• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Microeconomics — class 7 1.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Microeconomics — class 7 1."

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Microeconomics — class 7

1. Decompose change of demand for Cobb-Douglas preferences into income and substitution effects using continuous Slutsky equation.

2. Prove that subsitution and income effect in every form of Slutsky/Hicks equation are independent of choice of utility function representing preferences (despite the fact that compensated demand function depends on this choice).

3. Decompose change of demand into income and substitution effects using (discrete) Slutsky equation and Hicks equation — calculate effects for both goods in the case when p1 grows while p2 remains constant in the following cases.

a) Cobba-Douglas utility with a1+ a2 = 1;

b) perfect complements;

c) perfect subsitutes, in the case when only good 1 was consumed before the change and

(i) after the change still only good 1 is consumed;

(ii) after the change only good 2 is consumed.

4. Which of the two curves is more price elastic i.e. has greater decrease in income after increase of price (greater absolute value of price elastcity). Consider only situation when there is no Giffen effect.

5. An owner of a brewery consumes apples and beer. His utility function with marginal rate of substitution MRS(j, p) = 2jp (apples are measured in kg, beer in bottles).

Now both prices are 3, and the brewer has 1 kg of apples i 1000 bottles of beer.

What will be the effect of a) increase in price of apples;

b) increase in price of beer?

What part of the change is a result of substitution effect and which is a result of wealth effect (from continuous Slutsky equation)?

1

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The theorem im- plies that if there exist counterexamples to the conjecture in C 2 then those of the lowest degree among them fail to satisfy our assumption on the set {f m = 0} (it

We present an example of application of the last result and we obtain another class of sets satisfying the Borsuk conjecture (Theorem 3)... be partitioned into

Recall that the covering number of the null ideal (i.e. Fremlin and has been around since the late seventies. It appears in Fremlin’s list of problems, [Fe94], as problem CO.

As for the gradient estimate, for the proof of Theorem 1.3 one can either use the blowing-up analysis from [8] or estimates from [6] and [15] (proved independently from each other

Prove that the fraction 15k+2 6k+1 is irreducible for all integer values

[r]

More- over, our results and methods used in the proof suggest that in the class of bounded pseudoconvex complete Reinhardt domains the symmetry of the Green function is equivalent

In this short paper we investigate properties of Rings, putting special emphasis on the relationship between the two operations “+” and “·”... This follows from