• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

в On an inequality in the general additive theory of numbers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "в On an inequality in the general additive theory of numbers"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

R 0C Z N IK I POLSKIEGO TOW ARZYSTW A MATEMATYCZNEGO Séria I: PEA C E MATEMATYCZNE X V (1971)

A N N A L ES SOCIETATIS MATHEMATICAE POLONAE Series I: COMMENTATIONES MATHEMATICAE X V (1971)

M. K

a l e c k i

On an inequality in the general additive theory of numbers

Let A and В be two increasing sequences of integers

Щ 0 , cq , 0*2, . . . ^ •••

The increasing sequence formed by the sums 6 q+&?- {%

is denoted by C. Moreover, let us denote the number of terms of A , В and C which do not exceed n (exclusive of 0 ) by A(n), B(n) and C(n), respectively.

Finally,

inf к

A {к)

к and inf

к

в (к) к

are denoted by a and ft. If G(n) < n, then according to the theorem of Mann, G(n) + (a + /?)w. The inequality C(n) + A(n)-\-(in for niO — from which this theorem would easily follow — is not generally true as was shown by Mann (1) by the following example:

A 0 , 1 , 2 , 6 , 7, 8 , 12 , ... -1(11) = 5

В 0, 1, 2 , 6 , 7, 8 , 12 , ... 11 *0 = 1 1 - | = 4 . 4 C 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 , 7, 8 , 9, 10, 12, ... 0(11) = 9 < 5 + 4.4 There arises a problem of finding an inequality for

7 1 4

G of the type G {n) + A(n)-\-f{fi)n- We prove below this inequality for /(/3) = /3/(1 + /?).

The proof has some common elements with that of the theorem of Besicovitch (2): G(n) + A{n)-\-(t'n for П

4

С, where /S' = in f--- B(k)

к fc + 1 T

h e o r e m

. I f

7 1 4

G, then

C{n) + A { n ) + Y + J n -

(1) Henry B. M ann, Addition theorems, New York, London, Sydney 1965, p. 22.

(2) Ibidem, p. 20.

(2)

134 M. K a l e c k i

Proof. Since the theorem is obvious for = 0 we can confine the proof to the case 1 <гБ.

Let us consider the segments of the sequence C in the interval ( 0 , n) which contain at least one number aeA. Let us number the segments.

The first segment 1 will start from aQ = 0 . The number of segments will be denoted by m. Let us now denote the least a of the segment s by as, the greatest a of this segment by a's' and the greatest c of the segment by c8.

From l e В it follows directly and thus

( 1 ) C(n) > A (n) -f- m .

Next c ' + l 4G and consequently cs+ l ~ b i A . It follows that the numbers c = c '-fl — b satisfying the condition as < c s+ l - b ^ c'g do not belong to A. The number of such numbers is B(cs—a8). We have ( 2 ) C(as+1- 1 ) - C ( a s- 1 )

=

( A

(<Vn —1)

— A { d B— l ) ) + B { c 8 — d s )

+

( B ( d s + l — a 8 — l ) — B ( c 8 — d s ))

= A (ds+l- l ) — A (ds—l) + B{ds+1 — ds- l )

> A { a 8 + 1 — l ) — A ( d 8 — l ) + p { d 8+1 — a 8) — p .

For the least segment we obtain analogously, taking into considera­

tion njC,

(3) C ( n ) - C ( d m- l ) ^ A ( n ) - A ( d m- l ) + P ( n - d m+ l ) - j 3 . It follows now from ( 2 ) and (3)

(4) C(n) ^ A(n)-\-(in — pm

and multiplying (1) by /3 and adding it to (4),

( 6 ) G{ n ) ^ A( n ) + Y + J n -

For the sequence quoted at the beginning of the paper we obtain

2 5

i + i

9 > 5 4 •11 = 8 . 1 4 ...

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

In 1952 Piatetski-Shapiro [4] considered the following analogue of the Goldbach–Waring problem.. Assume that c &gt; 1 is not integer and let ε be a

If K and L are absolutely abelian number fields, however, we obtain a fairly explicit description of the number I(L/K).. This concludes the proof

Let K be an (absolutely) abelian number field of conductor n, G K its Galois group over Q, and O K the ring of integers of K.. By QG K we denote the rational and by ZG K the

In analogy to Lemma 2.1 the integral on the left-hand side exists since the boundary lies in a finite union of hyperplanes... Heights and

(One can also give a different proof by adapting that of Proposition 3 below; see the remark following that proposition.).. In this paper we obtain several new estimates of l(q) and

The most famous recent result is in the area of extending P t -sets and is due to Baker and Davenport [1], who used Diophan- tine approximation to show that the P 1 -set {1, 3, 8,

A well-known example is provided by the classical linear congruential method for the generation of uniform pseudo- random numbers, in which number-theoretic techniques are heavily

Ghosh [4] improved the construction of strong distributive lattices of rings given by Bandelt and Petrich, and characterized the class of all semirings which are subdirect products of