• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Integral Means of Univalent Harmonic Maps

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Integral Means of Univalent Harmonic Maps"

Copied!
8
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE C U RI E - S K L 0 D 0 W S K A LUBLIN - POLONIA

VOL. L, 16 SECTIO A 1996

MARIA NOWAK (Lublin)

Integral Means of Univalent Harmonic Maps

Abstract. The main results obtained in this paper are the following.

If f = h + g is a univalent harmonic map, then g,h € Hp and f € hp for p € (0, A-2), where A is given in (3). This is an improvement of a result presented in [AL]. Moreover, a further improvement of the range:

p € (0,1/3) is established for close-to-convex harmonic maps.

1. Introduction. Statement of results. Let A denote the open unit disc in the complex plane and Sh denote the class of all complex valued, harmonic, sense-preserving univalent functions f in A normalized by

(1) /(o) = o, A(o) = i.

Each f 6 Sh can be expressed as

(2) f = h + g,

where h(z) = z + 2 anzn and g(z) = bnzn are analytic in A . It is known ([BH]) that

(3) 3 < A = sup |a21 < 50 . fesH

Let Hp (hp), 0 < p < oo, denote the standard Hardy space of analytic (harmonic) functions on A. It is well-known that, if f is analytic and univalent in A , then f G Hp for 0 < p < | ( see e.g. [DI, p. 50]).

(2)

In 1990 Y. Abu-Muhanna and A. Lyzzaik [AL] proved the following

Theorem A. If f = h + g 6 Sh , then h, g € Hp and f € hp for every Pi P G (0, (2A + 2)-2), where A is given by (3).

In [BH] the authors proposed to find the exact set of all p > 0 such that f € hp , if f £ Sh • Here we extend the above cited range for p, namely we prove

Theorem 1. Under the assumptions of Theorem A, h, g £ Hp and f £ hp for 0 < p < A~2 .

Let Kn, Ch denote the subclasses of Sh consisting of harmonic map­

pings onto convex and close-to-convex regions, respectively. It has been shown in [CS] that if f = h+g E I(h, then h is close-to-convex and

|p(z)| < |h(2)| for z € A \ {0} . These facts imply

Theorem 2. If f = h + g £ Kh , then g, h £ IIp and f E hp for 0 < p < | .

In section 4 we show that the convex harmonic function [CS]

(4)

is in h? (although p, h II% ) but it is not in hp for p > | . Therefore the exact range of p > 0 such that, f £ hp if f is a convex harmonic function, can be at most the interval (0, |].

For close-to-convex harmonic mappings we get

Theorem 3. If f = h + g £ Ch, then h, g £ Hp and f € hp for 0 < P < I •

Because

sup |a2| = 2, sup |a2| = 3 , /e/<„ fec„

it seems natural to conjecture that, if f = g + h Ç. Sh , then g, h £ Hp and f £ hp for 0 < p < 1/Â, where A is given by (3).

(3)

2. Proof of Theorem 1. The proof of Theorem 1 is based on the following, below stated results.

For p € R and f harmonic on A let us set

(5) \f(re,t)\pdt, 0<r<l.

Now, let A denote the class of analytic, locally univalent functions h on A, normalized by

h(0) = 0, h'(0) = 1, and satisfying the condition

zh"(z) 2\z\2

(6) 2A|z|

V(2 ) 1

- |jf

for some constant A > 1. As in [P3, p. 176; P2] we define log Mp(r, h')

(7) ^(P) = linLsuP_loe(1_r).

<

Theorem B. If h E A , then for p E R

(8) /?/,(/>) < -1 + p + -p + A2 p2 .

To prove this theorem it is enough to proceed analogously as in the proof of Theorem 1 of [Pl] (see also [P3, pp.176-182])

The next result we will need is due to T.Flett [FI], [F2] (see also [MP]

for its simple proof).

Theorem C. Let 0 < p < 1 and h be an analytic function on A . If (9) /1(l-r)P-1Mp(r,h/)dr < oo,

Jo then he Hp.

Proof of Theorem 1. Let f = h + g € Sh • For fixed £ € A consider the function

/ G&) -1«»

(i-l<l2W) ‘

F(z) =

(4)

Then F € Sfj . This fact implies that the analytic and locally univalent function h satisfies (6) with A given by (3). Now it follows from Theorem B that for each e > 0 there exists C(e) such that

< Mp(r,h') < C(e)

(1 _ r)-|+P+\/4~P+j42P2 + <

Hence for 0 < p < 1 and for arbitrarily fixed e > 0

i (1 — r)p~l Mp(r,gl')dr < Z (1 - r)p~l Mp(r, h')dr

Jo Jo

('____ Cl;<>

Jo (i _ {-p+?42p2+e The last integral is finite if

j “ P + A2P2 < 1 - e < 1, and this inequality holds if

p < A~2 .

So, in view of Theorem C, h and g 6 Hp for p < A~2 .

3. Proof of Theorem 3. Let k be the function defined by the formula

(10) fc(z)=(TT7r’

We start with the following

Lemma. If f = g + h £ Ch is a close-to-convex harmonic map, then for 0 < p < oo

(11) Mp(r,h')<Mp(r,k).

Proof. It was shown in [CS] that zh.'(z') = F^z^G^z) if f = g + h £ Ch

and C(z) = e~,az + a,2Z2 + ..., —it < a < it, is a starlike function and F(z) — e*a + biz + ... satisfies |argF(z)| < it. Hence

log |h'(*)l = log |F(*)| + log

Now notice that to prove our lemma it is enough to apply the reasoning similar to that in the proof of Theorem 7.2 of [D2, p. 229].

(5)

Lemma 1 implies immediately

Corollary. If f = h + g € Ch , then g', h' £ Hp for 0 < p < |.

Proof of Theorem 3. Assume that f = h + g € Ch and | < p < 1.

Then Lemma 1 and the Lemma in [DI, p.65] imply that there is a positive constant C such that

r

From this

The last integral is finite if p < | and the assertion follows from Theorem C.

Remark. Notice that Theorem 3 implies the result of J.A. Cima and J.E.

Livingston [CL]: If f = h + g £ Sh and /(A) is a starlike domain (with respect to zero), then h, g £ Hp and f £ hp for 0 < p < 1/3.

4. Examples.

1. Let f = h + g be given by formula (4). We claim that f hp if p > |, whereas f € hxC .

First assume that j < p < 1. We have

Making the substitution t = cos 6 gives /• 7T

r _ /

>2-(3p+l)/2

A

where c 2r/(l + r2).

Thus

|/(re’e)|pdö = 2rp(l - r2)p/r —> oo as r 1"

(6)

and the first assertion made about the function f is proved.

Now we show that f 6 h1/2 . Because

sup / Re I --- 7

0<r<l Jo I \ 1 ~ re'

¡9 \ 1/2

~e (10 < sup

0<r<l

r re'e

Io 1 - re'6 (10 < 00 1/2

it is enough to show that Im/ € h1/2 . Similarly as above we get dt

(12)

Z2(l - ct)

4yr(l - r2) Z1 dt

T+V2 Jo - Z2(l _ (ci)2)

A

< 4-/r(l - r2) Z1

L

1 + 7’2

dt

</l - Z(1 - cZ)

Expanding the function Z —> 1/(1 — cZ) into a power series and integrating term by term we obtain

n:

L yr^i(i-cz) §

ł(i + i)---(B”)cn = 5(c).

Using the fact that the gamma function can be expressed as T(a) = lim n'.nIn“

n-7°° a(a + 1) • • • (a + n)

one can easily check that the coefficients in the series in formula (13) are of order n~3/4 = nl1/4-1) as n —► oo . This means that the function 5(c)

’’behaves” like the function E’(c) = (1 — c)-1/4, i.e. the ratio 5(c)/E(c) has a positive limit as c —> l- . Hence there is a constant C > 0 such that

_ ,r‘/< = + r2

5(c) < C(1 -c) Hence

r2ir

Jo

\/l — T

llm/ire^)!1/2^ < 8C.

2. Consider the close-to-convex function I — h + g where ,, x z - z2/2 + z3/Q t x z2!2 + z3!§

= ---71---- 33---’ 2(2) =

(l-z)3 (I-*)3

(7)

It can be easily checked that neither g , nor h is in H1^3 . However, I is in . It has been shown in [CS] that I can be expressed as

,w=jRe((r5) + •

Because Im(Z) € Zii it is enough to prove that the integral

is bounded as r —* 1 . We have

(14)

1/3

de

rZ0 < (1 - r2) /” —-L_

Jo | V1 - re'6 / | Jo 11 - re'

/t f2,r sin3 0 + ^12(1-r2)1/3 / -

Jo 1

d3

+ r2 - 2r cos#

< 2, + 4^12(1 - (1 _

where c - 2r/(l + r2) as above. Integrating term by term gives

dt »!

f1 dt _

J, (1-()>/•(!-d)'•(l-a) ¿Ji(t + 1)-"(! + n)

Now it is enough to notice that the coefficients in the last series are of order n1/6-1 as n —► oo . Thus there is a constant C > 0 such that

dt < C(1 - c)"1/6 = C(1 - r)"1/3(l + r2)1/6 01/6(1 _ ct)

This together with (14) proves that Re(Z) is in Zi1/3 .

Open problem. Is f in Zi1/2 (Zi1/3) if / is a convex (close-to-convex) harmonic mapping ?

Acknowledgment. The author wishes to thank the referee for a careful reading the manuscript and making several useful suggestions for improve­

ment of the paper.

ct) '

(8)

References

[AL] Abu-Muhanna, Y. and A. Lyzzaik, The boundary behaviour of harmonic univalent maps, Pacific J. Math. 141 (1990), 1-20.

[BH] Bshouty, D. and W. Hengartner, Univalent harmonic mappings in the plane, Ann.

Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A 48 (1994), 1-42.

[CL] Cima, J.A. and A.E. Livingston, Integral smoothness properties of some harmonic mappings, Complex Variables 11 (1989), 95-110.

[CS] Clunie, J. and T.Sheil-Small, Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn.

Ser. AI 9 (1984), 3-25.

[DI] Duren, P.L., Theory of Hp spaces, Academic Press, New York - London 1970.

[D2] Duren, P.L., Univalent functions, Springer-Verlag, New York -Tokyo 1983.

[FI] Flett, T. M., Lipschitz spaces of functions on the circle and the disc, J. Math.

Anal. Appl. 39 (1972), 125-158.

[F2] Flett, T. M., The dual of an inequality of Hardy and Littlewood and some related inequalities, ibid., 38 (1972), 746-765.

[MP] Mateljevic, M. and M. Pavlovic, Multipliers of Hp and BMOA, Pacific J. Math.

146 (1990), 71-84.

[Pl] Pommerenke, Cli., On the integral means of the derivative of a univalent function, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985), 254-258.

[P2] Pommerenke, Ch., On the integral means of the derivative of a univalent function II, Bull. London Math. Soc. 17 (1985), 565-570.

[P3] Pommerenke , Ch., Boundary Behaviour of Conformal Maps, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg- New York 1991.

Instytut Matematyki UMCS Plac Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 1 20-031 Lublin, Poland

received April 17, 1996

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Using the definition of the improper integral of the first kind, check if the integrals given below converge, diverge to ∞, −∞, or diverge.. If

The main difference is that in the case of improper integrals of the first kind we have an infinite range of integration, whereas in the case of improper integrals of the second kind

2.1. Hadamard’s three- circles theorem [6, p.. In addition, it is a convex function of log r. 142]) that a continuous convex function has finite right-hand and left-hand derivatives

technologies relevant to particulate mercury emission reduction, adsorption methods used for reduction of gaseous mercury emission, desulphurization and denox

[r]

More precisely, we show that two submanifolds of type number greater than one having the same affine connections and second fundamental forms are affinely equivalent.. The type

By taking S to be intuitionistic logic, the many-valued logic of Lukasiewicz, modal logic (with the necessitation rule), and BCK logic, we get a functional representation theorem

(For the case q = 1, this proof was also given in [11].) In fact, it shows that certain cases of Theorem (3.1) are equivalent to Doob’s results.. We end the section by deriving the