• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Horizontal and Vertical Wind Measurements from GOCE Angular Accelerations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Horizontal and Vertical Wind Measurements from GOCE Angular Accelerations"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Delft University of Technology

Horizontal and Vertical Wind Measurements from GOCE Angular Accelerations

Visser, Tim; Doornbos, Eelco; de Visser, Coen; Visser, Pieter

Publication date 2017

Document Version Final published version

Citation (APA)

Visser, T., Doornbos, E., de Visser, C., & Visser, P. (2017). Horizontal and Vertical Wind Measurements from GOCE Angular Accelerations. 81-81. Poster session presented at 4th Swarm Science Meeting & Geodetic Missions Workshop, Banff, Canada.

Important note

To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy

Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.

(2)

Horizontal and vertical wind measurements from

GOCE angular accelerations

T. Visser, E.N. Doornbos, C.C. de Visser, P.N.A.M. Visser

Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology; Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands; t.visser-1@tudelft.nl

Fourth Swarm Science Meeting & Geodetic Missions Workshop, Banff (AL), Canada, March 2017 Thermosphere session, Poster ID 18

Force

Torque

The 'measured' torque is derived from the

measured angular rate and acceleration.

Magnetic torque is caused by control from magnetic torquers, the ion thruster magnet, and residual magnetic dipoles. The residual dipole of the payload and scale factors for the control dipoles were estimated, reducing the residual torque in a least-squares sense.

Solar radiation pressure causes a small torque when not in eclipse.

Gravity gradient torque effects the pitch attitude when the pitch angle is large.

The thrust does not point through the center of mass, causing a misalignment torque. The resultant, unmodeled torque is assumed to be aerodynamic.

The 'measured' force is derived from the measured linear acceleration.

The thruster in controlled to counteract the drag, primarily in the in-flight direction.

Radiation pressure is modeled for sunlight, Earth infrared and Earth albedo.

The resultant force is assumed to be

aerodynamic.

Algorithm

In the past the linear accelerations measured by GOCE have been used to derive the neutral density and cross-wind in the thermosphere [1]. On this poster

the result of a similar effort is presented, in which the angular accelerations were used for the same purpose. Although modeling the disturbance torque

requires a greater effort than modeling the force (compare the left and right wing), a similar level of detail can be obtained from both sources. Combining

the forces and torques will in the future allow for estimating more aerodynamic parameters.

All time series are taken on May 28, 2011; the results section uses data from the whole month of May, 2011.

An iterative algorithm was implemented to obtain the wind and neutral density at the satellite's location

from the force and/or torque. The algorithm is initialized by finding the residual force and torque as

indicated on the left and right respectively.

Finally, when the error angle is below 10-4 degrees,

the aerodynamic torque is scaled to best fit the residual by estimating the neutral density.

It was found that although this algorithm works for forces, the Jacobian in step 3 is not full rank using only torques. The roll torque is very small and hardly

depends on the wind direction. Because the aerodynamic torque is almost purely yaw, the two

derivatives in step three are parallel.

To circumvent this problem, a large constant offset is added in roll to both the residual and the

aerodynamic torque in all above steps.

The magnetic control torque is dominant in the tightly controlled roll and pitch axes.

Estimated scale factors are included.

The aerodynamic model is used in residual

dipole estimations. It uses ANGARA* coefficients and GOCE derived wind and density data [1].

The gravity gradient over the satellite body is largest during maneuvers, that generally occur over the equator. J2 effects are observed in the same region, in the pitch torque.

Solar radiation pressure causes a minor

offset in the yaw torque, but is most significant in the roll torque, which is small overall.

The magnetic torque due to residual dipoles

is the primary torque to counteract for the torquers. Estimated dipoles are included.

The ion propulsion system uses a magnet, which causes a significant torque in pitch.

Correcting the thrust direction based on jumps in torque at orbit lowering maneuvers, the yaw torque is affected strongly by the thrust level.

The total modeled torque (including reference aerodynamics) closely approximates the

measured torque.

Torqu

e [mNm]

Time of day [HH:MM]

Roll Pitch Yaw

−0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.5 0 0.5 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.2 0 0.2 T

_

=

Vwi nd S N N T g g

_

=

Vwi nd

1

The aerodynamic velocity

is initialized as the sum of the orbital velocity and the corotation of the

atmosphere. Both the

aerodynamic and residual torque are normalized to unit vectors. V ˆ TR ˆ TA

3

V ˆ TR ˆ TA e µ ∂µueu ∂u ∂µwew ∂w ∂u ∂w

The same process in a

second direction yields another tangent derivative

(product of the unit vector and the angle). Together they form the Jacobian used to approximate the

required change in a least squares sense.

2

V ˆ TR ˆ TA [ˆTA]V +∂u eu ∂µu ∂u

The velocity is changed

perpendicular to its original direction, leading to a new aerodynamic torque. The

angle between the two normalized torques and the

direction along the arc connecting them are stored.

4

V V ˆ TR ˆ TA a∂µueu ∂u + b∂µ∂wwew ˆ TA a∂u + b∂w

The least squares solution found above is applied to find the new velocity. Both the new velocity and the new aerodynamic torque are normalized, and the algorithm is repeated.

Results

The thrust counteracts the drag, and is therefore dominant in the in-flight direction. Other components are due to misalignment.

Solar radiation pressure causes a small, constant force in the cross-track direction due to the sun-synchronous nature of the orbit.

The Earth radiation is a combination of albedo and Earth infrared. It has a significant influence in the vertical direction.

The total modeled force (including the reference aerodynamic model) closely approximates the measured force. This aerodynamic model is used as a reference. It uses ANGARA* force coefficients and cross-wind and density derived from GOCE linear accelerations in the past [1].

Force [mN ] Time of day [HH:MM] X Y Z −5 0 5 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −5 0 5 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −5 0 5 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 −5 0 5 −0.5 0 0.5 −0.2 0 0.2 15:30 16:00 16:30 −5 0 5 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.5 0 0.5 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.2 0 0.2 References:

[1] E.N. Doornbos. GOCE+ Theme 3: Air density and wind retrieval using GOCE data:

Data Set User Manual, July 2016

*ANGARA is a Monte-Carlo simulator developed by HTG, Göttingen.

−1 0 1 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.05 0 0.05 15:30 16:00 16:30 −1 0 1 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.2 0 0.2 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.05 0 0.05 Time of day [HH:MM] The residual force is reduced to zero if the

winds are estimated based on the forces. With winds from the torque the solution is more erratic than with the reference wind.

If the wind is derived from forces and

torques combined, we find an intermediate

solution after a fixed number of iterations that favors force in the cross-wind estimation.

Time of day [HH:MM] −0.01 0 0.01 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 −0.05 0 0.05 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.01 0 0.01 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.04 −0.020 0.02 0.04 15:30 16:00 16:30 −0.05 0 0.05

The residual torque is reduced to zero when torque is used to derive the wind. With wind from

forces the residual is clearly different from that

obtained using the reference wind data.

The solution from forces and torques especially improves the pitch residual, implying that the

torques significantly influence the vertical wind.

The results show that the wind and density from forces are inconsistent with those derived from the torques. As these discrepancies also stem from errors in the yaw torque and side force where aerodynamic effects are dominant, this implies errors still remain in the aerodynamic model. In our future work we will attempt to correct these inconsistencies by estimating more parameters, such as the accommodation coefficient.

Future work

y = 0.83x+30 (R2=0.77) y = 0.66x+45 (R2=0.38) y = 0.80x+8e-14 (R2=0.87) y = 0.98x+15 (R2=0.98) y = 0.85x+11 (R2=0.17) y = 1.00x-4e-16 (R2=1.00)

Torque-only Torque and Force

Cross-wind [m/s] Cross-wind (force-only) [m/s] V ertical wind [m/s] Density [kg/m 3 ] Density (force-only) [kg/m3]

Vertical wind (force-only) [m/s]

Using only the torque to derive the wind and density (vertical axis) we find reasonable consistency with the force-derived cross-wind. Because the roll torque hardly depends on wind, the density cannot be estimated in this case, and remains at the NRLMSISE-00 value used in the initialization.

Using both the torque and force to derive the wind and density (vertical axis) we observe that the

cross-wind closely follows the force-derived wind, whereas the vertical wind is more driven by the pitch torque.

Density can now be derived from the X-force, as in the forces-only case. Below the individual model outputs are

compared to the measured force.

Below the individual model outputs are compared to the measured torque.

All axes used on this poster are defined in the body frame displayed here. The x axis points in the direction of flight, z points down and y completes the right hand frame. Roll, pitch, and yaw are defined poisitive as shown, around the x, y, and z axis respectively.

X Y

Z

Pitch Roll

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

NKJP nie notuje żadnych przykładów użyć takich, jak: jakieś Bre-banki, Aliory, ale istnieją tego rodzaju użycia akronimów tworzących nazwy partii i instytucji politycznych: (8)

In the planning & design section, virtually all contributions focus on the decision-making process in which a flood risk reduction strategy takes shape: how different aspects

Ten proces na pierwszy rzut oka moglibyśmy potraktować jako kierunko- wy rozwój od mas praktycznych do masy abstrakcyjnej: grupa ludzi przeradza się w tłum, a tłum staje

Do okresów ostatnich 10 lat przed złożeniem wniosku o przyznanie renty rolniczej z tytułu niezdolności do pracy (art. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników, jednolity tekst: Dz. 291

można by dojść do wniosku, że konsumencki dług niepieniężny ma charakter długu odbiorczego (jak każde świadczenie niepieniężne). Wynikałoby z tego, że to przedsiębiorca

An effect of the applied field frequency on the real part of impedance Z’ versus hydration time of the cement pastes in the early stage of hydration was also presented.. The results

W porównaniu do konwencjonalnych stalowych albo żelbetowych konstrukcji słupowych konstrukcje zespolone stalowo-betonowe typu CFST (Concrete Filled Steel Tube)

There is however no doubt that the book itself presents a balanced view on the most important exegetical and historical problems related to the Dead Sea Scrolls, and as such