• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

On the coefficients of starlike functions of some classes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "On the coefficients of starlike functions of some classes"

Copied!
7
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

R O C ZN IK I PO LS K IE G O T O W A R Z YST W A M ATEM ATYCZNEGO Seiia I : P R A C E MATEM AT Y CZNE X V I I I (1974)

Z

b i g n i e w

W

i e c z o r e k

(Kielce)

On the coefficients of starlike functions of some classes

1. Denote by 8 the family of all regular functions of the form w = г + а 322 + ...

which are univalent in the circle К = {z : \z\ < 1 } and by 8* its subclass of starlike functions, i. e. of functions which map the circle К onto starlike regions with respect to the point w = 0. Then denote by 8* (a), 0 < a < 1 , the set of all functions of the family 8 such that

m

* n * ) x

< a

for every ze K . Obviously, 8* (a) c 8* and /S*(l) 8*.

In this paper we give the estimation of the coefficients in 8* {a).

In the proof we employ the method of Clunie [ 1 ] and make use of the properties of the family p { a ) defined below.

2. Let p be the family of all regular functions of the form

( 1 ) P {z) = 1 + + + ...

which are defined in the circle К and which satisfy the condition геР(г) > 0 for every zcK -, while p (a), 0 < « < 1 denote the family of functions of form ( 1 ) and such that

P ( z ) - 1 --- -< a

P (*) + 1

for every ze K . Obviously p ( a ) czp and p ( 1) = p .

I t follows immediately from the definition of the family that the functions P (z) of form ( 1 ) belong to p (a ) for а Ф 1 if and only if

(

2

)

for every ze K .

P ( z ) ~ 1 + a 2

1 — a 2 < 2a 1 — a 2

8 — R oczniki PTM — P ra e e M atem atyczn e X V III.

(2)

1 1 4 Z. W i e c z o r e k

Denote by Ü the set of all regular functions of the form w(z) —

g1z-^-c2z2 -\- . . .

which are defined in the circle К and such that

(3)

\w(z)\ < 1 for every z e K .

L

e m m a

. The function P (z) belongs to the fam ily p (a ) i f and only i f 1 + aw (z)

P (z) =

aw ( 0 ) fo r some function w(z) e Q and every z* K .

P r o o f. Let P ( z )e p ( a ) . We consider the function (4)

with

and the function ( 5 )

Q ( z )

P (z) a

___ -, K ,

a 1 + a 2

1 — a 2 ’ b 2a

1 — a 2

w(z) Q M - Q ( 0 )

l - Q ( 0)Q(z) ’ 0 e K .

Thus w(0) = 0. I t follows from (2) that \Q(z)\ < 1 by which \w(z)\ < 1 for 0 e K . Hence the function w(z) defined by (5) belongs to the family Ü.

Finding $ ( 0 ) from (5) and substituting it into (4) we obtain formula (3).

Conversely, if w(z)<= Q, then the function P(z) defined by formula (3) satisfies condition ( 2 ) and thus P { z )e p ( a ) . I t is known [2] th at the function f(z ) of the family S belongs to the subclass 8* if and only if

= -p( 0 ) for some function P ( z )e p ( a ) .

3. We shall prove the following

T

h e o r e m

1. I f f(z ) e 8* (a), 0 < a < 1, then ( 6 )

and (7)

la j < n a‘ i n = 2 , .. Я ,

a„ < N ( N - l )

n — 1 a

N

- 1 1 n = W + l , N + 2 , . . . ,

where N[ 1 + a 1 — a ’ 1 — a 2 is a natural number.

(3)

( 8 )

(9)

Estim ation ( 6 ) is sharp and equality holds in (6) fo r the function / » (1 — saz)2 ’ z

P ro o f. If f( z ) e S * ( a ) , then

zf'(z) 1 + aw{z) e\ = 1 .

f{z ) l — aw{z) for some function w(z)e Q.

I t follows from (9) that

*/ '(« )-/ (« ) = « (»/'(«) +/(»))'w(z), thus

CO oo

( 10 ) ^ ( f c — 1 )аАг* = aw(«) ^ ( f c + l)% z * (a, = 1 ).

A=2 *= 1

Equating the coefficients at г 2 on both sides of equality ( 1 0 ) we find a 2 = 2aw'(0). Since w '( 0 ) ^ 1 then

( 1 1 ) |u 2 | < 2 a.

Thus estimation ( 6 ) is true for n = 2 .

Let n > 2 . We write equality (10) as follows:

n OO t t — 1

( 1 2 ) ^ ( f c - l j a ^ d - £ dkzk = aw(z) JT* (fc + l )ak^ ,

k= 2 + l &=l

oo

where the series £ djczk converges in the circle K .

k —n + l

Since |w(æ)| < 1, we obtain from (12)

n OO *11

I - ! ) « * « * + £ dkZk\< a i ^ (* + !)« *« * |-

fc=2 & = tt+ l fc = l

Hence putting z = 0 < r < 1, 0 < i < 271, we have

2rr n

0 k—2 k = n + l

f I 'S'{h — ±)akrkeltk + V dt

!ir J I Z-J !

и—1

< 7~T j I (* + 1 ) V V

0 *=1

Integrating we get

11 OO n —1

(13) ^ ( f c — 1 ) 2 I«*|V* + £ \dk\2r2k < a 2 J ? (h + 1)2 \ак\2г*к.

f c = l & = w + l

In particular from (13) follows

lc=l

^ (fc - 1)2Kl V* < a 2 JT1 {Je + 1)2 \ak\ V *.

k = l

k= 1

(14)

(4)

1 1 6 Z. W i e c z o r e k

Passing in (14) to the limit as r -> 1 we obtain

n M— 1

^ ( J c - 1 ) 2 l^ l2 < a2 (Tc + 1)21%|2.

A=1 A;=]

Thus

тг—1

fc=i

We observe that a 2n 2 — (n — 2 )2 > 0 if and only if

r

< W.

Estimations ( 6 ) and (7) are obtained by induction. The function f*(z ) defined by formula ( 8 ) belongs to the family 8* (a) and /*(n)( 0 )/w

= nan~} en_1, thus estimation ( 6 ) is sharp. By which the theorem has been proved.

C

o r o l l a r y

. The values o f the function f(z )e 8* (a) include the circle

(15) \w\ < 1

2 ( l + a) '

In fact, let f{z )e 8* (a) and f(z ) Ф c for every 0 € K . Then the function

9(*)

1 ~/(»)/c 2 + (a2 + 1 /v)z2 + • • ■

belongs to the family 8. Thus |u 2 +l/c| < 2 . Hence by (11) we find (15).

4. Denote by E the family of regular and univalent functions

F {z) = — + a } z + a2z2+ ... + anzn + ...

z

defined in the ring Q = {z: 0 < \z\ < 1} and by E* its subclass of starlike functions, i. e. functions which map Q onto regions whose complement to the closed plane is a starlike region with respect to the origin.

I t is known that F e E* if and only if

re [ zF '(z)l F{z) J > 0 .

One may prove that F e E* if an only if zF'(z)

F (z) P ( z ) e p .

Now we shall define the class E *{a), 0 < a < 1.

(5)

Denote by 27*(a), 0 < a < 1 the set of all functions of the family 27 such that

zF' (z) --- — + 1

F ( z )

zF'{z) F (z )'

< a

for every z*Q .

Obviously, 27* (a) c .27*, 27*(1) = 27*.

In this part of the paper we shall find the estimations of the coefficients of the functions of the family 27*(a).

5. We shall prove the theorem.

T

h e o r e m

2 . I f F (z)e 2 7*(a ) , then

(16) \an\ < fo r n = 1 , 2 , ...

n + 1

Estim ation (16) is sharp, equality in (16) holds i f and only i f ,

(17) F*(z) = - ( l

0 eazn+1)n+1

(18)

P ro o f. If F ( z ) e 2 7*(a), then

zF'(z) 1 - f a w(z) F (z) 1 — aw(z) for some function w(z)e Q.

From (18) we have

F (z) -\-zF’ (z) — a[zF '(z) — F(z)]w (z) hence

o o o o

(19) ^ { J c + l ) a kzk+] = aw{z) ( - 2 + £ ( T c - l) a kzk+l]j.

k= 1 fc= 2

Equating in (19) the coefficients at 0 , z2, z 3 because of |cfc| < 1 (Jc — 1 , 2 , ...) , we obtain

( 20 ) Ia j < a, \a2\ < f a .

Let n > 3. Equality (19) may be written in the form

n OO n — 1

J ? ( k + l ) a k2p + l+ £ dkzk = [ - 2 a + {1c — 1 )aakzk+l\w{z).

к — 1 k = n + 2 k= 2

Since |ад>(г)| < 1, then

n oo n — 1

I ^ ( f c + l) « * 2fc+1 + dkzk I < a I — 2 + ^ Г ( й - 1 )алг*+1|.

/с== 1 k = n+ 2 /c= 2

(6)

118

Z. W i e c z o r e k

Accepting 2 = relt, 0 < г < 1 , 0 < £ < 2 т и after integrating we obtain

^ ( f c + l ) 2 |eyV(fc+1) + \dk\2r2k^ a 2 |4-f ^ ( f c - 1 )2 |afc| 2 r2(*+])] .

*=i Hence

k —n+2 k —2

■Ц, n — X

(21) J^ , (fc -fl) 2 |aA| 2 r2(*+1) < a2|4 + (к — l )2 |«y 2 r2(fc+1)|.

fc=l k = 2]

Passing to the limit in ( 2 1 ) as r -> 1 we get

n n — 1

£

( * + 1 ) 2 M 2 «: ce2 [4 + J T (fc - 1 ) 2 K l 2] .

fc= 1 fc

= 2

Hence

/» — i

(» + l ) 2K l 2 < 4a2- {4 |a,|« + £ [(* + l ) 2- ( k - l ) 2a2] Ы 2}

2

Since (fc + 1)2 — (fc — l ) 2 a 2 > 0 for к = 2 , 3 , . . . , then (w + l ) 2|a„|2 < 4a2

or

la-1 < 2a

w + 1 for n = 3 , 4 , . . .

Hence, because of (20), we obtain estimation (16). The function (17) belongs to the family 27*(a) and if F *(z) = - — \-a*zn jr . . . , then |a*|

Z

2 a for an arbitrary but fixed n thus estimation (16) is sharp.

n -\-1

C orollary . I f F ( z ) e 2 7*(a), then

( 22 ) [ ( l - a 2)/c2 + 2 ( l + a 2)& + (1 - a 2)] • |%l2 < 4 a 2.

In fact, let F ( z ) e 2 7*(a); then equality (19) may be written in the following equivalent form

00 o o

^ ( h 1 ) akzk+1 = a — 2 -+- ^ (A; l ) a fc 0 *+ 1 jw ( 0 ).

* = i fc=i

( 2 3 )

(7)

By^ \w(z)\ < 1 and for 0 = ret4>, 0 < r < 1 , 0 < 9 ? < 2iz, we get from (23) the integral inequality

2k 00 2 n 00

f | JT\& + l K r * +V<A+1)* | % < a2 f I - 2 + ^ { k - l ) a krk+1ei(k+l)<p^d(p.

0 1 0 1 1 .

Hence after integrating and passing to the limit as r tends to 1 we obtain ( 22 ).

References

[1] J. Clunie, On meromorphic schlicht functions, J . London Math. Soc. 34 (1959) p. 215-216.

[2] Z. N eh ari, Conformal mapping, New York 1952.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

From Theorem 2 it follows immediately that the functional (20) attains its extremal value for a function f*(z) belonging to the class 27&#34;... 58

Some authors (see eg. [4], [7], [8]) assumed that the class B is identical with the class L of normalized close-to-convex functions introduced independently and in a

, Continuation of oar paper “On the radii of ttarhkene»» of order alpha of certain Schware analytic fanction»’’ , Plovdiv.. , The radn of convexity of order alpha of certain

It would not be meaningful, however, to distinguish the class of Lu Qi-Keng domains without giving an example of bounded domain which does not belong to this class.. To this aim

We shall give the geometrical interpretation of functions of this family and prove a theorem connected with the circular symmetrization of strongly starlike domains..

Section 3 is devoted to obtain distortion properties and radius of meromorphic convexity of order i (0 &lt; 6 &lt; 1) for functions in EJ^(a).. In Section 4 we

Współczynniki Grunsky’ ego funkcji meromorficznycłi gwiaździstych i wypukłych Коэффициенты Грунского мероморфных, звёздных и

Współczynniki funkcji odwrotnych do funkcji regularnych gwiaździstych Коэффициенты функций обратных к регулярным звездным функциям.. Except for rotations the