• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Future transport

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Future transport"

Copied!
26
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

1

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Future transport

Prof Dr Bart van Arem

Director TU Delft Transport Institute

Content

Developments in transport

Development of automated driving

Congestion Assistant

(2)

3

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

The Netherlands World rank

Area 41543 km2 135

Population 16730623 63

GDP per inhabitant € 34822 17

Infrastructure of the Netherlands

Waterway density Liechtenstein 0,18 Netherlands 0,15 Belgium 0,07 Bangladesh 0,06 Vietnam 0,05 Roadway density Belgium 5,03 Netherlands 3,29 Japan 3,20 Hungary 2,12 Jamaica 2,01 Railway Density Czech Republic, Switzerland, Germany 0,12

Belgium 0,11

Hungary 0,09

Cuba, Austria 0,08

Netherlands, Slovakia, Japan,

(3)

5

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Mainports of the Netherlands

1stin Europe

10thWorld wide

Largest non Asian port 3% Dutch GDP Quality: 1stin Europe 4th world wide Europe 4thpassenger volume 3rdfreight volume

Port of Rotterdam

Schiphol airport

Transport in the Netherlands

Motorways with daily

volume over 180.000 vehicles Netherlands 15 United Kingdom 2 Germany 2 Haulier international transport performance (million tkm) Poland 97.456 Germany 60.028 Spain 58.872 Netherlands 39.036 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

(4)

7

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Congestion

0 50 100 150 200 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 225 km congestion is regular… (VID)

Morning peak Frequency < 80 km/h 37% < 60 km/h 3% < 55 km/h 1%

Evening peak Frequency < 80 km/h 42% < 60 km/h 6% < 55 km/h 3% (KIM,2012) Travel delay %

Traffic safety

Road fatalities per million inhabitants Sweden 28 United Kingdom 31 Netherlands 32 Malta 36 Ireland 45

(5)

9

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Development in transport demand

Freight and passenger transport flows Urbanization EU and world wide economic, demographic and political developments Climate change Travel behaviour Lifestyle, culture, demography, aging, on-line Connectivity and automation

Need for sustainability

200,000 people premature deaths per year in EU because of air-quality

Transport generates about 25-30% of Green House Gases

Smart use of available transport systems Life cycle management of transport infrastructure

Lack of space and money for new transport infrastructure

(6)

11

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Maintaining a world class

transport system

•World class transport is essential for our society and economy

•Past performance is no guarantee for the future •No single silver bullet: multi-disciplinarity is

crucial

•Cooperation government, knowledge institutes and private sector

•Technology for smart and sustainable transport •Behavioral and societal changes

Content

Developments in transport

Development of automated driving

(7)

13

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

DAVI on the Amsterdam A10 motorway

12

th

november 2013

(8)

15

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

State of practice-supported driving

•Integrated Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keeping and Driver Monitoring commercially available

•High-end segment, low penetration rate

State of art – automated driving

• Hands-off, feet-off and brain-off (?) driving • Research prototypes (numerous)

• Special permits, special drivers, dedicated tracks

Eindhoven, 2008 Rijnwoude, 1998 Amsterdam, 2013

Potential impacts

Prevent traffic jams by better stability

Solve traffic jams by increased outflow Better distribution of traffic over network Less congestion delay Better energy efficiency No accidents (?) Better travel experience

(9)

17

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Will this come naturally?

Laws and regulations Technology Behaviour Money Transitions

(10)

19

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Examples of driverless cars in action?

Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, European

Member States Article 8.5

“ Drivers shall at all times be able to control their vehicles or guide their animals. When approaching other road users, they shall take

such precautions as may be required for the safety of the latter.”

(11)

21

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Frontiers that were no frontiers….

•Electronic braking

•Adaptive Cruise Control (including braking) •Lane Keeping

•Adaptive Cruise Control and Lane Keeping •Automatic Emergency braking

Recent amendment:

A car may drive itself, as long as the system "can be overridden or switched off by the driver".

A driver must be present and able to take the wheel at any time.

How we addressed regulations in

DAVI

•Adjusting legal framework: • Regulation exemption granting. • Dutch Vehicle Regulations, chapter 6.4. •Digital roadmap.

•A proposed method for admittance: 1. Simulation: virtual testing.

2. Closed: testing basic manoeuvres on a proving ground.

3. Limited with experienced drivers: in a pre-defined area. To gain experience.

4. Limited with unexperienced drivers: in a pre-defined area. Especially for Human-Machine Interface testing.

5. Unlimited: admittance without restrictions. Section 2, 3 and 4 with an exemption.

(12)

23

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Wetten en regels Technologie Gedrag (!) Geld Transities

Technology

• Radar • Long range plm 70 Ghz 100-150 m • Short range 24 GHz 20 m • Video camera • Now: monocular • Stereo vision

• Dedicated Short Range Communication

(13)

25

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

v

t

d

d

ref

0

ref

ref

d d ref

k

d

d

a

_

v

v

r

a

ref_v

st ref

Regular cruise control

  

2 _

1

i n i j j rel v

v

n

k

Distance keeping Speed synchr

)

,

min(

_ _

_ACC ref v ref st

ref

a

a

a

Speed

v

Spacing

d

Rel speed

2 _irel

v

i i-1 i-2 i-n

p rel

v

_ n i rel v _ p rel v

v

k

_

Technological challenges

•From pilot to product

•Performance, robustness, safety •Software safety and security •Cost

•What are reasonable performance demands in Time-Between-Failure?

• Level 3: system monitors driving environment • Level 4: system provides back up performance

(14)

27

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Laws and regulations Technology Behaviour Money Transitions

Too many too mention…

•Attitude, willingness to pay, willingness to buy •System use, acceptance, adaptivity, adaptibility •Transition between levels of automation •Behavioral adaptation, driving skills •… but also:

•Better comfort leads to lower travel disutility •Better traffic efficiency leads to lower travel times Higher attraction car driving

Impacts on other transport modes, settling decisions?

(15)

29

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Wetten en regels Technologie Gedrag (!) Geld Transities

What will it cost? Who will pay?

In-car systems getting cheaper Consumer pays

Who pays for societal benefits?

High-tech vehicles on low-tech roads?

(16)

31

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Laws and regulations Technology Behavior Money Transitions

Two transition paths

connectivity

(17)

33

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Responsibility monitoring

driving environment and

back up performance

appear crucial steps

Towards ubiquitous information:

empowering the end-user!

(18)

35

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

35

Overview of Field test at Sangubashi

Roughly 10% of vehicles are equipped with three-media VICS-compatible car navigation systems

To downtown Tokyo

Sensors detect traffic

congestion, standing vehicles and slow-traveling vehicles

Infrared sensor

Roughly 300 m VICS beacon

To Hachioji

Car navigation display

Simple diagram display of conditions at the start of a curve Installed on April 27 ー Message sign

Accidents covered by the service

0 40 80 120 160

FY2003 FY2004 FY2005

N u m b er o f a cc ide n ts p er y e a

r Rear-end collisions (low speed) Secondary accidents

Rear-end collisions (other) Other accidents

79% reduction against previous fiscal year 45 33 7

Who is in control?

Extreme scenario: full freedom of choice

Extreme scenario: no freedom of choice

2015 2020

Possible scenario A: “Indiviual traveller moving within a societal context”

Possible scenario B:

“Optimal traffic system in which a traveller can move”

Trend breaches Informing, control and guidance go hand-in-hand Individual and market goals Collective and societal goals

(19)

37

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

The price of self organisation

Self organisation vs central control

User equilibrium vs system optimum

Total travel time UE 30% higher than SO at high network load

Content

Developments in transport

Development of automated driving

(20)

39

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

The congestion assistant

•Detects downstream congestion

•Visual and auditive warning starting at 5 km before congestion

•Active gas pedal at 1,5 km to smoothly slow down

•Takes over longitudinal driving task during congestion

Impacts on driving behaviour

Motorway scenario with congestion Impacts on driving behaviour

(21)

41

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Effects on mean speed

(22)

43

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

13 November 2009

43

Longitudinaal bestuurdersmodel

v

v

r

a

ref _v

ref

 

r ref

v p rel p

 

r v pp rel pp

 

r d d ref

c

d

t

t

d

c

v

t

t

c

v

t

t

a

_

_

_

_

_

2 3 2 1

c

v

c

v

c

d

ref

Study area: merging area A12 motorway,

Woerden, the Netherlands

star t

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 end

upstream detector downstream detector

(23)

45

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

13 November 2009

45

Speed upstream 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 Time Speed ( k m /h) A12 ITS Modeller Speed downstream 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 Time Speed ( k m /h) A12 ITS Modeller

Model file assistent

x

v

v

a

ac j

2

2 2

Actief gaspedaal:

v

t

d

d

st

0

st

d st v rel p

a d st

k

k

d

d

k

v

a

_

_

Stop & Go

v

v

r

a

st_v

st

int

(24)

47

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Resultaten

Speed upstream - 10% CA 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 Time (min) Sp e e d ( k m /h ) Reference 1500 m 500 m 1.0 s 0.8 s Speed upstream - 50% CA 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 Time (min) S p eed ( k m /h ) Reference 1500 m 500 m 1.0 s 0.8 s

Resultaten-2

Travel time (min) Delay (min) Delay reduction Free flow (110

km/h) 3.4 -

-Reference 5.7 2.3

-500 m / 0.8 s (10%) 5.0 1.6 30%

(25)

49

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

Closing remarks…

The road to

automated driving…

Regulations, type approval Collect, analyse and publish large scale real-world experience

Case studies for regional transport networks

(26)

51

Challenge the future

HF Auto Meeting 11thJune 2014, Delft

www.davi.connekt.nl

Automatisch rijden Sensoren Communicatie Gewone bestuurders Gewone wegen Innovatie-estafette 2016

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Stosunki polsko-jugosłowiańskie w ostatnich latach rządów Władysława Gomułki (1969-1970).. Abstrakt: W artykule przeanalizowano proces powolnej odbudowy stosun-^

Serce Jezusa i gest wyciągniętych rąk Religious and Sacred Poetry : An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education 1/1,

Nauczyciel akademicki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego (1982-2010), wicedyrektor Instytutu Pedagogiki (1996-2002), założyciel Zakładu Wychowania przez Sztukę (1996-2000),

Oto jednak najpierw tekst owej bajki według jej rękopiśm iennego przekazu znajdującego się w tym samym kodeksie, co autograf heroiko- micznego poem atu

Przystanek 1 — Rośliny na grodzie; Przystanek 2 — Olsze nad jeziorem; Przystanek 3 — Bzowe zarośla; Przystanek 4 — Zioła w ogródku; Przystanek 5 — Kwitnąca

Psychologiczne, Warsaw 2006, p.. addition to being an alcoholic, what kind of person am I?”; the answer to this becomes for the asking person the content of his life and is

Zauski: „Tutaj demokracja jest zapisana tylko w konstytucji”; „Zreszt na Zachodzie nie jest lepiej, tu ka dy Niemiec jest policjantem /…/ Dla przeci tnego Niemca wspópraca z

Klichowski M., Bonanno P., Jaskulska S., Smaniotto Costa C., de Lange M., Klauser F., CyberParks as a new context for smart education: theoretical background,