• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

SPaSIO Project Concept Map

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "SPaSIO Project Concept Map"

Copied!
3
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

SPaSIO Project Datasets ©Strategic Partnerships Group, 2013-2018 Dataset: SPaSIO/Research Project Concept Map

Editor: Andriy Tyushka

Authors: Lucyna Czechowska, Agata Domachowska, Karolina Gawron-Tabor,

Joanna Piechowiak-Lamparska, Piotr Pięta, Bartosz Płotka, Bartłomiej Różycki, Andriy Tyushka This is a concept map of the SPaSIO Collaborative Research Project on Strategic Partnerships between States and International Organizations, created with Mindjet MindManager. The concept map appears in both the simplified and extended versions, featuring only main (dependent and independent) variables and indicators or showing all variables, indicators and measures (and their inter-relationships) studied within the project, accordingly.

Data version: 1.0 (August 2018)

SPaSIO Project Datasets were created by Strategic Partnerships Group (SPG) in the framework of implementation of the SPaSIO (“Strategic Partnership between a State and an International Organization: An Ideal Model”) Collaborative Research Project

Funding acknowledgement: The SPaSIO project received funding under the National Science Centre's (Narodowe Centrum Nauki) grant no. UMO-2013/11/D/HS5/01260 (“SONATA 6”) Project implementation phase: August 2014 – August 2018

More information about the research team and the project itself can be found at www.spg.umk.pl Dataset Contents:

SPaSIO Concept Map – Simplified Variables View

SPaSIO Concept Map – Detailed Variables, Indicators and Measures View

Citation: SPG (2018e). SPaSIO Project Concept Map. Available at: http://www.spg.umk.pl/datasets/

SPaSIO Project Datasets by SPaSIO Collaborative Research Project ('Strategic Partnerships between States and International Organizations) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

(2)

STRATEGIC PARNERSHIPS

SPaSIO MODEL

DV1: COOPERATION WILLINGNESS

partnership legal basis and legalization level

partnership legal basis partnership legalization level

partnership age

effective partnership age partnership current status

cooperation basis

cooperation domains comprehensiveness average annual qty of all bilateral manifestos

partnership development dynamics

DV2: COOPERATION SUSTAINABILITY

open-ended character of cooperation

SP temporal scope

character of cooperation goals

commitment

unilateral institutional commitment intensity and scope of joint activities

challenge resistance

resistance to external challenge(s) resistance to internal challenge(s)

IntV: TRUST

mutual understanding

mutual-understanding promoting institutions mutual-understanding promoting activities

faux pas or insulting demarches

mutual respect

mutual respect for cultural diversity deliberation and decision-making parity

partner-interest undermining practices or broken promises

IV1: STRATEGIC GOALS CONVERGENCE

goals/issues convergence scope

qty all most salient goals/issues qty overlapping goals/issues

qty complementary goals/issues

qty competing/compatible goals/issues

goals/issues convergence degree

goals/issues proximity degree

goals/issues adjusted proximity degree

goals/issues convergence direction

positive goals/issues convergence (vectorial concurrence) negative goals/issues convergence (vectoral divergence)

IV2: STRATEGIC ROLES CONVERGENCE

international roles proximity

(PIPR-metrical Euclidean distance measure, r)

power influence presence

strategic relevance

strategic actor-system narratives convergence

IV3: UNIQUE BONDS

shared values

references to common values in manifestos

shared or similar experiences

references to shared or similar experiences in manifestos

developed personal diplomacy lack/occurrence of personal bonds

IV4: REGULARIZED BILATERAL STRATEGIC INTERACTIONISM

foreign-political interaction regularization

joint bodies

a) qty of joint bodies b) functions of joint bodies standardized meetings

dispute settlement mechanism

foreign-political interaction intensification

contact levels contact frequency informal interactions

(3)

STRATEGIC PARNERSHIPS

SPaSIO MODEL

DV1: COOPERATION WILLINGNESS

partnership legal basis and legalization level

partnership legal basis SP-founding document [1]

No SP-founding document [0]

partnership legalization level

bilateral intl. agreement: x >1 [+2]

bilateral action plan: x >1 [+1]

bilateral declaration: x >1 [+1]

none of the above manifestos [0]

partnership age

effective partnership age

76%-100% effective age/general age scale: [4]

51%-75% effective age/general age scale: [3] 26%-50% effective age/general age scale: [2] 1%-25% effective age/general age scale: [1]

partnership current status existing partnership: [1]

partnership not existing any more: [0]

cooperation basis

cooperation domains comprehensiveness cooperation domains: x > 1 [1]

cooperation domains: x = 1 [0]

average annual qty of all bilateral manifestos

qty manifestos/year: x > 7: [4] qty manifestos/year: 6 < x < 7: [3.5] qty manifestos/year: 5 < x < 6: [3] qty manifestos/year: 4 < x < 5: [2.5] qty manifestos/year: 3 < x < 4: [2] qty manifestos/year: 2 < x < 3: [1.5] qty manifestos/year: 1 < x < 2: [1] qty manifestos/year: 0.5 < x < 1: [0.5] qty manifestos/year: x < 0.5: [0]

partnership development dynamics

qty partnership upgrades: x > 4: [4]

qty partnership upgrades: x = 3: [3] qty partnership upgrades: x = 2: [2] qty partnership upgrades: x = 1: [1] qty partnership upgrades: x = 0: [0]

DV2: COOPERATION SUSTAINABILITY

open-ended character of cooperation

SP temporal scope non-time-limited: cooperation [1]

time-limited cooperation: [0]

character of cooperation goals milestone goals: [1]

finalité goals: [0]

commitment

unilateral institutional commitment

financial commitment: [+1]

policy coordination officer/department: [+1]

diplomatic representation: [+1]

other institutions: [+1]

no institutional commitment: [0]

intensity and scope of joint activities

high intensity and broad scope: [3]

medium intensity and moderate scope: [2]

low intensity and narrow scope: [1]

challenge resistance

resistance to external challenge(s)

loyalty to partner's external challenge(s): [1]

little to no loyalty to partner's external challenge(s): [0]

resistance to internal challenge(s)

solved internal crisis/crises: [1]

no internal crisis/crises: [0]

unresolved internal crisis/crises: [-1]

IV2: STRATEGIC ROLES CONVERGENCE

international roles proximity

(PIPR-metrical Euclidean distance measure, r)

power

a) status of power

global actor: [3]

major regional actor: [2] minor regional actor: [1]

b) type of power

structural power: [4] normative power: [3] soft power: [2]

hard (ordinary) power: [1]

influence

a) size of territory (sq m) b) size of population (no.) c) size of GDP (USD, current)

d) share of actor's GDP in world GDP e) GDP growth (annual, %)

f) military expenditure (USD, current)

g) military expenditure (% of GDP) presence a) geographical: [+1] b) diplomatic presence: [+1] c) economical: [+1] d) military: [+1] e) socio-cultural: [+1] strategic relevance

scholarly attribution of salience

to a given S/IO's 'strategic relevance' (EBSCO ASC n-gram)

strategic actor-system narratives convergence

high-level convergence: [3] moderate-level convergence: [2] low-level convergence: [1] IV1: STRATEGIC GOALS CONVERGENCE

goals/issues convergence scope

qty all most salient goals/issues qty overlapping goals/issues

qty complementary goals/issues

qty competing/compatible goals/issues

goals/issues convergence degree

goals/issues proximity degree (r similarity score for S vs IO)

goals/issues adjusted proximity degree

a) (r similarity scores for S vs S-IO) b) (r similarity scores for IO vs S-IO)

goals/issues convergence direction

positive goals/issues convergence (vectorial

concurrence) ("+" value of r similarity score for S vs IO) negative goals/issues

convergence (vectoral

divergence) ("-" value of r similarity score for S vs IO)

IV4: REGULARIZED BILATERAL STRATEGIC INTERACTIONISM

foreign-political interaction regularization

joint bodies

a) qty of joint bodies

qty > 11: [3]

qty = 6-10: [2] qty = 1-5: [1]

no joint bodies: [0]

b) functions of joint bodies

policymaking: [3]

policy coordination: [2]

consultation: [1]

no joint bodies: [0]

standardized meetings

regular meetings and a fixed formula: [1]

regular meetings or a fixed

formula: [0.5]

no regular meetings and fixed

formulas: [0]

dispute settlement mechanism

joint conciliation body: [3]

joint consultation mechanism: [2]

external dispute settlement

mechanism: [1]

no dispute settlement mechanism: [0]

foreign-political interaction intensification

contact levels

a) contact levels comprehensiveness

meetings at all 4 levels: [3]

meetings at 3 levels: [2]

meetings at 2 levels: [1]

meetings at only 1 level or none at all: [0]

b) the prevailing contact level

mainly specialist level: [4]

mainly lower-rank executive level: [3]

mainly higher-rank executive level: [2]

mainly parliamentary level: [1]

contact frequency

high annual average of

meetings: [3]

moderate annual average of

meetings: [2]

low annual average of meetings: [1]

informal interactions

occurrence of informal interactions: [1]

non-occurrence of informal

interactions: [0]

IV3: UNIQUE BONDS

shared values

references to common values in manifestos

yes: [1]

no: [0]

shared or similar experiences

references to shared or similar experiences in manifestos

references to positive experiences: [1]

no references: [0]

references to negative experiences: [-1]

developed personal diplomacy lack/occurrence of personal bonds

occurrence of identifiable positive personal bonds: [1]

lack of identifiable personal bonds: [0]

occurrence of identifiable negative personal links: [-1]

IntV: TRUST

mutual understanding

mutual-understanding promoting institutions

joint institution(s): [3]

both partners' individual institutions: [2] only one partner's promo

institution: [1]

one partner's promo institution covering another partner in wider regional scope: [0.5] no institutions: [0]

mutual-understanding promoting activities

both partners' periodical activities: [2]

one partner's periodical activities: [1]

partner's/partners' incidental activities: [0.5]

no initiatives: [0]

faux pas or insulting demarches

no faux pas or insulting demarches: [1] at least one faux pas: [0]

at least one insulting demarche: [-1]

mutual respect

mutual respect for cultural diversity

manifested in SP-founding document: [3]

not featured in SP-founding document: [0]

deliberation and decision-making parity

manifested parity: [3] missing parity: [0]

partner-interest undermining practices or broken promises

no interest-undermining

practices or broken promises: [0] manifested interest-undermining practices or broken promises: [-2]

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Drugim sposobem opisywania uciekinierów jest przedstawianie ich jako osoby, które pragną jedynie wykorzystać status uchodźcy, aby pozostać w Polsce i zarabiać.. Jak wiadomo,

Wanneer geheel nieuwe langs- of dwarsdammen zouden moeten worden aangelegd, dan blijkt uit tabel 2 dat er diverse varianten bestaan, die volgens de methode van de Netto Contante

First of all, currently there is no clear strategy (at least not publicly announced) that places the airport in a competitive position on the market; secondly, Portugal is not able

[r]

Przeprowadzane analizy empiryczne potwierdziły występowanie zależności pomiędzy wskaźnikiem wzrostu gospodarczego a spreadem stóp procentowych oraz poziom em inflacji

W przypadku prac zbiorowych po tytule przywołanego tekstu następuje w: (bez nawiasów prostokątnych), tytuł opracowania zbiorowego pisany kursywą oraz inicjał imienia i

The method can be used in multi- stage projects where there is free choice of the start of the next phases of the project, which creates a Real Option situation.. The starting the

In December 2014, Viktor Orbán viewed the signing of an agreement on the construction of the Budapest–Belgrade rail line as a signal of reaching “the most important milestone of