Long
term
effects
of
cyclic loading
on
suction
caisson
foundations
in sand
Prof. Frits van Tol TU Delft
/
Deltares lng. Rene Thijssen Volker lnfraDesign/
SPT )ffshore ln Cristina Lupea TU Detft-+-".-ffi;+
O ,.: a lr .a a .()
:(.
r.'-" ì .-7;-| --a,? I E Ð o\
,J'Figure 1 - Sketch af the cansidered structure, óMW wind turbtne with a th ree- le g jacket su bstructu re
INTROÐUCTION
Recently pubtished
statistics by
the
EuropeanWind
Energy Association, EWEA [2012], have shown that the investments in the offshore wind energy sector have ìncreasedfrom under
€500 mittion in 2001 to €4500 miLLion in 2012. Accor-dingto
DTI [20011,30% of these investments is re[ated to foundationcosts.
ln order
to
reducethe overat[ costs two
soLutions were identified: increasingthe turbine
capacity and/or movingf urther f rom the shore where higher wind power
coutd be tapped in. Both these sotutions lead to an increase in the foundation size and its costs. According to Senders [2008), significant project costs during instaltation are caused by stand-by periods as consequence
of
bad weather condi-tions. Thus, decreasingthe number of
offshoreFigure 2 - Comparison of modell.ing capabiLities af the avai{abLe approaches
operations required by simptifying
the
founda-tion instattafounda-tion may reduce costs significantty.[aboratory and/or in-situ testing is done.
Suction caisson foundations provide a simptified
instattatlon
procedure.According
to
Señders [2008] and Byrne & HouLsby [2003) suction cais-sonswithin
a mutti-footing configuration are a viab[e economicaI and environmental.l.y f riendLysotution
Unfortunatety,in
the current
guide-Lines and standards Limited guidanceis
given retatedto the
assessmentof their
long term
performance throughout the 25 year design [ife time [characterised by over 108 loading cycLes). Lupea [20'1 3) gives an overview of the avaitable approaches and suggests an aLternative method to assess the tong term behaviour of suction cais-sons under cyclic loading conditions. The current articte presents onLy a summary of these appro-aches The focus is to present the resutts of the modeLl.ing carried out, as these may simptify the design process, provided that validation throughPROBLEM DESCRIPTION
The effects
of
[ongterm
verticaI cyctic loading on a suction caisson embedded in sand are to be determined in the context of :.
Loss of stabitity-
the reduction of subsoiI bearing capacity due to pore pressure bu itd- u p;.
Loss of serviceabitity-
accumutation of differentiaI setttements Ii.e. introduction of rotati on ).It is to be noted that the governing requirements
are
retated
to
the
overatLtitting of the
windturbine
structure,
thus
imposingstrict
boun-daries retated
to
differentiaI sett[ementof
the suction caissons underneath the three teg jacket structure (see figure 1 IAVAILABLE APPRAACHES
The two most commonty used standards within It*âti!'e procFs -eror
gÊntration (trplicit +
control steFsJ, tr-¡¡ge awbtr 0f ptrmettrs with mcieæ physl ml mming, mlibration båEed m lÂborÂtor5¡ ttrts. Ittrat¡ve proffis -wor gmmation (*plicit + @ntro¡ lteps] , Large nmbtr of pilåmettr$ soi¡ d¿tÀ for ca¡ibration. Focos - steel comFgntrts ed not soi¡.se¡ected dttrie ref. steel,05t 1SS01-4 for geotechniml dæ!gnJ eñ'eclivÞ stress method¡ - all coobibutions to pore prëEur$ m$t be included cyciic load "=" qu!-static Liúitåìi ms 5Þæsæ/ Pore prssuæ
Stiffas s / Relâtive dtr ity
st¡eriBth mdy'or C¿Þacitf.
üly duê to st¡tic loadins only due to rtâtic
loådl¡s D¡sp¡acffifltsy'sFe¡n Åcdmu¡âtiob Cyclic loading NotmEgdêd Soil T,lpe Pils GBS Loag þipÊplls Foudetion T'99e Hybrid Hvbrid/Constitutive Empiri cai Ëmpiriel lfodel Tlpe Sfuâiú âffimülâtiÕr Eodels
PoFe presrc build-up modcls N0n50K
DNV APr/ts()
Oth* Uttratue, R6Érch Nôffi, Ståndä'ds od/or Guidelines
Summary
0ffshore wind turbine projects have been characterised by an increase in
costs, sizes and distances from shore, EWEA {2012J This created a need of investigating the adequacy of alternative and more fìnanciatty
attrac-tive foundation types such as suction caissons. Within a mutti-footing configuration, such as a three-leg jacket structure, these foundations prove to be an advantageous sotution for increasing water
depths lt
isdue to
their
configuration that a simpì.ified design is possibLe, [eading to onty verticaI cycLic [oading conditions. This articte provides a concisesummary of the M Sc. thesis of C. Lupea and presents an approach that
may altow for the simptìfication of the [onE
term
perfonnranceassess-ment under vertical cycLic loading of suction caissons ennbedded in
sand lt
provides a conservative theoreticaL base for the ideniification of potentiatLy damaging loads, which couLd cause significant pore pressurebuitd-up and strain accumutation. 0ne of the key conctusìons of this
research is that the foundation response is a function of both the apptied mean [oad and its cyclic amptitude for both terrsite and compresslve loading. Nonetheless, experimentaI work rnust be canried out to vatidate these results. o L 0 À =o' Soi1 H 8md nodel rith irtergrilrler atrei¡
=a1
-Enpíricel fomntes f€úr¡poletiúliûcre-.¡fg eccúf,uletiø r¡te - - - Iæi¡creæirg¡ccrEEl¡timrete
Îíoe
lal or cycleal-f
Figure 3
-
Sketch of proposed modelfor pore pressure buiLd-up (simiLar procedure for strainsJtion mode[ (Wichtman et aL. (201 1]). 0nce a trend
can be observed
in
pore pressure buiLd-up andstrain accu mu Lation, extra polation formulas can be used
-
see figure 3.Loading conditions
An
important
ro[e
in
the
proposedmodeI
isptayed by the considered Loading conditions [see f igure 1). ln the case that was analysed
for
thethesis, representative
for
North Sea conditions, Loading conditions were represented bythe
re-suttant forces at seabed [eve[ for the simutation ofthe
25 year designtife time of
a
óMW windturbine. The raw data
on
reaction forces
atjacket
Leg- caisson interfacewere
statisticatLy processedin
orderto
determine both extreme va[ues as wet[ as the most probable operationaILoads.
The
extreme valueswere used
in the
prede-sign
of
the
suction
caissonsfor
a
three-teg jacket structure. A safety factor of 2.5 was usedin
order
to
checkthe
foundation's capacity to undertake tension. The obtained caisson dimen-sions are 15 m diameter and 1ó m embedment Length, using formutas provided by API and DNVfor
undrained conditions.A
simptified anatysis showed that the required pressures forinstatla-tion were within the [imits imposed by the water depth of 40m. As this was not the main topic of research no further analysis was carried out [i.e. buckLing anatysis).
The most probabte operational load cases were
determined
basedon the
highest number
ofoccurrences
and
the
highest mean
and/oramptitude
of
the
Load, whicheveris
governing reLatedto
pore
pressure buitd-up and
strain accumutation. Dueto
the
high safety
factorsused in the predesign, the dominant operatÌonal Loading
cases
for
the three
caissons
provedto
be betow 10% ofthe
caisson's capacity. For cLarity, the fotLowing vatueswit[
be referring tounfactored Loads
with
respect to the capacity ofthe
15 m diameter suction caisson,with
a'1 ó m embedment [ength.the
offshore industry, the American Petroteumlnstitute
(APl)and Det
NorskeVeritas
IDNVl,provide guideLines
for the
anatysisof
stender pipe piLes Itength (Ll over diameter ID] ratio'
'10)
and gravity based foundations IL/D.1 ]. For
suc-tion
caissons having an embedmentratio
IL/DJ between 1and
10, depending onthe soil
type and instaltation pressures, no specific guidanceis
given. Furthermore, these standards provideLimited guidance
in
the
assessmentof
cycticLoading
on
foundations
through
empiricaIformuLas [the API suggests the use of a
reduc-tion
factor A = 0.9for the lateraI
resistance ofstender pites,
that
is
independent ofthe
cyctic Loading characteristics;the
DNV proposes an effective stress anatysis anda
reduction of theshear
stress
basedon
pore pressure buil.d-upfor gravity based foundations).
The avaiLable research suggests the use of
con-stitutive modeLs with a better capacity to assess the change in soiI properties throughout each in-dividuaL cycLe. These modeLs are either based on
strain or
pore pressure accumutation. A bridgeover
the
[arge number of cycles, characteristic to offshore toading conditions, is generatty pro-vided through the use of empiricaL formu[as andcontroI cyctes [Safinus et at. 201 1 ). These types
of modets shaLl. be considered as hybrids.
From
literature
search, severaI
criteria
wereidentified as being significant in the assessment of this prob[em. The comparison of the avai[abte
solutions
to
the
probtemat
hand
is
given
infigure
2.lt
becomes ctearfrom this
figure that the research carried out covers much better the questions faced now in the offshore windindus-t ry.
PROPOSED MODEL
From literature
it
is
conc[udedthat
for
the probtem at hand the use of a hybrid modeI usingthe
hypoptastic sand model. (Von WoLffersdorff,199ó)
with
intergranutar
strain
INiemunis
&Her[e,
1 997)is to
be
preferred.
The
reasonsfor this
choice residewith the
good prediction capabiLities of the modeL and its previous usage as the base for the High CycLic Strain-Failue Enve¡ope-Bang et al,(201Ð -Failue Enyelope-Supachawdote êt al. (2004) -Ho¡lzontal Opemtional Loa¿s
*Horizontal E\treme Loads
z à ñ G U
î
F 2-58+05 5,0E+04 7 0E+04 6 0E+04 5 0E+04 4 0E+04 3 0E+04 2 0E+04 1.0E+04 0.0E+00 0.0E+001,0E+05 1.5E+05 2.0E+05 Horlzonal Capacity [kNl z E { I
r
E E E Phâse Z F-* hptrtude [kNIF-*.
r' Phæe 4 ÂDpübde [d,Il Fu" r (pÊñd of 1 rycl.) lsl Tiûe lsl -,{ppljèdqEi-fttic loâd (discèds¡doD of ryclic lo¡d)
. ., * - Cyc)¡cloÁd sirl (b be dtsæ6sed)
Figure 5
-
Sketch of discretised loading in faur phases0.
h^
Figure 4 - FaiLure enveLope af the predesigned caisson
The
inftuence
of
horizontaI
toading
was investigatedby using
the
formu[as
suggested by Bang et at. [2011ì and Supachawarote et a[.[2002']. The
latter
method is appLicabLe for ctays.For
this
method,the
undrained shear strengthof
sand was
determined
using
DNV
(19921recommendations
It was conctuded
that
horizontal Loading did not yietd a significant change in the verticaI capacity-
see figure 4. The probtem at hand was there-fore simptified to verticaLcyclic [oading onty.The Loading conditions
were not
appl.iedcycl.i-caLLy, but quasi-stpticatLy using
four
phases asshown in figure 5. ln the odd numbered phases the load was instantty apptied undrained, whi[e in the even numbered phases time was altowed for consolidation for hal.f the period of one cycle The period was conservativety chosen equaI to the wave period, approximatety 7 s, even though
from
a study onthe
Loading condÌtions fottowsthat the
governing cyctic loadsare
[ike[yto
bec[oser
to
the typicaLwind
period of 30s. These vatues are atso c,utside the order of the opera-ting frequency of wind turbine generators.The hypoplastic sand model with intergranular strain
The hypopLastic sand mode[
with
intergranutarstrain
is a
non-[inear
incrementaL constitutive modet. lt associates the strain rate to the stress rate, expressing aLI mechanicaI behaviouraI cha-racteristics in one sing[e tensoriaI equation The particutarity ofthe
modeLis
retated tothe
factthat
it
does not decompose thestrain
rate into etastic or plastic parts, as one was accustomed from e[asto-pl.astic theory. The totaIstrain
is infact the sum of two components: an
intergranu-Lar
strain
tensor
retated tothe
deformation of interface layers at intergranutar contacts and acomponent retated to the rearrangement of the
soiI sketeton
Thefirst
componentis
observed in reverse and neutraI toading conditions, being characteristic to hypoetastic behaviour. ln conti-nuous loading conditions both components con-tribute and the behaviour may be characterised as hypoptastic.The
modified equation
by
Gudehus
11996Jinc[udes the inftuence of the stress leve[ (baro-tropyÌ and of density (pyknotropyl. The currently considered standard hypopl.astic sand modeI by Von Wotffersdorff has a Matsuoka-Nakai criticaI
CriticaI
state friction angl.e ["JGranutar hardness Icontrots the shape of the Limiting void ratio curves
-
stope) Exponent of compression law Icontrots the shape of the Lirniting void ratio curves-c u rvatu re )
Void ratio at maximum density for p=¡ lcontrols the peak sirength) Void ratio at criticaI state for p=0 [control.s the peak and residuaI strength) Void ratio at minimum density for p=¡ (controts the initiaI stiff nessJ
Pyknotropy factor controtl.ing the peak friction angle Pyknotropy factor controtting the shear stiffness
Stiffness muttiptier for initiaI or reversed toading (stiffness increase for a 900 reversat) Stiffness mul.tiplier for neutraI Loading [stiffness increase for a 180o reversaL]
Smatl. strain stiff ness Limit (radius of etastic range, may be taken as a materiaI constantJ
Parameter adjusting stiffness reduction curve stope Iused to catibrate against cyctic test dataì
Parameter adjusting stiffness reduction curve stope (taken as materiaI constant)
n edo €c0 eio c[ f3 mR fTì1 R'.n.,. 0.
x
Tabte
I
- Hypoptastic sand modetwith intergranular
strain concept parametersSymbol.
DescriptionTabte 2 - Overview of soil characteristics
0.
o 13t-l
CT e¿b t-t 0.4 Pr,¡utt< lkg/m3J 2072 Pi,ary lk9/m3J 1722 kylm/sl
2.5E-5t-l
0.13
1.s R-"*t-l
1.E-04l3,
x
t-lt-l
ê¡t-l
0.54 h lGPal 2.2t-l
0.22 n ecot-l
0.55 êiot-l
0.85 ffì pt-l
1.1 ft'ì¡t-l
1 0.01ó-0.75 LO20
GE1TECHN'IEK- Januari2ol4LONG TERM EFFECTS OF CYCLIC LOAD¡NG ON SUCTION CAISSON FOUNDATIONS IN
sAND
a Èå
ñ Þ I Þ e"¡t\ t o-Model
...TestData orB ¿rf9ol a Èå
ctã
Þ I Þe"6
$"
-Model
...TestData 9do r lo1+orl/2 [kPqo'F
-Model
...TestDataF
Àå
¡
L rût c1[o/ol x 6 Eo
o
r-0E-05 1.08-04 1.08-03 1.08-02
1.0E-01
1.08+00 90 80F70
&å60
Iro
sloo
Èt30
oÀ20
10 0-Model
-Test
DataR-"
",
B-yctê¡
[-( 020 40
60 80 100 t20
1+0 a t.
TestData
"Model2
r|rn
t-¡
Figure 6 - CaLîbration of hypoplastic sand modeL parameters
stress
state
condit¡on incorporated. Any mate-riaI point within the soiI mass is described using the stress state and void ratio. HypoptasticityaL-lows for atI the stress hisiory to be incorporated
in the current stress, while the presence of the void ratio in the formuta makes the model more
sensitive
to
past
deformations.
According to KoLymbas [2000ì hypoptasticity has an atgebraicformutation using
a
simpte tensoriaI
re[ation,whitst the
hyperpl.astic modeIis
a geometrical approach,using pictoriaI
conceptssuch
as
ayieLd and plastic potentiaI surfaces. More
infor-mation
regardingthe
hypoptasticsand
model can also be found in Bardet (1990] and Ling and Yang [200óì.The hypoptastic sand modeI
with
intergranutar strain, as imptemented in Ptaxis by Maðín (2012lr,has a totaI of 13 parameters to be catibrated, see Tabte 1. The
first
eight parameters betong to the hypopLastic sand model and areto
becatibra-ted
using
isotropical.Ly conso[idated undrainedtriaxiaI
test
data.
The last five
parameters,related
to
the
intergranutar [smattl strain,
areto be calibrated using cyctic undrained test data
[cyctic undrained
direct
simpLeshear tests
orcyctic
undrained
triaxiaI tests)
with
varylng cyctic shear stress ratios (CSSRl.Figure 7 - CaLibration of intergranuLar strain concept parameters
The
catibration
procedure
requires
a
goodunderstanding
of
[aboratorytest
resutts,
soiIbehaviour
and
of the
inftuenceof the
modetparameters. The soil. testing
faci[ities
in
Ptaxiswere
usedfor the
catibration
of the
soil
withrespect
to
the
existing cycIic [aboratory
testdata- see figure ó and figure 7.
The values resutting from the in-situ, l'aboratory
testing
and catibration procedureare
summa-rised in tabLe 2.The B, parameter depends on the apptied CSSR
(see
figure
81. Therefore,it
is
used as a bridgebetween
the
[aboratory andin-situ
conditions.It
ensuresthat
the
responseof the soil
to
theapptied
Loadingconditions
in-situ
is
correctty extrapolatedfrom the
loading conditions in the [aboratory.Extrapolation fo rmulas
The extrapolation formutas are a best
fit
basedon
the
accumulationtrend
that is
observed inthe
resutts generated by runningthe
anatyses, as shown in figure 12 and figure 13.Proble m D iscretisation
Even
though
the
probtem
is
axisymmetric
atboundary vatue levet, the probtem was analysed
using Ptaxis 3D, due
to the
Expert Mode func-tionatitywhich
atlowsthe
userto
input
aLL theinformation using command [ines. This feature
attows
for
a more
rapid and
semi-automatic introduction of the [oading conditions.Geometrica[ty,
the
probtem
was
discretisedin
two different
ways.First
a
rectangutar soilvotume
extending
45m around the
caisson,with
aLLdrained
boundarieswas
considered.Secondty
only
a quarter of the
probtem was anatysed,with
the verticaI adjacent boundaries considered undrained-
see figure 1 0. The tatestwas chosen
in
orderto
ensure more symmetry in the automatica[[y generated mesh, asit
wasobserved
that the
non-symmetryof the
meshwas
inftuencingthe
resutts.
Furthermore, theboundaries
of the soiI
volumewere
chosen ató.R [R
is the
radius of the suction
caisson] in order to avoid that they influence the simulation resu[ts. For the anatysis of this probLem interfa-ces were used between the caisson and the sand votume within and around it.ln
orderto
be abteto
observethe
response ofthe soiI
massto the
Loading conditions, nodes and stress points were setected both within and
,.!-o.t4
o.L2 o.10 o.08È
(Ao
()
o.06
o.o4
o.o2 o.o00
500
1,ooo
1,500
2,ooo 2,500
3,oooNuo
[-l
Figure 8 - lnfluence of fi, on C55,? and number of cycles required
ta reach liquefaction (N¡¡r)
outside the caisson
-
see figure 1 1É
û
ú
o
0.10
o.09
o.08
o.o7
o.o6
o.o5
o.o4
o.o3
o.o2
o.o1o.oo
-o.o
pr_bect
fit
[-] o-;o o 10 o. ¿o n ìo ----irìa
nq- lßr hest 3stfit
ißrt
Figure 9
-
Relatìonship between p. and C55R - curve through the valuesof þ, giving fhe best fit with laboratory data
RESULTS
As
the
appIied operationa[ loads were actuallyunder
10%of the
predesigned caisson'scapa-city, the resuLts showed no pore pressure
bui[d-up during the course of the 520 cycLes analysed
Isee
figure
12); havinga
symmetric
responsearound the zero mean va[ue
at
different pointswithin the soiI mass). Pore pressure buil.d-up is
the driving factor in reducing the bearing
capa-city of sand and consequentLy endangering
sta-bitity as it was defined in the Probtem
Descripti-on. ln figure 12 it can be seen that no significant
changes occur and therefore the stabiLity of the
structure is ensured.
When evatuating the strain accumutation in time
[see
figure
13) atrend
may be observed withintwo of the points located in the soiI mass in the
caisson. The accumutation trend forthese points
represents a Iinear distribution of 1.1.10-8/cycte.
lf
this trend
is
extrapotated[inearly
for
onemittion
cycles,a
tiLtof
0.5oof the
ful.L super-structure coutd be reached.A
[inear
extrapolationis
madeover one
mit-[ion cycles only, due to the fact that a signif icant
error
may be propagated. Measured [aboratoryor
in-situ
data may
providea
more
accurate extrapotation method.Having
such
a
smaLl
strain
accumuLationrate,
titting of the structure
dueto
differentiaLsettLements
is
within
the
boundaries
usedin the
offshore
wind
industry and,
therefore, serviceabitity is ensured.An
additionaI ana[ysis
was
carried
out
toinvestigate
the
foundation's behaviourto
moreextreme conditions (storm eventsl,
based on[oads
at
increased percentagesof
the
capa-city. Unfortunatety the modeI response in some
of
these
cases showed significant
instabil.ityIsee
figure
15J.ln
these
analysesit
couLd beobserved
that the
medium dense sand initiattydensified
within
the
caisson,but as the
cycticloading continueC, [ocatised loosening
due
toincreased
pore
pressure
buiLd-upunder
thecaisson top pl.ate and centre
took
ptace. Theseeffects are not expected to be significant in
den-ser sand, according to Andersen (20091.
The reasons for which instabiLity and
overestima-tion of pore pressure buitd-up occurs within the
software may be related to 3 factors [Ptaxis, 2013ì:
1
Even thoughthe
probtemis
symmetric
atboundary vatue levet, the generated mesh is
not symmetric and this causes
non-symme-tric
fai[ure mechanisms;2.
The high water depth of 40 m may have alsocaused unbatanced forces
within the
soft-ware;
3.
The over-estimationof
pore pressures wasatready expected
from the soiI
catibrationp roced u re.
Even though
for the
extreme cases noconctu-sions coutd
be
drawn
regarding stabiLity andservicea bitity, this modeI alLowed for the creation
of a chart that a[[ows for a safe design zone [see
figure
1ó1, within which [ongterm
performanceis ensured, by having a volumetric
strain
accu-mutation rate sma[[er or equaL to 1.1.10-8/cycte.
This
boundaryis
drawn
for
a
medium
densesand
Il¡
= 50%ì, considering a loading period ofapproximatety 7 seconds
for the
verticaL cyc[icload and a [inear accumutation trend. Moreover,
the baltast weight that may be appl.ied on top of
the caisson [which provides a positive effect on
the axiaI tensionaI capacity) was not considered.
It is
important
to
noticefrom this
chart,
alsofound by Jardine et at. [2012], that the
foundati-on respfoundati-onse depends foundati-on both the mean load and
the amptitude of the appLied load. Moreover, it is
gænetry in operational ænditious gæmetry in *treme mnditiom
Figuur 10 - FrobLem geometry {in operationat Loading canditions futL caisson, in extreme loading condítions anly a quarter)
5500 4500 3500 2,300 1,500 500 -500 '1500 -2 500 cydð [-1
Figure 15 - Sample of pore pressure buitd-up ÌnstabiLíty as a
function of the number of cycLes for more extreme cases
accuracy
of
the
obtained
resutts.
Nonethe-[ess,the
boundary as givenin
figure
1óprovi-des
a
guidetinefor a
safe
foundation design,though
it
might not always prove economic. This boundary is atso an indication of which cyclic Loadsneed to be further investigated in order to assess
possible long
term
damages. The same figureatso
confirms that
the
foundationcan
resist tensil.e loads,but
that
capacity decreasessig-nificantly
as
tensi[e
cyctic loading componentsappear.
Taking
this
tensionaLcapacity
into accountin
the design is an importantoptimiza-tion
sincein
the
designof
suction cêissons upto
now a[[ tensiona[ loads are normatty avoidedby
adding batlast
on the
caissons. Therefore, within certain Loading ranges this additional. weight might not be required.The given resutts
are
the
outcome
of
the researchand
numerical analyses conducted as part of the author's M.Sc. thesis. A futt overview of aLL the considered assumptions, [imitatlons and obtained resultscan
be foundin
Lupea [2013).Nonethetess, the provided results are based
pure-[y on numericaI anatyses, thus f iel.d and/or [abora-tory testing must stil.[ be carried out for vatidation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
As
mentionedin the
abstract,
this article
is basedon the work
carried
out for the
M.Sc.thesis
of
C.
Lupeaas part
of
her
graduationfrom
the
Geo-engineering programmeat
the TechnicaI Universityof
DeLft. Great appreciationis
given
to
dr. ir.
R.B.J.
Brinkgreve,ir.
W.J.Karreman, ir. WG. Versteijten and ir: H.J. Luger, whose guidance and support have made at[ this possibte. The authors atso
thank
a[[the
othersFigure 1ó - lnfLuence of mean Load and ampLitude on the foundation response for medium dense sand under undrained conditions, with a verticaL loading period of approx 7s [the safe design zone is characterised by dominantly
hy-poelastic behaviour, whiLe outside of it by dominantly hypaplastic behaviour)
that have provided input during the course of this research.
REFERENCES
-
K.H. Andersen [2009ì. Bearing capacity undercyctic loading
-
offshore, atong the coast, and on [and. the 21st Bjerrum [ecture presented in Osl.o, 23 November 2007. Canadian Geotechni-caI Journat, 4ó[5] :51 3-535.-
J
P.Bardet,
[19901. "Hypoptastic ModeL forSands." JournaI
of
Engineering
Mechanics,116.9],, 1973-1994
-
B.W. Byrne and G.T. Houtsby [20031.Foundati-ons
for
offshore windturbines.
PhilosophicaL Transactions of the RoyaI Society4.361:2909-2930.
-
S. Bang, K. Jones, K. Kim, Y. Kim and Y. Cho'.2011). lnctined
Loading capacltyof
suction piLesin
sand. 0cean Engineering, 38[7]:9'1 5 -924.-
EuropeanWind
EnergyAssociation
IEWEA, 20131. The European offshorewind
industry-key trends and statistics 201 2.
-
Department of Trade and lndustry (DTl, 20011.Monitoring
&
Evatuationof
Btyth
0ffshoreWind Farm.
-
G. Gudehus f 199óì. A comprehensiveconstitu-tive
equationfor
granutar
materia[s. JournaIof the
Japanese GeotechnicaI Society: Soitsa nd Fou ndatio ns 36111: 1 -12.
-
R. Jardine,A
Puech and K.H. Andersen,'Cy-ctic
Loadingof
Offshore Pites: PotentiaIEf-fects and PracticaL Design", in proceedings of
7th int.
conf. OffshoreSite
lnvestigation and Geotechnlcs, London, Sept. 201 2.-
D. Kotymbas [2000]. Constitutive Model.l.ing of Granutar Materiats. Engineering 0n[ineLibra-ry. Springer-Verl.ag. ISB N 97 83540669 197 .
-
H. Ling and S. Yang, [200ó1. "Unified SandMo-deI Based on
the
CriticaI State and Generati-zed PLasticity." JournaI of Engineering Mecha-nics, 132[12],'l 380- 1 39 1 .-
C. Lupea [20131. Longterm
effectsof
cyclic Loading on suction calsson foundations. M.5c. Thesis, TechnicaL University of DeLft- D.
MaËín [20121. PLAXISlmplementation
of HypopLasticity. Charles U niversity of Prague.-
A. Niemunis and L Herte[1997].
Hypopl.astic modeI for cohesionLess soi[s with el'astlc strainrange.
Mechanics of Cohesive-FrictionaIMa-Ierials 2:279-299.
-
Plaxis [2013) private e-maiI communication.-
5. Safinus, G. Sedl.acek and U. Hartwig [201 1ì.CycLic Response
of
Granular SubsoiI
Undera
Gravity Base Foundationfor
Offshore Wind Turbines. ln Proceedings of the 30th lnternati-onaL Conference on Ocean, Offshore and ArcticEngineering 0MAE, pp. 875-882.
-
M. Senders [20081. Suction Caissonsin
Sand as Tripod Foundationsfor
Offshore WindTur-bines.
Ph.D. Thesis, University
of
WesternAustratia-School
of Civit and Resource Engi-neen ng.-
C. Supachawarote, M. Randol.ph and S.Gour-venec
[2004].
lnctined Putt-out
Capacity ofSuction Caissons.
ln
Proceedings ofthe
14thlnternationa[ Offshore and Po[ar Engineering Conference, France, pp. 500-50ó.
-
P. von Wotffersdorff (199ó1. A hypoptasticreta-tion
for
granutar materiatswith a
predefined[imit
state surface.
Mechanicsof
Cohesive-FrictionaI Materlats 1l3l:251 -27 1. roo% 90% 80% 700/o 60% 50% 300/0 2oo/o 1Oof,2 oPr ú6p: -100/0 -2Aø/o -300/0 4Oo/o -s04" -600/0 -7Oo/o -aoø/ó -9Oo/o 700%
;
Ê c 0 E 0 E ts A A8putude/ c¡pactty P/d aaaDominæt Hjpoelastie Behaviou aDoÈinæt HJ4roplastic Behaviou
rf
,/o 4(ro 5(
/."'
ale
(leslgr t
zote
It^ r-(1-lolC
-Elcwclel
iLONG TERM EFFEETS OF CYCLIC LOADING ON SUCTION CAISSON FOUNDATIONS IN
5AND
Figure 12 - Sa,nple of excess pare pressure bui\d-up in time at
variaus points within the soil. mass {52A cycLesi
Figure 11 - Selection af nades and stress points for nleasuretnents
-4 E-19 2 5915E+06 2 5925È+06 i-3.8-05 1 Ð,05 ,2.8-05 , - ' I -K -L-M--N-O R -S -Linear (K) -4 Ð-O5 -5-E-05 -6.8-0s
Figure 13 - Sarnpte of volumetric stra¡n accumulation in tirne at
variaus points within the soi| mass {520 cyclesl
observed that as toading within the tensi[e
regi-on occurs, due to increased amptitudes and low
mean vaLues, the undrained capacity decreases
Yet,
this
chart shows that there isstitt
apossi-bitity
for the
foundationto
undertakea
[imitedamount
of
tensiLe Loading,thus
reducing thetotaI amount of batlast weight required. A design
comptetety
within
the
safe zonemight not
beeconomic, but
it
can hel.pthe
engìneer identifythe cases that wiLL cause neither significant pore
pressure buil.d-up nor strain accumuLation.
The obtained resutts represent a
first
step intohaving a better understanding of the behaviour
of
suction
caissons embeddedin
sand
underverticaI
cyctic loading. Additionatty, LaboratorymodeI
testing
is
stitt
required
for
vaLidation.Furthermore,
the
sensitivityof the
foundationresponse
to
changein
retative densityof
thesand,
compressibil.ity,effects
of
preshearingshouLd also be investigated
CONCLUSIANS
The prob[em anatysed during the course of this
research refers to the Long
term
performance ofsuction caissons under cyctic Loading. This was
investigated
in
orderto
ctarifythe
adequacy ofsuction caissons as foundations for Large (ó MWì
offshore wind turbines.
An
important aspectthat
has been discoveredand proved
with
this
investigationis that
for
athree leg jacket structure, suction caissons have a significant advantage in horizontaI resistance:
due to the specific Aeometry of the prob[em and
the
choiceof
Large diameter suction caissons,the
horizontaI resistanceis
much [arger
thanthe appLied horizontaI Loads. Thus, the probtem
was
reducedto the
behaviourof the
suctioncaisson under verticaI cycLic [oading only.
Voidratio (e) [.10'3]
Endofcycle5
Endofcycle25 m,0q æ5,00 m,æ ?É,w æ,æ 7å,û m,m óñ,æ ffi,æ ffi,w ffi,00 5E,m ffi,æ %,æ s,m lE,@ 49,æ lã,æ50
Endof 100The mode[ proposed
to
anatysethe
behaviourunder
verticaL cyctic Loadingis
basedon
thehypopl.astic
sand
modeL
with
intergranularstrain
concept integrated.lt
has provento
be agood tooI
for the
prediction of the foundation'sbehaviour
for
severai
hundredsof
cyctes for specific Loading ranges. The soil. conditionun-der investigation is represented by sand, as one
of
the
most
commonLy encounteredsoiI
typeswithin the
North Sea. The medium dense sand [lD=
50%ì usedfor
the
catibrationof the
soil mass, representsa
conservative case,as
theencountered sand within the offshore soiL
inves-tigations in the North Sea is generatty dense to
very dense. CycLic Loading effects are not
expec-ted
to
be significant ìn denser sand (Andersen,2009).
For
the
obtained
resuLtsthe
overestimationof
pore
pressure,
from
the
soiI
catibrationphase, proves
to
be prob[ematic in defining theFigure 14 -Densif ication effects within the medium dense sano under extreme laading conditi-ons {change in vaid ratio]