Erratum: “Modeling and characterization of dielectrophoretically structured
piezoelectric composites using piezoceramic particle inclusions
with high aspect ratios” [J. Appl. Phys. 113, 034103 (2013)]
D. A. van den Ende,
1,2,3,a)R. A. Maier,
4P. L. M. J. van Neer,
5S. van der Zwaag,
3C. A. Randall,
4and W. A. Groen
1,31
Holst Centre-TNO, HTC31, 5605 KN Eindhoven, The Netherlands
2
TNO (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Materials for Integrated Products
Department, Rondom 1, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands
3
Novel Aerospace Materials Group, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology,
Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
4
Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA
5
TNO, Department of Process and Instrumentation Development, Stieltjesweg 1, 2628 CK Delft, The
Netherlands
(Received 29 October 2014; accepted 17 February 2015; published online 5 March 2015)
[
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4914113
]
There are errors in the figure captions of the article
1from Figure
9
onwards.
The caption text of Figure
14
should be the caption text
of Figure
9
.
The caption text of Figure
9
should be the caption text
of Figure
10
.
The caption text of Fig.
10
should be the caption text of
Figure
11
.
The caption text of Fig.
11
should be the caption text of
Figure
12
.
The caption text of Figure
12
should be the caption text
of Figure
13
.
The caption text of Figure
13
should be the caption text
of Figure
14
.
The references to these figures should also be updated
accordingly:
The cross-references to Figure
9
(page 4, column 1, line
20; page 8, column 2, line 40; and page 9, column 1, line 6
in the original article) should instead be cross-references to
Figure
14
.
The cross-references to Figure
10
(page 5, column 2,
line 16 and page 5, column 2, line 23) should be to Figure
9
.
The cross-references to Figure
11
(page 5, column 2,
line 22; page 5, column 2, line 23; page 5, column 2, line 33;
page 7, column 1, line 11; and page 8, column 1 line 24)
should be to Figure
10
.
The cross-references to Figure
12
(page 6, column 2,
line 1; page 6, column 2, line 11; and page 7, column 1, line
14) should be to Figure
11
.
The cross-reference to Figure
13
(page 8, column 2, line
6) should be to Figure
12
.
The cross-reference to Figure
14
(page 8, column 2, line
15) should be to Figure
13
.
The corrected figures and their corresponding captions
are provided below.
FIG. 9. Electric field ratio acting on an ellipsoidal PZT particle as a function of aspect ratio,AR and different particle spacing, R using Eq. (4).
FIG. 10. The effective electric field concentration in the matrix layer between two adjacent particles as a function of particle dimensions and inter-particle distance.
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: vdende@gmail.com.
0021-8979/2015/117(9)/099901/2/$30.00 117, 099901-1 VC2015 AIP Publishing LLC
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 117, 099901 (2015)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP: 131.180.131.242 On: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:26:17
1
D. A. van den Ende, R. A. Maier, P. L. M. J. van Neer, S. van der Zwaag, C. A. Randall, and W. A. Groen,J. Appl. Phys.113, 034103 (2013). FIG. 11. Unipolar polarization and strain hysteresis of DEP structured
com-posites (a:Reff¼ 45) and (b: Reff¼ 85) and 1–3 fiber composite (c) and asso-ciated e33 and d33 values. The polarization and strain values were normalized for the PZT phase in the composites using Eqs. (8) and (9). The bulk PZT values can be found in Figs. 7(d) and 8(d) for comparison.
FIG. 12. Conversed33at field low conditions (Eapp¼ 0.1 kV/mm), compared to the directd33. The triangles are values, for example, composite with Reff¼ 45 and circles are values for the composite with Reff¼ 85.
FIG. 13. Maximumd33at high field conditions compared to thed33under low field conditions (converse effect). The triangles are values, for example, com-posite withReff¼ 45 and circles are values for the composite with Reff¼ 85.
FIG. 14. Impedance magnitude and phase around resonance of DEP struc-tured composites (a, u¼ 0.24, Reff¼ 41) and (b, u ¼ 0.15, Reff¼ 116), 1–3 fiber composite (c, u¼ 0.24) and PZT 5A4 bulk ceramic disk (d). The KLM fits for each sample are represented by the solid (magnitude) and dashed (phase) lines.
099901-2 van den Ende et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 099901 (2015)
[This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to ] IP: 131.180.131.242 On: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:26:17