BY
J.K.LUNDE
A NOTE ON THE LINEARIZED DEEP WATER
THEORY OF WAVE PROFILE AND WAVE
RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS
NORWEGIAN SHIP MODEL EXPERIMENT TANK PUBLICATION N°48
REPRINT JANUARY 1963
ARCHib-
Lab. V.
S4w.,-zr...1s!)on4wnd
NORWEGIAN SHIP MODEL EXPERIMENT TAM
P"':1-"""1
INSTITUTE OF EN
BERKELE
A NOTE ON THE LINEARIZED DEEP WATER THEORY OF WAVE PROFILE AND WAVE RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS
by
J. K. LUNDE
ERING RESEARCH
LIFORNIA
SERIES NO.
a2
ISSUE NO
DATE
Dezenitez,. 195.7
A NOTE ON THE LINEARIZED DEEP WATER THEORY OF WAVE PROFILE AND WAVE RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS
by
J. K. Lunde
Fourth Technical Report
submitted to the
Office of Naval Research on
Contract Nonr. 222(30)
Hydrodynamics of Naval Architecture
Series 82, Issue 4
December, 1957
Institute of Engineering Research University of California
by J. K. LUNDE
§ 1. Introduction. It appears that Wigley was the first to show that it
was practically possible to calculate the wave profile for certain fairly ship shaped bodies of small beam and of infinite drafts, moving at a constant speed of advance, and to obtain a fair agreement with the corresponding measured wave profile
[13*.
Immediately afterwardsHavelock gave a general linearized solution which is applicable to any ship shaped body of infinite draft, moving at a constant speed of advance and satisfying the linearized conditions [2). Since then some additional papers have appeared in the literature, but their number has always been considerably less than those dealing with the corresponding linearized
theory of wave resistance [3)
M.
In this report we shall return to the general linearized theory of wave profile and wave resistance.
§2. Free surface condition. Let the x-, y- axis of a right hand,
orthogonal reference frame coincide with the undisturbed free surface of a body of inviced and incompressible fluid with the z-axis directed
vertically upwards. Suppose the fluid fills the space
z
0
. If a bodyis at rest in a uniform stream whose velocity is -c in the x-direction, the velocity potential 4t can be written in the form
cip, (2-1)
where cx is the velocity potential of the uniform stream and where is the
velocity potential of the perturbation caused by the body.
We shall assume that the (1) produces negligible effect on cx at sufficiently great distance upstream from the disturbance. We assume
also that the deviation of any fluid particle from the state of uniform flow is resisted by a fictitious dissipative farce proportional to the perturbation velocity. This force does not interfere with the irrotational character of the motion. Hence the components
X
Z.
of the external force are given by
x ) 9
)(==-
/Li
\,(==
wherejut is a positive coefficient which is retained in the intermediate
analysis to a degree sufficient to attain its chief purpose and is made zero in the final result.
Since the velocity components u, v, w of the perturbation are
given by (1)3
(2-2) also as
dOrespectively, we can write
z.7ti
) --/41q5yz= 9-/
Multiplying the first equation by dx, the second by dy, the third by dz and adding them together, we have
9 dz.
Integrating this equation we find that .. 3
z
where S2 is a force potential.
When the fluid motion is steady and irrotational and the external force is conservative, the pressure equation reduces to Bernoulli's equation
9,2
=
C
where q is the resultant fluid motion, p is the pressure,
f
the constant density and C is a constant which has the same value throughout the fluidat all times.
2.
(2-2)
-
Equating Bernoulli's equation for a point within the disturbance produced by the body with the same equation for a point far in front of the disturbance where
(I)-4-0
we have(cP,12,-
qz)z]
+3
(-z-)
74 4 Ci)c2÷3
7-)f
where '>(x
- Y, 0) is the free surface elevation. But
(1=02"-t- (cV-+ (U2-=
2c
(4>J+
(kr;
and soP-
Pi+
C c1D + (c1)),)14((k3)1+(41)1+3
71qb
0.
Assuming
(ci))11-- ((i) )1+
( (12to be negligible compared with the other terms in this equation, we get at the free surface where F>
p
--riqb= 0)
(z=0).
(2-3)
When the fluid is in contact with a rigid surface, or with another fluid with which it does not mix, the general kinematic condition which must be satisfied if contact is to be preserved is that the fluid and the surface with which contact is maintained must have the same normal velocity at the surface. If the surface
S
is given byrelative to a reference frame fixed in space, the general kinematic boundary condition Which must be satisfied at every point on
S
is(2-0
=
Since the free surface is given by Z= ;(x, y, 0), we put
z
y, 0):= 0 and (2-4) reduces tock)A,
=
0
Neglecting small quantities of second order, i.e., the non-linear terms
d)xx
andi0:3
we haveci)= C.-. =---. - \./ CZ = 0)
2- k )
)
which is the kinematic boundary condition which must be satisfied at
the free surface. From (2-3) and (2-5) we get
v
ciD=
cAPxWhich is the kinematic boundary condition Which must be satisfied at the wetted surface of a fine ship, i.e., at the vertical centre line plan
of the ship. 4. (2-5) (3-1) cipt qb),
0
(z= o)
(2-6) where 9/d-z and/4)-§3.
The velocity potential. If 9 =-- -±.11) (X.) is the equation ofthe wetted surface of a ship at rest in a uniform stream moving with a velocity -c in the x-direction, we put
F=9:p4)(,,z)
and(24)
reduces to(C Ck)(1)),
-Ci)zlilt.=
0Keeping the same order of approximation as in (2-3) and (2-5) we have to assume a fine ship, i.e., we neglect the non-linear terms
Ci)), 4Ik (1), 4)-z. and
F7==
=
)
Subtracting the second limit from the first we have
We now make use of the
following
theorem from. potential theory [5].TheOrem I. If the density (S(G) Of A,
surface,
distribution onthe
regularsurface
8
is continuous at onS
the normal derivative of the potentialLI
at, P approaches limits as1D approaches along the normal to s5* atQ
On either side of . These limits arewhere U(G1) br14 Q)
+-SiS WaS
-6.U(OL)2
G-(Q) +ifs.01.70.U
114
dS
Subtracting (3-4) from (3-3),_
Let U be a velocity potential
d)
and letc.
be a pointthe surface 'yr-=10' 1 then becomes
respectively, and (3-6) can be written
_
-2)4) -4'y+4X600,3j,
we have (3-2) (3-3), (3-4) (3-5) (3-6) z), onVay4_,
a/Dy-(3-7)
)d.S ,S
where from (3-5)
)4)0<)tJ)-2-)=
fl'Cr(k')
ciS3
(3-8a.)
and r=
-k)a-1-91+S
Equation (3-8a)can be intreperted as the velocity potential due to a continuous distribution of sources over the portion $ of the plane
, the source strength per unit area or source density at (K)
O)
being
d(0)-f)
. Hence, the significance of (3-7) is that it enablesus to determine the density of this source distribution once normal derivatives of the velocity potential are known.
Comparing (3-2) and (3-7) we have on the surface
_
(
cr(x,0,z)=- 2c4x (>4,0)7-).-by't "e3-
(3-8)
Hence the boundary condition of the wetted surface of a fine ship can, in the linearized theory, be satisfied by assuming a continuous distribution of sources over the vertical centre line plane
S
of the ship so that the velocity potential CI) due to the perturbation can be written(t)
ds
(3-9)
where k)1,4- z-i- z. -01", and where,
from (3-8), the source density ( (
0,f)
is given by6.
(1)1 0, )= 25t (-Ph (h) f
(3-10)Source Of
Stre-nen
rn tat (0,0,-1)
FT5. ,
uniform stream moving with a velocity -c in
the x- direction (Fig. 3-1).
It will be shown that
the velocity potentialof
suCh a source can be
determined in a form which This last result is, however, obvious when considering what happens at the elementary area
SS
of the distribution8
away from the boundaries ofthe source distribution. As cc' is the source density, the total strength
over is (58S and the corresponding flux is equal to 4TEC
8SL
Owing to the neighboring source distribution and assuming a uniform distri-bution, the fluid does not flow radially out from as in the case of an isolate point source but is forced to flow out along the normal to the distribution at SS and at both sides of it. Thus the positive normal velocity V is given by
v.=
4itc:585/2aS-=--
27Cd , but from(3-1), V=- and hence c5
,
the source density, is given by (3-10).In the analysis which follows we shall assume that the density of the source distribution always is given by (3-10), even in the presence of
a free surface. The velocity potential 4) due to the perturbation caused
by a fine Ship and given by (3-9) for an infinite fluid has, however, to be modified in order to satisfy the free surface condition. However,
whatever form this modification takes d':) must tend towards (3-9) when
the free surface is moved further and further from the body. Hence, in the analysis which follows, we consider a source of strength
nn
situatedsatisfies the linearized free surface condition and the equation of continuity for an incompressible fluid. The velocity potential 16
,
due to perturbation caused by a fine ship, is then obtained by integrating Y over thevertical center line plane of the ship, assuming the source density 1 to be given by (3-10) since this expression of ot) will satisfy all
linearized boundary conditions as well as the equation of continuity.
Assuming that the fluid extends to infinity in every direction we have for a source in a uniform stream (Fig. 3-1)
where
(I)
C 22r,
z
r ,z-t-8. (3-11)If c is sufficiently small we have from (2-5) that the kinematic boundary condition of the free surface reduces tof4s1S*))(7))
0)
i.e.,
the surface condition when0
approximates to the condition of a rigid wall given byz=.0
. This condition can be satisfied by adding to (3-11) a term nn/ralcl1==
x2.+ya-1- (z-f)2"/which is the velocity potential due to a source at the image point (0)01*n
and of strengthrn .
Assuming that ct>5 , the velocity potential of the perturbation
caused by the presence of the source of strength rn , vanish at
infinite distance upstream from the source and is bounded at every point on the free surface, we have from (2-3)
If the integral
jci)(x,9,0)clx
C.0 exists, thenP,S
(f)N y 0) d
C.We have stated in §2 that/tijor/mi is to be made zero in the final result, hence
dPs(x) 9) o)
==
y, 0)d .Since the integral will presumably be finite we have that the free surface pressure condition for sufficient large values of c may be taken as
4)5(x)Y,0)
=
, which corresponds to motion under a free surfaceneglecting gravity. This condition can be satisfied by adding to (3-11)
a term
c-=
which is the velocity potential of a sink at the image point
(0,0)-4).
Having established the image system of a source below the free surface in a uniform stream for these two limiting cases, namely when0 and oo
,
we now assume that the image system for intermediate velocities can be built up of a certaindistribution of sources above the free surface and that one of these with strength nns is situated at the point ) s .
The velocity potential of the image system therefore may be written
Hence the velocity potential of a source
rn
at (0)0,-f)and at rest in a uniform stream of velocity -c is given by
(1)
x ci)s )4)s=
2-1 rn s 2. where(c)
(9-9s)1--4-(3-12)0
We do not yet know the exact form of the image system, but this will be determined when we satisfy the free surface condition given by
(2-6). First of all we have to write the terms in
(3-12)
in integralforms. For this purpose we make use of the known integrals
ic
it(tal-z)
27.(x24-91-i--zzi-
id& e
K
-ferroxlci
J
-7f 0
=jd9JeK)8
$trrZ'.O
-7C
where xco-s -t- Thus
(3-12)
now becomes-it .c,
1
r_n89
.eKU(7.)(z
4-f)32T
eik ...-r 0Kii.gx-xs)c.,yyr,,,,4-2.2.4
_I_Lrn4c19je
79 (-)s 9](-q
2.7c s --it 0where in the first integral term we require
2-44>0
and the second-4
7-s
0
Hence, in the form c4),s is written in equation10.
(3-13)
(3-13) it applies to
the
region --+ Z. Z-s ) and in particular tothe free surface where
Z=.0
Moreover,(3-13)
satisfies theequation of continuity for an incompressible fluid. Writing
(3-13)
in the formPc'
-(z+f
(iL77.-1-z) EIL\j88
-k--1-69
Zit1
a.
-'itand substituting in (2-6) we have
acosze
[rn
r(e) e).]
Cef.rn-C(G, k).]14 Cos
&['m
k)]0)
or
me.
(-1Kcos260-4L& Cu e) - r(e,)
(i< tue".0,
0+
M.Cos (4 This equation will be satisfied iff
r. ors 13, "4 NO 4' le CASS
9
zer_ 9
CA-s?-9 -4 o yAcet k-ke,st-c.1 sex, 9
write (3-15) in the forth.
jci
ejeK t:-cz+f)]
-7t
71 00 cz.a3!I IdJe
-It
Icso, .rt I/1 K.[ Era (7. -f
rnV-41se.2.9de
e? 7C--)
(7.-f)]
d.
(3-10
(3-16)
nd (3-13) can
be writtenas
CI)c- ez+-r)]
d
foo 2,7trn
fciek+
#14 b=3, +f 2,
ice.c."60 Z'itA se,8
-71 0
(3-35)
where
> 0
FO
CArs(901- Ild'n9
and real parts-have tobe taken We may also
--it
or
cso -t-(z-f33
rr,
rr,
sele
d
e.
se4..9 0 % pwhere q
+
t
and where real parts have to be taken. From the discussion in 44.2 it is to be understood that,- is to be made zero whenever its chief purpose is
attained. It will readily be seen that each one of the terms of (3-15),
(3-16)
and (3-17) satisfies the equation of continuity for an incompressiblefluid.
It has been assumed that the velocity potential CI:is of the source
vanish at infinite distance upstreat frim the source. It
appears that we are justified to make this, ,assumption, at least as,
far as
the wave motion is concerned, since the group velocity of gravity waves is never greater than the speed of propogation of the waves and hence gravity waves cannot precede the disturbance When the speed of advance is
constant.
We now have to show that
(3-17)
satisfies this condition.Since each of the two first terms behaves as
0(11)*
a.sit i the last term which has to be considered. Let ot,
Va
it
r.s-+ (z-f )31.
\)s#20daje
lk--=_. te..c./9 4. ?... se. a 0 012.
(3-17)
where
CO=
XCA,-Sta -I,- . Substitute 9 ..+1
and ID becomesIrk 00
14 c(z_o Z
6c:cats, y,s%14.19)3,
61-, ,i'secle
°tele
o o
e2&
iiA See. e:;...---*
x-4.x2'=ii
0
(x2). when A --i. C=.40 ) k *- ke/z.._-- ON) when --i.)
. o (x29 when *---0,.,
x when x--10. c o * 3--..:-_-, c.)(*)
but
CSubstitute S
and c becomesC
1Ce-2'6)
In the last integral, we substitute G+ 7t and it becomes
7
AL 0.0 [(1... j>cCArva S4-;" 0)) .1St-39de?
Hence,,0.
j
r
=...fs,42.6cla ft-t-fc);.,
(,,c4-1 e + d' 9). .e.Z:
ic.(.NeLod. ,,,s,;._ e)
o
0
r'"--- 4 Str'"& -kC-7l s.Qc G Tr/2_
We want, however, the real parts,
-rtia
0
write the double
Sec_ 19
-t-AseG
Lie.; 10.a C-17'Se 2;e%9
d.
.2.os#"- e-ty4^ &IL
9
-s,;,g)
-1-e
ktr...,276)
c-45s12-9 dejr
e-d
ste-9.) Las (km co-se) GArss.;.te)
\t-osect6.)%_t_/..s.,36).
-iy4A sec e Cc.* ta-sta)co-r(ik.s..., G.).]
Since it is the limiting value when /A-4O we have to consider we shall integral as bO
39- e
set./
cosdk.
co (K-it seee) 7-4.. 'Lk,.e.
(1kc Loqe)c.0-+(knrir% 9)1C:kj 0(3-18)
(3-19)
!I koStAltiici4
L + -i.e.,it ms consider the first integral term and in particular the part which is integrated with respect to
K.
This can be writtenle-6.--.1)fc..s[x(icei)c-rs 93
(4k
co:9)
I
0
s'untx N-q1c4fse],y,(kktcose)} urs (
44) (3-20)where
i"
te,J,je
andAre now make use of the following theorem which may be obtained
from the theory of Fourier integrals.
Theorem II. If fcs) is sectionally continuous in the interval (a, b)
and has derivatives from the left and right at a point
s=s0
,
thenIrfcset-o)
I.
rvin, irm
ds..
i f(a.+o)
> -t-i-.... a when
fcs. 0))
a cs.4
Sc,b
so,
s
If
Ifcs)ds
is absolutely convergent, i.e.,_PM8s
is
oconvergent, the limits a and b can be taken as 0 and oo respectively.
Under similar conditions,
rvrn cs) c4s(s-s°)
t
Applying these results to (3-20) and noting that
(i==koseje>0
we haveli_..._-ke.
t(zf)s:81
(14.1x co-s (3-21) 14.--
0
ks--b.We now consider the second integral term of (3-19),
Ic(x-f)
'T Urn e_ &`".' (ex ce-s
e) Los(
cik
a
7-b-01
00
-=---
rt..4.0
Urnj
(
4-v112-+/-sec.le
(3-22) where
14i= K:, e164> 0
and wherer (lc)
is a continuous function.As 7-0,- 0,
,
only values of K for which K- ,i--0' 0 makes the integranddifferent from zero. Let at therefore write -- Ki.--=-- n/c where
the limits of fl are _ cx) and -4- c=e3 since
1:1> 0
Assuming that tyt. --- 0 whatever the value of n v.re now have
2cf
P(te )
k...rn
/-
t
dr)
(iki) c-osAA% (n1-:+ste-9)
C0-5
e.,kikcctsfio)
COI(
SINN9)ki
(7.-f
(3-23) Substituting
(3-21)
and(3-23)
into (3-19), we find that the two integral terns which (3,19) consists of cancel each other when k'Hence the velocity potential of the perturbation cauSed by
the
,source, vanish at infinite distance upstream. Since
kf
114.11 F(9, ryle
the velocity potential of a source as given, by
(3-15)
reduces toKLLC,) (M14 )1 Ct
+
f
=
Ge
cik+
Crajci4
cik rc) rt.)7I
when
0
,
Hence(3-15)
satisfies the ,free surface conditionC1)4z(x, 9,0) -a-
0
when i.e., -0,
-Similarly, since
-10
(11 -Re,;k)== )
kd'i°0
the velocity potential given by (3-15) reduces to
it .6. -rt
1;.(Z(z+f).3
, Cct-03
Era
e
rn2.1L r r
-7t
when C-.A.c="Q Hence (3-15) satisfies also the free surface condition
(CO)) ---
0
WhenSince we have assumed that 4, is bounded on the free surface,
0
when/A-a0
and -2-=.0.From (2-3) we then have that the wave profile (*.,J)0) is given by
*We can.also use contour integration in connection with (3-17) and the question of the condition at large distances upstream and downstream, but we have then to make what may be called arbitrary assumptions as regards the indentation
of the contour at the pole
c-vVostje
. By making use of Theorem II we avoidthis and the result determines uniquely the contour to be used in connection
with (3-31).
16.
(3-24) If the fictitious dissipative coefficient/m- is not introduced
41) , the velocity potential of a source, apparently can still be assumed
to be given by (3-17), but the denominator of the last integral term will be ie-esejt9 instead of
k-k see
-4- (74" St-C. (3.By making use of (3-24) we find from (3-17) and (3-21) that we then have waves upstream from the source and that these approximate to
TfiL
_ 4
rne
c.-1,1c,Ksec.9)cas(V.e',69r4c(ii)sec-ecie3
(3-25)
0
when C.104
*
This is, however, contrary to one of our assumptions, namely that the perturbation vanish at infinite distance upstream. It is,therefore, necessary to superpose a freely moving wave pattern in such a way as to cancel out the waves at a very large distance upstream from the
source., We notice from (3-23) that the required term is
r
4rnleafe.;(z-f)smae
t;en(kik
co-4G)c4r: (qb
9)sejg
cIffwhich satisfies the equation of continuity by itself.
Therefore the velocity potential CV of a source, wilen the
fictitious dissipative force is neglected but otherwiSe undet the same
conditions which, apply to (3-17), is gival by
Io
1c/2k(2-f)
cps=
_rc
4 rrl
Self; de e-
Led oc,,.c.s.rtet)ci.rs(kys,:,,9) dk.
ri
7
k-secl-0
--im
leo o (k dc sec G ) cas ( sec..1-9 ref:"6? Li ,e)
lcCe-{ )ser...19
Where
r--=
(z+
f
and .Q=.=
a/de
It may be conceivable that the as given by (3-17), which tontains the fictitious dissipative forcer is not identical to CI)i as giveh
by (3-27). Indeed it is difficult to prove in .a rigorous nianner the equality
of these two expressions at all points in the fluid when transforming the
integral terms by contour integrations just, as they appear in (3-17) 4ftd.
(3-27).
From the discussion of the free surface conditions It will readily be seen that whilst
( y, 0)
=
3
4).oc. tV (3-28)gives, the free surface elevation, the same expression, but with
0
(3,26)
(3-27)
gives the elevation of a surface of constant pressure above its position
0
-'when there is no perturbation of the stream,. the elevation-of the
isobars.
From (3-27) and,
(3-28)
we havei
-Friz. c2.0is
s (k,1,2):= Cm** (1 - 1 ).=.
4 n-1secadti .42-
iH e-(v.4)'
s;.(k w c,:ps a co-s N
c:,,,9)1<clic ItAL'k-vosig_to
o009
=
Im
We Consider -t-4rY,K.f.(/-f
)re2:19c,34 (k,,k sA4 a)c4sfr,tdslos, lec-69
d
(3=29)
Ignoring constants and substituting A
=
9) CIA cei-t 9 d9 where A 4_- we find, that the dOuble integral tern of(3-29)
can bewritten "r/t, 0,3
tx--=-1Sec,,&c19e-k-ikostc.ze
(k), etrs e) cfrs(c;, t4) 'k
OcVkt
A)
tc, )4W:7
i671 = Az7
c17 18. (3-30)(3-31)
where 17 is a complex variable equal. to
in
)
F-7 -
0
and where
Irn
stands for the imaginary part.. The integrand has two Simplepoles at ik6J,&K0z4.- and
Ki-=
At
on
the tealexit.
Thecontour C
we choose iflhenx
0
consists of acircular arc of a radius which tends to infinity and the positive half of the real and imaginary axes. Since the integrand has a. pole at,4 on the positive part of the real axis we cut out, the part of the path within a
i.e.,
Ste'La)
Ak-Cauchy's integral theorem,
fci
=-.7.0.
Consider first the integration along the arc
r'
. We substitute and ultimately let2-4.
c..0. , thus7*- ;.oe zid
A OViz)2'
21e(1I jf(
:Re
+2i0c+ilx1Re
I
Res) 12 e;:c4i. d
ticI ..., 1<r: 1ZdoC
1a
KoRe.ze4s Al
'Re-44
F. 3-L.
0 rr? -?lone
V2.-Rlx
I s,,,<
e
---..1 1.2. i3O,R__ A2R do(
0since P4
0 andEl- Wej2L°(3112.=
Pi7
41
,
when
Tz-a. ...
.
Noting that S'vrice (2170oC we have thatsmall circle nr
of radius
r
about the pole,
and then make
r
tend to zero thus taking the princi-pal value in
the usual sense
(Fig. 3-2).*
Hence, by
for 0 oe-...4 7c/2.
*As the contour integrations which follow are round similar contours, we
will, for short, call them first, second, third and fourth quadrant when going round the origin in the counter-clockwise direction, the contour in Fig. 3-2 being the first quandrant. The direction of integration is
1..f(Re4()Riecz d
p
9 .3-3.
7C/2j
VlxiocKo-R -Az
-Rix II(R2- k tg
e
0.0Consider now the integration along the semicircle (Fig.
3-3).
Substituting 17= kitt'e_4°Cso that
pe
Kr2
rl'ic-ka-1-42() we find that0
Irn
tif(Pel:.°() cle( T(04*
rdA()
-
ix
i(kI4- re`.°C) 2_ Atirr,
beE+ re c
(lei+ re )
doc
F[KA VA2+
(40/2)1) ___4 7Ce
ViA2+
(4/2)2[K12+02+
ka/2)ticeskko2/24 (14/2)a Whenv.-4.a
Integrating along the real and imaginary
axes,
and collecting the results we haveSe"
i< 2- -,.4.)(kile"-A7-)leo- Az
led
A
F [4/2 -01A1-1- (/2J
re.
iecia+VAt+ Wel
21M1-1-
W2),-i
x rikr-E-Ate Unti- A2 ) Li, n F lKon, us n F
+
nd 0
(nt+A2)2 4- Ka r)2.
0
k0y2+,)Az-(4/2)'j
where x <0 ) (z-f) <0 and noting that the result from the
20.,
(3-32)
(i--integration along the real axis from
0
toA
is real and accordingly does not contribute to the value of the integral.Similarly, integrating round the fourth quadrant, we have
tencs..n At) d K
=--J Kt KoKA%
FE At+04./211pee1'24_4ft+
(e.k),-jecksrxik.2/2+ of./2 aV (ke,/2)z 00r)F
ri c../TnF]
je
ndn) (3 -3 3) where .x>0
and F.,(z-{)
0
.Substituting
=
0wec29
in the first term onthe right hand side of
(3-32)
and(3-33)
andfl=pstr,e) A=
I:1 cos 6in the second term of
(3-32)
and(3-33)
we find that(3-29)
can bewritten 00 -r/a j4->tp,A4p2szn[ct-f)pl:infEidkop.sr16 Cesat-4)Ps'n 93
9
rirt
7C. 1='2 Koz sirze
c,(pticas9*ede
o (3-3)4) wherex>0
and 7112. cc_i_mx )+ItrleKpop0jpBz-f)pE)]-0SW,9casaz--OPsnq
P2*-1-ic'as-vn29
cc s (py cos )(;e de
712. C.° e
cirs(kstc.93-s(ktet.1-6Str364) set-39 c16,
0(3-35)
where x40,7.4 LO and where rit= (z )1:, (-2,q
)2-in both
(3-3)4)
and (3-35). SubstitutingZ 0 in
ts(x.,y,7-) andexpression (3-3)4) gives the free surface profile in front of the source and
22.
(3-35) behind the source. Since the terms of
(3-34)
and the correspondingterms of (3-35), all with
z=.0
representing the non-oscillating part of the wave profile, dies out quickly with increasing distance from the source, they have in the past been called the "local disturbance" in order to distinguish them from the last term in(3-35)
which represents the oscillating part of the wave profile.From
(3-17)
we havecm
-
r-'r--'19.4.9 de,re
k
--- a
"11.rt./
C7
k<---c,SeC.,69 +VA-Se.C.9
K
CI-x
where real part has to be taken. This expression of AS corresponds to
that given
by (3-29)
and in fact the two should be equal.We consider the double integral term of (3-36). Ignoring the
constants, reducing the range of integration with respect to
a
from- )t
too,
7C/2 and substituting A.== CSLr9
we haveKFLZ-t (1-÷)]
Inn 19fte
Giex set-2* 4. (;tA. sec a
{ZO
tio
21Arj--TVL
k171:=---A"-1,-,-, 2ICCS(b /\)d)\j) (2.-C)
e
]c11(,,K- At+ t i.k te*--
e-K.e.--2(2.-0 A
We consider the two terms
Im
7,9.4,t:x62:-XL
4c0)6,9 I
e
7?--14012 Ctr2)
C.
In,
9(.9)67 "
Irr
Vta-At_<;,..fri_p_
76 7)
(3-37)
where the first integrand has a simple pole in the second and fourth
quadrant and the second integrand has a simple pole in the first and third
quadrant.
(3-36)
(7.-= 4)3
e
The contour C we choose when
x>,0
in the first and x4.0Sex crrui
in the integrand is the first quadrant (Fig.
3-2).
When >C4. inthe first
and
X>0
in the second integrand we choose the fOurthquadrant.
Hence, by Cauchy' s theorem of residues
ferdthi
'C.where
ZAR
is the sum of the residues of the integrand at its poles withinC.
With the contour chosen and with the Corresponding Conditions on the sign of x as stated, we get. no contribution when integrating alongthe circular arcs of these two contours. Carrying out the integration and taking the limiting value when /tA. --4- '0 we find that
firm
f e.F'` slit-4 i
iA-.1.0 i=2-koK-Az--ILY VL-A2.
Ft4A-4- VA% + (44)2-3
i
V At+ (k./2
)1. -[K4I+VAC4-04/2.)7j1cairdia2-4-kdAt+
(v0/2)2Ta
_ex V
r
nt---T-2--A ,Vril*X9 tin n;--
.:3n,C-1)-Sn
;'3an,
(n4.
z
A2)2- .4 14:lzrI2-n
0`
where X 4-Oil 7= tt- f ) and that
oo 06
n .--1.7-1Unt+At) *00 n F - i<on c 0-S nd
ci
.inn
(3-39)
,u-s()
Kt- V,,K-Az + :it r- ' 2 -_- - -- - Tv 1 `.44"-
le-xi
(flt 4 Anz 4.tc2-n2-S'
lien gt,n(x ie--i---1- A '1'
4
where ><>0j F= (z-f).
Making the same substituting in
(3-38)
and(3-39) as
in theoase of
(3=32)
and(3-33)
We find that (3-36), when 14.-4. reduces to (3-3/4:and (3-35). We therefore conclude that the two velocity potentials, gives
identical free surface profile and identical isobars in the fluid.
(3-38)
Moreover, since neither velocity potential contains terms which are independent of x the two expressions of
V
as give n by (3-17) and (3-27) areidentical as will also be readily seen by contour integration.*
It may look as if given by (3-34) and
(3-35) is
discontinuousalong the plane given bycO,
but this is notso (away
from
the source) since, the value of the single integral term ispositive and twice the. value of the double integral term Which is
negative for x---0)(3-35)),and positive f Qr. :>( 4.10 ( 3-34).
In particular,
.5( o, p, zj
2 for 't4-c
may be, expressed interm S of known functions,.
It will be found that the isobars on the plane %.11.t.r.0 can be
written as
s(x, 0, z.)
_
rn x r9
Vki+ (2+01-
01+ (x-f
it]
irk
4 rn
encrsseec
fleas (ri - f1)-kost4.2'e(n17.- fj)
c
Ste.
& 4 ntflan
(3-40)
0
0where
=01.10%...11
The use
of
the fictitious /A' as a means of suppressing waves in advanceof a disturbance has been critized from time to time by mathematicians, and, even recently, a paper by Green has been quoted as evidence that the
"-, method may give incorrect or incomplete result. Whatever faults ,AA-may have, that particular paper cannot be used as evidence. Indeed, no result can be quoted in which the solution obtained by the,- method is in
conflict with the result from other methods. Even if capillarity is taken
into account ,Ax operates the right way with capillary waves in front
and gravity waves to the rear of the advancing disturbance. and
sc)()C rn x
19 1/x+
(Z1-)(z-f)2-3
wherex<
Continuity of 5 ( , x 004.
Ann_r
4r61.
9 43 gn ars (rdt-f
ec..219.sin-,(n tz -f I) ,J
k,;:lsec, G -4- t+non
o o icia -r-, arnk,1-4:41z-f isee..2.9C
ctrs (kox sec-6)sec- e
1de
0tx,
inces(nlz- f I)- euseje
(r)(1-)ndn=
K,
es-k. "1-"C II"-C.
sE.c464 +.
St29
n2-Substituting
ezfisec.26)
um= nlz -ftof the known results
CerS0-1.1
u
a.°-r
> o,
o,
) 0 andoo
usn,o_u ,..i
i
1 -o. p
vu --:----2e
0,.Di p>0)
1:::?--- utJ
0
we find that the value of the integral term is
at the origin requires
__S00
-0(
f
LA Ctr1 U S.1%.r) it
e.
(te
1A1)1z. - fif I =
Kle'
Seje
0
Hence, the suggested equality of the two terms of (3-)2) is true.
and making use
(3-41)
(3-42)
d
du
-
It
0c"-9i-M-4-14+01 N/k
tz--i 1
n
being an integer (see Appendix I). Making use of (8) Appendix I we have finallyme.
olt-ft rArokolz-f 0+
L
(!6c
Substituting ZmO0 in (3-1460we have of' course the surface elevation
gtt:Lle4
origin above the source.It is of interest to determine also, at least roughly, how' behaves for small, intermediate and large values of x and y. We driall, however, limit our investigation to the simpler
case Of
e 0,z)
as given by (3-40) and (3-41).Since, for every value, of x)
oo
E(-I) ij
---
Ar).0
Care
26,
(ec,12.--410
.We have also that
7/L
s(00)z)=
1+44-Yikt. ""x°11.6fisejesec.3#9(3-)43Y Y ("E-44)2' k2.4. (z.- C,
e
de
.The integral term is, however,
kdl-z- Ostc:49
sec.309
d
4ack0htt -f I))
(3-44)
where the A-functions are defined as 1/2
An 6,0
jors2n+
16 oe.seJ 98 (3-)45)9
0
Sec. 7c/awe have, for the most interesting term,
/2-k (;0,-4,
8m ko
cArs(k,,,se,e)se.J9 69.
0
7/a2rr`k''
r(_0()
NA" -eolzflsec2e
2n4.3C L.`
sec..de
n=0(2,-4
6_00 No421
A
iiKs..z_cij
C.r1=0
(211)! "-n(3-46)
where the /4.41P) is given by (7) to (14) of Appendix I, and where
stands for the oscillating part of the isobars, i.e.,
(v)
0,oi
is the oscillating part of the wave profile along the negative part of the x-axis. The expansion given by (346) is suitable for
small values of
Since, for every x,
-e
$ri=o
-riftw )4' L)
GCS (1e0C Se-C.ei s.ec=36k.lzfl-toan29
ars
(les,xsec.e) sec..39 dgmifQ2n9 3
L=0
0°17-""firics.,s(iQ(sec.e)tv)se 6 de.
(3-47)
nT
n=0
0we have also
j
G
The integral may, for different values of r-1 be expressed in terms of
the Bessel function of the second kind. From (2) and
(4)
of Appendix IIwe find that
7/2
n=
0
Icors(e.0(sic.9) se.,...19.d. =
d No()
0
-Tc
Yi
040')(Kox)
4
ceok)
From (2) and (
6)
of Appendix II,n =_- 1
(e,),
e9 f(sp_45G-
Sec.30) s cec. cl=
rvil
lit (x)
Yi (0)1_
Tr
3
yo (v..><)+,-/k)
kxg.
a a ()1
(e.x)
a *At
()i
sec 9) sec_2-6 (AG
From (2) and (9) of Appendix II,
Ith
"R/2_n
taj
ors
Not
sc4 icur,40 se.t.,143ci (scc.79-
2 secs& -1-sec! 61)cos (1c,,* Sec (9)de
o 9
=_LicZydLox) +2c1311(.k)
d X (+Q()
L
(e.x)
(Kx)3
d (ke,x)
=
r r 3
Co
2 L\ (koe
0<004) 210
(4,,()
0e001
y (eA]
28.
( 3-148) ( 3-1490) (3-149):
.aFrom (2) and (12) of Appendix II,
-rck
I
3
l
c,,,., ,et 9j
+.,(2,9 .e.,..16de
=
J(-3e&
+ 3secse -se2
(9)cys secG)de
01--,37Kce,)
,ds-yotido+
d-,A(,k)
I
(ciCkok)
((.>63
ljj' 7 YDS
2520
( IS
G60 _L_5o 4o vy-(,,a
aL\ (lesk)1+ 6 04.43
(K)()3
(k.k)1
-1/(3-50)
and so on. The asymptotic expansion of
X(e)
is given by (14) ofAppendix III. This expression together with (3-48), (3-449) and
(3-50)
gives a suitable formulae from which(x 0
w Z.) can be obtainedfor large values of
We have found an expression for the double integral term of
(3-40
or(3-41)
at K.=0_O)
(2- which is theline along which the term has its maximum absolute value for a given value of z To show how the absolute value of this term falls off with increasing value of
ti
we can use the method used by Havelockin his discussion of the wave profile of a doublet in a stream
[1.
Thus the result of the integration with respect ton
can be expressed interms of the it- or function. Writing down the expansion of this
function for large value of argument and integrating term by term we
obtain, without too much difficulty, the first few terms in the asymptotic
expansion, A more direct method is to write the integral in
n
as thesum of
two integral termsone, a, inwhich
n>
and one,b, in which Se,19 Carrying out the double integration it
will be found that the contribution from the O. is 0 (Z.
k°'/.x)
for large values of In the case ofb
we expand the denominator in a series of ascending powers ofn/(osec.264)
integrating first with respect to In and then with respect to ED we
find the first few terms in the asymptotic expansion,
7/z
4 rn (.39 Tc.n cc,(rdz--11)
flLfl
sec_4(4 ina c2.rv: [121 1/-f1(6k4.+Sx2.17.-f12-212-f(4)] 1)(11[0-.4.(3-S1)
If,If, in addition, we assume that
lzfl
is small in comparison with additional terms may readily be obtained in the asymptotic expansion. Wigley has published a table of values of the integral in(3-51)
and theMathematical Division of the National Physical Laboratory has prepared a table of values of the single integral term of
(341)
PI,
-We shall in the following make use of the velocity potential as given by
(3-17)
or the corresponding velocity potential of ahorizontal doublet. According with the discussion in the beginning of
the present article, the velocity potential due to the perturbation caused by a ship is then given by
C°
qi(hi-f)dL,L4;jsej96a
e
27(.2%,
kj
-+ Sec.G(3-52)
0
where r-1.7-.= (.)c (Z - (7.3 )Cv;
s,
Sis the vertical centre line plane of the ship below the water line and
where
y==-Lp(4,7)
is the equation of the wetted surface of a fine ship.30
k fl)
-( -{)cih.d
It should be remarked, however, that although the method of obtaining the velocity potential of a fine ship by introducing the idea of source and sinks is convenient and descriptive, especially from an engineer's point of view, it is by no means necessary.
§4.
Wave profiles. Let us assume that we have a doublet at (0,0,-f)and that its axis is parallel to the )(- axis. In an infinite fluid the
velocity potential of the doublet can be obtained by taking
(l)k)4)5
(the velocity potential of a source) and substituting NI , the moment of the
doublet, for nn , the strength of the source. Assuming that
Ifl
is sufficiently large we get from (3-17)clpci
Mx_ Mx
,1
or, from (3-15),kCL(Z (1+4)3
cz 't'licer.s(a6a e-271: -7r k-C(LLM +(2 )3-+ Yfr,:et &
Cert
<14
Z100
4-'11'141secOde
7C
1<,,,se,7-(:).-recti 4'34.)
Using (3-28) we find from (4-2) that the wave profile due to
a doublet at and of moment M is
(4-1)
(4-2)
where "z--+ >0, z-f- 0 and c C.4
and where real parts have to be taken,
where .it 0,Q rk(67,-f) S\d(x, 0)
= -
co-4'6 J I e 2T97
icctlz-f) k(Lc7J- A + k,SeCIS 640. M I-e
e... 4. --de
zrzqe-
ct"iii ;fr,7tt
-
Lfr, ) -7C o (14-3)it being understood that it is the limiting real value
when/A
is made to vanish which is to be considered.In this form , the surface elevation, is finite and continuous and the expression can therefore be generalized by
integration over any distribution of doublets. We consider a distribution over a finite length of the vertical plane y=0 and extending downwards from to If
M(h4)
is the moment per unit area atthe point (h)0,-f)
,
then, from (4-3), the surface elevation along theplane
y.0
is given by71 0,,
1
()(,, 0,0)
=
71c,,fOlkIM(kr
)3 fid6
sec"'0
(k-.1)C.crS
is independent of the
f-
ordinate thus()(,),J)=7-cic+1(b) dkidej k-"%Sec1.6
+
Itco
32.
We shall, however, assume that Ni
'
.
Let the graph of Nei to a base of
h
between the stern el and theM(6) bow -4-t consists of
N1(1)
straight lines and
//
\\N
ranges of continuous changing gradient (Fig. 4-1). Let In V) 1)2 1""
leth'
i., 2"
h 1 gradientOh/10,VA
rcg. 4-i.
be junctions at which the straight lines meet and be junctions at which the continuous Changing
changes abruptly.
kt
fekciimeskok)c.-se ( Err, Gik k, 1! ki t4,But NI (4t)
m(4)= 0)
and all the other terms for which the integrationhas been carried out cancel in pairs. Hence, integrating once more with respect to
k
and noting that c1N1/(c)kl is zero along thestraight lines whilst
cit'l/dt-,
is constant we have formally (Fig. 4-2)1 kt
(011
1 +11i -0,1141.14,..+,0 4...4.
) C-GrN3 1,1 LI.I
2 kr,Integrating by parts with respect to
h
we have formally.itvi(o.ei:k(*-1,)co-s 9 mcin) (!k(c--k)c.0-s
e
ki
kt
kn4tMNie
If Li - ni.1 It
I
. co,_e
( j
atm
ik (X -11)CcrS Ocii
---ir
')
l(tCOVe kit V1r, kt+0, 1,0.0 1f
1 ocOciJi)ce,-19-
d mikOt -InOcers 6,
n--t
tu,stat oh
dh
1 .1.d m
V%fro
4,+0
-k
)co-,see.
can t'k(se-k)
cs-1 fardkl-
e
ode% -4- .,i, ,vs,.
4
-dk
E((-1,;,),cfrs
V 11,7- 0 e-fdm
1,2"..:kbc-I.,ti.0
&34.
Gin
6,40
itc(x-t, )co-ze
4
I.dk
1,4() o .*The integration is from stern to bow so that
16.71-0
(dm/c16)
tain oc1i+0
ock0
in terms of theslope of the adjacent parts of the M(k) graph (Fig.
4-2)
The surface elevation ().-4) now becomes
b= 1134'0 7C (111-0) (k, 0) -- 1 stje-de 7t c ks- 0
-o)
k=1; -0
1--+1 Tc.4--Where the first summation covers all points of sudden change of slope
of the M()-graph, including the bow and stern, and where the second
cit,i(11)/dt,.
summation covers all ranges of continuous changing gradient
Since
t
c1-17:(04+0)di
k((- )ca-ye oc) ci ( (7... sece) bQ(),-1A)cb-se
Sec.2:9 39d
(L_
stc's,
/4.A.P.cC9) ki+41-oSak).0
0when the summations cover all points of sudden changes of slope and all ranges of continuous changing slope, equation
(44)
can be writtenand
6r°
-(111-o) ct,tcrt C.rn PR_ . /"'10 k (4- VoSe-L-e Ltc,19)zk(x-
Ips),c..0-3 L.e
(I)
9.Secede
t((e.-ke,see 4.k?,itee)
obz, p(xhtce.re 9
i
1- e.
stjede
1cl
., ,k (k.
I4bS1.e9, -t-ysee 8)
0 _A °yr( qe-cy dtrs Ea )scje)
tqnC4-s(kg.co-sG)
(;01 cy co-1Lsi;v1( ct-co-.09).]k(
ems,e020)
-
Secte
----_0,
36.
(4-7)
There appears
to be
a singularityat
; this is not
really soas will be seen by taking
the real part of the integrand when 71/40
Thus
-1
If the distribution of doublets considered is submerged in an infinite stream, the velocity potential is given by
oo
'cif
I
Wh).(x-h)
c4 .J
(z* Pnr
0
Integrating by parts we have
j)
MN). (k-h) M(k)
Uk-
V01"(z+
ni-32/2
c191EN- 14' -+ yt+
(z, 0%
V2-h 1 -4-
4---II nflchi/dh
2-+WY"'
d
k
since
(t) = 0)
and since all the other terms for whichthe integration has been carried out cancel in pairs.
Hence,
dfrlid
ff91fr2.d
QC, 00MU).(-J)
0 m/c1dk
J
j[6,-
k)14 162-4(z- f)%"]2
EN-lir-
+(2- f
nvz
L(*-6)z-+
1/
-0
JT (114(i))Jk sec.td kt.1+0 )c.e-s -e. K( - Kt, sett& -4 ki ko-D 4-1-1 1,1+0)I
7c4,.(6)
c.4,"(k)Pck-k)db/
2.7Ca L'"" t 111-° 1-1°(1-0)
38.The velocity potential for a corresponding distribution of sources is given by
jciff
c(k)ZtVtd
where G(h) , the source strength per unit area at k--- h2
td= 0,
is assumed to be independent of the
f.-
ordinate.Comparing these two velocity potentials we have that they are
equal if
cim(b)
(k).
(4-8) Making use of (3-10) we finally have that
61'1(1) (.1)
V(h)
(14-9)
since in this case Lid(x) is the equation of the wetted
surface of the ship. Hence, (4-7) can be written in the form )ter-Set
o,
(kr1+°)
J
(ss)
S4c--
(ekt,
SECS+it
Stce) C1K 2.70" ins-0 0M-0)
(4-10
+(z-f)t3A-=
Note that the magnitude of the contribution due to an angular point on the ship is directly proportional to the change of slope that occurs there.
Example 1. Consider now a model Whose half water lines for positivalues
of Y are given by e -ihAs
91
6
)-y- 6
_
tz
ihAsA-a.
I Also41=
, and7
klki4
6
6
6
6
6.1-0 = t- 0-
I
From (14-10)(4-10) and (14-11) we have
-rt CNC>
e6r,o,o)=
srrIL
clef
or - -e)cu..t
9)
2X2a-exj i(e-K,ser-ae [(I
-7c 0
)ce.s
e)- (
-
-
(i-R_
"-0-)ctrIG
Substituting 9,17-
t),
9s., 0( -)
.t.,2.))3.
(4-11)
where
+4.
are measured from bow, stem, forward shoulder and after shoulder respectively and reducing the range of integration with respect to e from -7t, 71.
fo
7t/2 we have0
+
ith
korictafit,
c.6-1 Nk.d. co-se)6
aisa!eciej[0-e
(I- e,
64..Le")
(1-4 Dra 74 )12.-Kt(e-a) ,
K(
eL"te)6)
0 _ Coq9cas
fi-e
1-1-(1-e-
2 ) 4-( k - Iko se_c_t9 If we therefore write A(q.:12.72(.t...e.t)
454 clef{
K(K-Voseje
+t AA'e.
0 7
b
-F-Co()
then the total wave profile becomes
(co
t)
(k4-4(,
-4)-4 (x+. a-))it being 'understood that real parts of (4-13) hate to be taken. We consider R4.4){("9>G17 tb-S fa -.Aar Crt
e
)- (1-
e.)]
eg)404
(4-12)
(4-13)
(4-34)
(4-15)
where?? is a complex variable and equal to k+in Note that we are going,
-bcckcos
+
v..-
sec_e)
0, 0)e
.z.oc
r e..
Consider first the integration along the arc
r
We substitute and ultimately let,f()Lao<
2.
7c
where
Consider the first integral on the right hand side
712.
"Vz
7/2. (..C10( IS
doe,I
1Z-C11.( Tc /a0
0_s 12e"(-0... I o I ei7-44_ 0 0Consider now the second integral on the right hand side. We shall assume
le4-0
i.e.,
,kO.
Noting that St,noC (2.1n.) for 71Z ,we have , thus 7r(2 - co< z./kee. Z.-d do: a. to put tk=0 wherever this
can be done with-out introducing indeterminateness. As contour we we choose the fourth quadrant (Fig. 4-3).
e
0
Ia t.12. _ AI
eec
-C zclodJdo< 6
sea."'_ 01/4. 04, I 00
0te.
-4,\IE0
04 ';.?
e
cld ) (e-to1/41) 0The integrand
or
0-15), has a simple pole at sqwhich is within the contour. Since, the residue of
4cv
is
at a simple pole,we have
residue at 4setQ f;A&ice)
C%0
where we have put pt.T.--0 Bence, using Cauchy' s residue theorem,
ceps G
. L'eda
irrt S
it -,
o,k ()4-kose.,..ze Sec
el
'taX
Ski
.N.001. Sec)1-cfrd.0- ,ei.
e_
n
kg.stc4
k0 Ct2-(5 dL9'.0
for
Cie- O..When c.>0 we
integrate ()4-15) tOund d contour consisting of the*hole of the 14- axis and A large semicircle in the upper half. 12 -plane.
It will readily be seen that the integral round the semicircle tends to
Zci.kesee.. 9
e
- S):(%Corkosec.G.,) sec.2e942.
zero as the radius , provided 00,0
Hence.
I1.ilccr-coce
e
e_
k(K-e.ser.!a+zps,ec.e
S14(k
lc ostc_19 ZitA.S44.e)de
0
for
cif> 0,
Integrating round the first quadrant we have
d<ti,arse .1' 0 I --7-.. Z. Kci, c4,-s!e
d
,'
/,..-0
k-Ce- 1/4,sAct-e-f- itasec e )-Collecting the results0,
it= S2t,
ti,rn eL=4-e-crse 27c 4NI(14
ste a)z.Co+zrTic.0 kc, ses2-9
oo,
co& (rn1(00:,-.ree. 0) ,
0
,0.e
r9 rn (14m)
where we have put.
Or =---icir'Yand
Or- >
.
Also
co-1 (rn Ko
(+ate)
"Alexc. of,...> 0
sec% rr, (1* rn)
` )
1 urcATT Sa.t 43- cfinn(r)2
0 (14-16)(1-17)
for Or> 0.Substitute e---rnk se.2.9 I
hence
cl -- 1/4,3caLts d
oo
(rn koorSet
Sec.,E9 rn (It
-rr, ) 0 )quadrant that
'12 =
Kn.j
814, 2-ics.1:4,1k0 arstc0 Kosee.ta --itete.) oonot-col a
I
I
-(n2-t. kjse.219)1 -43 oc, _z Greets taf
Re_ Vrn ,17 -&Lee _-00
Uvrvte
' at lc. tA--*.01;4(K
s.jia
__CapIn similar
manner.
we find when integrating round the first-
*COS (2, I Oct-jI
Cp-Car e n(n2....1-k,otsam,49) kostc.I.6de
sAc,63ir
for 0( 4 0
.
By integratinground á
Contour consisting of the whole ofthe al-cis and a large semicircle in the lower - plane we have
oo
e
crart
k(t-k,seJe-ty.tstc.e.)
sejta
P
for
Integrating, round the fourth quadrant we have
44.
for
c- >o
0
Also by substituting
\c3 sej
"Re_ rp
-Collecting the results,
I a=
k(e-lcrcec.1-ci-civs,,9)
rac
zec-409oo
1
-
La-1(n',ko(14 rn )
0
tJ").-eirt. Or = (),' airtAA 0,1) 7, 0) ov,-..6
I ccrsfry k,Or
st,
ciry) ( -4..
where Or> 0
We consider the integrals in (4-20) and (4-21). From
(4-18)
(4-21) where we have put Cy...--CA and
Gli>
c".0
k cc-s (rn koCir Sec 9) wifuLr
0
Also
e_ C'>o.
(4-19)
I
61, )k0st,116) re, 04 r, )
caSubstituting these results into (4-13) we have
7t/t
7C /2.,)
00
0
R, lir, rao ___
.!:11.cs14,(e,,ci.l.stce) d G - LI"./A-) 0
ro
k'oyde
... 0 (..) -"'`erIcrn°()'''' ''''9)
clryi,
(4-20)
( I -+ rn )-
-
s(k.or.St.e)
sej-9
1-+ rr, )e
0
(3) Appendix II
Yo(x)=
Gc.,-sk, 4-)C.4.where
x>o
, and soitjz Yo(k)
The first integral term of (4-20) notation introduced by Havelock [9)p
1CIZ )eo
ars
11,,A(.0(4%st.c...e)d
-
V0( kc,01%) d(where the
7-
functions are defined as1V2
?2,q) -=
On' CArS'M e S,...1(p 5,eand 7c/2 szn+1
?
(I))
)JC0-r
5 Cc.t.T(tta) d
'2.n*t(-70('')=
t-) Sec Eii-; scc, GJ(5., 7172. 0can now be written, in a
being an integer (see Appendix III).
then [63
If 0 and '.e(In) 4
jr,(x)
(k in-it) ccrst,where Jr,(k) is Bessel function of the first kind. Hence
7/2.
st;,A(k Ste_S)2e.c6.i6,
Tr46.
(4-22)
(4-23)
(4-24)
(4-25)
2 - 77- Sect3 c..(n(k a)k
-2 (k t9) 7C 0 )0
9)
0 1and roct!
Ici(ifoc)ISec.9de
xn
Jr) (c)-')
k
0 7q2.Jo(ttArrn
nn
= -T7
2
ccseo9da
S'in(Qcvirnsr"-t4_
rn
1-1-But for 4/?..4-Re(r)) 1/2- we have 1,61
where
H()
Struve function,, Hencezit
24sec,9
de
("in'
se' t3)II+ 're\ 0 7/.
r H
-2 c
L no-zoiTC21[K,(4) -Y0(1404)1,
172 oo(ico9rfrnSec-e) (4. 1- co-sc aterSeC,
e)
,onn
r)-
1-v-t (114 Inn) 2.r
'
-47 0 0(/CoCit) d
001,a
0"))
0(4-26)
'using a notation introduded by Wigley [1] (see Appendix III).
Substituting' (4-24) and (4-26) into (4-20) and (4-21) we have
1F-ccy)
L4P,
-
OD( k.:,c41)(4-27)
for 0)t.>
and. 0 is 0-Re, kixy
POO,
ZasItQ (0
for c+(> 0
I
where 'Pcov) is defined by ap--13).We ,Can now
write
down the disturbance associated with the bowl shoulders and stern separately as indicated by (14-13)1, or(V).0)
4 f
A ,yr d 1.(.460,)-{, Q. [ Ck-.1> .ej
(14-,29)0.4)
G e-4413)>
(4-30 (x,o)))(f.s. iksk(11.6
Q
()(-0,) -7*t--0,)e, (4=28) U.(4-31)
kwc\s.to,
oss:41,0 ; 04t)
744 iiirPork,3(cL-k
(14-32)00)(eLt.',,fs.e f; 41'1.40-rot) Dto(ia.+4..4j
44-0. >0)
(14-33)aft)
j4.?Ck, (-etc-4k)]
-
x-a5)3'- > 0, (4-314))
f
itse
bc,o,o)
(S4t/rrlLd
a)._
__-.bQ EK,(.t-hkij
t-1-)e>0
°
that
(4-35)
14..0 0.--00V0
(4-36)
Where C.s. and a's, stands for forward and after shoulders respectively and
Where we have sibstituted for +x' in order to conform to the reference frame Chosen. In these equations stands for the local disturbance or non-oscillating part of the wave profile and is expressible in terms of the
-functions. w stands for the oscillating part of the wave profile,
and is expressible in terms of the -functions. Lastly, kr,t4--C
stands for the sum of the oscillating part and the local disturbance of
the wave profile.
Substituting (4-29), ,
(4-36) in (4-14)
we have that totalwave profile becomes
Z7r
n -10;10,0) 1,1Y,,(L'" IcLi
Lk.(0.k)i
tic(-',-")3
7(.{aivo
_
go [k/?)]
Q.[K. (-k-
- Q01--00c-c..).)(4-37)
where we have introduced the convention that ?z,(-io)
0
ando)(sA.eirn [k (
0J
The
Or function,
by which the local disturbance is expressed, is zero at its origin and increases indefinitely with distance from it.However, the local disturbance as a whole decreases with increasing distance. The total wave profile is given by
(4-37)
is in finite andcontinuous throughout.
Consider the wave profile at a very long distance to the rear
of the model. Since the terms in
(4-37)
tend to cancel each other,i.e., (k) 0,
0 0) ()K, W
values, or from
(4-37)
when >, °J, it follows that
when x takes large negative
4
oc,0;o)
kpc,
0, 0) E - x)JIv. (-
- %Ike
(4-38)
when
In (19) Appendix III it is shown that the predominant term in the asymptotic expansion for
(I')
is
(7/2e
)VLco-1 (T -7/4)Therefore, ultimately when , each U,0) of the four
wave systems becomes a cosine curve of continuously diminishing amplitude and of wave length 27/K, 27Z
c9
which is the natural wave length ofa
free gravity wave travelling at the speed of the ship.Substituting for 9. Q-1) its integral, i.e.,
712.
(e)
ga)we have
(0)0)
46)e
(-(--k)s-ec aj ep]s;,,D-S(-Jc-0,-)s.kc
50 .
(4-39)
1
77-The "velocity potential, 4)' of the perturbation due icy a Slender
ship is given by (3-52). Making use of Theorem II,
gi.3, and
in particularof (3-19),
(3-21)
ani(3-23) we
find that
4--C--f1p.1.7f)
tiffe11.6,,4
-tR,ejc0.s( S.C. 9) Sec:L9d
.0 (.14,14.0when
From
(3-28) we
have that the wave profile at any point far behindthe ship is given by
7th
kof sec%)
o) -1-=1144,01,-f)
dffe
csic
cal( te.
s 6 .sej.G).14%16
0
when. eaQ
Let as consider the mcdel given by ()-11). Integrating
(441)
with respect toand lb
we find that4
2- fit
S7,3 (e-)t)
ISvrV
-
Set t9..) 4DC0 4
ej
0
prja
Ty. c-0.)z. ,
fs]
(K, yisc, 9 ;I:La)
cis
(4-4?)
when
k
-We. notice that
(4-39)
and (4-)42)ate
eqUal-Whet Substitutingin the latter., From the
manner by
which("4-39) was
Obtained we have thatthe first term of
(4-39) and (442),
focused at thebow, is
due to the70.,
ki(xii0)(L..,7-:.
-fit ;4')
4 6'7fi
Xs (4- o,) 06
i.k Cot)Fcth
ask
,
0..ko 'Sec C433(
Z-e
seefe) d e
772
260_2'
Evosec29(xtos
kO.
73 (4-a)
-
Triz,(4-43)
Since we are not to much interested in the absolute value of the integral
as in the values of -the direction angle
0
which contribute most to thevalue of .(4-443) we shall make use of the principle Of stationary phase
in the form. stated. :in Theorem III below
[10]
'Theorem III. If 4.(2) and F-(2) are analytic functions of a complex variable Z. regular. in a domain :containing
C
a segment of the realaxis on which both
fet)
andF(z)
are real, then:(a) if
coo
has no stationary point ina
4.- 46
(contai.nedC )D
Z1c4(k)
via)
ikko..) / I-4-10 (17)
Zk (14.44)
52.
finite angle at the bow, and the second term, focussed at the stern, is clue to the
finite angle at the stern. The two last terms focused at the forward and -J
after Shoulders respectively are due to the finite discontinuity of the
water line ,angle at the forward and after shoulder respectively.
We shall discuss briefly any one of the component patterns of
(4-42), say the first one.. Moving: the origin to the bow we have
,
,
in
F(b)
rl
(b) if To() has
one
stationary value at x=r7c,C ino'--E
(contained inC ),
and if -C\ )> 0) as0(41
k-ccx),
Ia
e
F7x)r
-4/4-yr
PK)e
(+;)
04E
however, -1"(3() C. 0) c(-41 t:leftx; 14. k-fc.c)(i/toz
C`cx)r
Pc.c)ea. -L c"64) E(contained in
C )
and if fu(c4)"---' Oj4""64)*
0;li
ilec(x), e- FF/3)( 6 )1/1r
k-c-(.4)(1-
W3,)' - kif"661, at t=1.3 'k(4-45)
0446)
(4-47)
as --->(c) if
fo)
hasone
stationarypoint
at5c=oc
in Ek
.
If,cbr)
I=je
F-0,)(1
into a finite number of segments in any one of which .c-o,o has either
no stationary point or has only one stationary, Theorem III shows that the most dominant part of
I
..s cx) arises from thosesegments of
C
which contain the stationary points, assuming of coursethat f(() and F-N satisfies the conditions of the theorem.
Returning to
(4-43)
we substitute rccaet and rs.,Jr193Where 7r/1 4=
n)
i.e.,
we consider(4-43)
only for()
positive values of 4, since the profile is by tri-\
cal with respectto the X -axis
(Fig. 4-4).
Ignoring the constants, the
Hence, dividing the range of integration of an integral of type
integral of
(4-43)
becomes54.
(11-48)
(x
co-se
CA, 9)..]dp
i(or can (9es)s.t...9](4-49)
-7/z.
Let or..- be the angle the radius vector makes with the negative
axis of (Fig.
44.4).
Thenof=
and by substitutingco+04.,
=
we have1++ZA
Cos (e
stc,
e)
=
i=
- {(4.,+)
(14-50) C.erse c -c:46 )--tc::1 so thatfo.14._7.1&,fror(to_t)i-i
I
cit(e,t2]
I4tb (i+tt)
j
where and
r
are positive quantities, r being the distance fromthe origin to the point on the free surface at which we consider the
wave pattern.
We shall only consider
(4-51)
whenr
is a very large quantity.Hence the method of the stationary phase as stated in Theorem III may be used to find the first term in the asymptotic expansion of (4-51). The
phase is stationary when