• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

REPRESENTATION-FINITE SELFINJECTIVE ALGEBRAS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "REPRESENTATION-FINITE SELFINJECTIVE ALGEBRAS"

Copied!
5
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

VOL. 75 1998 NO. 1

DEGENERATIONS FOR MODULES OVER

REPRESENTATION-FINITE SELFINJECTIVE ALGEBRAS

BY

GRZEGORZ Z W A R A (TORU ´ N)

1. Introduction and main result. Let A be a finite-dimensional associative K-algebra with identity over an algebraically closed field K. If 1 = a

1

, . . . , a

n

is a basis of A over K, we have the constant structures a

ijk

defined by a

i

a

j

= P a

ijk

a

k

. The affine variety mod

A

(d) of d-dimensional unital left A-modules consists of n-tuples m = (m

1

, . . . , m

n

) of (d × d)- matrices with coefficients in K such that m

1

is the identity matrix and m

i

m

j

= P a

ijk

m

k

holds for all indices i and j. The general linear group Gl

d

(K) acts on mod

A

(d) by conjugation, and the orbits correspond to the isomorphism classes of d-dimensional modules (see [6]). We shall agree to identify a d-dimensional A-module M with the point of mod

A

(d) corre- sponding to it. We denote by O(M ) the Gl

d

(K)-orbit of a module M in mod

A

(d). Then one says that a module N in mod

A

(d) is a degeneration of a module M in mod

A

(d) if N belongs to the Zariski closure O(M ) of O(M ) in mod

A

(d), and we denote this fact by M ≤

deg

N . Thus ≤

deg

is a partial order on the set of isomorphism classes of A-modules of a given dimension.

It is not clear how to characterize ≤

deg

in terms of representation theory.

There has been work by S. Abeasis and A. del Fra [1], K. Bongartz [4], [3], Ch. Riedtmann [9], and A. Skowro´ nski and the author [11]–[14] connecting

deg

with other partial orders ≤

ext

and ≤ on the isomorphism classes in mod

A

(d). They are defined in terms of representation theory as follows:

• M ≤

ext

N ⇔ there are modules M

i

, U

i

, V

i

and short exact sequences 0 → U

i

→ M

i

→ V

i

→ 0 in mod A such that M = M

1

, M

i+1

= U

i

⊕ V

i

, 1 ≤ i ≤ s, and N = M

s+1

for some natural number s.

• M ≤ N ⇔ [M, X] ≤ [N, X] holds for all modules X.

Here and later on we abbreviate dim

K

Hom

A

(X, Y ) by [X, Y ]. Then for modules M and N in mod

A

(d) the following implications hold:

M ≤

ext

N ⇒ M ≤

deg

N ⇒ M ≤ N

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14L30, 16G10, 16G70.

[91]

(2)

(see [4], [9]). Unfortunately, the reverse implications are not true in gen- eral, and it would be interesting to find out when they are. The author proved in [14] that the orders ≤

deg

and ≤ coincide for all modules over all representation-finite algebras. Moreover, in [3] K. Bongartz proved that these orders also coincide for all modules over tame concealed algebras. The orders ≤

deg

and ≤

ext

do not coincide even for very simple representation- finite algebras (see [9]). The author proved in [14] and [13] that ≤

deg

and

ext

are equivalent for all modules over an algebra A with Ext

1A

(X, X) = 0 for any indecomposable A-module X, and for all modules over tame con- cealed algebras.

In the representation theory of algebras an important role is played by selfinjective algebras, that is, algebras A such that

A

A is injective. We are concerned with the question of when the partial orders ≤

deg

and ≤

ext

coin- cide for modules over representation-finite selfinjective algebras. The main aim of this paper is to prove the following theorem, which gives a complete answer to this question.

Theorem. Let A be a connected representation-finite selfinjective alge- bra. Then the following conditions are equivalent :

(i) There exist A-modules M , N such that M ≤

deg

N and M 6≤

ext

N . (ii) There exist A-modules M , N such that M <

deg

N and N is inde- composable.

(iii) The stable Auslander–Reiten quiver Γ

As

of A is isomorphic to ZD

3m

/(τ

2m−1

) for some m ≥ 2.

For basic background on the topics considered here we refer to [4], [6], [10], and for the representation theory of representation-finite selfinjective algebras to [5], [7], [8]. The results presented in this paper form a part of the author’s doctoral dissertation written under the supervision of Professor A. Skowro´ nski. The author gratefully acknowledges support from the Polish Scientific Grant KBN No. 2 PO3A 020 08.

2. Proof of the main result

2.1. Recall that A denotes a fixed finite-dimensional associative K- algebra with identity over an algebraically closed field K. We denote by mod A the category of finite-dimensional left A-modules. By an A-module mean an object from mod A. Further, we denote by Γ

A

the Auslander–

Reiten quiver of A and by τ =τ

A

and τ

A

the Auslander–Reiten trans-

lations D Tr and TrD, respectively. We shall agree to identify the vertices

of Γ

A

with the corresponding indecomposable modules. By Γ

As

we denote

the stable translation quiver obtained from Γ

A

by removing all projective-

injective vertices and arrows attached to them. For a noninjective indecom-

(3)

posable A-module U we denote by Σ(U ) the Auslander–Reiten sequence Σ(U ) : 0 → U → E(U ) → τ

U → 0,

and define πU to be the unique indecomposable projective-injective direct summand of E(U ) if such a summand exists, or 0 otherwise.

2.2. Let A be a connected representation-finite selfinjective algebra.

Then Γ

As

' Z∆/Π, where ∆ is a Dynkin diagram of type A

n

with n ≥ 1, D

n

with n ≥ 4, or E

n

with n ∈ {6, 7, 8}, and Π is an infinite cyclic group of automorphisms of Z∆ with finitely many orbits. Following [7] the vertices of Z∆ are denoted by (p, q), where p ∈ Z and q ∈ ∆, and the translation τ on Z∆ is given by τ (p, q) = (p−1, q). For a vertex (p, q) of Z∆ we denote by (p, q) its orbit in Γ

As

. Following O. Bretscher, C. L¨ aser and C. Riedtmann (see [5, (1.1)]) we define m

to be the smallest integer m such that the image v in the mesh category K(Z∆) equals 0 for all paths v in Z∆ whose length is greater than or equal to m. Then m

An

= n, m

Dn

= 2n − 3, m

E6

= 11, m

E7

= 17 and m

E8

= 29.

2.3. Lemma. Let A be a representation-finite selfinjective algebra of class D

n

or E

n

. If Γ

As

is not isomorphic to ZD

3m

/(τ

2m−1

) for m ≥ 2, then Ext

1A

(X, X) = 0 for all indecomposable A-modules X.

P r o o f. Take any indecomposable A-module X. If X is projective- injective, then Ext

1A

(X, X) = 0. Thus, we may assume that X ∈ Γ

As

. Following O. Bretscher, C. L¨ aser and C. Riedtmann (see [5, (1.4)]), we write Γ

As

= Z∆/(τ

r

Φ), where r ≥ 1 and Φ is an automorphism of Z∆ which fixes at least one vertex. Moreover, we may assume that Φ

k

= 1

Z∆

for some k ≥ 1, since ∆ = D

n

or ∆ = E

n

. Hence, every path in Z∆ starting from Y

1

and ending in Y

2

with Y

1

= Y

2

has length 2rl for some l ≥ 1. Take any W in Z∆ such that W = X. Applying the Auslander–Reiten formula and Proposition 1.5 in [7], we obtain

Ext

1A

(X, X) ' DHom

A

(X, τ X) ' M

Y 'X

Hom

K(Z∆)

(Y, τ W ).

Then Ext

1A

(X, X) 6= 0 implies that there exists an integer l ≥ 1 and a path v in Z∆ of length 2rl − 2 such that its image v in the mesh category K(Z∆) is nonzero. By the definition of m

, it remains to show that 2r − 2 ≥ m

. But this is done by (1.5) and (1.6) in [5], since τ

r

Φ 6= τ

2m−1

.

2.4. P r o o f o f t h e T h e o r e m. Clearly, (ii) implies (i).

(i)⇒(iii). Assume that Γ

As

is not isomorphic to ZD

3m

/(τ

2m−1

) for any

m ≥ 2. We claim that then the orders ≤

deg

and ≤

ext

are equivalent. If

A is a selfinjective algebra of class A

n

, then this is done by Theorem 2 in

[12]. Thus, we may assume that A is of class D

n

with n ≥ 4, or E

n

with

(4)

n ∈ {6, 7, 8}. Then our claim follows from Lemma 2.3 above and Theorem 2 in [14].

(iii)⇒(ii). Assume Γ

As

= ZD

3m

/(τ

2m−1

) for some m ≥ 2 and D

3m

of the form

1 → 2 → . . . → (3m − 2)

(3m − 1)

%

&

3m

The quiver ZD

3m

admits a mesh-complete subquiver of the form

(0,3m) (1,3m)

• •

%

(0,3m−1)

& %

(1,3m−1)

&

(0,3m−2)

• −→ • −→ • −→ • −→ •

(2,3m−2)

% & % & % &

(1,3m−3)

(2,3m−3)

% &

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

(0,m+1)

% &

(2m−2,m+2)

• •

% & % & % &

(0,m)

(1,m) (2m−2,m+1)

• •

& % & %

• •

(1,m−1) (2m−1,m)

Then there are the following short exact sequences in mod A:

Σ((0, k)) : 0 → (0, k) → (0, k + 1) ⊕ (1, k − 1) ⊕ π(0, k) → (1, k) → 0, for any m ≤ k ≤ 3m − 3, Σ((0, 3m − 2)) : 0 → (0, 3m − 2) → (0, 3m − 1) ⊕ (0, 3m) ⊕ (1, 3m − 3)

⊕ π(0, 3m − 2) → (1, 3m − 2) → 0, Σ((0, 3m − 1)) ⊕ Σ((0, 3m) : 0 → (0, 3m − 1) ⊕ (0, 3m) → (1, 3m − 2)

⊕ (1, 3m − 2) ⊕ π(0, 3m − 1) ⊕ π(0, 3m) → (1, 3m − 1) ⊕ (1, 3m) → 0, Σ((1, 3m − 2)) : 0 → (1, 3m − 2) → (1, 3m − 1) ⊕ (1, 3m) ⊕ (2, 3m − 3)

⊕ π(1, 3m − 2) → (2, 3m − 2) → 0, Σ((l, 3m − 1 − l)) : 0 → (l, 3m − 1 − l) → (l, 3m − l) ⊕ (l + 1, 3m − 2 − l)

⊕ π(l, 3m − 1 − l) → (l + 1, 3m − 1 − l) → 0, for any 2 ≤ l ≤ 2m − 2.

Applying Lemma (3 + 3 + 2) from [2, (2.1)] to these sequences, we get a short exact sequence

0 → (0, m) → (1, m − 1) ⊕ (2m − 1, m) ⊕ π → (2m − 1, m + 1) → 0,

(5)

where

π =

3m

M

k=m

(π(0, k) ) ⊕

2m−2

M

l=1

(π(l, 3m − 1 − l) ).

Of course, (2m − 1, m) = (0, m). Finally, applying [9, Proposition 3.4], we infer that (1, m − 1) ⊕ π <

deg

(2m − 1, m + 1). This finishes the proof.

REFERENCES

[1] S. A b e a s i s and A. d e l F r a, Degenerations for the representations of a quiver of type A

m

, J. Algebra 93 (1985), 376–412.

[2] I. A s s e m and A. S k o w r o ´ n s k i, Minimal representation-infinite coil algebras, Ma- nuscripta Math. 67 (1990), 305–331.

[3] K. B o n g a r t z, Degenerations for representations of tame quivers, Ann. Sci. ´ Ecole Norm. Sup. 28 (1995), 647–668.

[4] —, On degenerations and extensions of finite-dimensional modules, Adv. Math. 121 (1996), 245–287.

[5] O. B r e t s c h e r, C. L ¨ a s e r and C. R i e d t m a n n, Selfinjective and simply connected algebras, Manuscripta Math. 36 (1981), 253–307.

[6] H. K r a f t, Geometric methods in representation theory , in: Representations of Al- gebras, Lecture Notes in Math. 944, Springer, 1982, 180–258.

[7] C. R i e d t m a n n, Representation-finite selfinjective algebras of class A

n

, in: Repre- sentation Theory II, Lecture Notes in Math. 832, Springer, 1980, 449–520.

[8] —, Representation-finite selfinjective algebras of class D

n

, Compositio Math. 49 (1983), 231–282.

[9] —, Degenerations for representations of quivers with relations, Ann. Sci. ´ Ecole Norm. Sup. 4 (1986), 275–301.

[10] C. M. R i n g e l, Tame Algebras and Integral Quadratic Forms, Lecture Notes in Math. 1099, Springer, 1984.

[11] A. S k o w r o ´ n s k i and G. Z w a r a, On degenerations of modules with nondirecting indecomposable summands, Canad. J. Math. 48 (1996), 1091–1120.

[12] G. Z w a r a, Degenerations for modules over representation-finite biserial algebras, preprint, Toru´ n, 1996.

[13] —, Degenerations for representations of extended Dynkin quivers, preprint, Toru´ n, 1997.

[14] —, Degenerations for modules over representation-finite algebras, preprint, Toru´ n, 1997.

Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics Nicholas Copernicus University

Chopina 12/18 87-100 Toru´ n, Poland

E-mail: gzwara@mat.uni.torun.pl

Received 28 March 1997

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Moreover, applying the main results of [31], we prove in Theorem 2.6 that, if an algebra A ad- mits a strongly simply connected Galois covering R → R/G = A, then A is of

In a series of papers he considered the incompressible nonstationary Navier–Stokes equa- tions as a free boundary problem with constant surface tension and without surface tension..

By means of a Riccati type transformation, necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of eventually positive solutions and positive nonincreasing solutions are

One can see that up to duality (see Lemma 1.2(e)) and up to the order of tensor products (Lemma 1.2(a)) all cases of pairs of bound quivers providing tameness of their tensor

By taking S to be intuitionistic logic, the many-valued logic of Lukasiewicz, modal logic (with the necessitation rule), and BCK logic, we get a functional representation theorem

The main aim of this paper is to give a simple criterion for a special algebra to be representation-finite, that is, there is only a finite number of

Recall that a group G of K-linear automorphisms of B is called admissible if its action on the objects of b b B is free and has finitely.. 1991 Mathematics Subject

[r]