• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Quantum Estimation and Measurement Theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Quantum Estimation and Measurement Theory"

Copied!
1
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Quantum Estimation and Measurement Theory

Problem set 7

return on 30.11.2018

Problem 1 Consider multiparameter estimation case of the qubit estimation problem from the previous Problem set, where we assume that apart from φ also θ and p are unknown parameters to be estimated.

Write down the QFI matrix and try to conjecture whether there is measurement that allows to saturation of the CR bound for all parameters simultaneously.

Problem 2 We have introduced the Bures metric, where the distance element is dened through:

d2Bρ = 1

4Tr(ρ dΛ2), dρ = 1

2(dΛρ + ρdΛ). (1)

Prove that in case of a qubit, for which a general state is parameterized as:

ρ = 1

2(11 + ⃗r · ⃗σ), ⃗r = (r sin θ cos φ, r sin θ sin φ, r cos θ), (2) Bures metric takes the form:

d2Bρ = 1 4

[ d2r

1− r2 + r2(d2θ + sin2θd2φ) ]

. (3)

Hint: Start by parameterizing the state using Cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) and try to nd Λ from condition (1)remember that Λ is hermitian which means that it can be written asΛ = ∑3

i=0λiσi, where λi ∈ R, and σ0 =11.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Suppose we are interested in the best (under the above partial ordering) estimator in a class G of estimators under a fixed loss function L.. It appears that if G is too large, then

Problem 2 Reanalyze the Stern-Gerlach experiment as described in Sec. ??, but this time allow the particle to freely evolve, after the interaction with the magnetic eld, for a time

Therefore, we have a nice interpretation of the joined position and momentum measurements as projections on coherent states:. J (x, p)

We can, however, try to use the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimator in order to estimate θ and check whether we can approach the CR bound bound in the limit of large number of

Problem 2 Analyze the conditions for saturation of the Bayesian Cramér-Rao inequality and check if the gaussian model consider during the lecture is the only one for which

[r]

Problem 1 During the lecture we have derived the cost of the optimal Bayesian strategy of indentifying a completely unknown state of a qubit, |ψ⟩ (θ,φ) = cos(θ/2) |0⟩ +

This kind of state appears in the so called Kitaev phase estimation algorithm which is an important element of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm.. For this state there is no