• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

- ^ - (t, + + of the unified algebraic Riccati equation* On bound for the solution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "- ^ - (t, + + of the unified algebraic Riccati equation* On bound for the solution"

Copied!
8
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Ad a m Cz o r n i k

Gliwice

On bound for the solution

of the unified algebraic Riccati equation*

(Received 22.11.1997)

A b stra c t. In recent, years, several bounds of eigenvalues, norms and determinants for solutions of the continuous and discrete Riccati equations have been separately inves- tigated. In this paper, an upper bound for the solution of the unified algebraic Riccati equations is presented. In the limit case, the result is reduced to a new upper bound for t he solution of discrete and continuous Riccati equation.

1. In trodu ction . The continuous and discrete algebraic Riccati equa- tion are important in various areas of engineering system theory, particularly in control system theory and also in study of the stability of linear systems, see [6], [7]. Numerous papers have presented bounds of eigenvalues of the solution of continuous and discrete Riccati equation separately. A summary of results on this topic is given in [9].

The objective of this paper is to present an upper bound for sums and products of the eigenvalues of the solution of the unified algebraic Riccati equation. In the limit cases, we get some new bounds for the discrete and con- tinuous R iccati equation. Similar results for lower bounds are obtained in [10].

Consider the unified-type algebraic Riccati equation

(1) - Q = A 'P + P A + A A ' P A

- ( I n + A A ) ' P B { l r + A B ' B , P ) ~ l B \ I n + A A ) (2 ) = ( ! , , + A A ) ' ^ ( I n + A A )

- ^ - (t, + AA)'PB(Ir + AB'PB)~lB’P(In + AA),

*The work was supported in part by the KBN under Grant 8 T i l A 006 14.

(2)

14 A. Czornik

where In is the identity matrix of order n, A G R, A > 0, A, P, Q G Rnxn, and B G RnXr, with Q > 0 and P > 0 is the solution. If (A, B ) is stabilizable and (C, A), where Q = C 'C , has no unobservable mode inside the stability boundary, then the equation (7) has a unique positive definite solution, see [7].

Let Ai(X), i = 1 ,... ,n be the ?th eigenvalue of a nonegative definite matrix X G RnXn. Since X has only real eigenvalues, they can be ordered in a nonincreasing order

Re m a r k. From the unified Riccati equation (1), we obtain in limit cases continuous and discrete Riccati equations, see [7]. In continuous case (A = 0) from (1) we obtain the continuous algebraic Riccati equation. In discrete case and for A = 1 by substituting A by A — / n, we obtain from (2) the discrete algebraic Riccati equation.

Before formulating the main result of this paper we recall the following results.

Th e o r e m 1.1. For any symmetric positive semidefinite matrices R. G Rnxn (m(i g £ ffnxn f0ll0Wing inequalities hold:

(3) A,+;, - n(5 + T) > \i(S) + \j(T) i f i + j > n + 1 (4) Ai+j_ i(S T ) < \i(S)Xj{T) i f i + j < n + 1

1 k k

(5) J ^ A ' + Y) + k = 1 ,..., n.

i = l i = l i— 1

P r o o f. Inequality (3) and (4) were proven in [1]; for (5), see [2].

Th e o r e m 1.2 [8]. Let x i ,... , x n be nonnegative real numbers. Then

(6)

N2 = 1

n

Xi < E n i=1n

2. M ain results. Main results of this paper are given by the following theorem and corollaries.

Th e o r e m 2.1. The eigenvalues of the positive definite matrix solution P of (1), satisfy, for k = 1 ,..., n following inequality

(3)

(7) ] T a ,(P) i=1

< <

N + sjN* + 4k\n(BB>) A i(Q ) 2 A n(BB')

- E t i A i ( Q )

*/An( 5 5 ') ^ 0

A' + AAA')

a7

where N = k\i(A + A' + AAA') + AXn(BB')£ * =1A,(Q).

if Xn(BB') — 0

and Ai(A + A' + AAA') < 0

P r o o f. Using the matrix identity

(/„ + S T )" 1 = / „ - S (/r + T S ) " 1T,

where S' — P B and T — B', (1) can be transformed to the form:

(8) P = (/,, + A A Y i P - 1 + A B B ')~ 1(In + AA) + AQ.

From (8) by using (5) and taking into acount that A ,((/„ + z W f P - 1 + A B B ' y ^ I n + AA))

= A ,( ( /„ + A A)(In + A A )'(P ~ l + A B B ' ) - 1) we obtain

k k k

(9) y > ,;( P ) < ^ X M I n + A A W n + A A Y i P - ' + A B B ' r ^ + J ^ ^ i A Q ) .

2 =1 2—1 2=1

From (4) it follows that

(10) A ,((/„ + A A )(In + A A Y i P - 1 + A B B ' ) - 1)

< A i((/ „ + AA)(In + AA)')\d(P- 1 + ABB')-1).

Since

(11) X M P - 1 + a b b1) - 1) = x r + ^ p - 1 + ABB’) and using (3) (i = n ,j = n — i + 1), we rearange (10) to obtain

(12) A ,((/„ + A A )(In + A A )'(P ~ 1 + A B B ' ) - 1)

< A i((f„ + AA)(In + A A)') l + x .(p)X^ A B B ,) Applying (12) on the right hand side of (9), we have

k

(13) £ a,(P)

2 = 1

k k

< A, ((/„ + A A )(In + AA)') 1 + An(ABB')X,(P) + ^ A,(Zi<3)

2 = 1 2=1

(4)

10 A. Czornik

We conclude from (13) that the theorem is true in the case of An(BB') = 0.

Assume now that An(BB') ^ 0. For any convex function / : [a,b] —■> R and real numbers x-i G [a, b], a* > 0 , * = 1, ,k we have

:i4) ( i . n A \ \ w ^

f y g Y l aiXiJ -

where S' = Application of inequality (14) with function f ( x ) =

yr fiiid Xi Aj(-P),oti l,...,/u to (13) gives

k

(15)

7= 1

< A , ( (/ „ + AA)(In + AA)1) + E M ^ Q ) .

™ An{A B B ) Ai(-P) Rearranging (15) we get

k k k

(1(0 a„ (b b ' ) ( E M p 0 ^i{P) k ^ ^ Xt(AQ) < 0.

i = l i=l i = l

Prom (16), (17) follows immediately.

Co r o l l a r y 2.1. The eigenvalues of the positive definite matrix solution P of (1). satisfy for k — 1 ,... , n following inequality

i:i)

7= 1

' ( n + ^/m + 4k\n( B B ' ) T . t i M Q )

<

2 kXn(BB') - £ - =1a ,(Q) V k,Xl {A + A' + AAA') )

ifXn( B B ' ) ^ Q

if Xn(BB') = 0 and Ai{A + A' + AAA') < 0 , where N = k.X^A + A' + AAA!) + AXn{BB') ^ =1 Xt(Q).

P r o o f. Apply the arithmetic-mean geometric-mean inequality (6) to (7).

The following two Corollaries, follow from (8), (13) and Remark.

Co r o l l a r y 2.2. The eigenvalues of the positive definite matrix solution P of continuous Riccati equation

(14) - Q = A'P + P A - P B B 'P ,

(5)

satisfy for n following inequalities

(1 5)

and

k

£ a, (p )

' kX^A + A') +

<

- T , i = i K ( Q ) X^A + A')

h-MA + A'))2 + AkXn{BB') Yfkl=l Xi{Q) 2 A n{BB')

if Xn(BB') ? 0

if Xn{BB') = 0 and X^A + A') < 0

A:

( i « )

7 = 1 /

<

Ai(.4 + A') + f \ \ ( A + A') + 4A,(.4 + i M Q )

- E L M q A kXi(A + A’) j

2A n(BB') if A „(B B ') ^ 0

if An(BB') = 0 and Ai(^4 + A') < 0.

k

The bound (15) under the assumption that An(BB') ^ 0 was derived in [11] by a different method in the case when k = n and, in general, in [5].

The second part of bound (15) and the bound (16) are new.

Co r o l l a r y 2.3. The eigenvalues of the positive definite matrix solution P of discrete Riccati equation

(17) P = A'PA - A'PB{Ir + B'PB)~lB'PA + Q, satisfy for k — 1 ,... , n the following inequalities

A:

(IK) ^ A , ( C )

7 = 1

<

if A A B B 1) / 0

M + ^ M 2 + 4k\n(BB') n = i AM )

~ 2A n(BB’)

F -% * A A 'l if K { B B , ) = 0 and Xl{AA') < 1 and

(6)

18 A. Czornik

(i9) n A*(p )

i = l

' ( M + s j M t + ik\n(BB') S ? =1 Ai(Q)

< < 2k\n{BB') if Xa(BB') ± 0

where M = kXi(AA') — k + Xn(BB') i \(Q )- The following bound was derived in [4]:

k

(20) E A-(p ) ^

1 = 1

+ y/a2 + « A „ ( S B ') E t i Ai(0) 2A

where a = k(Xi(AA') — 1 + Ai(Q)An( 5 5 /)) and An(BB') ■=£- 0.

y~'fc \i(Q) Our bound (18) is stronger than (20), because Ai(Q) > ---- and, therefore, M < aand

M + v/m 2 + ik \ n(BB') £*=1 Ai(Q) 2A n( B B ’ )

a + ^ a 2 + ik\n(BB') E t i M Q )

Our bound (18) is stronger than

fc fc

i = 1

(21) X > i ( P ) < X > i ( Q )

1 = 1

given in [3], where (22)

1 -

2Xn(BB')

Ai (AA‘ ) t - l l + Xk(Q)Xn(BB')

1 - Ai(AL4;;

> 0.

l + Xk(Q)Xn(BB')

Indeed, denoting the right-hand side of (18) and (21) by Ri and i?2, respec- tively we have

kXi(AA')Ri k

(23) Ri = k + XniBB^Rx 1=1

^ Ai (a a ')r 2 y ' \ ( o 2 l + Xn(BB')Xk(Q) l{Q)- (24)

(7)

The; equations (11) and (12) imply (23) and (24) follows from (21). For the positive; definite matrix solution P of discrete Riccati equation (15) we have

(25) Xk(Q) < Xk(P),

see [3]. Using (23), (24) and (25) we can find the bound for the difference ll2 - R X

(25) R2 - R,

>

Xi{AA')R2 l + Xn(BB')Xk(Q)

X !{AA')R2 1 + A n(BB')Xk(Q)

Xi(AA') l + Xn(BB')Xk(Q)

kX1{AA’ )R1

~ k + Xn{B B ,)R1 Xi(AA')Ri 1 + A n(BB')Xk(Q) (R2- R 1).

In view of (2G) and (21) we have R\ < R2.

The bound (19) is new.

4. C onclusion. Upper bound for the sums and products of the eigenval- ue's e>f the' sefiution of the unified-type Riccati equation is presented in this note1. Semie' new bounds for the discrete and continuous Riccati equation are' e>btaiiie;d using this unified approach. A comparison with existing upper benuiels for elise:rete Riccati equation was made.

R eferences

[1] A. R. A m ir -M o e z , Extreme properties of eigenvalues of hermitan transformation a.nd singular values of the sum and product of linear transformation, Duke Math.

J., 23 (195C), 463 467.

[2] J. Fan, On a theorem of Weyl conferring eigenvalues of linear transformations I, Pror. Nat. Acad. Sci. U .S.A. 35 (1949), 652-655.

[3] J. G a il off, Bounds for the eigenvalues of the solution of the discrete Riccati and Lyapunov equation and the continuous Lyapunov equation, International Journal of Control, 37 (1986), 423-431.

[4] N. K< u n a ro ff, Upper bounds for the Solution, of the discrete Riccati equation, IEEE Transactions on automatic Control, 37 (1992), 1370-1372.

[5] N. K o m a r o ff, Diverse bounds for the eigenvalues of the continuous elgebraic Ric- cati equation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39 (1994), 532-534.

[6] P. L a n c a s te r and L. R o d m a n , Algebraic Riccati Equation, Oxford Univ. Press., 1995.

[7] R. H. M id d le to n and G. C. G o o d w in , Digital Control and Estimation — A Unified approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.

[8] D. S. M itrin o v ic ., Analytic Inequalities, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1970.

[9] T. M o ri and A. D erese, A brief summary of the bounds on the solution of the algebraic matrix equations in control theory, International Journal of Control, 39 (1984), 247-256.

(8)

20 A. Czornik

[10] M. M r a b t i and M. B e n se d d ik , Bounds for the eigenvalues of the solution of the unified algebraic Riccati matrix equation, Systems & Control Letters, 24 (1995), 345 349.

[11] S. W a n g et al., Trace bounds on the solution of the algebraic matrix Riccati and Laypunov equations, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 31 (1986), 654-656. I

I NS r YTl JT A !JTOM AT'Y KI I'OUTEOIIMKA SL/\SKA ii-io! g u w i c t:

PO. AKADIiM ICKA 16

I.-M All.: ADA MOZOR@ZEUS.POLSL.GLIWICE.PL

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

These conditions are described in terms of data of the problem and allow one to identify those problems for which linear state feedback stochastic robust control can be constructed..

The continuity of the solutions of difference and algebraic coupled Riccati equations for the discrete-time Markovian jump linear quadratic control problem as a function of

“Constants for lower bounds for linear forms in the logarithms of algebraic numbers II.. The homogeneous

Periodic solutions — ordinary iterations... Periodic solutions — approximate

[r]

Let ME denote the family of all nonempty and bounded subsets of E and NE the family of all nonempty and relatively compact sets in E.. D e f in it io

In this note we consider the bounds for periods of periodic solutions of difference equations in normed linear spaces with Lipschitz continuous right-hand

For the most part, the assumptions imposed on f in the literature imply very simple dynamics of f ; it is usually assumed that f has exactly one fixed point which is,