• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Free groups acting without fixed points on rational spheres by

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Free groups acting without fixed points on rational spheres by"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

LXXXV.2 (1998)

Free groups acting without fixed points on rational spheres

by

Kenzi Satˆ o (Yokohama)

For every positive rational number q, we find a free group of rotations of rank 2 acting on (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 whose all elements distinct from the identity have no fixed point.

Introduction. The following conjecture raised by Professor J. Mycielski was proved in [Sa1]:

The subgroup hµ 1 , ν 1 i of the rational special orthogonal group SO 3 (Q) = {φ ∈ Mat(3, 3; Q) : t φ · φ = id, det φ = 1} is a free group of rank 2 whose non-trivial elements have no fixed point on the rational unit sphere S 2 ∩ Q 3

= {~v ∈ Q 3 : |~v| = 1}, where hµ 1 , ν 1 i is the group generated by

µ 1 = 1 7

 6 2 3

2 3 −6

−3 6 2

and ν 1 = 1 7

 2 −6 3

6 3 2

−3 2 6

 .

In this paper, we consider the same problem about the rational sphere (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 = {~v ∈ Q 3 : |~v| =

q} for positive q ∈ Q. Notice that the rational unit sphere S 2 ∩ Q 3 and the rational sphere (

2 S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 are not similar. In particular, S 2 ∩ Q 3 has a trio of pairwise orthogonal vectors

~e 0 =

 1 0 0

 , ~e 1 =

 0 1 0

 , ~e 2 =

 0 0 1

 ,

but (

2 S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 does not have such a trio, because, for two orthogonal vectors ~v, ~v 0 ∈ (

2 S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 , the vector 1

2 ~v × ~v 0 does not belong to Q 3 . The purpose of this paper is to prove:

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 20E05, 20H05, 20H20; Secondary 15A18, 51F20, 51F25.

[135]

(2)

For each positive rational q, SO 3 (Q) has a free subgroup hµ q , ν q i which acts on (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 , the rational sphere with radius

q, and whose non- trivial elements have no fixed point on (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 . This implies a paradox: (

q S 2 )∩Q 3 has a Hausdorff decomposition, i.e., (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 can be partitioned into three subsets A, B, and C such that A, B, C, A ∪ B, B ∪ C, and C ∪ A are all congruent by rotations of hµ q , ν q i (see e.g. [Sa0; W, Cor. 4.12]). We only have to prove the assertion for each positive integer q which is square-free, in other words, q does not have a prime whose square divides q, because the rational spheres (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 and (

q 0 S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 are similar with similitude ratio q :

q 0 if q /

q 0 ∈ Q.

Moreover, we can assume q 6= 1 from [Sa1].

Remark. It is possible that rational spheres are empty (e.g., with radius

7). For given q, it is easy to check whether the rational sphere with radius

q is empty or not (see [M, Ch. 20]):

(

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 6= ∅ if q ≡ 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6 (mod 8), (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 = ∅ if q ≡ 7 (mod 8).

For higher dimensional spheres, Professor J. Mycielski raised the follow- ing problems (see [Sa1]):

Problem A. For n ∈ N, n even, n ≥ 4, does SO n (Q) have a free non- abelian subgroup F 2 such that no elements of F 2 different from the identity have eigenvectors in Q n ?

Problem B. For n ∈ N, n odd, n ≥ 5, does SO n (Q) have a free non- abelian subgroup F 2 which acts without non-trivial fixed points on S n−1 ∩ Q n and is such that if f, g ∈ F 2 have a common eigenvector in Q n then f g = gf ?

[Sa2], which gives a free group hσ, τ i of SO 4 (Q) acting on S 3 without non-trivial fixed points, and [Sa1] answer in the affirmative Problem A for n ≡ 0 (mod 4) and Problem B for n ≡ −1 (mod 4). This paper and [Sa2]

also answer in the affirmative the following problem for n ≡ −1 (mod 4):

Problem B 0 . For a positive rational q and an odd integer n ≥ 5, does SO n (Q) have a free non-abelian subgroup F 2 which acts without non-trivial fixed points on (

q S n−1 ) ∩ Q n and is such that if f, g ∈ F 2 have a common eigenvector in Q n then f g = gf ?

For n = 3, similar problems for more general surfaces, which the referee

of this paper suggested, can be considered:

(3)

Problem C. Is there a free subgroup of rank 2 of the group {φ ∈ Mat(3, 3; Q) : t φ · Λ · φ = Λ, det φ = 1} acting on the rational surface

 

x y z

 ∈ Q 3 : αx 2 + βy 2 + γz 2 = q

 

without non-trivial fixed points (where Λ =

α 0 0 0 β 0 0 0 γ

! )?

Preliminaries. Let q be a positive and square-free integer distinct from 1. The following two lemmas enable us to find integers p and b such that p is an odd prime divisor of 1 + b 2 but not of q, and q is a quadratic non-residue to the modulus p.

Lemma 0. For such an integer q, there exists an odd prime p such that q is not divisible by p and

 −1 p



= 1 and

 q p



= −1, where · · 

is Legendre’s symbol.

P r o o f. This is a special case of [H, Satz 147]: “Let a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a r be integers such that: a product of powers

a u 1

1

a u 2

2

. . . a u r

r

is the square of an integer (if and) only if all u i ’s are even. Furthermore, let c 1 , c 2 , . . . , c r be arbitrary one of ±1. Then there exist infinitely many primes p which satisfy the condition

 a i

p



= c i for i = 1, 2, . . . , r.”

Lemma 1. For such a prime p, there exists an integer b such that 1 + b 2

≡ 0 (mod p).

P r o o f. This is obvious from −1 p 

= 1.

Using such an integer b, let µ q = 1

1 + b 2

1 + b 2 0 0

0 1 − b 2 −2b

0 2b 1 − b 2

and

ν q = 1 1 + b 2

1 − b 2 −2b 0 2b 1 − b 2 0

0 0 1 + b 2

 .

(4)

There are group isomorphisms S(H)/{±1} −→ σ

= SO(H 0 ) −→ m

= SO 3 (R),

where S(H) is the group of quaternions h whose norm |h| is equal to 1 in the Hamilton quaternion field H and SO(H 0 ) is the group of all linear isometries with determinant 1 of all pure quaternions H 0 onto itself. The left isomorphism σ sends ±h to the isometry H 0 3 h 0 7→ hh 0 h −1 ∈ H 0 . On the other hand, the linear map ι : H 0 → R 3 , which takes the basis I, J, and K of H 0 (with IJ = K, JK = I, KI = J, and I 2 = J 2 = K 2 = −1) to the standard basis ~e 0 , ~e 1 , and ~e 2 of R 3 respectively, gives the right isomorphism m : κ 7→ ι ◦ κ ◦ ι −1 . So we have S(H)/{±1} −→ m◦σ

= SO 3 (R). See [C, Th. 3.1 of Ch. 10; L, Th. 3.1 of Ch. 3; Sa0; Sa1]. Two matrices above and their inverses are represented by

µ ε q = m ◦ σ



± 1 + εbI

1 + b 2



and ν q δ = m ◦ σ



± 1 + δbK

1 + b 2

 ,

where ε and δ are either −1 or 1. For each reduced word w of {µ −1 q , µ q , ν q −1 , ν q }, we define

±H w = p

1 + b 2 ]w σ −1 ◦ m −1 (w) ∈ Z(H)/{±1},

where ]w is the number of occurrences of µ −1 q , µ q , ν q −1 , and ν q in w and Z(H) is the set of quaternions whose components are all integers. The relation H  H 0 means that H and H 0 in Z(H) are proportional mod p, i.e., there exists an integer t ∈ {1, . . . , p − 1} such that each component of H − tH 0 is divisible by p. We consider whether H  H 0 or not. We can choose H w

from

1 + b 2 #w σ −1 ◦ m −1 (w) whichever you like because H  −H.

Main result. The following two lemmas imply the main theorem of this paper which gives a free subgroup of rank 2 of SO 3 (Q) whose non-identical elements have no fixed point on the rational sphere with radius

q.

Lemma 2. Let w be a non-empty reduced word of {µ −1 q , µ q , ν q −1 , ν q }. If w = µ εk q then

H w  1 + εbI;

if w = ν q δl then

H w  1 + δbK;

if w has the form µ ε q . . . ν q δ (i.e., w starts with µ ε q and ends with ν q δ ) then H w  1 + εbI + εδJ + δbK,

where ε and δ are either −1 or 1, and k and l are positive integers.

(5)

P r o o f. The following four equations and 1 + b 2 ≡ 0 (mod p) imply this lemma:

(1 + εbI)(1 + εbI) = 2(1 + εbI) − (1 + b 2 );

(1 + δbK)(1 + δbK) = 2(1 + δbK) − (1 + b 2 );

(1 + εbI)(1 + δbK) = (1 + εbI + εδJ + δbK) − (1 + b 2 )εδJ;

(1 + ε 0 bI + ε 0 δ 0 J + δ 0 bK)(1 + εbI + εδJ + δbK)

= (1 + ε 0 ε + δ 0 δ − ε 0 δ 0 εδ)(1 + ε 0 bI + ε 0 δJ + δbK)

− (1 + b 2 )(ε 0 ε + δ 0 δ + (ε 0 δ − δ 0 ε)J);

where ε, δ, ε 0 , and δ 0 are either −1 or 1.

Lemma 3. Let w be a word which appeared in Lemma 2, i.e., w = µ εk q , w = ν q δl , or w = µ ε q . . . ν q δ . Then

q |Im H w | is irrational, where Im H w is the imaginary part of H w , i.e., Im(C + XI + Y J + ZK) = XI + Y J + ZK.

P r o o f. It is enough to show that q|Im H w | 2 is a quadratic non-residue to p, which is a consequence of Lemma 2, the equality q p 

= −1, and the following three formulae:

q((εtb) 2 + 0 2 + 0 2 ) = qt 2 b 2 , q(0 2 + 0 2 + (δtb) 2 ) = qt 2 b 2 ,

q((εtb) 2 + (εδt) 2 + (δtb) 2 ) = qt 2 (1 + 2b 2 ) ≡ qt 2 b 2 (mod p), where t = 1, . . . , p − 1.

We attain our objective from the previous lemma:

Theorem. The rotations µ q and ν q generate a free group whose non- trivial elements have no fixed point on (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 .

P r o o f. We only have to prove that Im H w is non-zero and that q · ι(Im H w )/|Im H w | does not belong to (

q S 2 ) ∩ Q 3 for each reduced word, w, of the form µ ε q . . . ν q δ (i.e., w starts with µ −1 q or µ q and ends with ν q −1 or ν q ) or simply a power of µ q or of ν q , because

w has a fixed point ⇔ w 0 ww 0−1 has a fixed point,

for an arbitrary word w 0 of {µ −1 q , µ q , ν q −1 , ν q }. For such a non-empty reduced word w, Im H w is obviously non-zero and Lemma 3 implies

q ι(Im H w )

|Im H w | 6∈ Q 3 .

References

[C] J. W. S. C a s s e l s, Rational Quadratic Forms, Academic Press, New York, 1978.

(6)

[H] E. H e c k e, Vorlesungen ¨ uber die Theorie der algebraischen Zahlen, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1923.

[L] T. Y. L a m, Algebraic Theory of Quadratic Forms, W. A. Benjamin Inc., Mas- sachusetts, 1973.

[M] L. J. M o r d e l l, Diophantine Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1969.

[Sa0] K. S a t ˆo, A Hausdorff decomposition on a countable subset of S

2

without the Axiom of Choice, Math. Japon. 44 (1996), 307–312.

[Sa1] K. S a t ˆo, A free group acting without fixed points on the rational unit sphere, Fund.

Math. 148 (1995), 63–69.

[Sa2] —, A free group of rotations with rational entries on the 3-dimensional unit sphere, Nihonkai Math. J. 8 (1997), 91–94.

[W] S. W a g o n, The Banach–Tarski Paradox , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1985.

Department of Mathematics Faculty of Engineering Yokohama National University Hodogaya, Yokohama 240, Japan E-mail: kenzi@math.sci.ynu.ac.jp

Current address:

Department of Mathematics Faculty of Engineering Tamagawa University 6-1-1, Tamagawa-Gakuen, Machida Tokyo 194-8610, Japan E-mail: kenzi@eng.tamagawa.ac.jp

Received on 21.1.1997

and in revised form on 29.1.1998 (3121)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

It is clear that these permutations are infinite

We remark that the fact that this approach can be used to build dense sum-free sets has been independently observed by Ruzsa (private communication).. Let α be an irrational number

Our proof owes much to Wooley’s ideas, and it is therefore natural to apply it to an arbitrary form for which the surface contains 3 rational coplanar lines.. We hope that

The condition (1.6) becomes stronger as we increase Q, corresponding to higher terms in the Taylor expansion of F (x). To extend our results to larger Q we need Pad´e approximants

(b) It is an immediate consequence of the definition of the group law that if an elliptic curve is represented as a double cover of the line and one branch point is chosen as the

We will make use of both assertion and proof of the Chinese Remainder Theorem for polynomials, which we adapt from the integer version given by Cohen [3, Corollary

We study the distribution of rational points on certain K3 surfaces defined over an algebraic number field k of finite degree, namely the Kummer surfaces S/k attached to

The difference between the number of partitions of n into an even number of parts from the multiset S and the number of partitions into an odd number of parts from S is bounded if