• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

On conditional bases of

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "On conditional bases of"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

A N N A L ES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATICAE POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE X V (1971)

Bor-Luh L

in

(Iowa City) and Ivan S

in g er

(Bucharest)

On conditional bases of l2

1. A sequence {xn} in an infinite dimensional Banach space E is said to be a basis of E if for any element x in E there exists a unique

00

sequence of scalars {an} such that x = aixi . A basis {a?n} is said to be

i — l

conditional (unconditional) if there exists (if there does not exist) a series oo

which is convergent but not unconditionally convergent. It is well

•i= l

known that {xn} is a basis (respectively, an unconditional basis) if and only if there exists a constant К > 1 (respectively, A unc > 1 ) such that

n n + m

i = l % = 1

for any scalars a17 .. ., an+m (respectively, such that

П П

{^) || ^ j ^гаг*^г|| ^ ^unc 11 Щ^г||

г= 1 г= 1

for any scalars cq, .. . , an, <5X, ..., ôn with lôj < 1 , ..., |<5J < 1). The least such constant C({xn}) = min A (respectively, Cuno({^}) = m inAunc) is called the constant (respectively, the unconditional constant) of the basis {xn}.

A basis {aqj is called bounded, if 0 < inf \\xn\\ < sup||£rj| < -{-oo.

П П

We recall that two bases {xnj and {yn} of a Banach space E are said to be equivalent if there exist constants Cx and C2 such that for any finite sequence of scalars ax, .. ., an

n n n

(3) < c 2 || 2 'aia?i||-

г= 1 г= 1 i = l

In the sequel, we shall make use of the following well-known theorem of Bari [2] and Gelfand [4] (see also [9]): In the space l2 all bounded un­

conditional bases are equivalent.

(2)

136 B. L. L i n and I. S i n g e r

Although Hilbert spaces have “the best” geometric properties among all Banach spaces, the construction of conditional bases in separable Hilbert spaces appears to be more difficult than in the other concrete Banach spaces with unconditional bases. Since the existing construc­

tions of conditional bases in the separable Hilbert space L2([ —тс, tc ]) (see Babenko [1], Gaposkin [3], Helson and Szegô [ 6 ]) lean heavily on analytic tools, it is natural to raise the problem of finding a simple geo­

metric construction of conditional bases in l2 of the form

(4) con = ( w = l , 2 , . . . ) ,

i= 1

where {en} is the unit vector basis of l2. Moreover, with the Gram-Schmidt process we can obtain from any conditional basis {;xn} of l2 or А 2 ([—тс, тс]) an orthonormal basis {zn} of the form

n

Zn =

1

ф о II rH whence

n

г= l

A n) ф о {n = 1 , 2 , ...)

Since {;zn} is orthonormal, there exists a linear isometry и of l2 or L 2{{—тс, tu ]), respectively, onto l2, such that u(zn) — en (n = 1 , 2 , ...), whence the sequence

П

( 6 ) yn = «(*„) = № ф 0 (n = 1 , 2 , . . . )

i=l

is a conditional basis of l2. Thus, there arises the problem of finding explicitly a conditional basis of l2 of the form ( 6 ). (Let us observe that one cannot obtain the desired basis by applying the above procedure to the conditional bases of L2([—тс, тс]) constructed in the papers [1], [3], [ 6 ], since in these cases the a above involve integrals which are not computable.)

J. Lindenstrauss and A. Pelczynski have called to our attention that from a recent paper of McCarthy and Schwartz [ 8 ] follows the construction of a conditional basis of l2 of the form (4). Namely, from [ 8 ] one can obtain, for each щ a basis x^ , ..., x ^ of the №-dimensional Hilbert space l2 n such that 0 ({a?}n)}jL x) < I f < + oo, but Cfunc({®jn,}jL1) - > + o o as w- > + ° ° >

whence by [5], Theorem 2 or [10], Lemma 2, the sequence

(6) { o , 4 2> , o , . . .

•*• > • • • » 0 , 4 n\ о* • • > {о? • • • j 4 4 o, • -•}i •

Л—1 71— 1

(3)

is a conditional basis of (Ji\ x l\ X ... X l2 nX . ..)гг. Hence by the natural canonical equivalence of (Jt\ X l\ x ... X l2 n X .. .)# with l2, we obtain a con­

ditional basis of l2 of the form ( 1 ).

In the present note, still using the ideas of [ 8 ], we want to give somewhat more, namely, a conditional basis of l2 of the form (5) and a conditional basis of l2 of the form

00

(7) œ, = A"' *0 (» =1,2,...).

г

2. T

h e o r e m

. The sequences {ccn} c- l2 and {yn} <= l2 defined by

00

(® ) 1 ^2n — 1H- ^ i —n + 1 ^2г ? ^2n ^2» • • • ) >

i = n n

( 0 ) V i n — X ^ 2 n — 1 ? У 2 n г + l ) ^ 2 г — 1 ~ Ь • • • ) ?

г= 1

{еи} denotes the unit vector basis of l2 and an > 0 (w = 1 , 2 , ...),

00 00

J j a * < + ° ° > 2 4 = o o ( e . y . , o w e c a n t a k e a n = l l ( n l o g n ) ) , a r e c o n d i t i o n a l

3 = 1 3 = 1

ôases of l2.

Proof. For any finite sequence of scalars j 8 1; we have

2 n n n с о n

P j X j f^2j — 1 ^ 2 j — l H~~ f t23 — 1 a i —з'+1^ 2г~ Ь ( ^ 2 j ^ 2 )

3 = 1 3= 1 3 = 1 г = з ) = 1

« n j

= ^ ^ 2 ) - 1 е 2 ) - 1 - \ ~ ^ ^ i^2fc— 1 a 3 - fc + l + /?2з) e 2j +

7 = 1 / = 1 & = 1

oo

+

2 ( 2

/ ^ 2 f c - l a 3 -f e + l ) e 23?

) ' = « ■ + 1 fc=l

whence

(10)

2n n n 7 oo n

jj /?y^-j| = £ \ ^ 2 j ~ l \ 2 j r ^ р 2 к - 1 а 7 - к + 1 + p 2 j I + I ^ 2 f c - l « 3 - f c + l| '

3 = 1 3 = 1 3 = 1 &=1 3 = и + 1 A=1

Since by the Holder inequality we have

OO n o o j n

£ I ^ & * - i a * - * + i | 2 < ( £ \ a k \ 2 ) £ \ p 2 i - x \ 2

3= w + 1 к = 1 з ' = п + 1 f c = 3 ‘ — n + 1 г = 1

oo n o o n

< 2 * Ü - 1 ) к -l 2 F ^ У i ai 2

3 = 2 г= 1 з*=1 i = i

(4)

138 B. L. L i n and I. S i n g e r

it follows that for any finite sequence of scalars , ..., §m with m > 2 n we have

7 = 1 &=1

^ I j°i) !/^ 2 ;-l|2+ j +A

7= 1 7 = 1 7=1

OO

Ш

< ( г + 2 t â ) \ l 2 №

7 = 1 7 = 1

Similarly, for any finite sequence of scalars /Зх, ..., |Sm with m > 2n—l we obtain

2 n — 1 oo m

У fijXj ||2 < ( l + ^ jafj || JT (ijXj |j2.

7 = 1 7=1 ?= 1

Consequently, {xn} satisfies (1) with К ) / i + l « {xn} is a basis of l2. Let us also observe that

and hence

(

11

)

11^271-1 \ Ы \ = 1 0 ® = 1 , 2 , . . . ) .

On the other hand, by ( 10 ) we have

n n n j oo n

||

^ 2 j - \ X 2 j - l

j| = ^l^

27

-ll2+ |

^ 2 k - l a i - k + l

I + j

y 1, f t 2 k —l a j - k + l

|

j= 1 3=1 3 = 1 k= 1

3=n

+ 1 k = l

n n

?

^

У !

I

$ 2 j —1 1

I

@ 2 к - 1 a ) - k + l

I 7

7

=

1 ?‘= 1 k =1

whence, in particular, for /32?-_i = 1/Vn (j = 1 , ..., n) we obtain, taking П

into account that by our hypothesis j a?-j 2 -> oo as w -> oo,

7 = 1

it follows that {xn} is not equivalent to {en}, and hence, by the Bari-Gelfand

theorem mentioned above, {xn} is a conditional basis of E = l2.

(5)

Observe now that (xn, yn) is a biorthogonal system, since for all m, n = 1 , 2 , . . . , we obviously have

0 ^ 2 n i V ï m — \ ) i f 2 г г ? ^ 2 m — l ) ^ ? OQ

i . ^ 2 n — 1 ? У 2 т — \ ) ~ { ^ 2 n—1 “ H a i — n + 1 ^ 2 t ? ^ 2 m — l j ^ м ? г = п

m

i p ^ 2 n l У 2 т ) | ^ 2 г г ? ( ® m — г + l ) ^ 2 г — 1 " h ^ 2 m j ^ n m l г = 1

oo m

{ ^ 2 n — 1? У 2 т ) |^2и,—lH ~ n + 1 ^2г ? г+ l ) ^2г—1 H- ^2m j

г = » г г = 1

0 if m < n ,

г г + 1 ( ^ 2 ? г — 1 ? e 2 n - l ) H “ a m - n + l ( e 2 m l ^2m )

^ if

7ÏI ^ 71.

Hence, by well-known duality theorems (see, e.g., Karlin [7], theorem 3), {yn} is a conditional basis of E* = l2, which completes the proof of the theorem.

Kote that {yn} is obviously different from the basis of the form ( 5 ) obtained by starting with the basis {;xn} defined by ( 8 ) (i.e., applying the Gram-Schmidt process to {a?n}, etc.).

References

[1] К. I. B a b e n k o , On bases in Hilbert spaces, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR. 57 (1947), p. 427-430 (Russian).

[2] N. K. B a ri, Biorthogonal systems and bases in Hilbert spaces, Uc. Zap. Moskov.

G-os. Univ. 148, Matematika 4 (1951), p. 69-107 (Russian).

[3] Y. F. G -aposkin, A generalization of a theorem of M. Biesz on conjugate functions, Mat. Sb. 46 (88) (1958), p. 359-372 (Russian).

[4] I. M. G elfa n d , BemarJc on the work of N . K . B ari “Biorthogonal systems and bases in Hilbert spaces ”, Uc. Zap. Moskov. G-os. Univ. 148, Matematika 4 (1951) p. 224-225 (Russian).

[5] Y. I. G u rarii, On inclinations of subspaces and conditional bases in Banach spaces, Doklady Akad. Nauk. SSSR. 145 (1962), p. 504-506 (Russian).

[6] H. H e ls o n and Gr. S z e g o , A problem in prediction theory, Ann. Mat. Рига Appl.

(4) 51 (1960), p. 107-138.

[7] S. K a r lin , Bases in Banach spaces, Duke Math. J. 15 (1948), p. 971-985.

[8] C. A. M cC a rth y and J. S c h w a r tz , On the norm of a fin ite Boolean algebra of projections and applications to theorems of Kreiss and Morton, Comm. Pure and Applied Math. 18 (1965), p. 191-201.

[9] I. S in g er, On a theorem of N . K . Bari and I . M . Gelfand, Archiv der Math.

19 (1968), p. 508-510.

[10] M. Z ip p in , A remark on bases and reflexivity in Banach spaces, Israel J. Math.

6 (1968), p. 74-79.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The above defined Hilbert transforms H a and H (a p ) have the same properties as those mentioned in Theorem 2.3 and their proof are analogous. Though in [11] only the

In this paper we give new estimates for the Lipschitz constants of n-periodic mappings in Hilbert spaces, in order to assure the existence of fixed points and retractions on the

[1] Abkar, A., Jafarzadeh, B., Weighted sub-Bergman Hilbert spaces in the unit disk, Czechoslovak Math..

The classical identification of the predual of B(H) (the algebra of all bounded operators on a Hilbert space H ) with the projective operator space tensor product H ˆ ⊗H is extended

For example, we show that a generalized ordered space has a weakly uniform base if and only if it is quasi-developable and has a G δ -diagonal, that a linearly ordered space has

Moreover, assume that the function h and its partial derivative with respect to the variable x are bounded on Be x BQ for any £e(0, r)... So defined map wXo is of the class

If X is compact and µ is a finite measure defined on the Baire sets, then µ extends uniquely to a Radon measure (see [8], Theorem 54D), and every Borel set is equal to a Baire

In this paper, by using the topological degree theory for multivalued maps and the method of guiding functions in Hilbert spaces we deal with the existence of periodic oscillations