ARCHIEF
TWO-DIMENSIONAL DAMPING COEFFICIENTS FROM THIN-SHIP THEORY
by
Paul. Kaplan
and
Winnjfred R. ¿acobs j:
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DAVIDSON LABORATORY
CASTLE POINT STAT1ON Lab.
y.
Scheepsbouwkunde
HOBOKEN, NEW JERSEY
Technische Hogeschool
TWO-DIMENSIONAL DAING EFFICIENTS
FROM THIN-SHIP THEORY1
by
2 Paul. Kaplan
and
Winnifred R. Jacobs3
This work was carried out at the Davidson Laboratory of Stevens Institute of Technology under support of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Panel 13-5 on Analytical Ship
Wave Relations.
Chief HydrodynamiciSt9 TRG, Inc. (Technical Research Group),
Syosset, N. Y. (formerly Head, Fluid Dynamics Division, Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, N. J.)
Mathematician, Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology,
ABSTRACI
Analytical expressions are presented for the two dimensional section damping of ships, which are based upon thin-ship theory. The results are applicable to forms with sloping
sides
at the waterline, thereby complementingother available damping data. Application of these results to realistic (and full) ship forms shows fair agreement with experiment and with the results of other theoretical computations0
NOMENCLATURE
dimensionless wave amplitude
a wave amplitude at infinity
B beam
c wave propagation speed
f ship section lateral offset G Green's function
g gravity
2
K wave number
og
N total heave damping coefficient
N9 total pitch damping coefficient
n normal; also general numerica], exponent
n sectional damping coefficient
R radius of circle T draft of section
t time
w vertical velocity amplitude
x longitudinal coordinate along ship y lateral coordinate
z vertical coordinate
z amplitude of vertical motion
p water density
'0 velocity potential circular frequency
INTRODUCTION
When considering the steady state response of a dynamic system to an oscillatory
forcing function, it is
evident that
the
damping coefficient is the quantity thatlimits the response at resonance conditions.
This situation,
with some minor modifications due to cross-coupling, isdefinitely true for the case of the motion of a ship in a
seaway. The importance of this
quantity, and also the fact
that it is amenable to mathematical solution by use ofpotential flow
theory, has led many investigators toattempt
a theoretical solution. At the present time, the moat
successful method of calculating the
damping for a particular
ship form is by use of strip theory. In that method, the local damping at a section is found from the radiated wave energy, assuming that the body and the flow field are two-dimensional. An integration of these strip valuesover the ship length gives
the total damping. There is no interaction between differentsections and also no account is taken of
forward speed.
In the practical application of the strip method of cpmputing damping, a value of sectional damping is obtained from a family of curves for different forms by interpolation. The results of Grim l4for Lewis sections have been found to be the most useful set of data,
where the sectional damping
coefficient is plotted in terms of the beam-draft ratio and the sectional area coefficient.. The Lewis sections, obtainedfrom Lewis' (2) basic transformation of a circle, are all
wal]..»sided at their intersection with the surface.
Thus, any
important effects due to the nature of sloping sides at the intersection with the free surface cannot be found from the data for the Lewis family of sections.
The methods used by Grim to obtain values of the sectional damping involved extensive numerical work in nen
analytic form for each section. It would certainly be
advantageous to have a simple analytic forimila which could
be used to obtain the damping for any arbitrary section. In a discussion of a paper by Havelock (3)), Vessera (4) gave an
expression r the two-dimensional section damping of a thin
ship. The final result, was presented in simple analytic
form, but no details of the procedure (use of Fourier transform
methods) were. given.
In the present paper it is intended to derive the result for section damping of thin ships by another method, to present charts for a fmily of various representative sectional forms, and to apply the results to practical ships in order to determine the range of applicability of the results.
SOLUTION OF THE POTENTIAL PROBLEM
-The method of solution of the potential problem is by application of the Green's function technique. The basic
equation for the potential is aplace's equation and the
boundary conditions for the potential and the Green!s function
uRÇ,
A-E
y
cì
G(iì,C; y, z) are:
A7
)
o
(2)
where the coordinate axes and half of the thin ship section
are shown in the sketch below.
The quantity K0 is defined
as
2where w is the circular frequency of oscillation, w is the
vertical velocity amplitude and f(z;x)
is the lateral offsetof the section at some particular station (x-coordinate
location). The potential is represented as
Ø(y,z)et
Let L
denote the positive real axis,
L1 thepositive imaginary axis (directed downward), and A the
projection of the sectional contour on the imaginary axis.
Onlyhalf of the ship section is considered due to
thesymmetry of the problem.
Applying Green's theorem
q5 1
)&
2Ls
(7)
around. the contour represented by L1, the quadrant of a large
semicircle, and.L2, it can be shown that the contributions
from the circular arc portion vanish because of the asymptotic
behavior of the potential and the Green's function.
The
contributions along
L2 cancel identically, and the resulting
value of
Øis
= (8)
where
the boundary condition on the body surface (applieden the projection on the
axis) has been used,and T
is thedraft.
The Green's function
2-(-
í-fl
4Sd
(9)
G=4I
(
L-r
1-(Y-
o 4-(4satisfies the free surface boundary condition, but not the velocity boundary condition (equation (4)). Another Green's
function satisfying
the free surface boundary condition isand the sum of the two is the required Green's function to be used in equation (8), i.e.
()
G1+-The part of the potential that leads to the radiated waves at infinity is the only quantity of interest in the present
Since the wave height ii
(10)
of the
(13)
and the K'integra]. in equation (12) for large values of ja
iK0y
the amplitude of the waves generated to both sides body is, letting w
iciz0,
=
study, and it is represented by
jL4Jt i
and the sectional damping coefficient is then
T
f
-which is in
agreement with Vessare' result.The total heave
dampingcoefficient for
a ship, according to strip theory, is then represented byN%
and the total pitch damping by
=
L
where xband x are the bow and stern x-coordinates,
respectively.
EVALUATION OF DAMPING FOR A FAMILY OF SECTIONAL FORMS
In the application of theoretical damping data to ship motion problems, the damping coefficient of a segment is represented by
-i
h (19) where A & (20) (16)-6-The mean energy radiated to both sides of the body
is therefore
is the ratio
of the
radiatedwave amplitude
to the amplitude of the heaving motion of the ship section. Thequantity A
is presented in mast of the charts auarizing theoretical results, as in the work of Grim (1], and that will be the form in which the results of the present study are presented.
The family of sections chosen was the set of forma considered by Haskind
(NJ, in which the sections
arerepre-sented by f = Z(), where B is the beam at the particular section, and where
\
Z(=
(21)The values of n considered were n - , l, ., 2,
3_and 4 and
the beam-draft ratios were taken from 0.5 to_2.0, in
steps of 0.5. The value of A2 may be represted as
T
2..I
-
(i3)
[f
-'
--r
e
(22)
As an example, the value of the integral
in the expression
for A2 will be evaluated in detail below.
T
r
o
Letting K0z y2 the integral becomes
ÇL
Í1
-where
is the error function
connected with probability
theory. The values of A, according to the definition given in equation (22),are exprea8ed in analytic
formin Table i foriáll values of n
considered.
Curves
ofA as a function of 1(B/2
2ß/2g for
different values of n and beam-draft ratios are
presented. in
Figures 1 through 4, where the ship forms for each case arealeo drawn.
The
quantity is thegecdn
coefficient, given byn/ui-l.
Thus a new
tool is available for use in determining section damping of forms different from theseconsidered in
previous
studies. It only remains todetermine
the range ofapplicability, of these results to realistic forms, in view of
the fact that they were derived on the basis of thin ship
theory assumptions.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
As a test
to
determine thá range of forms to which these results could be applied, it was decided to consider the results obtained for a section which was a semicircle. A forniof this
type is quite full
andcertainly violates the
oenditionsrequired for thin ship theory tóbe valid.
However,
theoretical results for this case are available in the werks of Grim and Ursell (6] and comparison would give a good measure of hew farthe thin ship results would differ from
more
exact theories.Fer a circle of radius R, the value of
A is
and this was evaluated
numericálly in therange 0K0R
2.0,
whore K0R w2B/2gfor
the present case. Figure 5 presents acomparison of these results with those of
Grim and
Ursell,and
while
it is obvious that the
present results differ in magnii..tude from. the others, it is seen that the manner of variation
is similar while the magnitude departure is not so severe as
'would be anticipated for such a form.
This it appears that
the present results can be used as a tool in order to find
dampinglues for representative ship forms.
The charts in Figures 1 to 4 were used to obtain
values by interpolation for the section damping of the Series
O model tt aa studie4 experimentally by Gerritsma
t
7]i.M integration ever the. hullis used t. obtain, the total heave
and pitch damping, and the results are shown in Figure 6,
where comparisons are
made with experimental data, the value
from Grim's charts,
and
also the value obtained from acircum-ferential source distribution, Iown as the HavelockHelstein
method (8).
It may be seen that the thin ship results are in
better agreement with experiment fer heave damping than those
derived from the use of Grim's charts, while the pitch damping
La larger than that obtained from experiments and Grim's theory.
Thus it appears that the results derived from .thïn ship theory
can be utilized with fair Success to determine heave and pitch
damping for ueual ship forma, as a complement to the Grim
charts, while their best application will be teforms having
Sloping aides at the waterline interSection. The ability todetermine sectional damping values analytically by this method
lends it
some attractiveness for future work.This present investigation was part of an overall study program whose purpose was to determine the
three-dimensional stripwise
corrections for the distribution ofdamping along a
ship hull. These results are necessary inorder to achieve mere precise computations of bending moments acting on ships in waves, and also for a better understanding
of damping phenomena. The two-dimensional strip damping values found fer thin ships aré therefore available to be compared with the
three-dimensional
strip values, which account forin-teraction between different parts of the hull. (The results
for three-dimensional strip damping values will be presented
in a forthcoming note). From the aforementioned comparison, the major effects of three-dimensional flew
at every
section ofan oscillating ship (within the limits of thin ship theory) will be delineated. Thus a better knowledge of the actual
damping force distribution will be Obtained, and this will assist in carrying out bending moment and
motion
calculations in waves with greater accuracy.-REFERENCES
Grim, O., "Berechnung der Durch Schwingungen Eines Schiffskrpers
Erzeugten Hydrodynamischen Kräfte", Jahrbuch S.T.G., Vo].. 47, 1953. Lewis, F.M.: "The Inertia of the Water Surrounding a Vibrating
Ship", Trans. SNAME, Vol. 37, 1929.
1-lavelock, T.H.: "The Damping of Heave and Pitch: A Comparison of
Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Calculations", Trans. of Inst. of Naval Arch., Vol. 98, No. 4, October 1956.
Vossers, G.: Discussion of Have].ock's 1956 paper. Trans. of Inst.
of Naval Arch., Vol. 98, No. 4, October 1956.
Haskind, M.D.: "Two Papers on the Hydrodynamic Theory of Heaving and Pitching of a Ship", SNAME Technical and Research Bulletin
No. 1-12, April 1953.
Ursell, F.: "On the Heaving Motions of a Circular Cylinder on the Surface of a Fluid", Quart. Jour. of Mech. and Applied Math.,
Vol. 2, June 1949.
Gerritsma, J.: "Experimental Determination of Damping, Added Mass and Added Mass Moment of Inertia of a Ship Model", International
Shipbuilding Progress, 1957.
St. Denis, M.: "On Sustained Sea Speed", Trans. SNAME, Vol. 59, 1951.
3 4 TABLE i -K T 1
[2 - e
(K 2T2+2K T + 2))
(K0B)2 o o -K T[6-e
°(K3T3+3K2T2+6KT+6))
o o o-
12-1/2 1 2 ' B 1/2[erf(\ji)]
oe°)
()(1-oReferences
Kaplan, Paul: "Application of Slend3r-Body Theory to the Forces Acting on Submerged Bodies and Surface Ships in'Reular Waves", Jour, of
Ship Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, November 1957.
Kaplan, Paul, and Hu, Pung Nien: "The Forces Acting on Slender Submerged
Bodies and Body-Appendage Combinations in Oblique Waves't, Proc.
Third U. S. National Corç. Applied Mechanics, 1958.
Hvelock,. T. H.: "TheForces on a Submerged Body Moving Under Waves", Trans. Inst. of Naval Architects, Vôl.. 96, 1954.
Cummins, William E.: "Hydrodynamic Förces. and Moments Acting on a Slender Body of Revolution Moving Under a Regular Train of Waves",
David Taylor Model Basin Report 9l0,.December 1954.
5.. Lighthill, M. J.: "Methods for Predicting Phenomena in the High Speed Flow of Gases", Jour. Aero. Sci. VOl. 16, pp. 64-83, 1949.
6.', Spreiter, John R.: "On S1nder Wing-Body Theory", Jour. Aero. Sci.,
Vol. 19, pp. 571-572, 1952.
Cummins., William E.: "The Force and Moment on a Body in a Time-Varying Potential Flow", Jour, of Ship Research, Vol. 1., No. 1, April 1957.
Kuerti, G.; McFadden, J.A. and Shanks, D.: "Virtual Mass of Cylinders
with Radial Fins and of Polygonal Prisms", U. S. Naval Ordnance
Lab.', NAVORD Rpt. 2295, January 29, 1952.
Taylor, G:. I.: "The. Forces on a Body Placed in a Curved or Converging
Stream of Fluid",Proc. Royal Soc., A, London, Vol. 120, 1928. 10. Landweber, L. and Yih, C. S.: "Forces., Moments, and Added Masses for
Rankjne Bodies", Jour, of Fluid Mech., Vol. 1, Pt. 3, September
1956. . .
N-543 20