About writing a diploma work giving a successful presentation and
J. Pamin
Chair for Computational Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering,
Cracow University of Technology
Kraków, 2019
Scope of seminar
Diploma procedure (1st cycle)
Instructions on writing a diploma work
Structure of thesis
Bibliography
Useful expressions and other hints
Attention! Plagiarism
How does one present her/his work
Recap of fundamental logic
Guidelines can be found in web pages www.wil.pk.edu.pl and www.cce.pk.edu.pl Diploma subject form
Thesis title page
Academic System of Thesis Archiving (Akademicki System Archiwizacji Prac ASAP)
1st cycle diploma exam and thesis defence See Poradnik Samorządu Studentów PW
http://bcpw.bg.pw.edu.pl/Content/1524/PoradnikPisaniaPracyDyplomowej.pdf
Diploma procedure
Thesis topic form
Students must choose the
topic of the diploma work in 6th semester at the latest.
They ought to fill in the form of selection of diploma work title and have the Polish title
formulated (summary of the work in Polish will be required).
Supervisor submits the diploma subject form to be
approved of by the Chair Head.
Students enclose the diploma subject form as the second
page of the thesis copy
submitted to the supervisor to be archived.
Title page
University and chair names
Degree program, diploma profile
Thesis title in English and Polish
Author's name and surname
Supervisor's name and surname
Grade obtained
Place, year
ASAP system
The procedure of checking the thesis text for plagiarism is given on the web page of the department and at
antyplagiat.pk.edu.pl
After the thesis is accepted by the supervisor, the student uploads his thesis in PDF format to ASAP system (additional information needed, e.g. summary) and states that it is
her/his own independent work
The supervisor approves of the thesis in the system, appoints a reviewer, the document is sent to be checked for plagiarism
The supervisor evaluates the so-called similarity report and, if nothing raises her/his suspicion, states that the work does
not violate the copyright law
In parallel the reviewer reads the thesis, decides with the supervisor about the grade, prepares her/his opinion and makes it available to the student
Sources of further recommendations
1. M. Węglińska, Jak pisać pracę magisterską, Poradnik dla studentów, Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Kraków 2004
2. J.W. Niemantsverdriet, How to Give Successful Oral and Poster Presentation, EFCATS, Eindhoven,
www.efcats.org/Give+Successful+Presentations.html
3. www.wikipedia.org
4. B. Raphael and I.F.C. Smith, Fundamentals of Computer-Aided Engineering, Wiley, Chichester, 2003 (additional reading)
Contents of Reference [1]
Definitions of fundamental notions in scientific writing
Structure of thesis and its parts
Remarks on title - should be concise, precise, unambiguous, representative for thesis contents
Remarks on objective/aim/purpose statement - theoretical or practical
Remarks on considered problem which requires solution
Remarks on general concerns - scientific/engineering field
Research methods and tools
Formal and language aspects
Typical thesis structure
Assignment page (optional)
Contents list
Introduction (possibly preceded by preface)
Overview / state-of-the-art chapter (presentation of research field and relevant literature)
Problem to be solved (author's assignment): basic notions, theory, hypotheses, research methods, organization of work, data available, results to be achieved
Presentation and analysis of results, observations
Conclusions (theoretical, practical)
List of references
Summary, appendices (optional)
Structure of typical chapter
Introduction - particular problem to be solved
Presentation of (data and) results
Evaluation and interpretation of results
Observations and conclusions
Summary (optional)
Every figure/table must be referred to and described.
Conclusion of thesis
Author's final remarks on whole work, recollection of plans, description of what has been achieved
Optionally references to literature, general concerns,
particular problems addressed, objectives, methods and tools used - whatever comments one considers useful or interesting
Statement of main results, discoveries (e.g. “there is a relationship between...”, “this model/method gives better results...”) and ensuing conclusions
Optionally suggestions of future work
References
List of books, articles and other documents (theses,
reports, standards, web sources) ordered according to a certain criterion
For each reference author(s), title, place and year of publication must be given, publisher if relevant
[5] O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L.Taylor, The Finite Element Method, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, London 1989.
[6] de Borst, R. and Muehlhaus, H.-B., Gradient-dependent plasticity: Formulation and algorithmic aspects,
Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng, 35, p. 521-539, 1992.
Useful expressions
Verb forms: passive preferred (e.g. “it has been found that”
rather than “we have found that”), simple present tense is preferred (e.g. “the plate under uniform loading is
analyzed” rather than “has been”), past tense only when reporting on particular research that took place in the past
Connecting words, implication statements: firstly,
secondly, then, finally, moreover, therefore, hence, as a result, this is the reason why, it has been observed that, one can conclude that, ...which leads to the conclusion that
Each symbol used in equations must be explained
Presentation of figures/diagrams, e.g. “in Fig.5 this and that is shown/presented”
Attention! Plagiarism [3]
Definition of plagiarism is not unambiguous, but its sense is clear: it is a theft of someone's intellectual property
Stanford: "use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or
acknowledging the author or source, of another person's original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language,
research, strategies, writing or other form"
Yale: "use of another's work, words, or ideas without attribution", including "using a source's language without quoting, using
information from a source without attribution, and paraphrasing a source in a form that stays too close to the original"
Princeton: “deliberate use of someone else's language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging its source"
Oxford: “use of a writer's ideas or phraseology without giving due credit";
Brown: "appropriating another person's ideas or words (spoken or
written) without attributing those words or ideas to their true source"
Never forget to write the source of
used materials and cited information
How to give good oral presentation [2]
Based on manual by J.W. Niemantsverdriet from
Eindhoven University of Technology: „develop your own presentation style, but try to avoid commonly made
mistakes”
Audience attention
Structure of presentation
Ten steps to successful presentation
Instructions on slides
Time discipline
Audience attention [2]
Audience waits for motivation and background information
Why does the audience stop listening?
Lecturer thinks everybody knows a lot about what he/she presents
Presentation structure is improper
There are too few illustrations, they are unclear or described too fast
Presenter uses complex/hermetic language
Presenter reads, speaks monotonously, too fast or too slow
Think who is in the audience
Speak facing the audience or standing with your side towards people present
Efficient presentation [2]
How should presentation be arranged
General description of the problem presented
Objective, subject and methodology of research
Model 1, results and observations
Model 2, results and comparisons
Conclusions, discoveries, plans
Draw attention, but let the audience relax if the presentation is long
Ten steps to successful presentation [2]
Start preparation early
Formulate your message in one sentence
Select and order results to be presented
Think the introduction over and train it
Formulate precise and convincing conclusions
Most important are informative drawings/figures
Desing clear-cut slides
Communicate, do not show off
Time and general principles [2]
Measure your time while training, do not save time during introduction and conclusion
Sufficient command of the English language is a must
You may not speak longer than allotted time - there is
nothing worse than when the chairmen forces you to finish your presentation before conclusions
Realize what message you would like to convey to the audience and decide in what way it is the best to do it
Post scriptum: fundamental logic [4]
Three types of inference: deduction, abduction, induction Bar with Young's modulus E, cross section A and length L,
under tensile load P exhibits extension u=PL/EA For a given bar we have:
two facts: P and u
one causal rule (if cause then effect): if P then u
Inference type Given info Inferred info Deduction Cause and rule Effect
Abduction Effect and rule Cause Induction Cause and effect Rule
Post scriptum: fundamental logic [4]
Deduction is the only proper inference type in open world
Abduction and induction require closed-world hypothesis (all facts and rules are known for a given problem)
If we know the rule and deformation u is observed, in open world we cannot say that u is caused by load P
(abduction)
If we only observe load P and deformation u we cannot formulate the rule “if P then u” (induction)
Other facts in open world may justify another rule
If one assumes that the only relevant pieces of info are the two facts P and u, and one rule, then abduction and
induction become valid.
Post scriptum: engineering tasks [4]
Engineers operate in open world - are expected to identify creative solutions
Simulation:
cause+structure→effect structure→behaviour (analysis)
Diagnosis:
effect+structure→cause
Synthesis:
required behaviour→structure
Interpretation of information:
structure+behaviour→behaviour models
Creative Thinking – An Essential Skill for the 21st Century