• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ"

Copied!
25
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Homework

(2)

Advanced exercise

(a) Show that, if tan 2 φ = 2 tan φ + 1, then tan 2φ = −1.

(b) Find all solutions of the equation

tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ

which satisfy 0 < θ < 2π, expressing your answers as rational multiples of π.

(c) Find all solutions of the equation the equation cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ which satisfy

− 3π

2 < θ < π

2 .

(3)

Before you proceed you should give this question a go.

This is an advanced question (good prep for paper 3 and for students whose aim is to get 7 on the finals).

You’re probably not yet familiar with questions of this level of difficulty, so don’t feel discouraged. A good time limit for this questions is 30 minutes.

Even if you look at the solutions, try to do the steps yourselves.

(4)

Part (a)

We want to show that:

tan 2φ = −1 given the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

We start from the left hand side:

LHS = tan 2φ = 2 tan φ

1 − tan 2 φ = 2 tan φ

1 − (2 tan φ + 1) = 2 tan φ

−2 tan φ = −1 = RHS

The second step is the formula for tan 2φ and the third step is the use of

the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

(5)

Part (a)

We want to show that:

tan 2φ = −1 given the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

We start from the left hand side:

LHS = tan 2φ = 2 tan φ

1 − tan 2 φ = 2 tan φ

1 − (2 tan φ + 1) = 2 tan φ

−2 tan φ = −1 = RHS

The second step is the formula for tan 2φ and the third step is the use of

the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

(6)

Part (a)

We want to show that:

tan 2φ = −1 given the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

We start from the left hand side:

LHS = tan 2φ = 2 tan φ

1 − tan 2 φ = 2 tan φ

1 − (2 tan φ + 1) = 2 tan φ

−2 tan φ = −1 = RHS

The second step is the formula for tan 2φ and the third step is the use of

the assumption that tan 2 φ = 2 tan θ + 1.

(7)

Part (b)

We want to solve:

tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ for 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π.

We will start by deriving the formula for tan 3θ: tan 3θ = tan(θ + 2θ) =

= tan θ + tan 2θ 1 − tan θ tan 2θ =

= tan θ + 1−tan 2 tan θ

2

θ

1 − tan θ 1−tan 2 tan θ

2

θ

=

= tan θ(1 − tan 2 θ) + 2 tan θ

1 − tan 2 θ − 2 tan 2 θ = 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ

1 − 3 tan 2 θ

(8)

Part (b)

We want to solve:

tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ for 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π.

We will start by deriving the formula for tan 3θ:

tan 3θ = tan(θ + 2θ) =

= tan θ + tan 2θ 1 − tan θ tan 2θ =

= tan θ + 1−tan 2 tan θ

2

θ

1 − tan θ 1−tan 2 tan θ

2

θ

=

= tan θ(1 − tan 2 θ) + 2 tan θ

1 − tan 2 θ − 2 tan 2 θ = 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ

1 − 3 tan 2 θ

(9)

Part (b)

So we get the following equation:

tan θ = 2 + 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ 1 − 3 tan 2 θ

Multiplying both sides by 1 − 3 tan 2 θ and rearranging we get: 2 tan 3 θ − 6 tan 2 θ + 2 tan θ + 2 = 0 Dividing by 2 and setting tan θ = t, we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = 0

and one obvious solution to this polynomial is t = 1.

(10)

Part (b)

So we get the following equation:

tan θ = 2 + 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ 1 − 3 tan 2 θ

Multiplying both sides by 1 − 3 tan 2 θ and rearranging we get:

2 tan 3 θ − 6 tan 2 θ + 2 tan θ + 2 = 0

Dividing by 2 and setting tan θ = t, we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = 0

and one obvious solution to this polynomial is t = 1.

(11)

Part (b)

So we get the following equation:

tan θ = 2 + 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ 1 − 3 tan 2 θ

Multiplying both sides by 1 − 3 tan 2 θ and rearranging we get:

2 tan 3 θ − 6 tan 2 θ + 2 tan θ + 2 = 0 Dividing by 2 and setting tan θ = t, we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = 0

and one obvious solution to this polynomial is t = 1.

(12)

Part (b)

So we get the following equation:

tan θ = 2 + 3 tan θ − tan 3 θ 1 − 3 tan 2 θ

Multiplying both sides by 1 − 3 tan 2 θ and rearranging we get:

2 tan 3 θ − 6 tan 2 θ + 2 tan θ + 2 = 0 Dividing by 2 and setting tan θ = t, we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = 0

and one obvious solution to this polynomial is t = 1.

(13)

Part (b)

So we can factor out (t − 1) and using synthetic division we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = (t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1)

So

(t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1) = 0 gives tan θ = 1 or tan 2 θ = 2 tan θ + 1.

The first equation has solutions θ = π

4 or θ = 5π

4 .

(14)

Part (b)

So we can factor out (t − 1) and using synthetic division we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = (t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1) So

(t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1) = 0 gives tan θ = 1 or tan 2 θ = 2 tan θ + 1.

The first equation has solutions θ = π

4 or θ = 5π

4 .

(15)

Part (b)

So we can factor out (t − 1) and using synthetic division we get:

t 3 − 3t 2 + t + 1 = (t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1) So

(t − 1)(t 2 − 2t − 1) = 0 gives tan θ = 1 or tan 2 θ = 2 tan θ + 1.

The first equation has solutions θ = π

4 or θ = 5π

4 .

(16)

Part (b)

The second equation reduces to tan 2θ = −1 by part (a) and this has solutions:

θ = 3π

8 or θ = 7π

8 or θ = 11π

8 or θ = 15π 8 So finally the solutions to

tan θ = 2 + tan 3θ are

θ ∈  π 4 , 3π

8 , 7π 8 , 5π

4 , 11π 8 , 15π

8



(17)

Part (c)

The last part is a piece of cake if you remember the formula that allows you to change a function into a co-function.

We want to solve:

cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ for θ satisfying − 3π

2 < θ < π 2 .

Everything is aligned perfectly if we just set θ = π

2 − φ. We get the equation:

cot  π 2 − φ



= 2 + cot

 3  π

2 − φ



with 0 < φ < 2π.

(18)

Part (c)

The last part is a piece of cake if you remember the formula that allows you to change a function into a co-function.

We want to solve:

cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ for θ satisfying − 3π

2 < θ < π 2 .

Everything is aligned perfectly if we just set θ = π

2 − φ. We get the equation:

cot  π 2 − φ



= 2 + cot

 3  π

2 − φ



with 0 < φ < 2π.

(19)

Part (c)

The last part is a piece of cake if you remember the formula that allows you to change a function into a co-function.

We want to solve:

cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ for θ satisfying − 3π

2 < θ < π 2 .

Everything is aligned perfectly if we just set θ = π 2 − φ.

We get the equation:

cot  π 2 − φ



= 2 + cot

 3  π

2 − φ



with 0 < φ < 2π.

(20)

Part (c)

The last part is a piece of cake if you remember the formula that allows you to change a function into a co-function.

We want to solve:

cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ for θ satisfying − 3π

2 < θ < π 2 .

Everything is aligned perfectly if we just set θ = π

2 − φ. We get the equation:

cot  π 2 − φ



= 2 + cot

 3  π

2 − φ



with 0 < φ < 2π.

(21)

Part (c)

Now we of course have cot  π 2 − φ



= tan φ (after all this is the reason we’ve used the substitution θ = π

2 − φ).

Now let’s look at cot

 3  π

2 − φ



: cot

 3  π

2 − φ



= cot  π

2 − (3φ+π)



= tan(3φ + π) = tan 3φ

So we end up having to solve:

tan φ = 2 + tan 3φ

with 0 < φ < 2π. We already did this in part (b), so we know that: φ ∈  π

4 , 3π 8 , 7π

8 , 5π 4 , 11π

8 , 15π 8



(22)

Part (c)

Now we of course have cot  π 2 − φ



= tan φ (after all this is the reason we’ve used the substitution θ = π

2 − φ).

Now let’s look at cot

 3  π

2 − φ



: cot

 3  π

2 − φ



= cot  π

2 − (3φ+π)



= tan(3φ + π) = tan 3φ So we end up having to solve:

tan φ = 2 + tan 3φ with 0 < φ < 2π.

We already did this in part (b), so we know that: φ ∈  π

4 , 3π 8 , 7π

8 , 5π 4 , 11π

8 , 15π 8



(23)

Part (c)

Now we of course have cot  π 2 − φ



= tan φ (after all this is the reason we’ve used the substitution θ = π

2 − φ).

Now let’s look at cot

 3  π

2 − φ



: cot

 3  π

2 − φ



= cot  π

2 − (3φ+π)



= tan(3φ + π) = tan 3φ So we end up having to solve:

tan φ = 2 + tan 3φ

with 0 < φ < 2π. We already did this in part (b), so we know that:

(24)

Part (c)

Remember that we set θ = π

2 − φ, so of course φ = π

2 − θ, which gives:

π

2 − θ ∈  π 4 , 3π

8 , 7π 8 , 5π

4 , 11π 8 , 15π

8



and we get that:

θ ∈



− 11π 8 , − 7π

8 , − 3π 4 , − 3π

8 , π 8 , π

4



and these are the solutions to the equation cot θ = 2 + cot 3θ for θ satisfying − 3π

2 < θ < π

2 .

(25)

In case of any questions you can email me at T.J.Lechowski@gmail.com.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

This is, of course, necessary for a construction of special normal forms with the property that passing to another special normal coordinates is provided by linear

The purpose of this section is to develop the method of proof of Theorem 2 and prove the following theorem..

And as mentioned above, Keynes (1930) noted that with the decline of work, man must face the problem of how to occupy his leisure. Here technological progress has clearly changed

The following easy result shows that countably incomplete ultrapowers of infinite structures are always non-trivial..

The claim of the theorem concerned Galois module properties of class groups of towers of cyclotomic fields and was reformulated by Iwasawa in [I2] as a conjecture, later named the

Odw iedziny bpa Józefa R ancansa, sufr... SP IS

Fill in your session number on the front of the answer booklet, and attach it to this examination paper and your cover sheet using the tag providedy. y Unless otherwise stated in

The research described in this thesis has led to (a) a new method to compute a limited number of tool access orientations by accessibility analysis of a free-form object, (b) a