• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

A note on the extension of functionals

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A note on the extension of functionals"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

A C T A U N I V E R S I T A T I S L O D Z I E N S I S _____ FOLIA MATHEMATICA 4, 1991

Oigra Kulcairova

A NOTE ON THE EXTENSION OK FUNCTIONALS

In [4] there is defined an extension of a mapping Jq: B -* <0, <*> > to J*: H -* <0, “> >, where B is a sublattice of a lattice H. In this paper we introduce the notion of an n-cover of an element of H with respect to a system subsets of B. Then a relation between the ele­ ments of H having n-covers with respect to {^t}teT and the elements with small J*-values is given.

Let B be a sublattice of a given lattice H, a mapping J*: H -* <0, “> be an extension of JQ : B •+ <0, »>. For every non­ negative integer n, let us denote

g»n = {x e H: J*(x) < £}, Q n = {x e H: J*(x) S £}.

Further define a system (c^)teT °f subests of B by c^t = {x e e B: JQ (x) < t }, where T c (0, “). We are going to introduce the notion of an n-cover of an element of H with respect to {c^t}teT. Now let be the set of all elements of H having an n-cover with respect to

{c^}teT-In this paper we give some simple conditions for T and for JQ , B, which guarantee the validity of

* n c < c G n

for every nonnegative integer n. The relation between sequences {cA^}, {3^} and {Qn > constructed by analogous way for rings and o-rings was investigated by J. L l o y d in [l] and P. C a- p e k in [2]. The inclusion cP* <=- in [2] (see Lemma 3) is incorrect.

(2)

1

Let H be a distributive, relatively o-complete lattice with the least element 0. Suppose that there is given a binary ope­ ration \ on H, satisfying the following conditions:

1) If x, y, z e H, x < y, then z \ x g z \ y , y \ z £ x \ z 2) x = (x v y) \ y whenever x, y e H, x A y = 0.

Let B be a sublattice of H, closed under the operation \ . As regards B, we assume in the following that for every x e H there is a b e B such that x £ b. Finally, we assume that there is given a mapping JQ : B ■* <0, <»> satisfying the following condi­ tions:

(i) JQ (0) = 0;

(ii) For x £ y, x, y e B is JQ (x) < JQ(y); (iii) JQ (x v y) § JQ (x) + JQ (y) for all x, y s B;

(iv) if xn / x, xR e B, n = 1, 2, ..., x e H, then x e B and JQ (x) = lim Jo (xn);

n-*"°

(v) JQ (x) = JQ (x a y) + JQ (x \ y) for all x, y e B.

Let N denote the set of all positive integers and let us re­ peat that

*#*t = {x e B: JQ (x) < t}, t e (0, “ ).

Let ic^t}teT be a system of subsets of the lattice B, where T is a nonempty subset of the set of all positive real numbers such that 0 is a limit point of T.

DEFINITION 1. Let n e N. By an n-cover of an element x e H with respect to the system {«#(.} teT we mean a system ixi ^ 6x of elements x^ e with being a sequence in T, satis­ fying the following conditions:

1) V j xA exists in H,

2)

x

g

V Xi ,

iel 1

3) S k, S J.

iel 1 n

Let c/T* denote the set of all elements of H having n-covers with respect to

(3)

We extend J : B -» <0, »»> to J*: H ■* <0, “>. For every x e H we put

J*(x) = inf {JQ(f)s f r B, x £ f} (see [4], Definition 1.1.). The mapping J*: H •+ <0, «>> satisfies the following conditions: 1) J* is an extension of JQ ,

2) J* is non decreasing,

3) J*(x v y) £ J*(x) + J*(y) for every x, y e H.

We repeat that

*>n = {x e H: J*(x) < i}, a n = (x e H: J*(x) S n e N. LEMMA 1. oY1* c Q. n n for every n e N.

P r o o f . Let x e c/P*, i.e. there exist a system of numbers of T, and x. e JO. , i e I c N such that x §

V

x, e H

1 Ki iel 1

and £ k. < iel 1 n

a

If the set I is finite, then V x4 = V x, e B and since iel 1 i=l 1

J*(x) < x, ) = JQ( 'V' x.) < z J0 (Xj ) < S k < £, i=l 1 ° i=l 1 i=l ° 1 i=l 1 n we have x e Q, n .

00

If the set I is infinite, then by (iv)

V

x. =

V

x. e B iel 1 i=l 1 and

J*

so

( 'V' x,) = J (V' x.) = lim J ('O' x.) S lim Z Jn (x4) i=l 1 ° i=l 1 n-» ° i=l 1 n-*“» i=l ° 1

= £ J (x. ) g £ k. < ± , i=l ° 1 i=l 1 n

00

J*(x) is J*( V x. ) i — , which completes the proof. i=l 1

LEMMA 2. If T = {j!j: n e N}, then $>n c ^ for all n e N. Proof is very simple, so we can omit it.

(4)

V f t Olga Kulcsarova

From Lemmas 1 and 2 we obtain the following theorem.

THEOREM 1. If T * {jj: n s N}, then £Pn c ctf5* c for every n e N.

Denote by (D) the following condition: for every f, g e B, f < < the set (J0 (r)! r 6 B * f < r < g) is dense in <JQ (f), JQ (g)>.

The lattice Z is called complementary, if for every x, y e Z, x § y there exists z e Z such that x v z = y and x a z = 0. This

property of the lattice Z we denote by (C ).

LEMMA 3. Suppose that the mapping JQ: B -* <0, <»> satisfies the condition (D) and the lattice {x c B: x S y) has the pro­ perty (C) for every y e B. Then £f>n <=■ <JC* for all n e N.

P r o o f . Let x e $> , i.e. x e H, J*(x) < jj. The defini­ tion of J* gives the existence of f e B such that x S f and J (f) < Let {f} do not be an n-cover of x. Put t * jj - JQ (f) and choose tQ e T, 0 < tQ < e and p e N, p > 2 such that

(P - l)tQ < JQ(f) < ptQ < JQ (f) + c.

Now we define the sequence {fj}^”J, fj e B, j = 1, 2, ..., p - 1 as follows. By the condition (D) there exists 6 fi * f with

Suppose that f^ e B, j = 1, 2, ..., i for 1 5 i < p - 2 are de­ fined having the following properties:

fj < f, J - 1, 2, ..., i Jo (f) <

p ” S Jo (fj) < to' i = l' 2’ i' fk a f1 * 0 for k / 1, k, 1 = 1, 2, ..., i.

In virtue of (D) there exists f e b such that

V

f4 < f < f and 3=1 3

J (f) belongs to the interval o

(5)

i Jn (f) Ja (f>

(J (

b

f, + +

t c - - y -

_

(Jo (j=l fj' P 2 P t Jo (f) 1 Jc (f) T i f S S i “uo p V j i i rj' ’r “ \/ ‘'o'1 ' JA<Zi + ---- 5--- ).

Since the lattice {x e B: x S £} has the property (C), there

ex-i+1 „ i .

ists f. ,, 6 B such that V » ? and f, . a (

V

fj> “ 0.

1+1 j=l 3 j=l 3

Evidently f^+1 < f and fi+1 » = 0 for j = 1, 2, ..., i. Fur­ ther, by (v) and (2) Jo (V W ' V f~> - Jo (fi+lJ + Jo (V V ' i 3 At) l i t s5 v v + - v < Jo(fi+i) + fml J« w < , = w + ^ + 4 Jo (f) •r 2p ' hence JD (f) - V < Jo (fi+l> < V P

Finaly, by (C) there exists f e B such that V f-> = f and

p j=l J

f a fj = 0 for j = 1, 2, p - 1. We have

Jo(fp ) = J0Cf) - J0 < V fj) - V f > ' I " Jo (fj> § JAf) 3Af)

< j c(f) - (P-D = - V " < V

Hence f. e ^ for every j e {1, 2, ..., p} and taking into

3 to

account that pto < ~, we have that ¿s an n-cover of the element x. The proof is complete.

(6)

THEOREM 2. Under the hypotheses of Lemma 3 i®, c OC* c Ą for every n e N.

n n "■n

LEMMA 4. If T 3 <0, 1>, then J»n c t/i5* for all n e N.

Proof is evident. Lemmas 1 and 4 imply the following theorem. THEOREM 3. If T 3 <0, 1>, then $>n c c*5* c Ą n for every po­ sitive integer n.

REFERENCES

[1] L 1 o y d J . , On c l a s s e s o f n u ll s e t s , J . A u str. Math. S o c ., 14 (1 9 7 2 ), 317-328.

[2] C a p e k P ., On sm all sy ste m s, A cta f a c . r e r . n a t. Univ Comen. (1 9 7 9 ), 93-101.

[3] N e u b r u n n T . , R i e i a n B ., M iera a i n t e g r a l, VEDA, 1981. [4] R i e c a n B ., On th e C aratheodory method o f the e x te n sio n o f m easures

and i n t e g r a l s , Math. S l o v ., 4 (1 9 7 7 ), 365-374.

Department o f M athematics K o sic e , UPJŚ

Olga Kulcsarova

0 ROZSZERZENIACH FUNKCJONAŁÓW

W prezentowanym a rty k u le rozważa s i ę problem r o z s z e r z e n ia odwzorowania J q : B -* <0, “ > do J * : H ■+ <0, «“>, g d z ie B j e s t p odkartą k a rty H. Wprowadza s i ę p o ję c ie n -p o k ry cia pewnych elementów z H względem u sta lo n e g o systemu podzbiorów zb io ru B. Podany j e s t również związek pomiędzy zbiorem elementów z H mających n -p ok rycie względem systemu a tymi elem en ta­ mi z H, d la których w artość odwzorowania J * j e s t m ała.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

The known sufficient condi- tions for the existence of a kernel by monochromatic paths in m-coloured (m ≥ 3) tournaments, (or nearly tournaments), ask for the monochromatic- ity

Before we start the derivation of the fundamental pursuit equation in the electromagnetic and gravitational field, we remind the basic notions of the relativistic theory

Key words and phrases : evolution problem, stable family of operators, stable approx- imations of the evolution operator, evolution problem with parameter, hyperbolic

In 1952 Piatetski-Shapiro [7] considered the following analogue of the Goldbach–Waring problem: Assume that c &gt; 1 is not an integer and let ε be a small positive number.. In

The author would like to thank the SFB 170 in G¨ ottingen and the Mathematics Institute of the University of G¨ ottingen for their kind hospitality, support and the use of

The contents of this paper formed part of the author’s PhD thesis (Nottingham Uni- versity, 1991) which was supported by Science and Engineering Research Council.... In [4] Hua and

The method presented here is the key to the inductive construction of theorems on the higher order regularity of the solution of the problem (1), (2) with respect to the parameter

1. This question arises in such algebraical problems as solving a system of linear equations with rectangular or square singular matrix or finding a generalized