Delft University of Technology
Microwave self-healing technology as airfield porous asphalt friction course repair and
maintenance system
Tabakovic, Amir; O’Prey, Declan; McKenna, Drew; Woodward, David
DOI
10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00233
Publication date
2019
Document Version
Final published version
Published in
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Citation (APA)
Tabaković, A., O’Prey, D., McKenna, D., & Woodward, D. (2019). Microwave self-healing technology as
airfield porous asphalt friction course repair and maintenance system. Case Studies in Construction
Materials, 10, [e00233]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00233
Important note
To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable).
Please check the document version above.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy
Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.
Case
study
Microwave
self-healing
technology
as
air
field
porous
asphalt
friction
course
repair
and
maintenance
system
Amir
Tabakovic
a,b,c,*
,
Declan
O
’Prey
d,
Drew
McKenna
e,
David
Woodward
eaResearch,EnterpriseandInnovation,TechnologicalUniversityDublin,Ireland bMaterialsandEnvironment,DelftUniversityofTechnology,Netherlands c
SchoolofCivilEngineering,UniversityCollegeDublin,Ireland
d
LaganBitumenLtd,BreedonGroup,Ireland
e
BelfastSchoolofArchitecture,ArtandtheBuiltEnvironment,UlsterUniversity,Ireland
ARTICLE INFO Articlehistory:
Received16October2018
Receivedinrevisedform25February2019 Accepted3March2019
Keywords:
Self-healingofasphaltpavements Microwaveheating
Porousasphalt PorousFrictionCourse
ABSTRACT
Aproblemincreasinglyfacedbyairportauthoritiesisthemaintenanceofrunways.Dueto theirlargeaircraft loadings associatedwith take-offand landingoperations,runways experiencesurfacedeterioration.Poorqualityrunwaysurfacescannotbetoleratedinsuch anenvironment.Maintenanceissuesmustbecarriedouttomaximisesafetyandminimise theriskofaircraftdamage.Arecentdevelopmenthasbeentheintroductionofself-healing technologies such as rejuvenatorencapsulation, inductionand microwave heatingto addresstheseissues.Thispapersummarisesalaboratoryinvestigationtodeterminethe effectivenessofmicrowaveself-healingforcrackrepairofPorousFrictionCourse(PFC) usedforairfields.Fourmixturescontainingvaryingpercentagesofconductivesteelfibre weretested.TheirrelativeperformancewasassessedusingtheIndirectTensileStiffness Modulus(ITSM)andIndirectTensileStrength(ITS)testmethods.Theresultsshowthatthe additionofconductive steelfibreincreasesinitialstiffnessandstrengthofthemix.A combinationofmicro-waveheatingandsteelfibreadditiontothemixindicatesthatitis possible to significantly improve asphalt performance by making it self-healing to structuralproblemssuchascracking.
©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1.Introduction
Thetwomostimportantmaterialsusedintheconstructionofrunwaysurfacesaroundtheworldareeithercementor asphalt based.The EAPA [1] reportedthat out of 126runways surveyed,58 wereconstructed withasphalt,37 were constructed using concrete and 31 constructed using some other material. Irrespective of the construction method employed,runwaysneedtobeconstructedwithsufficientstrengthtocarrythemovingaircraft.Theirrunwaysmusthave adequatewetskidresistanceinviewoftheveryhighspeedsinvolved.Poorwetskidresistanceisacommonproblemfor agedconcreterunways.Onewayofmaintainingorrenewingoperationalwetskidresistanceintheseinstancesistooverlay theoldrunwaysurfacewithanewporousopen-gradedsurfacecourseknownasporousasphaltorfrictioncourse(EAPA, 2003).Theporousmaterialactsasadrainagelayertoreducesurfacewateradverselyaffectingaircrafttyregriponthe surfacinginwetweather.However,thehighairvoidscontentoftheseporousasphaltmaterialsi.e.typicallyaround20%,
*Correspondingauthorat:Research,EnterpriseandInnovation,TechnologicalUniversityDublin,Ireland. E-mailaddress:amir.tabakovic@dit.ie(A.Tabakovic).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00233
2214-5095/©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Case
Studies
in
Construction
Materials
allowwaterandairtopenetrateintothesurfacecourselayer.Thiscanaccelerateageingleadingtorapidhardening,reduced flexibilityandultimatelytoaggregatelossandfretting[2].
Self-healingtechnology[3]offersanalternativemethodforasphaltairfieldrunwaymaintenance.Threemainmethods havebeendeveloped.Rejuvenationisanencapsulatedhealingagentintheformofacapsulethatisaddedintotheasphalt mixduringproductiontorestoretheoriginalbinderproperties[4–10].Whenmicrocracksareinitiatedwithintheasphalt layer,theyencounteracapsuleinthecrackpropagationpath.Thefractureenergyatthetipofthecrackopensthecapsule, releasingthehealingagentwhichthendiffuseswithintheasphaltbindertosealthemicrocrack.Ithasbeenreportedthat rejuvenationmaytakeapproximately20h[9].Inductionheatingandmicrowaveheatinginvolvetheadditionofelectrically conductivefillerssuchassteelfibresorsteelwooltotheasphaltmix[3,11–17]duringproduction.Inductionheatingcreates analternatingcurrentwhichflowsthroughacoilandproducesaninvisibleelectromagneticfieldaroundthecoil.Whenthis electromagneticfieldisinducedoveraconductiveasphaltpavement,itcausesthesteelfibreswithintheasphaltmixtoheat up.Thisheatstheagedbitumenandsoftensit,allowingittoflowandrepairthemicrocrackdamage.Microwaveheating createshighenergywavelengthswhichreactwiththeconductivefibresintheasphalt.Thiscausesthefibrestoheatup whichthenheatstheagedbitumenandsoftensit,allowingittoflowandrepairthemicrocrackdamage.Laboratorystudies haveshownboth methodscanrepair testspecimendamagewithin3minforinduction[18,19]and microwave[15,20] heating.Themicrowavemethodrequireslessconductivefibrestoachievetherequiredtemperaturetohealthedamage. Thestudyreportedinthispaperinvestigatestheeffectivenessofmicrowaveself-healingforthecrackrepairofPorous FrictionCoursemixesthatwouldtypicallybeusedforairfields.Fourmixturescontainingvaryingpercentagesofconductive steelfibrewereevaluatedusingatestingprogrammethatcrackedthetestspecimens,healedthesecracksandevaluatedthis processusingtheIndirectTensileStiffnessModulus(ITSM)andIndirectTensileStrength(ITS)testmethods.Theresults showedthatconductivesteelfibresincreaseinitialstiffnessandstrengthofthemix.Theadditionofsteelfibressignificantly improved asphalt healing performance. The results found that Porous Friction Course containing 5% steel fibres outperformedthecontrolmixwithoutfibresandallofthemixturescontaininghighercontentsofthefibre.
2.Materials
2.1.PorousFrictionCoursemix
ThePorousFrictionCourse(PFC)mixwaspreparedinaccordancewithMODSpecification040.Theaggregatewasahigh skidresistanceSiluriangreywackefromNorthernIreland.ThefillerwasacombinationofcrushedCarboniferouslimestone fillerandhydratedlimetoBSEN459-1.Thebitumenwasa160/220penasspecifiedbyMOD040.Fig.1showsthemix gradingcurve.
Table1summarisesthePFCmixconstituentsandshowstheirproportionsinthemix,bothwithandwithoutsteelfibres. Thefibreswereaddedinanamountof5%,10%and15%.Gonzalezetal[21]haddemonstratedthat5%isanoptimumfibre contentwithinanytypeofasphaltmixformicrowavehealingprocess.Liu[22]hadshowedthattheoptimumcontentof conductivefibreforinductionhealingofanPorousasphaltmixis10%.Theaggregategradingwaskeptconstant.Theaddition ofsteelfibreswasusedtoreplacebymasspartofthebitumencontent.
2.2.Steelfibres
ThesteelfibreusedwasGrade3coarse-grainedTrollullSteelWool.Fig.2illustratesthesteelwoolfibreused.Thefibre diameterwas90
m
m.Thefibreswerecutusingscissorstoapproximately10mminlength.ThemixingprocedurewasamendedtoavoidconglomerationofsteelfibreswithinthePFCmix.Thecoarseaggregate, sand,filler,limeandbitumenweremixedfirst.Thesteelfibreswerethenaddedslowlytothemix.Thisincreasedtheasphalt mixingperiodcausingthemixtostartcoolingandreduceditsworkability.ThePFCmixhadtobereheatedseveraltimesto 160C.ThefinalmixingofthePFCwasperformedbyhandtoensurethatallofthemixconstituentswerefullyandevenly coatedbythebitumen.
Fig.1.PFCmixgrading.
2.3.Testspecimencompaction
ThetestspecimenswerecompactedinaccordancewithISEN12697-31:2007usingaSERVOPACgyratorycompactor. Eachtestspecimengot100gyrations.Theywere100mmindiameterandapproximately80mminthickness.Thetargetair voidcontentwas16%basedonamaximumdensityof2263kg/m3.Intotal16cylindricalspecimens,4testspecimensper mix,wereproducedperPFCmix.Thespecimenswerecutto50mmthicknessusingamasonrycuttingsawfortesting. 3.Testingmethodology
3.1.PFCBinderDrainagetest
ThebinderdrainagetestwascarriedoutinaccordancewithEN12697-18usingtheSchellenbergMethod.Asampleof mixedPFCmaterialwasplacedintheglassjarandkeptat160Cfor1h.Followingthisthecontentsofthejarwereemptied outandthejarreweighedtocalculatetheamountofbinderleftadheredtotheinsidesoftheglassjar.
3.2.IndirectTensileStiffnessModulustest
Thenon-destructiveIndirectTensileStiffnessModulus(ITSM)testwasconductedinaccordancewithEN12697-26:2012. ThisusedaCooperServo-pneumaticUniversalTestingMachinewithapneumaticcloseloopcontrolsystem.Thespecimens wereconditionedat10Cforfourhourspriortotesting.TwoLinearVariableDifferentialTransformers(LVDT)wereusedto measurethehorizontaldeformation.Thestiffnessvaluewasrecordedontwodiametersorientatedat90toeachotherand anaverageofthesetwovaluesreportedasthespecimenstiffness.
3.3.IndirectTensileStrengthtest
TheIndirectTensileStrength(ITS)testwasconductedinaccordancewithEN12697-23:2003.ThisusedaMarshall/ IndirectTensileCompressiontester.AfterITSMtesting,thespecimenswereconditionedinatemperaturecontrolchamberat 5Cfor1h.TheITStestappliesaverticalcompressivestriploadataconstantloadingrate,inthiscase50mm/s,tothe
cylindricalspecimen.Theloadisdistributedoverthethicknessofthespecimenthroughtwoloadingstripsatthetopand bottomofthetestspecimen.Thetestswereconductedat5Ctoensurecrackinitiationandpropagationalongthetest
specimencentralloadingline.Thespecimenswereloadeduntiltheloadvaluehadfallenbacktozeroorthespecimenhad fullysplitintotwo.UseoftheITStestcreatedtwohalvesofatestspecimenthatcouldthenberecombinedandsubjectedto micro-waveheating.
3.4.HealingefficiencyofPFCmixcontainingsteelfibres
Atestingprogrammewasdesignedtoinvestigatetheeffectoftheconductivesteelfibresonthemechanicalpropertiesof thePFCmixandevaluatethehealingefficiencyofthemicrowavehealingsystem.Theprogrammeisasfollows:
Table1
PFCmixcomposition.
MixConstituent(mm) Control 5%Steelfibre 10%Steelfibre 15%Steelfibre
14to10 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 10to6.3 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 6.3to2.0 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.0to0.063 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% Filler 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% Hydratedlime 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Bitumen(160/220) 5.5% 5.22% 4.95% 4.67% Steelfibre 0.0% 0.275% 0.55% 0.825%
1 Specimensarefirsttestedfornon-destructiveITSMat10CanddestructiveITSat5C.
2 AftercompletionoftheITStestingthetwohalvesofthetestspecimenarerecombined.Itisthenplacedintoaspecially designedcylindricalplasticcollarwith100mminternaldiameterandconditionedfor1hatanambienttemperatureof 203C.
3 Thecplasticcollarandrecombinedcrackedspecimenisthenplacedinamicro-waveovenandheatedfor3minusingthe Defrostsettingat300W.
4 Theplasticcollarisremovedandthespecimenisleftundisturbedtocooltoroomtemperature203Cduringwhichthe healingprocesstakesplace.
5 Thistestingandhealingprocedureisrepeatedtwice.
Fig.3illustratesthemainelementsofthetestprogramme.ThemicrowaveovenusedwasaTescoSolo,ModelNo:MM08 with700Wpoweroutput.Thedefrostsettingof300Wfor3minwasfoundtobetheoptimumhealingconditionforthePFC mix.Somesparkswerevisibleduringthefirsthealingcycleprobablycausedbysomeofthefibresnotbeingfullycoatedwith bitumen.Nosparkswereobservedforthesecondhealingcycle.Thisisdifferenttothatfoundinliteraturewherethetest specimensarehealedbyheatingfor40sonthehighestmicrowavepowersettingof600W.Thestudysummarisedinthis paperobservedthatatthislaboratorymicrowavesettingintensesparksandsmokewereemittedasthehealingbegan. Subsequentattemptstoreducepowerhadlittleeffectonthesamples.
3.5.Thermalimaging
Thermalimagingwascarriedouttoobserveheatdistributionthroughoutthetestsampleduetothemicrowavebased healingprocess.ThisusedaMicroEpsilonThermoIMAGERTIM400.Recordingbeganimmediatelyaftertheplasticcollarwas removedfromthemicro-waveheatedspecimen.Fig.4showsathermalimageofatestspecimen60saftermicrowave healing.Theimageshowstemperaturedistributionacrossthesurfaceofthetestspecimen.Theaveragetemperatureis 61.8Crangingfrom56Cattheedgesofthetestspecimento66Catitscentre.Fig.4showsthatthiselevatedtemperature isrelativelyevenlydistributedacrossthesurfacesuggestinggoodsteelfibredistributionthroughouttestspecimenandin turngoodasphaltmixhealing.
4.Results
4.1.PFCBinderDrainage
TheprinciplebehindtheBinderDrainagetestistoquantifytheamountofmateriallostbydrainagei.e.materialthathas adheredtothetruckormixerattheplant.Therefore,itisimportanttoverifywhateffecttheadditionofsteelfibreswould haveonBinderDrainageofthePFCmix.
TheequationusedforBinderDrainageBD¼100½W5½W4W3W3W6 ð2Þ Where:BD=theDrainedmaterial(%);W3=massoftheemptybeaker(g);W4=massofthebeakerplusbatch(g);W5=mass ofthebeakerplusretainedmaterialafterupturning(g);W6=massofthedriedresidueretainedonthesieve(g).”
TheBinderDrainageresultsareshowninTable2.TheresultsshowthattheadditionofsteelfibrestothePFCmixin concentrationsofupto15%byweightofthebitumenhasno/negligibleeffectonthebitumenanditsBinderDrainage. 4.2.PFCmixstiffness
Fig.5plotstheITSMtestdata.ThisshowsasignificantimprovementinITSMbetweenthecontrolPFCmixcontainingno steelfibresandthePFCmixcontaining5%steelfibres.Theadditionof10%and15%steelfibrescausedareductiononITSM valuescomparedtothe5%PFCmixes.
Fig.6plotstheaverageITSMdatafortheinitialtestingandthenafter2rehealingperiodssimulating2periodsof simulated crack treatment. This shows a gradual linear stiffness decrease for the control mix with a significant
Fig.3.Microwavehealingtestsystemsetup.
deteriorationinstiffnessgivenbyanISTMratioof0.58.Theresultsshowthatthecontrolsampleswithnosteelfibre havenostiffnessrecovery.ThePFCmixescontainingsteelfibresshowbetterinitialITSMcomparedtothecontrol.Asthe specimensarecrackedandhealedthereisareductioninstiffnessafterthefirstre-healingcycle.Thedatashowsthe ITSMtoeitherremainthesameortoslightlyimproveafterthesecondre-healingcycle.Afterthesecondre-healing cyclethePFCspecimenscontaining5%steelfibrehaveapproximatelytwicetheITSMofthecontrolPFCcontainingno steelfibre.Whilstthisisasimplelaboratoryinvestigationtheimplicationsofthisaresignificantformaintenanceofan airportrunway.
4.3.IndirectTensileStrength
Fig.7plotstheITSdata.AsummaryoftheaveragevaluesisgiveninTable3.TheITSdatashowsteelfibreadditionhas apositiveeffectonITS.ThecontrolPFCgroupcontainingnosteelfibreshadthelowestITSvaluesthroughouttesting. ThePFCmixeswith5%steelfibreshadthebestITSdatasimilartotheITSMtestdata.Increasingamountsofsteelfibre gaveITSvaluesgreater thanthe controlPFCcontainingnosteelfibre.Thisisduetohowthe fibresaredistributed throughoutthemix.
Fig.4.ExamplePFCtestspecimenthermalimage60safterremovalfrommicrowave.
Table2
BinderDrainageResults.
Mixture TargetTestTemperature(C) ActualTemperature(C) AverageBinderDrainage(%)
Control 160 160 0.1
5%Steelfibre 160 160 0.1
10%Steelfibre 160 159 0.1
15%Steelfibre 160 159 0.1
4.4.Thermalimaging
Fig.8plotstheaveragemaximumsurfacetemperaturereachedimmediatelyafterremovalfromthemicro-waveandafter 60scooling.ItshowsastrongpositivelinearcorrelationbetweentheamountofsteelfibresaddedtothePFCmixand temperatureaftermicro-waveheatingwithR2valuesof0.9832and0.9524respectively.Forexample,aftermicrowave heatingPFCspecimens with0%steelfibresreachedanaverageof55Cwhich after60scoolingdroppedto45C.PFC specimenswith15%fibresreachedanaverageof81C whichafter60scoolingdroppedto73C.Fig.9illustratesthe temperaturedistributionacrossthesurfaceofselectedPFCspecimens60safterremovalfromthemicrowave.ThePFC
Fig.6.AveragedITSMdata.
Fig.7.AverageIndirectTensileStrengthbeforeandafterhealing.
Table3
AverageIndirectTensileStrengthbeforeandafterhealing.
SteelFibreContentinPFCMix(%) InitialIndirectTensileStrength(MPa) IndirectTensileStrengthafterhealing(MPa)
0 2.00 2.27
5 2.93 3.00
10 2.66 3.03
15 2.64 2.51
Fig.8.Averagesurfacetemperaturevssteelfibrecontent. 6 A.Tabakovicetal./CaseStudiesinConstructionMaterialsxxx(2019)e00233
specimenwithnosteelfibreisatanaveragetemperatureof40.8C.IncontrastthePFCwith15%steelfibreis33Chotter. PFCmixescontainingsteelfibreswerefoundtohavebettertemperatureretention,withthe5%mixretaining95%ofitsinitial temperatureafter60s.10%and15%mixesretained89%and90%oftheirinitialheatrespectively,whilethecontrolsample onlyretained82%ofitsinitialheat.Thisheatretentioncapabilityisdirectlyattributedtothethermalconductivityofthe steelfibres.
4.5.PFCmixmicrowavehealingefficiency
ThePFCmixcontaining15%fibresdidnotperformaswellasthe5%and10%PFCmixes.Thisisprobablyduetothe clusteringofsteelfibressubsequentlysuperheatingthebitumenbeyonditsflashpoint.
Fig.10showsanexampleofsteelfibreclusteringandsubsequentsteelfibreoxidationinoneofthetestspecimens. Theyellowcirclesshowlocalisedareasofbitumenbinderdamageduetotheexcessiveheatingofsteelfibreclusters. Theredcircledepictsanoxidizedsteelfibrecluster.Largersteelfibreclusterswererecordedashavingaheatspikeof upto400C.Temperaturesofthismagnitudeareabovetheflashpointofthebitumeni.e.approximately250C,and wouldcauseittoinstantlyvaporize.Thisiswhatlikelycausedtheflashesandblackfumesthatwereemittedfromthe 15%PFCmixduringmicrowaveheating.Thismayhaveweakenedthetestspecimenstructureleadingtoitspoorertest data.
ThelinearlossinITSMforthecontrolPFCmixescontainingnosteelfibresuggestnothingtoassisttheheatingand softeningofthebitumentoinfillthecracksformedbyITStesting.Consequently,theinitialITScrackandsubsequentcracks didnotsubstantiallyhealduringmicrowaveheatingi.e.thetemperaturewasnotsufficienttobebeneficial.Thisrepeated stressinginevitablycontinuedtoweakenthePFCmix.ThisisshowninFig.11whichshowsPFCspecimen#4containing0% steelfibres.TheimageontheleftisthetestspecimenafterthesecondITSphase.Theinducedcrackisvisible.Theimageon therightshowsthecrackstilltobevisibleindicatinginsufficienttemperatureduring healing.Thetestspecimenwas heatedto41C,asshowninFig.9whichisjustslightlygreaterthanthebitumen’ssofteningpointof37C.Although slightly greater it wasnot able tosufficientlysoften thebitumen toflow and repair thedamageclosing microand macrocracks.
ThePFCtestspecimenswith5%steelfibresincreasedstiffnessvalueafterthehealingcycles.Fig.12showsPFCsample#6 containing5%steelfibresbeforeandafterhealingcycle2.ComparedtoFig.11,thecrackiscompletelyhealed.Theincreasein heathasprobablyreducedbinderviscosityallowingittoflownotonlyintothevisiblecracksbutalsointoothermicrocracks withinthespecimen.Thisagreeswiththemajorhealingmechanismofinductionhealingbeingcapillaryflow[23]and diffusionoftheasphaltbinderathightemperatures.Fig.13showsPFCsample#15whichcontains15%steelfibres.Thecrack isfullyrepaired.
5.Conclusion
Thislaboratorystudyhasprovidedpositiveevidencethattheuseofsteelfibreandmicrowaveheatingisapotentialand viableoptionforairfieldasphaltrunwayrepairandmaintenance.Ithasshownthatadditionofsteelfibresand3minof microwavehealingcreatesarapidhealingprocessthatoffersscopeforbusyairportsfacedwithrealproblemsofrunway closure.PFCmixescontainingsteelfibresoutperformedthecontrolmixwithnosteelfibres.EventhoughthePFCmix withoutsteelfibreswasabletopartiallyrepairitscrackdamagethemixturescontainingfibresmanagedtoachievefullcrack closure. The addition of steel fibres reinforced the PFC mix structure improving its stiffness and tensile strength characteristics.Mixturescontaining10% and15%steelfibresinthemixhadlowerstiffnessand strengthrecoveryafter healingincomparisonwithmixturecontaining5%offibres.Thismaybeduetotheclusteringofthesteelfibre[24]causing hightemperatehotspotsinthetestspecimenduringthehealingprocess.Theselocalisedhotspotsmayhavecausedbitumen
Fig.10.PFCspecimen#16showinglocalisedissuesofoxidationandbinderdamage.
Fig.11.PFCcontrolspecimen#4:Left:beforehealingandRight:afterhealingshowingpartiallyclosedcrack.
Fig.12.PFCspecimen#6with5%steelfibre:Left:beforehealingandRight:afterhealingwithfullyrepairedcrack. 8 A.Tabakovicetal./CaseStudiesinConstructionMaterialsxxx(2019)e00233
evaporationthusweakeningstructuralintegrityofthetestspecimen.Thelaboratorytestingconcludesthattheoptimum steelfibrecontentforthePFCmixis5%agreeingwithpreviousstudies[8,15,21].Itbeenhasfoundthatalowerpower heatingof300WismoresuitableforcrackhealingofthePFCusedinthisinvestigationcomparedtothepossiblemaximum poweroutputof700Wforthemicrowaveused.Thisissignificantasitshowstheimportanceofthistypeoflaboratory investigationtooptimisenotonlytheamountofsteelfibreadditionbutalsotheamountofenergyrequiredtohealcracksin this PFCmix. It maybeconcludedthat this laboratory studyclearlyshowsthat theself-healing technologyusedhas significantpotentialinrunwaymaintenance.
Conflictofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarethattherearenoconflictsofinterstregardingthepublicationofthispaper. References
[1](EAPA),E.A.P.A,AirfieldUsesofAsphalt,(2003) p.27.
[2]C.L.Hill,I.W,ImprovedperformancemixturedesignmethodologyforUKairfiledporousfrictionCourse,5thEurasphalt&EurobitumeCongress(2012). [3]E.Schlangen,etal.,in:M.eRooij(Ed.),OtherMaterials,ApplicationsandFutureDevelopments,inSelf-HealingPhenomenainCement-BasedMaterials,
2013RILEMSeries:State-of-the-ArtReports.p.241–256.
[4]J.F.Su,E.Schlangen,Synthesisandphysicochemicalpropertiesofhighcompactmicrocapsulescontainingrejuvenatorappliedinasphalt,Chem.Eng.J. 198-199(2012)289–300.
[5]J.F.Su,J.Qiu,E.Schlangen,Stabilityinvestigationofself-healingmicrocapsulescontainingrejuvenatorforbitumen,Polym.Degrad.Stab.98(6)(2013) 1205–1212.
[6]J.F.Su,etal.,Experimentalinvestigationofselfhealingbehaviourofbitumen/microcapsulecompositesbymodifiedbeamonelasticfoundation method,MaterialsandStructures,Springerpublication,RILEM,2014.
[7]J.F.Su,etal.,Investigationthepossibilityofanewapproachofusingmicrocapsulescontainingwastecookingoil;in-siturejuvenation,Constr.Build. Mater.74(2015)83–92.
[8]A.Tabakovic,etal.,Thecompartmentedalginatefibresoptimisationforbitumenrejuvenatorencapsulation,J.TrafficTransp.Eng.(2017). [9]A.Tabakovic,etal.,Anevaluationoftheefficiencyofcompartmentedalginatefibresencapsulatingarejuvenatorasanasphaltpavementhealing
system,MPDIAppl.Sci.7(2017)16.
[10]S.Xu,etal.,Calciumalginatecapsulesencapsulatingrejuvenatorashealingsystemforasphaltmastic,Constr.Build.Mater.169(2018)379–387. [11]A.García,etal.,Electricalconductivityofasphaltmortarcontainingconductivefibersandfillers,Constr.Build.Mater.21(10)(2009)3175–3181. [12]A.García,E.Schlangen,M.vandeVen,Inductionheatingofmasticcontainingconductivefibersandfillers,Mater.Struct.44(2)(2011)499–508. [13]Á.García,E.Schlangen,M.vandeVen,Twowaysofclosingcracksonasphaltconcretepavements:microcapsulesandInductionHeating,KeyEng.
Mater.417-418(2010)573–576.
[14]A.García,etal.,Asimplemodeltodefineinductionheatinginasphaltmastic,Constr.Build.Mater.31(2012)38–46.
[15]J.Norambuena-Contreras,etal.,Effectoffibresadditiononthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofasphaltmixtureswithcrack-healingpurposesby microwaveradiation,Constr.Build.Mater.127(2016)369–382.
[16]J.Gallego,etal.,Heatingasphaltmixtureswithmicrowavestopromoteself-healing,Constr.Build.Mater.42(2013)1–4.
[17]M.Bueno,M.Arraigada,M.N.Partl,Damagedetectionandartificialhealingofasphaltconcreteaftertraffickingwithaloadsimulator,Mech. Time-DependentMater.20(3)(2016)265–279.
[18]Q.Liu,etal.,Inductionheatingofelectricallyconductiveporousasphaltconcrete,Constr.Build.Mater.24(2010)1207–1213. [19]Á.García,etal.,Asimplemodeltodefineinductionheatinginasphaltmastic,Constr.Build.Mater.31(2012)38–46.
[20]J.Norambuena-Contreras,A.Garcia,Self-healingofasphaltmixturebymicrowaveandinductionheating,Mater.Des.106(2016)404–414. [21]A.González,etal.,Self-healingpropertiesofrecycledasphaltmixturescontainingmetalwaste:anapproachthroughmicrowaveradiationheating,J.
Environ.Manage.214(2018)242–251.
[22]Q.Liu,InductionHealingofPorousAsphaltConcreteFacultyofCivilEngineeringandGeosciences,TUDelft,TheNetherlands,2012. [23]A.García,Self-healingofopencracksinasphaltmastic,Fuel93(2012)264–272.
[24]B.A.Bednarcyk,J.Aboudi,S.M.Arnold,Analysisoffiberclusteringincompositematerialsusinghigh-fidelitymultiscalemicromechanics,Int.J.Solids Struct.69-70(2015)311–327.