Texturesand Microstructures,1988,Vol. 10,pp.37-40
Reprintsavailabledirectlyfrom the publisher
Photocopyingpermittedbylicenseonly
(C)1988 Gordon and Breach Science PublishersInc.
Printed inthe United Kingdom
Short
Communication
H. BAVINCK and R. F. SWARTTOUW
DelftUniversityof Technology,DepartmentofTechnical Mathematics
andInformatics,Julianalaan 132,2628BLDelft,The Netherlands
Aconjecture byBrakman(1987)concerninga suminvolvingbinomial coefficients is
proved by usingformulae forhypergeometricfunctions.
KEY WORDS: Hypergeometric functions,binomial coefficients.
In a recentpaperBrakman (1987)conjectured that
(l+m-2)(
l-m+2)
1-n k n-m+k+2 n-m+k+l (1+m 2)!(1-n+1)!(n m+1)! (20! x l-n+l l-n+ for 1,m, n,
m<-n<-1. Wepresentaproofofthisformula, using hypergeometricfunctions.Thehypergeometricfunctions 2F and 3F2are definedby
and
2Fl(
a’ b c (a)k(b)k .k Z Z =o (c)ktz)
",
(a)k(b)k(C)k k=O (d)k(e)kk!zk’
where (a)k=a(a +1)... (a+k-1).
38 SHORT COMMUNICATION
Weshall onlyusethecasewhere a, b,c, d,e Zand z 1. For a positive integer n we maywrite
and
(n)k
(n
+k-1)! (n- 1)!n
(--n)k=(--1)k(n_k)----’----
7:
for k<-n, (--n)k=O for k>n.E
(-1)k k=O k n-m+k+2(
21)
n-m+k+l 1--tlE
(-1)k k=O (1+rn 2)!(1-rn+2)!(n rn+k+1)! (2/+m n k 1)! k!(l+m k 2)!(n m+k+2)!(1-n k)!(21)! (l m +2)!(n m+1)!(21+rn n+1)! (21)!(n rn+
2)!(1- n)! ’-" (n 0,(2- m),(n m+2), x ,=o (n m 21+1),(n m+3)k (l-m+2)t(n m+1)!(2/+m n 1)! (21)!(n rn+2)!(1- n)!3F2[n-1,2-1-m,n-m+2
Xkn
-m-21+1, n-m +3Wenow use theformula (Luke, 1969,p. 111, formula(38))
3F2
d+l,c+l z c-d2F\d+l z
d ./a,b,c
SHORT COMMUNICATION 39 towrite
3F2f
n-1, 2-1-m, n m+2 -m-21/2,n -m +3 n-m+2 2/+1 -m-21+21)
-n-m-21+21+1
1nn-l,
2-l-m, n-m +2 x3F2 -m-21+1,n-m +3 or3F2(n-
l,2-l- m, n m+2 \n-m-21+1, n-m +31)
21+m-n-13F2 m 21+2, n m+
3 n-m+2 21+m-n-1 2F(-1,2-1-m -m-2/+2The hypergeometric functions on the right can be evaluated by
using the formulae
2F(-n,
b.
1)
(c-b) (Luke, 1969, p.99formula(3)) c and -n, a, bF
a+
b-n -c+l, c Weobtain (c a),,(c b),, 1=(c),,(c-a-b),,
(Luke, 1969, p. 103 formula(2)).3F2(nn
l’2-l- m’ n m+2)
-m-21+l,n-m+3 1 (2/+1)(n+
l+1)/-n(1)t-n (2/+m n 1)(n m+3)/_(/+m 1)l_n (n m+
2)(n l)l-,, (21+
rn n 1)(n rn 2l+
2)l-n40 SHORTCOMMUNICATION (2l+1)(/-n)!(21)!(l+m 2)!(n m +2)! Hence (2l+rn n 1)(1+n)!(l rn+2)!(21+rn n 2)! (n m
+
2)(/- n)!(l+rn 2)! (2l+rn n 1)(21+rn n 2)! (l- n)t(/+rn 2)!(n rn+2)! (2/+rn n 1)![
(2/+1), 1]
(l+n)t(l rn+2)!-
(n rn+1)!E
(-I):
k=O k n-m+k+2 n-m+k+l (1+rn 2)!(n rn+1)t(l-n+ (20![
(2l+1), (l-m +2),]
(1+n)!(l n+1)!-
(1 n+1)!(n m+1)! (1+m 2)!(n m+1)!(1 n+1)! (21)t[(
21+1)_(1-m+12)]
l-n+1 l-n+which isthe desiredresult.
References
Brakman,C. M.(1987).Evaluationof the integralfl Pr’n(X)P’--2"n(x)dx. Textures
and Microstructures,7,207-210.
Luke, Y. L. (1969). The specialfunctions and their approximations, volume I,