59. V 1 n e F. J., W i IsoO n J. T. - Magnetic anoO-malies over a young oceanic ridge ()ff Vancou-ver Islaond. SCience, 1965, VoOl. 150.
60. We ss 00 n P. S. -'- Mantle creep: elasticoviscous versus modified Lomnitz law and problems of the "new global tectonics". BuR. AAPG, 1972, VoOL 56,
no. 11. .
61. We SS 0 n P. S. - ObjectioOns
to
continental drift and plate tectoOnics. Jour. Geol., 1972, vol.80, no. 2. .
· SU~MARY
This is a review of BODle selected trends in the historical development of ,the new grooal .tecwnics and their ·implieatiOOls. RevoOlutionary character of
thLs hyppthesis as a .new paradigm has been clai-med by iIts adhereIllf:s. Lt seems to be oonfil'med by .the wide ac~eptance in tne communilty of tIle l!;arth ·sden'li1sts. However, the arguments oOf the antagonists shOll'ld also be ltaken in·to consideration.
In
the firat pal't of the !paper the following com-monly knOWlIl ibasic foundations of the new g..tobal tectonics are Ibrief1y summarized: sea-fIloor spreading hy.pothesis, signifieance of linear magnetic anomalies fits of continents,· time-scale of geomagnetic rever-sals, coneept of ·transform faults and ,plate teCiOO-oks hypothesis. Then. the principal objections put foOrward by the QIlfPOIDents ·to the new ideas are enumerated. These are based mainly urpon the woTks of A. A. Meyerhoff ,(030-37), R. van Bernmelen (4),J. M. Sheynmann {54), A. Mantura (26, a6), P. Wesson (60, 81),
a
G. Wunderllch (65) and V. V. Beloussov(1-(3). Some general aspects of these objedt:ions and
diStCussioDS are stressed: controversy between ,,geo-physiocai" and "geologiICaI" points .of view, contradi-ctions between ~obal model and regioOnal data, poor correlation between oceanic and continental geoloOgy, stacking of hypothes.es on tops oOf oOther hypotheses, subjective selection of facts supporting the new ideas and rejeotion oOf embarTassing ones.
Criticism may be either constructive or destructi-ve. DfscussiOIm are often hasty and not complete. So-me Off principal obJectioOns
to
the .new hYlPOtheses have·been answered, some oOthers have not.
Neverthe-less,
the views of owonents play .their !POsi.tive role forcing the adherents to justify ,their IM"guments tho-roughly and focusing the scientific efforts .on the most disputable probleau;. Both the compleXity oOf nature and the 8cal'City of informa.tion on the muMi-farious !processes forming the face of the Earth may be responsible foOr the divergeneies between the first, Simplified model and the geological reality. It is quite po8sWle that several other tectogenetic agents, apart from ,plate tectonics, were being ac-tive in the long history .of the Earth's evot1,ution.Second part of lthis paper, dealing witth the implications of plate tectooial, win be published in the
next
issue.62. Wilson J. T. - A new dass oOf faults and their bearing 001 continental drift. Nature, 1965, voL
207, no. 4995.
. 63. Wilso n J. T. - A revolution in Earth scien-ce. Geotimes, 1968, voL 13,
no.
10.64. W i Is 00 n J. T. - A reply to V. V. Bieloussov. Dbidem, 1968, vot 13, no. loO. .
65. W u n d er 1 i c h H. G. - Plattentektonik in kri-tische.r Sicht. Z. deutsch. Geol. Ges., 1973, Bd. 124,.·
T. 1.
PE3IOME
B CTaTbe npe,ltC'l'asneH 0630p HeK:OTOPbIX Hanpas-neHIDi: B pa3BHTHH rHlIOre3l>I HOBO~ rno6anbHo~
TeXTO<-HHKH. PeBOJIIO~HHbm xapaxrep 3TO~ rHlIOTe3bl,
npo-B031''JIaWae1\ad~ ee CTOpoHHHKaMH, HaIIlen oTPalKeHHe B WHpoKKX Kpyrax HCCJle~BaTene~ 3eMJIH, B 6om.-WHHCTBe O,lt06pmoIIl.KX 3TH B3I'JI.lip;bI. O,JUIaKO, Cnel{YeT lIpHHHKaTl> BO BHHMaHire H apryMeHTbl lIPOTHBHHKOB rHIlO'l'e3LL
B nepsoA qaCTH CTaTbH ~aHa KpaTKaH TPaKTOBKa 06IIl.eH3BeCTHhIX OCHOB HOEOA rJIo6am.Ho:A TeKTOHHKJf: rHIIOTe3.bI paCT.lilK~HHJl OKeaHH'leCKOrO ,JUIa (cnpe~HHl'a),
POID!: JIHHe:fbu.IX ImI'HHTHbIX aHOMamdi:, COOTBeTC'l'BiIfJI o<repTaHHii KOH'I'HHeHTOB, BpeMeHHOA IIIXaJIbl HHBepcHii MarHH'l'H'OrO noOns, KOHI{e~HH 'l'paHCq,oPMH:&IX pa3JIO-MOB H ,tW. lI.a~ nepeqHCJUIlO'.t'C.Ii OCHOBHble B03paJKe-HHJl, Bhl~BHHyTl>le npoTHBHHKa¥H HOBbIX B3rJI.Ii,ltOB. OHH OCHOm.maIOTCS, rJIaBHhIM 06pa30¥, Ha pat50TaX
A. A. MeAeproqxpa (30-37), P. BaH-:aellUoleJIeHa (4), 10. M. IlleAHlIlUlHa (54), A. MaHTypa (25, 26),
n.
Bec-COHa (60, 61), X.r.
ByH~epJIHXa (65) H B, B.BeJIoyco-Ba (1-3). OTKe'!eHl>I HeKOTOPble o6IQKe nOJIOlKeHHSi
nOJIeMHKH: pa3JIH'l:HII KelKM ,,reocpH3H'lecKoA" H ,,reo-JIorH'lecKoA" TO'fxall4H 3peHHH, npoTHBopeqHs: ¥elK~y
rJIo6am.HoIi Jlo~em.1O H perHOHaJIbHbIMH ,tIaHHloDlH, cJIa6as xoppeJIsqHII l'eoJIoOrHH KOHTHneHTOB H ()xeaHoB, IIOcTpoeHHe rHlIoOTe3 Ha ,zu>yrHX rHlIOTe3aX, cy6beKTHB-HOCTb B Bbl60pe cpaxroB ~JIS no~p:IK~.aHs:
B3MS-~OB H npeHe6pelKeHHe Hey~o6HloIMH cpaKTalilH. KpJl-THItH3J1 JlOEe'!' 6blTl> KOHC'I'pyK'l'HBHbIM JUIH ~eCTPyK
THBHbIM. lI.HCKyCCHH 'faCTO 6blBalO'l' DocneWHblllJl1 H He-nOJIHhIMH.
. Ha HeKoOrophle so3palKeHHH !IpO'l'HB HoOBbIM rHlIO-Te3aM HaAAeH
o-naeT;
Ha ,zu>yrHe eIQe JleT. OAHBKO, BOOpameHHJl mpaIOT IIOJIOEHTem.HYlO ilom., TaK KaK 3aCTaBJl.RlOT 60JIEe TIIl.aTeJIbHO o60cHoBbIBaTi. CBOH B3I'JI.liAbI H npHBJIeKalOT BHHllruU:re y'feHbIX K HrurooJIee CnOpHbIM npo6JIeMa¥. HecooTBeTCTBHe nepBOA, ynpo-IQeHHoA ¥o,lteJIH c reoJIOrHqeexo:A ~eACTBHTem.KOCTblO¥OlKeT S03HHKaTb nCJIe~CTBHe OqeHb CJlOlKHbIX HBce-CTOPOHHJI1X npo~CCOB, JlOA'8JIHpYIOIQHX JIHK 3e¥JIH, a TaKme HeAOCTaTKa AaHHbIX, KOTOPblMH pacnoJIaraeT HaYKa. BnOJIHe ~nycTHMO, 'iTO B Te'feHHe AJIwreJIbHOA 3BOJIIOI{HH 3ellJIH AeACTBOBaJlH, Iq)OJle TeKTOHHKH lIJIHT, H .zu>yrKe TeKTOreHHbJe cpaKTOpbL
BTOpaJI 'faCTI> pai5OTbl, nOCBmI{eHHas lIo.tlmPmca-qHIIM TeKTOHHKH nJIKT, 6y~eT oOny6JlHKOBaHa B cneAY-IOIQeM Ho¥epe.
ANDRZEJ SZYBIST
Akademla G6rnlczo-Hutnic£il
notE SOLI KAMIENNEJ W LEGNICKO·Gl..OGOWSKIM
OKRF;GU MmnZIOWYM
Prowadzone na moOnoklinie przedsudeckiej prace geologi'Czno-rozpoznawcze w r!lIl].ach poszukiwan z16i rud miedzl i bitumin6w zarejestrowaly s61 ~amien
nil w profilu formacji cechsztynskiej, w obszarze, kt6ry nazwano p6tniej Legnicko-Glogowskim
Okr~-giem MiedzJowym. .
Pierwsze dane 0 wystE:pQwaniu soli kamiennej w interesuJllcym nas obszarze uzyskano przed rokiem
1960, z otwor6w · wiertniczych w rejonie SierGSzo-MC i Zofi6wki. Dalsze prace wiertnicze, prowadzone do chwill obecriej, post@ujllc szerokim frontem dalej w kierunku p6lnocnym, ujawnlly chlglQj~ w.
572
UKD 11&1.631.04:&51. 738.3:.s50.8Z3. '(084.3+24)(438.3lI woJ. legnickie)
zaleganiu cechsztyfiskiego zloZa &olnegoO ·wtym
re-gionie. . ... ,
Przedstawiony w niniejszym artykule obraz zlois. solnego, najwiekszego z roOzpoznanych dotychczas w Polsce, poza wYDiesieniem t.eby nad Baltyk1em, jest wyIlikiem rozwillzail graficznych na poostawie licz-nych . profi,li otwor6w wiertniczych.
Ogolne rysy budowy geolo«iczneJ,· Budowa geolo-_ giczna Legnicko-Glogowskiego Okr~u · Miedziowego,
poznana licznymi wierceniami, byla przedmiotem sze-rcgu pubUkacji ~raz opracowan geologicznych.
