SURVEY OF PAPYRI 175
G u s t a v B r a u n e c k e r , Ein Monorecaiiton aus dem späten fünften oder beginnenden sechsten Jahrhundert nach Christi und eine
byzantynische Streitbeendigung durch Vergleich in den Pap. Graec. Vindob. 32015. und 25923. (Festschrift Artur Seiniventer p p . 1 3 9 - 1 5 2 ) .
T h e f i r s t d o c u m e n t is a receipt of a special t y p e (s.c. μονορεκαυ-τον; cf. on t h i s question C. W e s s e 1 y , W. St. 24 (1902) 138 a n d t h e c o m m e n t a r y of t h e editor) issued b y t w o optiones t o t h e e p i m e -lete of H c r m u p o l i s Magna in a c k n o w l e d g e m e n t of t h e delivery of 2370 a r t a b a e of w h e a t for an a r m y - d e t a c h e m e n t passing t h a t w a y . F r o m t h e legal p o i n t of view t h i s i n t e r e s t i n g d o c u m e n t is a practical a p p l i c a t i o n of N o v . J u s t . 130, 1 (de transitu militum). T h e second d o c u m e n t p r e s e n t s a new case of s e t t l e m e n t of a p r i v a t e q u a r r e l t h r o u g h t h e conclusion of διάλνσι,ς — a g r e e m e n t (see M o-d r z e j e w s k i , JJP 6, 254 ff.; t o t h e f o r m u l a in t h e διάλυσις-a g r e e m e n t see T διάλυσις-a u b e n s c h l διάλυσις-a g , Lδιάλυσις-aw2 405 a n d t h e sources cited t h e r e ) . I t is w o r t h while to p o i n t o u t t h a t t h e d o c u m e n t was erroneously d a t e d b y t h e n o t a r y .
T h e t w e l f t h y e a r of t h e reign of t h e E m p e r o r Maurikios (August 593 — A u g u s t 594) h a d no one d a y c o m m o n w i t h t h e t h i r t e e n t h indictio, which b e g a n 1.9.594 A . D . T h e error is explained b y t h e f a c t , t h a t a p a r t of t h e protocol h a d b e e n w r i t t e n prior t o t h e d a t e of issue of t h e d o c u m e n t (20.X.594 A.D.). [ H . K . ]
J a n — Olof Τ j ä d e r , Ein Verhandlungsprotokoll aus dem Jahre 433 п. Chr. Pommersfelden, Lat. Pap. 14 recto (Scriptorium. Intern. Rev. of Manuscript Stud. X I I (1958) p p . 3—43 + 2 plates). This p a p y r u s (now in t h e collection S c h ö n b o r n - W i e s e n t h e i d , Schloss Weissenstein ob P o m m e r s f e l d e n , B a y e r n ) which originates p r o b a b l y f r o m B a v e n n a c o n t a i n s a f r a g m e n t of a judicial protocol. T h e p a r t i e s i n t h e lawsuit are a c h u r c h r e p r e s e n t e d b y t h e n o t a r y Contius a n d a p r i v a t e person. D u r i n g one of t h e earlier stages of t h e lawsuit t h e c h u r c h a p p l i e d t o t h e e m p e r o r f o r decision. On a suc-cesive h e a r i n g , t h e protocol of which is c o n t a i n e d in t h e P a p . L a t . 14 recto, t h e r e s c r i p t a n d t h e w r i t t e n cautio of t h e d e f e n d a n t are e n t e r e d in t h e acts (acta, gesta) of t h e l a w s u i t . T h e editor J . O. T j ä d e r , w h o h a s given u s an excellent edition of t h e Nichtliterarischen
176 С· KUNDEREWICZ — H . KUPISZEWSKI — A. ŚWIDEREK
Lat. Pap. Italiens, has provided this document with an unusually
rich philological commentary as well as with an index of vocabula which appear in it. [H.K.]
A. G r o h m a n , Greek Papyri of the Early Islamic Period in the
Collection of Archduke Rainer (Études de Papyrologie, t. VIII
(1957) pp. 5 - 4 0 , pl. 7).
The texts here published on the basis of С. Wessely's reading are important for the history of Egypt, because they contain many items of valuable information about the Arab period. No. 1
(un-dated) is a demand-note for payment in cash. No. 2 (642 A.D.) — an acknowledgement of the delivery of corn for the embola. No. 3 (642 A.D.) — a receipt of a loan. No. 4 (643 A.D.) — an order for a delivery of corn and oil. No. 5 (643 A.D.) and 6 (643 A.D.) are the orders for deliveries of provisions. No. 7 (647 A.D.) is a decla-ration of receipt of various articles. No. 8 (642 A.D.) — a decladecla-ration of receipt of horses. No. 9 (653 A.D.) — a tax-receipt issued for the inhabitants of Phys. No. 10 (VII — V I I I cent.) — an assessment of the public gold-taxes for the village of Magdolon. No. 11 (VII cent.) — a receipt for the public gold-taxes paid by the people of Kerkesouchos Oros. No. 12 (VII cent.) — a tax receipt. No. 13 (VIII cent.) — a demand-note for a part-payment of wages to the sailors of the Arab fleet. All the texts have been discovered in Ehnâs or in K ô m el-Haryâne (Fayûm). [С.К.]
COPTIC PAPYRI
P. V. J e r η s t e d t, Dva administativnykh koptskikh pisma
arabskogo vremeni (Palestinskiy Sbornik 4 (67) 1959 pp. 5 —11).
The author publishes two Coptic official letters from the Arab period. The first papyrus was subsequently published in the edition of the Coptic texts of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow (No. 15; cf. p. 180 of our Survey). The second document — a Coptic papyrus, facsimile of which had been published by F. Rossi (cf. I papiri copti del Muzeo Egizio di Torino, v. I, tav. IV, Torino, 1887) — is here for the first time read, translated into Russian and commented. This letter written by a pagarch concerns a charge
