• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

A remark on R. G. Woods’ paper “The minimum uniform compactification of a metric space”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A remark on R. G. Woods’ paper “The minimum uniform compactification of a metric space”"

Copied!
2
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE

149 (1996)

A remark on R. G. Woods’ paper “The minimum uniform compactification of a metric space”

(Fund. Math. 147 (1995), 39–59) by

M. G. C h a r a l a m b o u s (Samos)

Abstract. A question raised in R. G. Woods’ paper has a simple solution.

The minimum uniform compactification uX of a metric space X is the smallest compactification of X such that every bounded real-valued uni- formly continuous function on X has a continuous extension to uX. Two subsets of X are distant iff they have disjoint closures in uX. Woods proves that uR is a perfect compactification of R and leaves the case of uR

n

open.

Theorem. Let X be a convex subset of a normed linear space. Then uX is a perfect compactification of X.

P r o o f. Let f : βX → uX be the Stone– ˇ Cech extension of the inclusion X → uX. In what follows the bar will denote closure in uX. uX is a perfect compactification of X iff f has connected fibers. Suppose that uX is not perfect. Then there is a point p of uX − X such that the closed subspace f

−1

(p) of βX is not connected. Consequently, f

−1

(p) is the union of non-empty disjoint closed subsets E, F of βX. As βX is normal, there are disjoint open subsets G, H of βX such that E ⊂ G and F ⊂ H. Let A = X − G ∪ H. Now the image under f of the compact space βX − G ∪ H is a closed subset of the Hausdorff space uX containing A but not p. Hence p 6∈ A. Let B be an open neighbourhood of p in the regular space uX such that A ∩ B = ∅. Then B ∩ X = B

1

∪ B

2

, where B

1

= B ∩ X ∩ G and B

2

= B ∩ X ∩ H.

As B is open and X is dense in uX, we have B = B ∩ X = B

1

∪ B

2

. Thus, without loss of generality, we may assume that p ∈ B

1

. Note that p also belongs to f (F ) and hence to the bigger set H ∩ X. Consequently, d(B

1

, H ∩ X) = 0, where d is the metric induced by a norm | · | on X.

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: 54D35, 54E35.

[287]

(2)

288 M. G. Charalambous

Let ε > 0. Then there are b in B

1

and c in H ∩ X such that d(b, c) < ε.

Consider next the line segment L = {(1 − t)b + tc : 0 ≤ t ≤ 1} joining b to c in the convex set X. As L is a connected subspace of βX and G, H are disjoint open sets of it containing b, c, respectively, A = X − G ∪ H contains at least one point a = (1 − t)b + tc of L. But then d(a, b) = |a − b| =

| − tb + tc| = td(b, c) < ε. This implies d(A, B) = 0 and hence A ∩ B 6= ∅.

This contradiction establishes the result.

Department of Mathematics University of the Aegean Karlovassi 83200 Samos, Greece

Received 18 October 1995;

in revised form 12 December 1995

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

As consequences of inequality (1) we can estimate the oscillation of poste- rior distributions under (small) violations of the assumed prior distribution and we can conclude that

We also obtain some results on preservation of compactness for the Bohr topology of several types of MAP Abelian groups, like L ∞ -groups, locally convex vector spaces and free

Hence, the theory of Lipschitz mappings between semimetric spaces cannot yield more information than the theory of Lip- schitz mappings between metric spaces.. This is the reason

The first step of our proof is a general “scattered” reduction of the theorem to the same statement but now only for metric spaces M which are both nowhere locally compact

The principal positive contribution of our paper [1] is Theorem 2.10, which asserts that every LCA group G strongly respects compactness in the sense that for every subset A of G

Let K be the compact space generated by this family of functions (see the beginning of this section for the definition of K).. Then the space K has the

Indeed, a rather useful theorem of Kechris, Louveau and Woodin [6] states that a coanalytic σ-ideal of compact sets is either a true coanalytic set or a G δ set.. For each

She is pleased to thank the Department of Mathematics of Wesleyan University for generous hospitality during the spring semester of 1992.. The second author is pleased to thank