next visit or transmitted to remote monitoring systems.

We report the case of a patient with episodes of inappropriate detection of long -lasting asys- tole. A 63-year -old man was admitted to our department because of a  history of infre- quent syncope. Previous cardiac and neuro- logical evaluation did not reveal the underly- ing cause. An ILR (BIOMONITOR III, Biotron- ik SE & Co, Berlin, Germany) was implanted, and the R wave amplitude at implantation was 1.47 mV. The Home Monitoring System (Bio- tronik) was activated. A few weeks after im- plantation, 5 episodes of asystole lasting from 6 to 50 seconds within 2 weeks were recorded by the Home Monitoring System. After each event, a phone call was performed, but the pa- tient did not report any symptoms during ep- isodes. Moreover, episodes occurred at differ- ent times of the day, while performing various activities like watching television, driving, or riding a stationary bicycle. An exemplary epi- sode recorded at 7:28 while driving is illustrat- ed in Figure 1. We regarded those events as cas- es of false -positive asystole detection. Several

Correspondence to:

Maciej grymuza, MD,  Department of Cardiology,  Poznan university of Medical  Sciences, ul. Długa 1/2,  61‑848 Poznań, Poland,  phone: +48 61 854 91 46, email: 

maciej.grymuza@skpp.edu.pl Received: June 8, 2020.

Revision accepted: July 17, 2020.

Published online: July 24, 2020.

Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78 (11): 1171‑1173 doi:10.33963/KP.15531 Copyright by the Author(s), 2020

C L I N I C A L V I G N E T T E

False -positive episodes detected by an implantable loop recorder

Maciej Grymuza, Aleksandra Ciepłucha, Agnieszka Katarzyńska ‑Szymańska, Romuald Ochotny, Maciej Lesiak, Przemysław Mitkowski

1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan university of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

(2)

KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA 2020; 78 (11) 1172

Vs 625 Vs 617

Asystole detection

–20 –21

–22 –23

–24 –25

–26

Time, sec

SECG

Asystole detection

–14 –15

–16 –17

–18 –19

–20

Time, sec

SECG

BIOTRONIK

BIOTRONIK

Asystole detection

–8 –9

–10 –11

–12 –13

–14

Time, sec

SECG

Asystole detection

–2 –3

–4 –5

–6 –7

–8

Time, sec

SECG

BIOTRONIK

BIOTRONIK

Vs Vs 719

Vs 797

Vs 578

Vs 586

Vs 578

Vs 578

Vs 578

Asystole detection

4 3

2 1

0 –1

–2

Det. BRADY

Time, sec

SECG Det. ASYST

Vs 586

Vs 586

Vs 602

Vs 602

Vs 602

Vs 609

Vs 609

Vs 609

Vs 617

Vs 617

Asystole detection

10 9

8 7

6 5

4

Time, sec

SECG

BIOTRONIK

BIOTRONIK

Figure 1  Subcutaneous electrocardiogram (SECG) of an episode inappropriately qualified as an asystole by an implantable loop recorder (the red arrow indicates  the atypical beginning and end of the supposed asystole, and the blue arrow shows the course of the curve following the episode)

Abbreviations: Det. ASYST, detected asystole; Det. BRADY, detected bradycardia

A

B

c

(3)

C L I N I C A L V I G N E T T E False ‑positive episodes recorded by an ILR 1173

How to cite grymuza M, Ciepłucha A, Katarzyńska ‑Szymańska A, et al. False‑

‑positive episodes detected by an implantable loop recorder. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78: 

1171‑1173. doi:10.33963/KP.15531

references

1 Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 eSC guidelines for the diagnosis  and management of syncope. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76: 1119‑1198.

2 Brignole M, Black CLB, Thomsen PeB, et al. improved arrhythmia detection in  implantable loop recorders. J Cardiovasc electrophysiol. 2008; 19: 928‑934.

3 Chrysostomakis Si, Simantirakis eN, Marketou Me, et al. implantable loop re‑

corder undersensing mimicking complete heart block. europace. 2002; 4: 211‑213.

4 Bortnik M, Occhetta e, Magnani A, et al. inappropriate asystole detection in  early postoperative phase after loop recorder implantation. iSrN Cardiol. 2011; 

2011: 146062.

5 Ali H, Sorgente A, Daleffe e, Cappato r. Asystole detected by implantable loop  recorders: true or false? Ann Noninvasive electrocardiol. 2014; 19: 595‑597. 

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Uwzględniając wynik badania histologicznego węzłów chłonnych, usuniętych podczas operacji, oraz toczący się w sąsiedztwie proces zapalny (ropniak opłucnej) odrzucono tezę

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in an unselected cohort in order to determine diagnostic yield, time to

Patients considered for ILR implantation have a similar demographic and clinical profile in centers with and without EPS availability but a different diagnostic strategy used,

Key words: ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, geomagnetic activity, cosmic ray (neutron)

Celem pracy była ocena liczby zdarzeń i cza- su trwania hipoglikemii, w tym nieuświadomionych, zarejestrowanych systemem ciągłego monitorowa- nia glikemii (CGMS, continuous

[r]

Aim of the study: In this study we evaluated the clinical value of preop- erative ultrasound scan (USS) testing performed during primary disease staging in patients with early

Baker ([1], [2]) that if K is an algebraically closed field of zero characteristic and f is a non-linear polynomial over K then f has in K cycles of all lengths with at most