• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Ś II APPENDIX B – Input data and results of bird collision risk modelling for OWF B

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Ś II APPENDIX B – Input data and results of bird collision risk modelling for OWF B"

Copied!
184
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

A P P E N D I X B

– Input data and results of bird

c o l l i s i o n r i s k m o d e l l i n g f o r O W F B

Ś II

(2)
(3)

B

Input data and results of bird collision risk modelling

This appendix presents screan shots of Excel files presenting data input worksheet and result worksheets of the standard collision risk modelling application as suggested by Band (2012). The details of collision risk assessment methodology are provided in the EIA report chapter 6.6.2.

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

B.1

Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver Gavia stellata and Gavia arctica

(8)

B.1.2 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 1 with low turbine tower (120 m)

(9)
(10)

B.1.4 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 1 with high turbine tower (175 m)

(11)
(12)

B.1.6 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 2 with low turbine tower (145 m)

(13)
(14)

B.1.8 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 2 with high turbine tower (175 m)

(15)
(16)

B.1.10 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 3 with low turbine tower (145 m)

(17)
(18)

B.1.12 Red-throated Diver and Black-throated Diver: migrant collision risk worksheet for variant 3 with high turbine tower (175 m)

(19)

B.2

Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis

(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)

B.3

Velvet Scoter Melanitta fusca

(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)

B.4

Common Scoter Melanitta nigra

(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)

B.5

Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope

(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)
(88)
(89)
(90)
(91)

B.6

Swans Cygnidae

(92)
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)

B.7

Geese Anserini

(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113)
(114)
(115)

B.8

Common Crane Grus grus

B.8.1 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds for turbine variant 1 with low turbine tower (120 m), 3 “raptor-type”

(116)

B.8.2 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 1 with low turbine tower (120 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(117)

B.8.3 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 1 with low turbine tower (120 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(118)

B.8.4 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds for turbine variant 1 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(119)

B.8.5 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 1 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(120)

B.8.6 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 1 with high turbine tower (175 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(121)

B.8.7 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds for turbine variant 2 with low turbine tower (145 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(122)

B.8.8 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 2 with low turbine tower (145 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(123)

B.8.9 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 2 with low turbine tower (145 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(124)

B.8.10 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds for turbine variant 2 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(125)

B.8.11 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 2 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(126)

B.8.12 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 2 with high turbine tower (175 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(127)

B.8.13 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds for turbine variant 3 with low turbine tower (145 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(128)

B.8.14 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 3 with low turbine tower (145 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(129)

B.8.15 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 3 with low turbine tower (145 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(130)

B.8.16 Common Crane: input data for migrating birds turbine variant 3 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(131)

B.8.17 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 3 with high turbine tower (175 m), 3 “raptor-type” scenarios

(132)

B.8.18 Common Crane: migrant collision risk worksheet for turbine variant 3 with high turbine tower (175 m), standard Band2012 model scenarios

(133)

B.9

Herring Gull Larus argentatus

(134)
(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
(143)
(144)
(145)

B.10

Little Gull Larus minutus

(146)
(147)
(148)
(149)
(150)
(151)
(152)
(153)
(154)
(155)
(156)
(157)

B.11

Black-headed Gull Larus ridibundus

(158)
(159)
(160)
(161)
(162)
(163)
(164)
(165)
(166)
(167)
(168)
(169)

B.12

Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo

(170)
(171)
(172)
(173)
(174)
(175)
(176)
(177)
(178)
(179)
(180)
(181)

B.13

Razorbill Alca torda and Common Guillemot Uria aalge

Colission risk for Razorbill and Common Guillemot could not be assessed using Band (2012) tool, as all registered birds of these species flew below rotor heights of all considered wind turbine variants.

(182)
(183)
(184)

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The workshop invites both practitioners and academics in its discussion on what Service Design can add to networked collaboration and what directions are desirable for new Service

Rozłączność zakresu stosowania odsetek i kary umownej oraz samodzielność tych reżimów przemawia – przy jednoczesnym po- dobieństwie spełnianych funkcji – przeciw

treaty, as mentioned before, held the office of curator aquarum during the reign of Emperor Nerva, that is in the times when equites were already often appointed for the position

Petrus showed that if D is a 2- cell, then there exists a Whitney level A in C(D) which is not contractible, in fact A has non-trivial fundamental group and non-trivial first

The elements of the lattice are then interpreted as linear manifolds, i.e., points, lines, planes, and so on, whilst the lattice operations are seen as

Kurt Zulauf fährt seine Rollerskater schon über 10 Jahre.. Ihm geht es

[r]

*Trzy pytania muszą dotyczyć OSÓB, dwa pytania MIEJSC, dwa PRZEDMIOTÓW, trzy pytania muszą dotyczyć WYDARZEŃ przedstawionych w książce (z początku, środka i