• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Quantum Signature of a Squeezed Mechanical Oscillator

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Quantum Signature of a Squeezed Mechanical Oscillator"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Delft University of Technology

Quantum Signature of a Squeezed Mechanical Oscillator

Chowdhury, A.; Vezio, P.; Bonaldi, M.; Borrielli, A.; Marino, F.; Morana, B.; Prodi, G. A.; Sarro, P. M.; Serra, E.; Marin, F. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.023601 Publication date 2020 Document Version

Accepted author manuscript Published in

Physical Review Letters

Citation (APA)

Chowdhury, A., Vezio, P., Bonaldi, M., Borrielli, A., Marino, F., Morana, B., Prodi, G. A., Sarro, P. M., Serra, E., & Marin, F. (2020). Quantum Signature of a Squeezed Mechanical Oscillator. Physical Review Letters, 124(2), [023601]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.023601

Important note

To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy

Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology.

(2)

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

THEORETICAL MODEL

The linearized evolution equations for the intracavity field operator δˆa and the mechanical bosonic operator ˆb, in the frame rotating at frequency ωL, are [1]

δ ˙ˆa =  i∆ −κ 2  δˆa + ig0α(ˆb + ˆb†) + √ κ δˆain (1) ˙ˆb =−iΩ0m− Γm 2  ˆb + ig0δˆa + αδˆa) +p Γmˆbth (2)

where ∆ = ωL− ωc is the detuning with respect to the cavity resonance frequency ωc, κ and Γm

are the optical and mechanical decay rates, Ω0m is the mechanical resonance frequency, g0 is the

single-photon opto-mechanical coupling rate, and α is the intracavity mean field. The input noise operators are characterized by the correlation functions

hˆain(t)ˆa†in(t

0)i = δ(t − t0) (3)

hˆa†in(t)ˆain(t0)i = 0 (4)

hˆbth(t)ˆb†th(t0)i = (¯nth+ 1) δ(t − t0) (5)

hˆb†th(t)ˆbth(t0)i = ¯nthδ(t − t0) (6)

where ¯nth is the thermal occupation number.

We now consider an input field composed of two tones, shifted by ±Ωm around ωL. Here Ωmis

the effective resonance frequency, modified by the opto-mechanical interaction, that will be defined later in a self-consistent way. The mean value of the input field has the form

αin= αin−e−i(ωL−Ωm)t+ αin+e−i(ωL+Ωm)t. (7)

The intracavity mean field, in the rotating frame, is α = α−eiΩmt+ α+e−iΩmt, with amplitudes

α±= αin±

√ κin

−i(∆ ± Ωm) + κ/2

(8) where κin is the input coupling rate. In the Fourier space, equation (1) can be written as

δ˜a(Ω) = 1 −iΩ − i∆ + κ/2  ig0  α−˜b(Ω + Ωm) + ˜b†(Ω + Ωm)  + α+˜b(Ω − Ωm) + ˜b†(Ω − Ωm)  +√κ δ˜ain(Ω)  (9)

(3)

where we use ˜O to indicate the Fourier transformed of the operator ˆO, and ˜O†for the Fourier trans-formed of ˆO†. We now restrict our analysis to weak coupling, in which case the opto-mechanical damping rate and frequency shift of the mechanical oscillator (whose expressions will be given later) are much smaller than its resonance frequency. Therefore, in the equation (2) we just con-sider the quasi-resonant components in the opto-mechanical coupling term g0(α∗δˆa + αδˆa†), and

the equation in the Fourier space can be written as

− iΩ + iΩ0m+ Γm/2 ˜ b(Ω) = −g20  |α−|2˜b(Ω)  1

−iΩ − i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

− 1

−iΩ + i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

 + |α+|2˜b(Ω)



1

−iΩ − i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2 −

1

−iΩ + i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2 

+ α∗α+˜b†(Ω − 2Ωm)



1

−iΩ − i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2 −

1

−iΩ + i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2  + ˜bin(Ω) (10) where ˜ bin(Ω) = p Γm˜bth(Ω) + ig0 √ κ  α∗ δ˜ain(Ω − Ωm) −iΩ − i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

+ α∗+ δ˜ain(Ω + Ωm) −iΩ − i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

+

+α−

δ˜a†in(Ω + Ωm)

−iΩ + i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

+ α+

δ˜a†in(Ω − Ωm)

−iΩ + i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

 .

(11)

In the right hand side of Eq. (10), we notice the usual opto-mechanical effects of the two laser tones (first two terms inside square brackets), plus their coherent common interaction, proportional to the fields product α∗−α+, that originates the parametric squeezing. It can be directly calculated

that this parametric effect is null for ∆ = 0, i.e., when the two tones are equally shifted with respect to the cavity resonance.

The total input noise source described by Eq. (11) includes thermal noise and back-action noise, the latter given by the terms into square brackets.

The standard opto-mechanical interaction is parametrized by the optical damping rate Γopt,

defined as [1] Γopt= 2g20Re  |α−|2  1

−iΩ − i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

− 1

−iΩ + i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

 + |α+|2



1

−iΩ − i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

− 1

−iΩ + i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

 ,

(12)

and by a frequency shift that determines the effective resonance frequency Ωm according to the

equation Ωm= Ω0m+ g02Im  |α−|2  1

−iΩ − i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

− 1

−iΩ + i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

 + |α+|2



1

−iΩ − i∆ − iΩm+ κ/2

− 1

−iΩ + i∆ + iΩm+ κ/2

 .

(4)

The total damping rate is Γeff = Γm+ Γopt. Its expression coincides with that given in the main

text if we define the total opto-mechanical coupling strength g2 = g02 |α−|2+ |α+|2, the ratio

between intracavity powers c = |α−|2/(|α−|2 + |α+|2), and using the quasi-resonant frequency

condition Ω ' Ωm. With the same condition, Eq. (10) simplifies to

− iΩ + iΩm+ Γeff/2

˜ b(Ω) = − Γpar 2 e iφ˜b(Ω − 2Ω m) + ˜bin(Ω) (14) where Γpar= 4g02|α+||α−|∆ ∆2+ κ2/4 (15)

and φ = π/2 + arg[α∗−α+]. Using the notation defined above, the expression for Γpar coincides with

Eq. (4) of the main text. Moving to the frame rotating at Ωmby means of the transformation

ˆ

bR= ˆb eiΩmt ˆb†R= ˆb†e−iΩmt (16)

and, for Fourier transformed operators, ˜

bR(Ω) = ˜b (Ω + Ωm) ˜b†R(Ω) = ˜b

(Ω − Ω

m) (17)

and defining the frequency with respect to the mechanical resonance ω = Ω − Ωm, Eq. (14) and

its Hermitian conjugate can be written in the form of the system of coupled linear equations   −iω +Γeff 2 Γpar 2 eiφ Γpar 2 e

−iφ −iω +Γeff 2     ˜ bR ˜ b†R  =   ˜ bin ˜ b†in  . (18)

The determinant of the system matrix is D =  − iω +Γ+ 2  − iω +Γ− 2  (19) where Γ± = Γeff± Γpar (20)

and the solutions of the system can be written as ˜ bR= 1 D  − iω +Γeff 2  ˜binΓpar 2 e iφ˜b† in  (21) ˜b† R= 1 D  − iω + Γeff 2  ˜ b†in− Γpar 2 e −iφ˜ bin  . (22)

(5)

The correlation functions for the input noise source of Eq. (11) are obtained from Eqs. (3)-(6) by considering that h ˆO(t) ˆO†(t0)i = c δ(t − t0) implies h ˜O(Ω) ˜O†(Ω0)i = 2πc δ(Ω + Ω0):

1 2πh˜bin(−Ω)˜b † in(Ω)i = Γm(¯nth+ 1) + A+ (23) 1 2πh˜b † in(−Ω)˜bin(Ω)i = Γmn¯th+ A− (24) 1 2πD˜bin(−Ω)˜bin(Ω) E = 1 2πD˜b † in(−Ω)˜b † in(Ω) E∗ = −g20κ α ∗ −α+ ∆2+ κ2/4 (25)

where the Stokes and anti-Stokes rates due to the two tones are [1] A+= g20κ  |α−|2 ∆2+ κ2/4 + |α+|2 (∆ + 2Ωm)2+ κ2/4  (26) A−= g20κ  −|2 (∆ − 2Ωm)2+ κ2/4 + |α+| 2 ∆2+ κ2/4  (27) and it can be verified that Γopt = A−− A+.

The spectra of the Stokes and anti-Stokes motional sidebands are finally calculated from Eqs. (21)-(22) using the correlation functions given above, and are respectively

b† Rˆb † R = 1 2πh˜bR(−ω)˜b † R(ω)i = Γeff 2  1 + ¯n − s/2 ω2+ Γ2 −/4 +1 + ¯n + s/2 ω2+ Γ2 +/4  (28) SˆbRˆbR = 1 2πh˜b † R(−ω)˜bR(ω)i = Γeff 2  ¯ n + s/2 ω2+ Γ2 −/4 + ¯n − s/2 ω2+ Γ2 +/4  (29) as in Eqs. (5)-(6) of the main text, where we have dropped the subscript R to simplify the notation, and form the integrals over ω of the different Lorentzian components we can derive the Eqs. (1)-(2) of the main text. The squeezing parameter is s = Γpar/Γeff and the oscillator effective phonon

number in the absence of parametric effect is ¯

n = Γmn¯th+ Γoptn¯BA Γeff

(30) with ¯nBA= A+/Γopt.

A quadrature Xθ of the oscillator is defined as Xθ = (eiθˆbR + e−iθˆb†R)/2. The quadrature

operator can be calculated in the Fourier space from Eqs. (21)-(22), obtaining ˜ Xθ = 1 2D  eiθ˜bin  −iω +Γeff 2 − Γpar 2 e −i(2θ+φ)  + e−iθ˜b†in  −iω +Γeff 2 − Γpar 2 e i(2θ+φ)  . (31) Minimal and maximal fluctuations characterize the quadratures defined respectively by 2θ + φ = 0 and 2θ +φ = π. These quadratures are defined in the main text as Y ≡ X−φ/2and X ≡ X−φ/2+π/2.

Their operators are

Y = e −iφ/2˜b in+ eiφ/2˜b†in 2  −iω +Γ+ 2  X = ie−iφ/2 ˜bin− eiφ/2˜b†in  2  −iω +Γ− 2  (32)

(6)

and the associated spectra are SY Y = Γeff(2¯n + 1) 4  ω2+Γ2+ 4  SXX = Γeff(2¯n + 1) 4  ω2+ Γ2− 4  . (33)

The integrals of the spectra give the variances σ2Y = σ02/(1 + s) and σ2X = σ02/(1 − s) with σ02 = (2¯n + 1)/4.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

As shown in Figure 22 , those nine cases have the same outer diameter (130 mm) and wall thickness (13 mm), but with different winding angles of the fibres in the reinforced layers..

When the qubit is driven to perform Rabi oscillations, with Rabi frequency in resonance with the oscillator, the latter can be driven far from equilibrium.. Blue detuned driving

We investigate strong mechanical feedback for a single electron tunneling (SET) device coupled to an underdamped harmonic oscillator in the high-frequency case, when the

The use of the pull- in time as a sensing mechanism removes circuit noise as a limiting factor in mechanical noise analysis, since pull-in time depends on force and is not affected

„Wśród form, które zw ykliśm y określać jako formy trybu przypuszczającego, należy wyróżnić: 1) podstawowe formy tego trybu, charakteryzujące się

The transverse exciton-spin relaxation time of our NW-QD, caused by fluctuation in surrounding excess charges in the NW, is suppressed with decreasing excitation power, which

Voor deze overwegingen zal ik de problematiek met betrekking tot mimesis echter negeren: in dit stuk staat niet de kwestie centraal hoe dicht een schrijver of journalist bij

W latach 2000 – 2014 najczęściej cytowanym typem publikacji w „Pamiętniku Literackim” były książki, na które powołano się 14 685 razy, co sta- nowi blisko