Verteporfin inhibits growth of human glioma in vitro without light activation

(1)

Verteporfin inhibits growth of

human glioma in vitro without light activation

Ahmad Al-Moujahed

¹

, Katarzyna Brodowska

¹

, Tomasz P. Stryjewski

¹

, Nikolaos E. Efstathiou

¹

, Ioannis Vasilikos

²

, Joanna Cichy

³

, Joan W. Miller

¹

, Evangelos Gragoudas

¹

&

Demetrios G. Vavvas

¹

Verteporfin (VP), a light-activated drug used in photodynamic therapy for the treatment of choroidal neovascular membranes, has also been shown to be an effective inhibitor of malignant cells. Recently, studies have demonstrated that, even without photo-activation, VP may still inhibit certain tumor cell lines, including ovarian cancer, hepatocarcinoma and retinoblastoma, through the inhibition of the YAP- TEAD complex. In this study, we examined the effects of VP without light activation on human glioma cell lines (LN229 and SNB19). Through western blot analysis, we identified that human glioma cells that were exposed to VP without light activation demonstrated a downregulation of YAP-TEAD-associated downstream signaling molecules, including c-myc, axl, CTGF, cyr61 and survivin and upregulation of the tumor growth inhibitor molecule p38 MAPK. In addition, we observed that expression of VEGFA and the pluripotent marker Oct-4 were also decreased. Verteporfin did not alter the Akt survival pathway or the mTor pathway but there was a modest increase in LC3-IIB, a marker of autophagosome biogenesis. This study suggests that verteporfin should be further explored as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors^{1, 2}. Histopathologically, they are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, mixed oligoastrocytoma, and ependymoma with glioblastoma (WHO astrocytoma grade IV) being the most common adult glioma^{1, 2}. In the eye, optic nerve gliomas (ONGs) comprise 2–5% of all pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors and are the most common CNS tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)³.

Signs and symptoms of gliomas depend on the site of CNS that is affected. For instance, brain gliomas cause headache, vomiting, and seizures¹, while the presenting clinical signs of ONGs include mild to profound vision loss, proptosis, optic disk swelling or pallor, ophthalmoplegia, and strabismus^4–8. Gliomas are rarely curable and the prognosis of patients with high grade gliomas is usually poor^{1, 2}. Neither surgery, chemotherapy, nor radiation has been demonstrated to prolong survival in cases of malignant optic nerve glioma^4–8. Moreover, even in cases of low grade glioma in children, treatment is associated with significant morbidity, with risks including iatrogenic damage to the optic nerve, cortical atrophy, degenerative vascular changes and increased incidence of secondary tumors⁹.

A recent experimental innovation in cancer therapy has been the use of porphyrins, which are organic het- erocyclic molecules consisting of four modified pyrrole units interconnected via methane bridges¹⁰. A unique feature of porphyrins is their ability to act as photosensitizers¹⁰. One clinical application of porphyrins in the eye is through photodynamic therapy (PDT), a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved intervention to treat discrete subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes secondary to age related macular degeneration¹¹. PDT involves intravenously administering verteporfin (trade name Visudyne), which accumulates in neovascular sub- retinal vessels, and is then activated upon exposure to 693 nm, low-energy, nonthermal infrared laser. Activation of verteporfin (VP) produces free radicals in the abnormal vessels resulting in their destruction through multiple mechanisms including a direct cytotoxic effect, promotion of vascular thrombosis, as well as an immune

1Retina Service, Angiogenesis Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, USA. ²University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. ³Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. Ahmad Al-Moujahed and Katarzyna Brodowska contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.G.V. (email: vavvas@meei.harvard.edu) Received: 13 February 2017

Accepted: 28 June 2017 Published: xx xx xxxx

OPEN

(2)

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

mediated effect. The highly localized effect spares the overlying fovea and retinal pigment epithelium. Since its first application, its use has expanded worldwide and has preserved vision in tens of thousands of patients¹².

More recently, PDT has also been experimentally used as a light-based therapeutic modality for several human malignancies^13–17. It has been proposed that the therapeutic mechanism of treating malignancies with VP is not only through its light-activated destruction of neovascular vessels, but also as a possible inducer of apoptosis or autophagy in malignant cells¹⁸.

Yes Associated Protein (YAP), a candidate oncogene on the human chromosome 11q22 amplicon, and component of the Hippo-pathway has been associated with human tumorigenesis^19–21. In addition, high YAP nuclear levels are present^22–24 and have been linked to chemoresistance^25–28 in various cancer types. YAP works as a transcriptional coactivator and binds to several DNA-binding transcription factors; the best characterized have been the TEAD family of transcription factors²⁹. Recent studies have shown that VP may disrupt the YAP-TEAD complex and inhibit growth of hepatocellular carcinoma and ovarian cancer without light activation^{10, 30}. In addition, we recently demonstrated verteporfin’s ability to interfere with the YAP-TEAD signaling pathway, resulting in a downregulation of proto-oncogenes, molecules involved in angionesesis and cell migration, and a reduction in the pluripotency cell marker Oct-4³¹. Drugs that disrupt YAP-TEAD interaction can have selective effects on malignant cells with minimal toxicity on the surrounding healthy tissues because this pathway is usually not active in normal tissues. This makes these drugs an attractive potential novel therapeutic option. Given the recently characterized role of YAP expression in human glioblastoma^{32, 33} and the need to identify less toxic and more effective therapies for this deadly cancer, we investigated the effects of non-light activated VP on human glioma cells.

Materials and Methods

Reagents.

Verteporfin (Visudyne) was obtained from Novartis (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St.Louis, MO, USA). The following primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA) and were diluted 1:1000 unless stated otherwise: c-myc, axl, phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (Ser235/236), phospho-4EBP1 (Thr37/46), LC3B, phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182), 4-Oct, survivin, pAkt (S473) (1:2000).

The following antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, Texas, USA): cyr61 (1:500), VEGFA (1:500), CTGF (1:500).

Cell culture.

Human glioma cell lines LN229 and SNB19 were purchased from Leibniz Institute DSMZ German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Lines (Leibniz, Germany) and were grown in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (ATCC), penicillin (100 μg/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), 10 mM HEPES (all obtained from Invitrogen). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO₂ and split when the cells reached approximately 80%

confluence. Cells were continuously protected from light (by the use of aluminum foil) and all experiments were performed in darkness.

Assessment of growth curves.

The cells were seeded in 6-well plates with approximately 100 000 cells per well. One day later, verteporfin was added (final concentrations 2 µg/ml or 10 µg/ml) and cells were incubated for 3 and 6 days. At days 2, 4 and 6, cell number and viability were determined by the trypan blue (0.4%) dye exclusion method. Growth curves were drawn.

Measurement of cell growth and viability by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)- 2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) assay.

Cell viability was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)- 2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The MTT assay is used to measure the reduction of a tetrazolium compound by the cellular mitochondria, which produces the optically active compound formazan.

Cells were cultured in 96-well plates at an amount of 10 000 cells per well. After 3 and 6 days of treatment with VP, MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well at a 1/10 volume. Cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C and resuspended in DMSO. The absorbance at 595 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Data are displayed as percentage of control.

Protein extraction and western blot analysis.

Cells were incubated for 24 hours in the presence of VP at concentrations of 2 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml. Control cells were treated with PBS. The samples were lysed in M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo-Scientific, Rockford, IL USA) supplemented with protease (as per manufacturer recommendation; Roche Applied Science) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (dilution 1:50;

Thermo-Scientific, Pierce Protein Research Products). All cells and samples were continuously protected from light.

Ten micrograms of total protein were loaded onto 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (NuPAGE; Invitrogen). Electrophoresis was performed in darkness using NuPAGE MOPS Running Buffer (Invitrogen) and then samples were transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After transfer, the membranes were stained with Coomassie blue to ensure equal loading, and then blocked for 45 minutes at room temperature in 5% wt/vol BSA followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C with the above listed rabbit anti-human primary antibodies. Then the membranes were washed three times with 1xTBS 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature with the horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary anti-rabbit antibody at 1:50000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). The immunoreactive bands were visualized with ECL exposure onto Fuji RX film (Fujifilm,Tokyo, Japan). The results were quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) relative to Coomassie blue staining as a loading control.

Statistical analysis.

Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical signifi- cance was evaluated using the one-way ANOVA test with Dunnett’s modification for multiple means comparison

(3)

or a t-test for two mean comparisons. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Two-tailed tests were used for all comparisons.

Results

Verteporfin inhibits cell growth and viability of human glioma cell lines.

To determine if VP inhibits human glioma cell growth and proliferation without light activation, we analyzed its effect on the growth of human glioma cell lines LN229 and SNB19. The cell lines were exposed to one of three arms: VP 2 µg/ml, VP 10 µg/ml, or a placebo group with a vehicle control. Cells were continuously protected from light. Both verteporfin exposed cell lines demonstrated dose-dependent decrease in cell growth as measured by trypan blue exclusion testing (Fig. 1A,B). Similarly, a statistically significant inhibition of cell growth and viability was observed in verteporfin treated cells using the MTT assay (Fig. 1C,D).

VP affects YAP-TEAD signaling pathway in human glioma cells.

We next examined whether cells exposed to VP had a change in the expression of genes regulated by TEAD. At 24 hours, cells treated with VP (2 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml) demonstrated a dose-dependent downregulation of pro-proliferative molecules that are affected by a YAP-TEAD interaction, including c-myc, axl, survivin, cyr-61 and CTGF (Fig. 2A–E).

VP down-regulates VEGFA expression and pluripotency marker Oct-4 in human glioma cells.

It has been previously shown that TEAD is involved in VEGF, a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer, expression via interaction with Vestigial-like (Vgll) transcription coactivators³⁴. We demonstrated using western blot analyses that a dose-dependent decrease of VEGFA-expression was observed in glioma cells that were exposed to VP (Fig. 3A). OCT-4, a pluripotency cell marker that is expressed in cancer cells including cancer stem cell subpopulations, has been shown to be highly expressed in human gliomas and this expression increases in parallel with increasing glioma grades³⁵. The YAP-TEAD pathway has also been shown to interact with OCT-4³⁶. Our finding that VP causes a downstream decrease in YAP-TEAD pathway associated molecules prompted us to test the effect of VP on OCT-4 in glioma cells. Our results show that exposure of the glioma cells to VP is associated with a reduction in OCT 4 (Fig. 3B).

VP activates p38 MAPK in human glioma cells.

A major regulator of the cell cycle and apoptosis are mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs)¹⁷, and p38 MAPK activation is associated with an inhibition of tumor growth. In our study, exposure of glioblastoma cells to VP was also associated with induced expression of p38 MAPK (Fig. 4).

Figure 1. Verteporfin (VP) inhibits growth of glioblastoma LN229 and SNB19 without light activation.

Glioblastoma cell lines (SNB19 and LN229) were treated with vehicle (PBS), 2 µg/ml VP or 10 µg/ml of VP for 2,4, and 6 days (A,B) or 3 and 6 days (C,D) protected from light at all steps. (A,B) Cell growth curves as determined by trypan blue exclusion counting. VP treatment resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth. (N = 3, error bars are SE, *p < 0.5 (C,D) Cell viability assessed by MTT assay. Results expressed as percentage of growth (%) relative to control values. (N = 3, error bars are SE, ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.5).

(4)

VP does not affect the mTOR pathway while it slightly increases LC3-IIB protein levels in human glioma cells.

Recently it was determined that YAP mediates crosstalk between the Hippo and PI(3) K–mTOR pathways and activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which is a major regulator of cell growth¹⁹. Western blots of whole cell lysates showed that VP treatment does not affect the phosphorylation status of ribosomal S6, p4EBP1 protein (Fig. 5A,B), or Akt Ser 473 (Fig. 5C). VP treatment led to a small increase in LC3-IIB protein levels in glioblastoma cells (Fig. 5D).

Discussion

Despite the recent advances, malignant glioma remains a disease that results in death within a short period of time. In addition, in the pediatric population, treatment of benign glioma is associated with significant morbidity, underscoring the need for new targets and less toxic therapies. In this study, we demonstrate that human glioblas- toma cell growth is inhibited in vitro when exposed to VP without the presence of light activation. VP may have a direct inhibitory effect on retinoblastoma, hepatocarcinoma, and ovarian cancer cells growth via disruption of the YAP-TEAD complex and the prevention of YAP-induced oncogenic growth^{10, 30, 31}. YAP has been identified as a transcription coactivator that binds several transcription factors, including TEAD that is crucial for cellular development and cancer progression²⁹. TEAD can also interact with multiple other coactivators that play an important role in cancer progression, such as Vgll proteins that upregulate the expression of VEGFA gene, the pro-angiogenic factor involved in cancer pathogenesis³⁴. TEADs and their coactivators facilitate the progression of many cancers, including glioblastoma, through the upregulation of genes mediated by YAP, including c-myc, survivin, Axl, CTGF and Cyr61^{37, 38}. The function of these genes is to promote cellular proliferation, tumor cell invasion, inhibition of apoptosis, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition^39–42. In our study VP treatment was associated with downregulation of these procancer proteins as well as downregulation of the proangi- ogenic protein VEGF.

In addition to VP’s effects on pathways that promote cancer growth, treatment of glioblastoma cells with VP was also associated with an increased expression of LC3IIB, a marker of autophagosome biogenesis.

Accumulation of autophagosome may represent either autophagy induction or, alternatively, suppression of the autophagy pathway downstream of autophagosome formation⁴³. In fact, Donohue E et al. showed that VP is a late stage autophagy inhibitor in MCF-7 cells⁴⁴. Autophagy, the process of degrading unnecessary cellular proteins Figure 2. Verteporfin (VP) downregulates several members of the YAP-TEAD effectors in glioblastoma cells.

SNB19 and LN229 cells were treated with vehicle (C), 2 µg/ml of VP (L) or 10 µg/ml of VP (H) for 24 hours protected from light at all steps. Western blot of protein extracts were probed for (A) c-myc, (B) axl, (C) survivin, (D) cyr-61, and (E) CTGF. Cropped blots are shown. Quantification of the blots relative to Coomassie blue staining, as a loading control, is on the right. (Experiment repeated 3 times, representative blot is shown here).

(5)

and organelles through the actions of lysosomes, can be an appropriate response to stress and promote survival, but persistent stress can lead to autophagic (or programmed type II) cell death⁴⁵. Therefore, the increased expression of LC3IIB suggests that verteporfin may affect cancer autophagic cell death, but this effect could be different among different cancer types and different experimental conditions. VP has been shown to induce, in a non-light dependent mechanism, the formation of cross-linked oligomers and high molecular weight protein complexes (HMWC) that could interfere with autophagy and cancer cell growth^{46, 47}. More recently, our group showed that the prevalence of at least some HMWCs is likely due to the presence of ambient light during post-lysis analysis⁴⁸. Our data in the current study suggests that the observed downregulation of some YAP-TEAD-associated downstream signaling molecules in darkness is not due to HMWC formation (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2) and that VP may have direct effects on some cancer growth pathways.

An anti-proliferative effect of verteporfin on human glioblastoma cells was also observed through activation of p38 MAPK, which has been implicated in the inhibition of tumor growth⁴⁹. Activation of p38 MAPK induces apoptosis in multiple cancer cell lines, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and hepatoma cells⁵⁰, and also promotes the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway⁵¹. We therefore suggest that p38 may mediate VP’s effect on glioblastoma cells. Interestingly, VP treatment of human glioblastoma cells did not affect Akt or mTOR pathway, which is in contrast to our prior results on the effect of VP on human retinoblastoma³¹. This is a surprising finding because YAP mediates crosstalk between the Hippo and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling Figure 3. Verteporfin (VP) inhibits expressions of VEGFA and OCT-4 in glioblastoma cells. SNB19 and LN229 cells were treated with vehicle (C), 2 µg/ml of VP (L) or 10 µg/ml of VP (H) for 24 hours protected from light at all steps. Western blot of protein extracts were probed for (A) VEGFA, (B) pluripotency marker OCT-4.

Cropped blots are shown. Quantification of the blots relative to Coomassie blue staining, as a loading control, is on the right. (Experiment repeated 3 times, representative blot is shown here).

Figure 4. Verteporfin (VP) activates p38 MAPK glioblastoma cells. SNB19 and LN229 cells were treated with vehicle (C), 2 µg/ml of VP (L) or 10 µg/ml of VP (H) for 24 hours protected from light at all steps. Western blot of protein extracts showed that VP treatment induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK in a dose-dependent manner. Cropped blots are shown. Quantification of the blots relative to Coomassie blue staining, as a loading control, is on the right. (Experiment repeated 3 times, representative blot is shown here).

(6)

pathways and it activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), signaling pathways that are important for the promotion of tumor proliferation, migration, and apoptosis^{40–42, 49}.

Additionally in this study we found that verteporfin downregulated the pluripotent marker Oct-4, a transcription factor that is expressed in cancer stem cells and in human glioma cells³⁵. This builds on our prior work that suggests that targeting OCT-4 may beneficial in treating some cancers and supports suggested role of YAP/TEAD signaling pathway in pluripotency³¹.

In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that verteporfin can inhibit growth and proliferation of human glioma cells without any light activation in vitro and that this inhibition of cell growth correlates with downreg- ulation of some YAP/TEAD-associated downstream signaling molecules. It also shows for the second time that Verteporfin may interfere with pluripotency marker OCT-4. Our study supports the role of VP as a potential therapy for multiple solid tumors, such as retinoblastoma, hepatocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, and glioma. Further studies are needed to elucidate the exact mechanism of VP action and supports further exploration in animal research.

References

1. Richard, D. et al. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet 379, 1984–1996 (2012).

2. Goodenberger, M. L. & Jenkins, R. B. Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genetics 205, 613–621 (2012).

3. Czyzyk, E., Jóźwiak, S., Roszkowski, M. & Schwartz, R. A. Optic pathway gliomas in children with and without neurofibromatosis 1.

J Child Neurol 18, 471–478 (2003).

4. Nair, A. G., Pathak, R. S., Iyer, V. R. & Gandhi, R. A. Optic nerve glioma: an update. Int Ophthalmol 34, 999–1005 (2014).

5. Friedrich, R. E. & Nuding, M. A. Optic Pathway Glioma and Cerebral Focal Abnormal Signal Intensity in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Characteristics, Treatment Choices and Follow-up in 134 Affected Individuals and a Brief Review of the Literature. Anticancer Res 36, 4095–4121 (2016).

6. Traber, G. L. et al. Malignant optic glioma - the spectrum of disease in a case series. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 1187–1194 (2015).

7. Rasool, N., Odel, J. G. & Kazim, M. Optic pathway glioma of childhood. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28, 289–295 (2017).

8. Wabbels, B. et al. Unilateral adult malignant optic nerve glioma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242, 741–748 (2004).

9. Parsa, C. F. et al. Spontaneous regression of optic gliomas: thirteen cases documented by serial neuroimaging. Archives of Ophthalmology 119, 516–529 (2001).

10. Liu-Chittenden, Y. et al. Genetic and pharmacological disruption of the TEAD-YAP complex suppresses the oncogenic activity of YAP. Genes & Development 26, 1300–1305 (2012).

11. Agostinis, P. et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update. CA Cancer J Clin 61, 250–281 (2011).

12. Miller, J. W. et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization caused by age-related macular degeneration: results of a single treatment in a phase 1 and 2 study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 117, 1161–1173 (1999).

13. Pogue, B. W. et al. Photodynamic Therapy with Verteporfin in the Radiation-induced Fibrosarcoma-1 Tumor Causes Enhanced Radiation Sensitivity. Cancer Res 63, 1025–33 (2003).

14. Mo, J.-S., Yu, F.-X., Gong, R., Brown, J. H. & Guan, K.-L. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by protease-activated receptors (PARs). Genes & Development 26, 2138–2143 (2012).

Figure 5. Verteporfin (VP) does not affect the mTOR or Akt pathway in glioblastoma cells, but increases LC3-IIB. SNB19 and LN229 cells were treated with vehicle (C), 2 µg/ml of VP (L) or 10 µg/ml of VP (H) for 24 hours protected from light at all steps. Western blots of whole cell lysates did not show an alteration in the phosphorylation status of ribosomal S6 protein (A) or of (B) p4EBP1 after VP treatment without light activation. (C) No changes in the phosphorylation levels of Akt (S473) were observed. (D) VP treatment of glioblastoma cells led to an increased expression of autophagic marker LC3-IIB in a dose-dependent manner.

Cropped blots are shown. (Experiment repeated 3 times, representative blot is shown here).

(7)

15. Liu, A. M., Wong, K.-F., Jiang, X., Qiao, Y. & Luk, J. M. Regulators of mammalian Hippo pathway in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1826, 357–364 (2012).

16. Fernandez-L, A. et al. Oncogenic YAP promotes radioresistance and genomic instability in medulloblastoma through IGF2- mediated Akt activation. Oncogene 31, 1923–1937 (2012).

17. Mechanism of p38 MAP kinase activation in vivo. 17, 1969–1978 (2003).

18. Initiation of apoptosis and autophagy by photodynamic therapy. 38, 482–488 (2006).

19. Tumaneng, K. et al. YAP mediates crosstalk between the Hippo and PI(3)K-TOR pathways by suppressing PTEN via miR-29. Nat Cell Biol 14, 1322–1329 (2012).

20. Pobbati, A. V. & Hong, W. Emerging roles of TEAD transcription factors and its coactivators in cancers. Cancer Biology & Therapy 14, 390–398 (2013).

21. Xu, M. Z. et al. AXL receptor kinase is a mediator of YAP-dependent oncogenic functions in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 30, 1229–1240 (2011).

22. Steinhardt, A. A. et al. Expression of Yes-associated protein in common solid tumors. Human pathology 39, 1582–1589 (2008).

23. Cordenonsi, M. et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell 147, 759–772 (2011).

24. Li, Z. et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell maintenance in oral cancer. Mol Oncol 9, 1091–1105 (2015).

25. Lai, D., Ho, K. C., Hao, Y. & Yang, X. Taxol resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated by the hippo pathway component TAZ and its downstream transcriptional targets Cyr61 and CTGF. Cancer Res 71, 2728–38 (2011).

26. Bartucci, M. et al. TAZ is required for metastatic activity and chemoresistance of breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene 34, 681–690 (2015).

27. Touil, Y. et al. Colon cancer cells escape 5FU chemotherapy-induced cell death by entering stemness and quiescence associated with the c-Yes/YAP axis. Clin Cancer Res 20, 837–846 (2014).

28. Mao, B. et al. SIRT1 regulates YAP2-mediated cell proliferation and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 33, 1468–1474 (2014).

29. Vassilev, A. et al. TEAD/TEF transcription factors utilize the activation domain of YAP65, a Src/Yes-associated protein localized in the cytoplasm. Genes & Development 15, 1229–1241 (2001).

30. Feng, J. et al. Verteporfin, a suppressor of YAP-TEAD complex, presents promising antitumor properties on ovarian cancer. Onco Targets Ther 9, 5371–5381 (2016).

31. Brodowska, K. et al. The clinically used photosensitizer Verteporfin (VP) inhibits YAP-TEAD and human retinoblastoma cell growth in vitro without light activation. Experimental Eye Research 124, 67–73 (2014).

32. Artinian, N. et al. Phosphorylation of the Hippo Pathway Component AMOTL2 by the mTORC2 Kinase Promotes YAP Signaling, Resulting in Enhanced Glioblastoma Growth and Invasiveness. J Biol Chem 290, 19387–19401 (2015).

33. Lee, H. et al. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) controls the invasiveness of glioblastoma through YAP-dependent expression of CYR61/

CCN1 and miR-296-3p. Biochim Biophys Acta 1859, 599–611 (2016).

34. Teng, A. C. T. et al. IRF2BP2 is a skeletal and cardiac muscle-enriched ischemia-inducible activator of VEGFA expression. The FASEB Journal 24, 4825–4834 (2010).

35. Du, Z. et al. Oct4 is expressed in human gliomas and promotes colony formation in glioma cells. Glia 57, 724–733 (2009).

36. Lian, I. et al. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes & Development 24, 1106–1118 (2010).

37. Chen, P.-X., Li, Q.-Y. & Yang, Z. Axl and prostasin are biomarkers for prognosis of ovarian adenocarcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 17, 425–429 (2013).

38. Coumar, M. S., Tsai, F.-Y., Kanwar, J. R., Sarvagalla, S. & Cheung, C. H. A. Treat cancers by targeting survivin: just a dream or future reality? Cancer Treat Rev 39, 802–811 (2013).

39. Lee, K.-B. et al. CYR61 controls p53 and NF-kappaB expression through PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways in carboplatin-induced ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett 315, 86–95 (2012).

40. Gu, Z. et al. The p44/wdr77-dependent cellular proliferation process during lung development is reactivated in lung cancer.

Oncogene 32, 1888–1900 (2013).

41. Ewald, F. et al. Combined targeting of AKT and mTOR using MK-2206 and RAD001 is synergistic in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 133, 2065–2076 (2013).

42. Pal, S. K. & Quinn, D. I. Differentiating mTOR inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 39, 709–719 (2013).

43. Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. & Levine, B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140, 313–326 (2010).

44. Donohue, E. et al. Inhibition of autophagosome formation by the benzoporphyrin derivative verteporfin. J Biol Chem 286, 7290–7300 (2011).

45. Kondo, Y., Kanzawa, T., Sawaya, R. & Kondo, S. The role of autophagy in cancer development and response to therapy. Nature reviews Cancer 5, 726–734 (2005).

46. Donohue, E., Balgi, A. D., Komatsu, M. & Roberge, M. Induction of Covalently Crosslinked p62 Oligomers with Reduced Binding to Polyubiquitinated Proteins by the Autophagy Inhibitor Verteporfin. PLoS ONE 9, e114964 (2014).

47. Zhang, H. et al. Tumor-selective proteotoxicity of verteporfin inhibits colon cancer progression independently of YAP1. Sci Signal 8, ra98 (2015).

48. Konstantinou, E. K. et al. Vertepor n-induced formation of protein cross-linked oligomers and high molecular weight complexes is mediated by light and leads to cell toxicity. Sci. Rep. 1–11, doi:10.1038/srep46581 (2017).

49. Saini, K. S. et al. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK pathways in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 39, 935–946 (2013).

50. Sengupta, T. K. et al. Cytotoxic effect of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-4-ribofuranoside (AICAR) on childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells: implication for targeted therapy. Molecular Cancer 6, 46 (2007).

51. García-Fernández, L. F. et al. Aplidin

™

induces the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway via oxidative stress-mediated JNK and p38 activation and protein kinase C δ. Oncogene 21, 7533–7544 (2002).

Author Contributions

Design of the study (D.V., E.G., J.M.); Conduct of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation (A.A., K.B., D.V.); Manuscript preparation and review (A.A., K.B., D.V., I.V., T.S., J.C., E.G., J.M., N.E.).

Additional Information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07632-8 Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

(8)

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre- ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.