• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Fundamentals of atomic physics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Fundamentals of atomic physics"

Copied!
22
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Fundamentals of atomic physics

Main directions of development:

- spectroscopy a) atomic b) molecular

-"new" disciplines: - nonlinear optics - quantum optics - physics of ultracold matter - quantum computing - applications- incl. quantum metrology

Lecture schedule:

I. The atomic structure

II. Interaction of atoms with EM radiation

III. Experimental methods - important experiments in atomic physics

•Materials: http://chaos.if.uj.edu.pl/~kuba/teaching.html

• Pass - exercises + exam.

Subject of research: atom, molecule (single - not crystal or liquid)

- structure of energ. - stationary states

- influence from external factors (fields and particles)

(2)

Recommended textbooks:

§ H. Haken, H. Ch. Wolf "Atoms and Quanta",PWN, 2002 (2 ed.)

•Zofia Leś, Fundamentals of Atomic Physics PWN 2015

§ GK Woodgate "The structure of the atom", PWN, 1974.

§ W. Demtröder "Laser spectroscopy", PWN, Warsaw 1993.

§ C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, F. Laloë "Quantum Mechanics"

vol. 1 + 2, Wiley (N. York, 1977).

§ R. Eisberg, R. Resnick "Quantum Physics", PWN, 1983.

§M. Inguscio and Leonardo Fallani: Atomic Physics: Precise measurements and ultracold Atoms, Oxford UP 2013

+ selected articles in "Advances in Physics", "World of Science", websites, etc ...

(3)

3/ 22

1665 Isaac Newton

(splitting the light into its components)

From the start …

1814 Joseph von Fraunhoffer

(absorption

lines in the solar spectrum )

1860 Robert Bunsen & Gustav Kirchhoff

(prism spectroscope)

1 - development of measurement techniques (new

observations):

(4)

2 - Search for an explanation of the observation.

1889 Johannes R. Rydberg

÷ø ç ö

è

æ -

= 2 12 '

1 1

n R n

l

1884 Johan Jakob Balmer

(hydrogen spectrum) H

4 lines from the Fraunhoffer spectrum;

l

= (9/5) h, (4/3) h, (25/21) h, (9/8) h, where h = 364.56 nm

®

spectral series 1 /

l

~ (1/4 - 1 / n2)

(5)

5/ 22

1. E. Rutherford's model of the atom (~ 1911)

exp. Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden (1909)

1871-1937 Nobel 1908 (Chemistry) particle source a

(He kernels)

q

particle detector a

Metal foil.

• dispersion: alpha particle ® the repulsive Coulomb force

• Cases of Backscatter® strong res.

"® strong fields® charge ~ point

• no recoil of foil atoms ® dissipative charges in heavy "objects"

F

~ all foil matter is concentrated in a heavy nucleus atoms = extremely small, positively charged nuclei (~ 10-14 m << atom size ~ 10-10 m) + light electrons

The beginning of the "modern" atomic science

M

(6)

2. Bohr's Model (1913):

"Angular momentum quantization for allowed orbits " L = mur = nħ (ħ = h / 2p)

consequences:

Only discrete circular orbits with energy- levels En are allowed.

Radiationless movement.

1. When switching from an orbit with greater r (greater energy) to a lower one - emission of radiation with the frequency hν= En-En’

where En= -Rhc / n2

2. Correspondence rule: For large n the frequency of emission /

absorption corresponds to the frequency of the orbital movement of the electron (this does not fit for small n) → we compare n and n'= n-1 →

determining the constant R.

(7)

2. Bohr's Model (1913):

The Energy with Coulomb potential is: 𝐸 =

!"#!

$%!

&

k

()*'

"

Example of Virial theorem: 2 𝑇 = 𝑛 ⟨𝑉⟩ for 𝑉~𝑟

+

forces

!"& !

=

$%&!!

𝑚𝑣

#

/2 =

$%#&!

⇒ 𝑚𝑣𝑟 ⋅ 𝑣 ⇒ 𝑣 =

$%,!

From Bohr’s postulate for stationary orbits, we already have 𝐿 = 𝑛ℏ giving 𝑣 =

$%+ℏ!

and thus,

𝐸

+

= − 𝑚𝑣

#

2 = − 𝑚𝑘

#

𝑒

(

2ℏ

#

𝑛

#

(8)

2. Bohr's Model (1913):

consequences:

un = K.Zu0/n u0 = e2/ ħ

Þ E.n = - (Z2/n2 K.2)E.I E.I = K.me4/ 2ħ2= en. ionization = 13.6 eV

rn = n2 a0/ KZ a0 = ħ2/ me2 = 0.052 nm (0.52 Å) Bohr radius K. º 1 / (4pe0)

Sommerfeld Extensions:

- extension to elliptical orbits, quantization l = 0, .. n-1 - relativistic mass change effect - low l orbits

→ L degeneracy removed (proper - Dirac equation only) Rydberg constant: R = K.2 me4/ 2ħ2

(9)

9/ 22

Ground state as a steady state

G Quantum fluctuations are essential

classically

Energy E = Tclas + Vclas

Tclas = ½ mu2 = |balance of forces: forces !"#! = $%#!! | = ½ ke2/ r0 E = - ½ ke2/ r0

Vclas = - ke2/ r0

E (r0) 0.

Classically el. falls on nucleus!!

(10)

v with Quantum. Mech. Dr Dp ³ ħ

so that the classical orbits and angular momentum make sense you need Dp << p, Dr << r, i.e (Dr / r) (Dp / p) << 1

Bohr's postulates contradictory with existing Physics

circulating electron emits (accelerated charges radiate) and it should loose energy and fall on the nucleus.

For small n

contradiction

M

F

but Dr Dp ³ ħ Þ (Dr Dp) / rp ³ ħ / rp

mvr = pr = nħ , i.e. (Dr Dp) / rp ³ 1 / n

Þ One should not talk about localized orbits Þ (in the classical sense.)

(unless n >> 1 - Rydberg states)

(11)

11/ 22

V = -ke2/ r most preferably when r ® 0,

According to Quantum Mechanics :

v but from the uncertainty relation. when an electron is located in an area with a radius of r0; Dr » r0, this Dp » ħ / r0 (non-zero

momentum)

v when momentum is nonzero, in turn, kin. En.

is nonzero.

T. ³ T.min = (Dp)2/ 2m = ħ2/ 2mr02

v E = T + V

minimum Emin = Tmin + V occurs for r0 = ħ2/ me2 = a0 Þ stable atom J "Zero vibration energy"

T.min

V 0 and0 r

(12)

Quantum mechanics on atomic energy levels

electron in Coulomb field from Z protons acc. to quantum. Mech.

HCM= p2/ 2µ - k Ze2/ r µ º meM / (me+ M), k º 1 / (4pe0) C / r C / r coulomb (central) potential

Dy + 2µ/ħ(E-C / r) y = 0

• spherical symmetry Þ possible factorization in radial and angular parts y(r,J,j) = R (r) Y (J,j)

n = 1, 2, ...

Shrödinger eqn.:

! "#$

Possibility to separate variables in different coordinate systems - standard - spherical

- standard - parabolic, semi-parabolic

- relationships with the selection of commuting observables

(13)

13/ 22

f. radial Rnl(r)

for Coulomb’s Potential R

nl

(r) depends on n and l, but E

n

only on n

® degeneration:

"

n, l = 0.1, ..n-1.

States m

l

also zdegener.

Þ

degree deg.

g = S

l (2l + 1)

= n

2

V (r) does not depend on l

-13.6 -3.4 -1.51 -0.85 0

E [eV] l = 0 1 2 3 4

n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 n = 4

G

n =¥

Accidental degeneracy

(only for coulomb - hydrogen!)

(14)

Energ levels "one-electron" atoms

)

2

2

(

2 2

2 2

n Rhc Z n

E

n

= - C = -

! µ

3 4

4 c ! R e

p

=

K2

µ

Hydrogen isotopes

µ º meM / (me+ M)

isotope (mass) effect

H

b

D

b

(15)

15/ 22

"Exotic" atoms

§ positronium (positronium) = (e

+

e

-

) e

-

e

+

§ muonium (muonium) (

µ+

e

-

)

v µ+

e

-

§ meson atoms:

Similar potential Þ same level structure, Different µ Þ different energies

(16)

muon atom (p µ - ):

orbit radius <R

nucleus

Þ

the muon penetrates (probes) the nucleus

µ-

p

(17)

Hydrogen Atom in “4-D”

Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector (LRL-vector) Classical form : ⃗𝐴 = ⃗𝑝×𝐿 − 𝑚𝑘 ̂𝑟

LRL-vec. in an inverse-square central force.

It is evident that

𝒅𝑨𝐝𝐭

= 𝟎 Scaling this as 𝐷 =

#!|5|3

.

Invariants for negative energies. 𝐷 ⋅ 𝐿 = 0 & 𝐷

#

+ 𝐿

#

=

!$#|5|!

The Poisson brackets:

{𝐷

6

, 𝐿

7

} = 𝜀

67$

𝐷

$

{𝐿

6

, 𝐿

7

} = 𝜀

67$

𝐿

$

{𝐷

6

, 𝐷

7

} = 𝜀

67$

𝐿

$

(18)

Quantum Mechanical Form: ⃗𝑝×𝐿 is non-Hermitian while

'

#

⃗𝑝×𝐿 − 𝐿× ⃗𝑝 is. Thus, the scaled LRL-vec becomes.

𝐷 = 1

2𝑚|𝐸

+

| [ 1

2 ⃗𝑝×𝐿 − 𝐿× ⃗𝑝 − mk ̂𝑟]

With the commutation relations:

[𝐻

8,

𝐷] = [𝐻

8,

𝐿] = 0

[𝐿

6,

𝐿

7

] = 𝑖𝜀

67$

𝐿

$

Has SO(3) group structure.

[𝐿

6,

𝐷

7

] = 𝑖𝜀

67$

𝐷

$

[D

:,

D

;

] = iε

:;<

L

<

Together they give 𝑆𝑂(4) structure

(19)

Explicit presence of SO(4)

Define: ℒ

:;

≡ 𝜖

67$

𝐿

$

:(

≡ 𝐷

6

Leads to [ℒ

:; ,

:<

] = 𝑖ℒ

;<

Casimir Invariants : 𝐿. 𝐷 = 0 ℒ ⃗

#

= 𝐿

#

+ 𝐷

#

= −1 −

'

#="

^^

Redefining the operators.

𝐽

'

=

'#

(𝐿 − 𝐷 ), 𝐽

#

=

'#

(𝐿 + 𝐷 ) we get the comm. relations 𝐽

'6

, 𝐽

'7

= 𝑖 𝜖

67$

𝐽

'$

𝐽

#6

, 𝐽

#7

= 𝑖 𝜖

67$

𝐽

#$

𝐽

'6

, 𝐽

#7

= 0

2 independent angular momenta are also constants

of motion.

(20)

Generators

Generators for rotation : 𝑅 Ω = exp(−𝑖Ω ⋅ L) Where the 3 components of L transforms the 3 parameters of Ω and are thus the generators.

Transformation oper. for SO(4): 𝒯 ⃗𝛼, ⃗𝛽 = exp(−𝑖 ⃗𝛼 ⋅ L − ⃗𝛽 ⋅ ⃗𝐴)

= exp −𝑖 ⃗𝛼 𝐽

'

+ 𝐽

#

+ ⃗ 𝛽 𝐽

#

− 𝐽

'

= exp −𝑖 ⃗𝛼 − ⃗ 𝛽 𝐽

'

exp −𝑖 ⃗𝛼 + ⃗ 𝛽 𝐽

#

Where the isomorphism SO(4) ∼ SO(3) ⊗ SO(3) is evident.

And the Casimir Invariants in this case are

(21)

From SO(3) (Quantum Angular Momentum).

We have 𝐽

'#

, 𝐽

##

→ 𝐽 𝐽 + 1 , where 𝐽 = 0,

'#

, ⋯

This gives from the relation 2 𝐽

'#

+ 𝐽

##

= −1 −

'

="

𝐻

8

= − 1

2 2𝐽

'#

+ 2𝐽

##

+ 1 ⇒ 𝐸 = − 1

2(4𝐽 𝐽 + 1 + 1)

− 1

2𝑛

#

= − 1

2 2𝐽 + 1

#

Now as 𝐽

'>

, 𝐽

#>

can take values m

:

∈ −𝐽, −𝐽 + 1, ⋯ , 𝐽 − 1, 𝐽

We have the degeneracy 2𝐽 + 1

#

= 𝑛

#

consistent with standard solution of the Schrödinger Eqn. if the el.

spin is not taken into account.

(22)

Basis Vectors in 𝑱

𝟏,𝟐𝟐

, 𝑱

𝟏𝒁

, 𝐉

𝟐𝒁

𝐽

'#

𝐽, 𝑚1, 𝑚2 = 𝐽 𝐽 + 1 𝐽, 𝑚

'

, 𝑚

#

𝐽

6>

𝐽, 𝑚1, 𝑚2 = 𝑚

6

𝐽, 𝑚

'

, 𝑚

#

𝐿

>

𝐽, 𝑚1, 𝑚2 = (𝑚

'

+𝑚

#

) 𝐽, 𝑚

'

, 𝑚

#

𝐷

>

𝐽, 𝑚1, 𝑚2 = (𝑚

'

−𝑚

#

) 𝐽, 𝑚

'

, 𝑚

#

Note that the values

corresponding to 𝐿

?

can take values between -2J and 2J = n-1.

2𝐽 = 𝑛 − 1 = 𝑛

'

+ 𝑛

#

+ |𝑀 | 𝑚

'

+ 𝑚

#

= 𝑀

𝑚

'

− 𝑚

#

= 𝑛

'

− 𝑛

#

Basis Vectors for spherical solution of the Schrödinger Eqn. 𝐽! + 𝐽" = 𝐿

𝐽

#

𝐽, 𝐿, 𝑀 = 𝐽 𝐽 + 1 𝐽, 𝐿, 𝑀

These states can be found using Clebsch-Gordan

𝑛

'

, 𝑛

#

, 𝑀 −

quantum nmbs in

parabolic coords.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

On the other hand, several references [2]–[4], [6], [8]–[10] investigated the approximation of continuous functions on [0, 1] and [−1, 1] by elements from Π n k (actually,

Montgomery and Vaughan [27] have observed that results like Theorem 1 can help to show that a short interval contains lots of Goldbach numbers... (even numbers representable as a sum

(See the proof of Lemma 7 in [1].) For some N , making sufficiently many lin- ear equations obtained by equating the coefficients of powers of x, including positive powers, we are

We repeat all steps up to formula (5.4) (proof of which was the most dif- ficult part of Theorem 1) and observe that (5.4) trivially holds for squarefree numbers without any

1991 Mathemati s Subje t Classi ation: Primary 11R45; Se ondary 11B39.. Key words and phrases : Lu as sequen e, Chebotarev

If we partition the set of integers n on the left according to the value of the largest squarefull divisor t of n, we find that the quantity on... The estimate

From the one-to-one correspondence between conjugacy classes of S n and ordinary partitions of n, this amounts to the question whether or not almost all pairs of ordinary partitions

By considering a broader class of isometric immersions, Abe and Haas [2] showed that given a dif- ferentiable lamination on H n (−1) there is a family of isometric immersions of H