• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

1. Introduction. The recent article [1] gives explicit evaluations for exponential sums of the form

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "1. Introduction. The recent article [1] gives explicit evaluations for exponential sums of the form"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

ACTA ARITHMETICA XCIII.2 (2000)

A note on evaluations of some exponential sums

by

Marko J. Moisio (Vaasa)

1. Introduction. The recent article [1] gives explicit evaluations for exponential sums of the form

S(a, p

α

+ 1) := X

x∈Fq

χ(ax

pα+1

)

where χ is a non-trivial additive character of the finite field F

q

, q = p

e

odd, and a ∈ F

q

. In my dissertation [5], in particular in [4], I considered more generally the sums S(a, N ) for all factors N of p

α

+1. The aim of the present note is to evaluate S(a, N ) in a short way, following [4]. We note that our result is also valid for even q, and the technique used in our proof can also be used to evaluate certain sums of the form

X

x∈Fq

χ(ax

pα+1

+ bx).

2. Evaluation of S(a, N ). Let F

q

denote the finite field with q = p

e

elements, χ

1

the canonical additive character of F

q

and α a non-negative integer. Let N be an arbitrary divisor of p

α

+ 1. Our task is to evaluate the sums

S(a, N ) := X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

N

)

for non-zero elements a of F

q

.

Let d = gcd(α, e). Since S(a, N ) = S(a, gcd(N, p

e

− 1)) and

gcd(p

α

+ 1, p

e

− 1) =

 

1 if e/d is odd and p = 2, 2 if e/d is odd and p > 2, p

d

+ 1 if e/d is even,

as proved in [1] and [3, p. 175], it is enough to consider sums S(a, n) for all divisors n of p

d

+ 1. The case e/d odd is easily established (see [1]).

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11T24.

[117]

(2)

118 M. J. Moisio

To state our result we fix a primitive element of F

q

, say γ, and denote the multiplicative group of F

q

by F

q

.

Theorem 1. Let e = 2sd and n | p

d

+ 1. Then X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) =

 ( − 1)

s

p

sd

if ind

γ

a 6≡ k (mod n), ( − 1)

s−1

(n − 1)p

sd

if ind

γ

a ≡ k (mod n), where k = 0 if

(A) p = 2; or p > 2 and 2 | s; or p > 2, 2 - s and 2 | (p

d

+ 1)/n, and k = n/2 if

(B) p > 2, 2 - s and 2 - (p

d

+ 1)/n.

In the special case n = p

d

+ 1, p odd, our Theorem 1 gives Theorem 2 of [1].

The proof of our theorem is based on the relation (see [2, p. 217])

(1) X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) = X

ψ∈H

G(ψ)ψ(a)

where H is the subgroup of order n of the multiplicative character group of F

q

, and G(ψ) is the Gauss sum

G(ψ) = X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(x)ψ(x).

Proof of Theorem 1. Let H

0

be the subgroup of order n of the multiplica- tive character group of F

p2d

. The surjectivity of the norm mapping N from F

q

to F

p2d

implies H = {ψ ◦ N | ψ ∈ H

0

}. Now (1) and the Davenport–Hasse theorem (see [2, pp. 195–199]) imply

(2) X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) = X

ψ∈H0

G(ψ ◦ N)ψ(N(a)) = (−1)

s−1

X

ψ∈H0

G

0

(ψ)

s

ψ(N(a)),

where G

0

(ψ) is computed over F

p2d

.

Let ψ

0

denote the trivial multiplicative character of F

p2d

. Since G

0

0

) =

−1, it follows from (2) that X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) = (−1)

s−1

X

ψ∈H0∗

G

0

(ψ)

s

ψ(N(a)),

where H

0∗

:= H

0

\ {ψ

0

}.

Let ψ ∈ H

0∗

. Since ord(ψ) | p

d

+ 1, we observe that Stickelberger’s theo- rem (see [2, p. 202]) is applicable.

Now, if p = 2 or 2 | s, then G

0

(ψ)

s

= p

sd

. To consider the remaining

cases, we fix a generator of the multiplicative character group of F

p2d

, say

λ, and define t = (p

2d

− 1)/n.

(3)

Evaluations of exponential sums 119

Now ψ = λ

tj

for some j ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1}. Since ord(ψ) = n/gcd(n, j), we see that (p

d

+ 1)/ord(ψ) is even if (p

d

+ 1)/n is even. Consequently, G

0

(ψ)

s

= p

sd

if (p

d

+ 1)/n is even.

Thus in Case A we have X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) = (−1)

s−1

p

sd

n−1

X

j=1

λ

tj

(N(a)).

In Case B, (p

d

+ 1)/ord(ψ) is even if and only if j is even. Thus X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

n

) = (−1)

s−1

p

sd

n−1

X

j=1

(−1)

j

λ

tj

(N(a)).

Noting that N(γ) is a primitive element of F

p2d

, we easily obtain the result.

If n = p

d

+ 1 and s = 1, for example, we can prove by a more or less similar reasoning (see [5])

Theorem 2. Let a, b ∈ F

q

, b 6= 0. Then X

x∈Fq

χ

1

(ax

pd+1

+ bx) =

 0 if a + a

pd

= 0,

−p

d

χ

01

(−b

pd+1

(a + a

pd

)

−1

) if a + a

pd

6= 0, where χ

01

is the canonical additive character of the field F

pd

.

Acknowledgements. The author is indebted to Professor Keijo V¨a¨an-

¨anen for his valuable comments on a preliminary version of this note.

References

[1] R. S. C o u l t e r, Explicit evaluations of some Weil sums, Acta Arith. 83 (1998), 241–251.

[2] R. L i d l and H. N i e d e r r e i t e r, Finite Fields, Encyclopedia Math. Appl. 20, Ad- dison-Wesley, Reading, 1983 (now distributed by Cambridge Univ. Press).

[3] R. J. M c E l i e c e, Finite Fields for Computer Scientists and Engineers, Kluwer, Dor- drecht, 1987.

[4] M. J. M o i s i o, On relations between certain exponential sums and multiple Kloost- erman sums and some applications to coding theory, preprint, 1997.

[5] —, Exponential sums, Gauss sums and cyclic codes, Dissertation, Acta Univ. Oul.

A 306, 1998.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Vaasa

Box 700, 65101 Vaasa, Finland E-mail: mamo@uwasa.fi

Received on 11.8.1998

and in revised form on 30.12.1999 (3442)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The geometric random sums appear also in the existing in the literature definitions of geometrically infinitely divisible (GID) [4, 14], geometrically strictly stable (GSSt) [5, 6,

This is the first nontrivial discrepancy bound for parts of the period of inversive congruential pseudo- random numbers with prime-power modulus.. An analogous result for prime

In particular, if N = P α and M ≥ N then we get a square root type saving in average in the discrepancy, no matter how small the fixed positive number α is.. A problem

In general, even when there is a critical point of multiplicity d, a sharper upper bound than (1.16) is available by applying our result for pure exponential sums, Theorem 2.1,

The parameter σ α has appeared in many papers on exponential sums but we are not aware of an upper bound of the type (1.13) ever appearing before, even for the case of

Bruggeman [2, 3] has investigated the points (p/q, D(p/q)/q) in R 2 , using the representation theory of the group SL(2, Z). It would be of interest to investigate the distribution

We first prove (6), which is in fact a consequence of Weil’s bounds on exponential sums and hybrid sums.. In analogy to (10), we have, for x

S z´ek e l y, Crossing numbers and hard Erd˝os problems in Discrete