• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

De Branges-Rovnyak spaces and generalized Dirich- let spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "De Branges-Rovnyak spaces and generalized Dirich- let spaces"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

DMV-PTM Mathematical Meeting 17–20.09.2014, Poznań

De Branges-Rovnyak spaces and generalized Dirich- let spaces

Maria Nowak

Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland mt.nowak@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl

The talk is based on the joint work with Bartosz Łanucha Session: Spaces of analytic functions

The spaces now called de Brange-Rovnyak spaces were introduced by de Branges and Rovnyak in 1966. De Branges-Rovnyak spaces are subspaces of H2 the standard Hardy space of the open unit disk D. To give their definition we denote by Tχ, χ ∈ L(T), where T = ∂D, the bounded Toeplitz operator on H2, that is, Tχf = P (χf ), where P is the orthogonal projection of L2(T) onto H2. Given a function b in the unit ball of H, the de Branges-Rovnyak space H(b) is the image of H2 under the operator (I − TbTb)1/2. The space H(b) is given the Hilbert space structure that makes the operator (I − TbTb)1/2 a coisometry of H2onto H(b), namely

h(I − TbTb)1/2f, (I − TbTb)1/2gib= hf, gi2 (f, g ∈ (ker(I − TbTb)1/2)).

It turns out that if b is an inner function, then H(b) = (bH2). Here we deal with the case when b is not an extreme point of the unit ball of H. We describe the structure of some spaces H(b) and their connections with the generalized Dirichlet spaces defined below.

For λ ∈ T we define the local Dirichlet integral of f at λ by

Dλ(f ) = 1 2π

Z 0

f (λ) − f (eit) λ − eit

2

dt.

where f (λ) is the nontangential limit of f at λ. If f (λ) does not exist, then we set Dλ(f ) = ∞. Let µ be a positive Borel measure on T. The generalized Dirichlet space D(µ) consists of those functions f ∈ H2 for which

Dµ(f ) = Z

T

Dλ(f )dµ(λ) < ∞.

In 1997 D. Sarason showed that D(δλ), where δλ is the unit mass at λ, can be identified with H(bλ), where bλ(z) = (1 − w0)λz/(1 − w0λz), and w0 = (3 −√

5)/2. Further results showing connection between the spaces H(b) and D(µ) have been recently obtained by T. Ransford, D. Guillot, N. Chevrot and C. Costara.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

This result generalizes Sullivan’s classical theorem on the formality of symmetric spaces, but the proof is of a different nature, since for generalized symmetric spaces

(These two spaces stood out because they had no history of compatibility with any demanding Σ, and because ( 5 ) The reader should note that we are not offering a slick

Suppose E is a Banach lattice and EA is order dense in E (for example, this holds in Orlicz spaces generated by finite-valued functions). The dual space E% can be

The paper deals with the theory of Orlicz spaces of functions with values in separable, linear topological spaces... Separability of Orlicz

I should explain what I mean by saying the Corollary is “more or less” due to Giffen. The difference between Corollary 3.4 and the result in Giffen’s [1] is in the precise

Through the Dobrushin ergodicity coef- ficient, we generalize some ergodic theorems obtained earlier for classical Markov semigroups acting on L 1 (or positive operators on

This intriguing situation, which occurs also in Theorem 2 of [9], depends on the fact that our proof of Theorem 3 uses ideas similar to those of Shapiro's paper [11] on weighted

For a compact space X, Fedorchuk [Fe 1,2 ] proved that if X is locally connected and has no isolated points then C(X) and C(X, I) are dense in USCC(X) and USCC(X, I),