• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

About writing a diploma work and giving a successful presentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "About writing a diploma work and giving a successful presentation"

Copied!
29
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

About writing a diploma work giving a successful presentation and

J. Pamin

Chair for Computational Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering,

Cracow University of Technology

Kraków, 2019

(2)

Scope of seminar

Diploma procedure (1st cycle)

Instructions on writing a diploma work

Structure of thesis

Bibliography

Useful expressions and other hints

Attention! Plagiarism

How does one present her/his work

Recap of fundamental logic

(3)

Guidelines can be found in web pages www.wil.pk.edu.pl and www.cce.pk.edu.pl Diploma subject form

Thesis title page

Academic System of Thesis Archiving (Akademicki System Archiwizacji Prac ASAP)

1st cycle diploma exam and thesis defence See Poradnik Samorządu Studentów PW

http://bcpw.bg.pw.edu.pl/Content/1524/PoradnikPisaniaPracyDyplomowej.pdf

Diploma procedure

(4)

Thesis topic form

Students must choose the

topic of the diploma work in 6th semester at the latest.

They ought to fill in the form of selection of diploma work title and have the Polish title

formulated (summary of the work in Polish will be required).

Supervisor submits the diploma subject form to be

approved of by the Chair Head.

Students enclose the diploma subject form as the second

page of the thesis copy

submitted to the supervisor to be archived.

(5)

Title page

University and chair names

Degree program, diploma profile

Thesis title in English and Polish

Author's name and surname

Supervisor's name and surname

Grade obtained

Place, year

(6)

ASAP system

The procedure of checking the thesis text for plagiarism is given on the web page of the department and at

antyplagiat.pk.edu.pl

After the thesis is accepted by the supervisor, the student uploads his thesis in PDF format to ASAP system (additional information needed, e.g. summary) and states that it is

her/his own independent work

The supervisor approves of the thesis in the system, appoints a reviewer, the document is sent to be checked for plagiarism

The supervisor evaluates the so-called similarity report and, if nothing raises her/his suspicion, states that the work does

not violate the copyright law

In parallel the reviewer reads the thesis, decides with the supervisor about the grade, prepares her/his opinion and makes it available to the student

(7)

Sources of further recommendations

1. M. Węglińska, Jak pisać pracę magisterską, Poradnik dla studentów, Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Kraków 2004

2. J.W. Niemantsverdriet, How to Give Successful Oral and Poster Presentation, EFCATS, Eindhoven,

www.efcats.org/Give+Successful+Presentations.html

3. www.wikipedia.org

4. B. Raphael and I.F.C. Smith, Fundamentals of Computer-Aided Engineering, Wiley, Chichester, 2003 (additional reading)

(8)

Contents of Reference [1]

Definitions of fundamental notions in scientific writing

Structure of thesis and its parts

Remarks on title - should be concise, precise, unambiguous, representative for thesis contents

Remarks on objective/aim/purpose statement - theoretical or practical

Remarks on considered problem which requires solution

Remarks on general concerns - scientific/engineering field

Research methods and tools

Formal and language aspects

(9)

Typical thesis structure

Assignment page (optional)

Contents list

Introduction (possibly preceded by preface)

Overview / state-of-the-art chapter (presentation of research field and relevant literature)

Problem to be solved (author's assignment): basic notions, theory, hypotheses, research methods, organization of work, data available, results to be achieved

Presentation and analysis of results, observations

Conclusions (theoretical, practical)

List of references

Summary, appendices (optional)

(10)

Structure of typical chapter

Introduction - particular problem to be solved

Presentation of (data and) results

Evaluation and interpretation of results

Observations and conclusions

Summary (optional)

Every figure/table must be referred to and described.

(11)

Conclusion of thesis

Author's final remarks on whole work, recollection of plans, description of what has been achieved

Optionally references to literature, general concerns,

particular problems addressed, objectives, methods and tools used - whatever comments one considers useful or interesting

Statement of main results, discoveries (e.g. “there is a relationship between...”, “this model/method gives better results...”) and ensuing conclusions

Optionally suggestions of future work

(12)

References

List of books, articles and other documents (theses,

reports, standards, web sources) ordered according to a certain criterion

For each reference author(s), title, place and year of publication must be given, publisher if relevant

[5] O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L.Taylor, The Finite Element Method, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, London 1989.

[6] de Borst, R. and Muehlhaus, H.-B., Gradient-dependent plasticity: Formulation and algorithmic aspects,

Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng, 35, p. 521-539, 1992.

(13)

Useful expressions

Verb forms: passive preferred (e.g. “it has been found that”

rather than “we have found that”), simple present tense is preferred (e.g. “the plate under uniform loading is

analyzed” rather than “has been”), past tense only when reporting on particular research that took place in the past

Connecting words, implication statements: firstly,

secondly, then, finally, moreover, therefore, hence, as a result, this is the reason why, it has been observed that, one can conclude that, ...which leads to the conclusion that

Each symbol used in equations must be explained

Presentation of figures/diagrams, e.g. “in Fig.5 this and that is shown/presented”

(14)

Attention! Plagiarism [3]

Definition of plagiarism is not unambiguous, but its sense is clear: it is a theft of someone's intellectual property

Stanford: "use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or

acknowledging the author or source, of another person's original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language,

research, strategies, writing or other form"

Yale: "use of another's work, words, or ideas without attribution", including "using a source's language without quoting, using

information from a source without attribution, and paraphrasing a source in a form that stays too close to the original"

Princeton: “deliberate use of someone else's language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging its source"

Oxford: “use of a writer's ideas or phraseology without giving due credit";

Brown: "appropriating another person's ideas or words (spoken or

written) without attributing those words or ideas to their true source"

(15)

Never forget to write the source of

used materials and cited information

(16)

How to give good oral presentation [2]

Based on manual by J.W. Niemantsverdriet from

Eindhoven University of Technology: „develop your own presentation style, but try to avoid commonly made

mistakes”

Audience attention

Structure of presentation

Ten steps to successful presentation

Instructions on slides

Time discipline

(17)

Audience attention [2]

Audience waits for motivation and background information

(18)

Why does the audience stop listening?

Lecturer thinks everybody knows a lot about what he/she presents

Presentation structure is improper

There are too few illustrations, they are unclear or described too fast

Presenter uses complex/hermetic language

Presenter reads, speaks monotonously, too fast or too slow

(19)

Think who is in the audience

Speak facing the audience or standing with your side towards people present

(20)

Efficient presentation [2]

(21)

How should presentation be arranged

General description of the problem presented

Objective, subject and methodology of research

Model 1, results and observations

Model 2, results and comparisons

Conclusions, discoveries, plans

Draw attention, but let the audience relax if the presentation is long

(22)

Ten steps to successful presentation [2]

Start preparation early

Formulate your message in one sentence

Select and order results to be presented

Think the introduction over and train it

Formulate precise and convincing conclusions

Most important are informative drawings/figures

Desing clear-cut slides

Communicate, do not show off

(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)

Time and general principles [2]

Measure your time while training, do not save time during introduction and conclusion

Sufficient command of the English language is a must

You may not speak longer than allotted time - there is

nothing worse than when the chairmen forces you to finish your presentation before conclusions

Realize what message you would like to convey to the audience and decide in what way it is the best to do it

(27)

Post scriptum: fundamental logic [4]

Three types of inference: deduction, abduction, induction Bar with Young's modulus E, cross section A and length L,

under tensile load P exhibits extension u=PL/EA For a given bar we have:

two facts: P and u

one causal rule (if cause then effect): if P then u

Inference type Given info Inferred info Deduction Cause and rule Effect

Abduction Effect and rule Cause Induction Cause and effect Rule

(28)

Post scriptum: fundamental logic [4]

Deduction is the only proper inference type in open world

Abduction and induction require closed-world hypothesis (all facts and rules are known for a given problem)

If we know the rule and deformation u is observed, in open world we cannot say that u is caused by load P

(abduction)

If we only observe load P and deformation u we cannot formulate the rule “if P then u” (induction)

Other facts in open world may justify another rule

If one assumes that the only relevant pieces of info are the two facts P and u, and one rule, then abduction and

induction become valid.

(29)

Post scriptum: engineering tasks [4]

Engineers operate in open world - are expected to identify creative solutions

Simulation:

cause+structure→effect structure→behaviour (analysis)

Diagnosis:

effect+structure→cause

Synthesis:

required behaviour→structure

Interpretation of information:

structure+behaviour→behaviour models

Creative Thinking – An Essential Skill for the 21st Century

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Celem zbadania wpływu operacji zaciskania rur na ich wytrzymałość hydrostatyczną, próbki rur PE dn 63 mm (PE 80 i PE 100) po przeprowadzeniu zaciskania zostały

The trigger-probability mapping displays the interplay between trigger values for a given signpost and the level of confidence regarding both that critical conditions have changed,

In two recent monographs devoted to SR literary criticism, Evan Gottlieb’s Romantic Realities: Speculative Realism and British Romanticism and Brian Willems’ Speculative Realism

Н а 20-і рр. припадає розквіт модернізму у світовому літературному просторі, а на українських теренах — це доба нового культурного

Rzeczywiście, część byłych obywateli NRD, przede wszystkim dawna elita partyjna i gospo­ darcza, nie zmieniła swych poglądów politycznych, a zatem budowała pozy­ tywny obraz

The basic rule of comparing tests is the following: for a given set of null and alternative hypotheses, for a given significance level, the test which is more powerful is

However, retail chains with existing detailed data will treat this information as business secrets, and will not voluntarily outsource it.restore confidence while

In the article the modern condition of the world power industry are explored, the structure of global energy consumption are analyzed. The necessity to diversify the supply