Maritime Research InstituteNetherlands
2, Haagsteeg; P.O. Box 28
6700 M 4fagerthgen. The Netheflands
Telephone +31837093911 Telex 45148 nsmb nl Telefax +31 8370 93245
Delit University of Technology
Ship Hydromechanics Laboratory
Library
Mekelweg2, 2628 CD DeItt
The Netheriands
f Phone: +31 152786873 - Fax: +31 15 2781836
Z52242 - Paper ISOPE-92-05-174
TIME-VARYING DRIFT FORCES IN
CROSS SEAS: MEASUREMENTS AND
THEORY
By: Jan O. de Kat
March 1992.
LABSI1AC7
This paper presents a novél method to determine
experimentally both mean and time-varying
drift
forces., This method is applied to measure the low
Ire-quency forces in cross-sea conditions.. £ brief review
is given of the theory for determining the second
or-der forces acting on a moored vessel in directional
seas. Phereas in previous experimental work only mean
drift
forces could he determined, the present study shows that time-varying drift forces can be measuredwith reasonable accuracy.. surge and sway forces and
yaw moments are measñred for a 200,000 DWT tanker
sub-.jected té cross waves in 82.5 n water depth. Compari'
son between measured and theoretical values is
reason-able.
KEY PORDS: Drift forces, directional seas, sécond
or-der effects, Kalman tutes, experiments, tanker
1.. IN1'R0DUCTI0r
A vessel aoored in seas with directional
spread-ing vU.l be subjected to mean and low frequency wave-induced
drift forces
The lev f reqùency behavior canhave an important influence on the design of the
moor-ing system.. In a mooring analysis, one typically
con-siders long-crested seas, for which an extensive
amount of iodai test results and validated analytical
tools exist.. Relatively littlè work has been carried
out with respect
to drift
forces in short-crestedseas. So far, experimental wòrk has ben limited
wort-ly to cross seas, i..e.. the còdbination of two long-crested wave systems coming from different directions.
Asideresults,
from facilitating
the interpretationof test
cross seas do occur gùité frequently in a
typical ocean environment.
Pinkster (1985) derived expressions for the
sec-ond order drift forcés in directional seas and per'
TIMZ-VASYING DRIfl FORCES IN CROSS SEASz HEASIJREENTS AND THEORY
JanO. deKat
Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN) Kageningén, The Netherlands
formed tests to measure the meén drift forces in
reg-ular Cross waves with equal frequencies and also in irregular cross seas.. Experiments with a spring-moored vessel in cross waves with equal frequencies vere.
re-potted by Krokstad (1990), who also investigated
re-spense and wave 4ft damping effects in thode
condi-tions Nwogu and Isaacscn (1991) conducted tests in
both long-crested and multi-directional
seas,
illus-trating that overall low frequency rotions are reduced
by wave directionality. Other theoretical
considera-tions concerning drift forces In directional seas have
been presented by Kim and The (1989) and Viaje (1988).
This work is an extension of the research
re-ported by Pinkster (1985).. For cross sea coéditions
with equAl frequencies for both wave components,
it
was shown that
for a particular realization
of the wave processthe mean drift
force consists of the indepeddent contributions of the individual wavecom-ponents and an interaction term The agreement between
theory and measurements vas reasonable. The objective
of the present work is (1) to show that time-varying
drift
forces can be measured with a reasonable degree of accuracy; (2) to compare measured drift forces withcomputed values in crosS wave conditions..
A review is given of the expréssions for the sec-ond order drift forces in directional seas.. The focus of this study will be on the slowly vérying part of
the excitation forces, and in particular on the surge
drift force.. To determine possible interaction effects between directions, the elementary case of two regular
waves from perpendicular directions is cons.dered experimentally.
The experimental determination of time-varying
drift
forces posesa difficult
problem: .the veisélmust be free to perform first order motions (as these
influence the second order forces to a large extent), yet it should not, exhibit any low frequency mottoés.. A novel approach has been instigated at MARIN, where use is made of dynamic positioning techniques and a
the vessel is unrestrained as regards first order mo-tions. The forces required to maintain, the average
position are, equal to the second order drift forces..
A description is given of experimentAl proce-dures the Objective of the tests is to determine the second order
drift
forces acting :fl a 200,000 DWT tanker moored in 82.5 u vater depth The vessel issubjected to regular cross vares, where the angle
between the wave train directions is 90 degrees and
where the relative heading angle of the vessé.1 is 45 degrees with respect to bOth vave systems. Tests are
carried out for a range of vave frequencies and
ampli-tndes, and the obtaiñed experimental values are
corn-pared with theoretical predictions..
2 SECOND ORDER DRITT FORCES TN DIRECTIONAL SEAS: THEORY. RZVIV
This section presents a brief review of the
the-oretiral de6cription of the mean and slowly varying
drift
forces in directional seas, dee to Finhetet (1985).2.1. Incident Paves
We asse that the wave elevation at a point can
be described by a double Tourier series, which
charac-terizes the surface elevation as a sum of regular
long-crested waves from various directions:
j! ki
ik 'COS(L:t + !jk) (2.1) where:wave frequency
Lik random phase angle
N = number of discrete frequency components
N = nimber of directional cOmponents
ik wave amplitude = wave frequency index
k wave direction index..
In a multi-directional sea the amplitudes of the
wave components are found from:
ik 2
4o.$
(2.2)where:
directional wave spectrum
Le frequency interval
a direction interval..
After selection of the random phase angles a time
record of the surface elevation can be generated from
eq. (2.1).
2.2.. Second Order Pave Drift Torces
Second order wave fOrcés acting on vessels or
structures in waves can be computed based on direct
integration of second order pressures and forces, see Pinkster (1980)..
In vector notation the general expression for the second order wave forces is as follows:
Y2(t)
-f
pg- rií-
p (1)2 ds + S0 -Jf(p(Ï'
V+)).dS
+ x (N (1)) g + 2))) 5 Sot
t
úhere:41) first order relative wave elevation äround thewaterline PL
- first
order velocity potential inclnditgef-fects of incoming waves, diffracted vavès and
waves generated by the body motions
N - mass matrix of the body in air ( 1)
( 1)
Realizations of Drift Torce Records in Time Domain
Eq. (2..3) Chews that the secondörder torce
consists. of terms involving products of first order
quantities
or ifltegfts
of productsof first order
quantities, and
at'- /et
terms.. Using the discreteformulation of eq. (2.1) for the waves, thé second
order force in irregular directional seas can be
written as:
T2(t)
i-1 j-1 k=1 1=1'2 E H Eik
N N M N cos((w-e)t +(AikEjj)} +
N .N M X E Z Et
ik
1 ikl
sin((e a )t +
i1 j1 k1 11
first order oscillatory linear motion vector
- first order
oscillatory angular motion vectorof the body
second order 'incoming yayO' potential
second order 'diffraction' potential..
(2.3)
where P and Qj are the in-phase and quadrature
quadratiraasfer-nctions based on. eq. (2.3). The quantities and represent the amplitudes of the
varé cbnponêRts, whéf e i and j are the frequency in-dices and k and 1 are the diréction inin-dices.
Each cf the components Of eq.. (2.3) contributes to the total th-phasé and quadtature quadratic
trans-fer functions. This will not be treated further here. 2 The cpributions due to the nonlinear potentials
and ' ar-e approximated using the method given
b Pthkster (1980), making use of the uoñlinear second
order potential for the undisturbed directional waves.
(2.4)
n - outwa.rd pointing normal Vector to the hull
S0 - mean wetted hull surface 2)
17
-- We
vili
assume hereafterthat
the quadratictransfer functions include contribUtions from aB.
com-ponents of eq.. (2.3)..
Mean Value of Realizations of Wave Drift Force Records The time-average drift force ïsfound from eq..
(2.1.) for iaj:
2 N N N
( (t)
t
k1
3.iik1 cos(Éjk-Ejl) .f+
sin(&-&1))
(2.5)It
can be shown that the ensemble average of thedrift force is:
N X
EF2J
F Et
k
i4k1
which, in continuouS form becómes:
- 2.J ¡
S,,(e,a) P(e,e,,a) da de
00
where P(e,e,a,a) is the quadratic transfer function 6f
the mean drift force in regular waves of frequency e
from wave direction a..
Frequency Domain Representation of the Drift Forces:
Drift.Force..Spectrum . -- -
-It is of interest
to obtain information on thelow frequency drift forces in irregular vares in the
frequency domain. We use eq. (2.4) as starting point to obtain the spectral density of the d;ift forces..
The
derivation df the spctral
density wili notbe given here. As is the case with the wave elevation
in
a point as gien by eq
(2,,l) the second örderforce given by eq. (2.4) is non-ergodic and for a par-ticular realization (choice of c's) the spectral den-sit)' of the force is dependent on the phase angles r.
The average of all realizations (ensemble aver-age) is found tó be:
2it2n
- S f
¡
.1 S7(e+i.,a) Sr(e,e) 0 0 0 da dP de where: P(w+i,e,OE,p) +Por the quadratic transfer functions the follow-ing symmetry relationships apply:
- P(e,e+t,$,a) (2.10)
e - Q(s,e+.&,p,a) (2.11)
which is the same as:
- T*(s,+1,a)
(2.12)where * denotes the complex conjugate. Similar
synüne-try equations apply to the discrété quadratic transfer
fuñctions Q1 and the amplitude
Drift Force .iñ Regular Cross Seas with EqUal
Frequencies
The sieso drift force in irregular
multi-.direc-tiona]. seas is given by eq.. (2.5). Each of the terms in this equation reflects a contribution due
to
in-tétactioñ of a
regUlar wave with frequency e fromrection k with a regular wave with frequency ej from directiOn 1.
Consider the elementary case that ve have one
regular wave with frequency e1 frOm direction 1 énd
one regular wave with the sand frequency from
d.irec-tien 2 Taking into account the symmetry relat.onship
of eqs. (2.10) through (2.12) thé meañ drift force is given br:
F(t)
ii
p1111 + l2 p1122 ++ 2 t11 12(P1112 os(r11-s12) +
+ Q11 sin(c11-E12fl (2.13)
The first two components of eq.. (2.. 13) are the
mean forces due to each regular wave independently.
The third coñtribution is dUe to interactiòó effects
of the two regular waves in the mean dríft force. It
is
seen that this component is, besides being afun-ction of the quadratic transfér fitiOns P1112 and
Q11.1,, a function of the phase angles t11 and £12 of tEe two regular waves.
Drift Force in. Regular Cross Seas with. Unequal
Frequencies
For regular cross seas with unequal component
frequencies the time-dependent drift fòrce follows from eq. (2.4) and the symmetry relationships used above:
F2(t)
-
C112 + t22 P2222 ++ 2 t11 t22 [p1212 cos{(w1-m)t + (C11C).) -t
+ Q1212 sin((e-e2)t f (cji..c22))J
Thus
also in this case
the méan drift force jacomposed of the superpoSition of the mean forces dUe
to each independent wave component. The elsie-dependent
part
of the drift force is
caused y'the interactionbetween the two intersecting vare trains. The ampli-tude of the slowly varying párt is given by:
2 C ? 'P .. fl 2 16
a
'
' -
11. '22 1212 1212The theoretical secOnd order drift force can be
determined by computing the frequency and direction
dependent quadratic transfer functions P and
k1 This can be
achieved through 3-D diiction
cgiculatjons..
(2.14) (2.8) varying part, where the mean component is given by:
The drift force ConSists of a mean and a slowly
F (t) p . (2.15)
11 1111 '22 2222 (2.9)
(2.6)
3.. EXERIKENTAL PROCEDUB.ES 31 General
ïtodel tests aiid computations were carried out for
a 200,000 DWT tanker (90% loaded) moored in 825m water depth.. The particulars of the tahker are shown
in loble 1, and a body plan is Fig.. 1. The
experimental setup in KASIN's Vaya and Current Basin
is shown schematidafly in Fig. 2. This facility
mea-sures 60 n x 40 n and is equipped with snake type wave generators located on two sides of the baSin. The wave generators can be driven independently to produce reg-ular and irregular cross-sea conditions.. The scale
used in the experiments is i to 82.5.
Table 1 Iain particulars of 200,000 DWT tanker
(.90% loaded) Tanker model- 5612
öde1 scale I to 82.5
The principle of the mooring arrangement is as follows. The tanker is moored using two constant
ten-sion winches connected transversely to the model with
steel wire, and one constant tension winch in longi-tudinal direction.. Pretension is obtained by means of counterweights. The winches are steered through a con-trol system, which checks the low frequency vessel
no-tions against the desired position at each time step
during testing and takes corrective action if neces-sary.
Ieasurenents comprise three earth-fixed ¡notions
(surge, sway and yaw) and three ship-fixed forces (one
longitudinal force, One transverse force forward and
one trañsverse force aft). The forces and yaw moment
that are obtained from the measurements represent the wave drift forces.
3.2. Positioning Control System - laman Filter
The displacements of the tanker model are
re-corded by the control system in a basin-fixed coordi-nate system. In this investigation the center of
grav-ity
is used as the reference point on the model todetermine the excursion of the model with respect to a
reference position in the basin,. The control system
uses thïs information ro determine the required winch
forces.
STATION IO
Fig.. 1 General layout and body plan of tanker
The motion of the tanker model consists of
moza-bimed low frequency and high (. wave) frequency
mo-tions.. The low frequency notions are to be
counter-acted by the winches. The basic principle of the
con-trol
System is to use mathematical models ro estimatethe low frequency motions of the ship and filter the
high frequency oscillations. The estimate is updated
at èvery time step, using the measured surge, sway and
yaw motions.. To predict the motions at the next time
step, the contrOl system has access to-a tine-domain
simtilation program that computes the low frequency
motIons of a moored or dynamically positioned vessel,
taking into account the various hydrodynanic effects
related to waves, current and wind. Given the
calcu-lated drift forces and model position with respect to
the reference position, the required winch forces are
determined and applied.
The ¡boye type of filtering is keovn as Kainan
filtering.
The Kalman- filteris a set
of equations, which allows an estimator to be updated once a newob-servation becomes available, This process is carried
out in two parts. The first step consists of -forming
the optimal pred.ictor of the next observation, given
all
the information currently available. The new observation is then inc5rporated into the estimator of
the state vector, It is assumed th.ar the low frequency
dynamics of the system can be described as follows by the laman filter model:
(3.1)
Y (3.2)
Eq.. (2.17) is the state equation of the system
and eq.. (2.18) is the observation equation.. X
repre-sents deterministic input and and r, are uncorrelated
noise processes, where the covariance matrix is given
by; Designation Symbol Unit liagnitude
ength between perpendiculats L n 310.20
Breadth S n 47.20
Depth D n 24.40
Draft - T n 17.66
Displacement weight 8
t
233,315Center of gravity above keel KG n 13. 70
Center of buoyancy forward of
section 10 n 7 34
Netacentric height . GM in 5.69
Longitudiñal radius of
gyra-tionizair
-k
yy n 74 41
Transverse radius of gyration
inair
xí n - 16 00(3)
(4)
Fig. 2 Schematic representation of setup of tanker model in Vave and Current Basin
cov{]_{
]
The objective is to forecast S at the next time
step, based on previous observutions (Y) At each time instant a number of steps are applied:
Kalman gain;
P ET(H p M +
where rT represents the transpose of H and F.
defined bys
s E{(S
- Stlt_i)(st - S1_1))
State corrector at current time:-
F (Y - R Stjt_i)State predictor:
StIt+i P 5tk + C
Error predictor:
Therefore, at tine t+1 the following information
is needed for the required computations: Y ,
P , F, H, R and Q.. The state predictio
givén y
eq.(,,5) is carried out using
the time-domain simu-lation program mentioned earlier in this section. Thisprogram, named DESI, does not take wave directional
spreading into account.. Based on the available
infor-mation (surge, sway and yaw position, and the forces
acting on the tanker) an estimate is ¡nade of the (33) forces required to maintain the desired tanker
posi-tion. This information is subsequently relayed to the three controlled winches and updated every second.
Us-ing this procedure the low frequency motions are kept
to a miniininn and the measured forces are equivalent to the second order wave drift forces.
For the present test setup the moasured response
of the mooring system to a given displacement away
(3.4) from the equilibrium position is shown
in Fig. 3 for
surge and sway. In both cases the tanker is brought
back to its equilibrium position without any
oscilla-tions.
(3..5)
(3.6)
Waves 2250
+Fx
Force transducer (fi
fi
Beach Wsves l35 '..Winch FY-FORE Winch fl-AFT Beach +FY-FOR . Counterweight Counterweight
.',
+FY-AFTForce transducer (fi)
t-
..,.
o t
-
4e¿
}ig. 3 Surge and sway extinction time traces
Table 2 Review of test conditions
4. TEST CONDITIONS ND RESULTS
An overview of the test conditions is shovn in Table 2.. The wave fre4uencies vere chosen to obtain a realistic range: 0.5 - 0.8 radIs.. For three casez
(0.5, 0.6 and 0.-7 .rad/s) the sane frequency vas used
for both di±ectijns to check the behavior found by Piukster (1985) For all cases with cross waves a fre-quency difference of 0.04 rad/s vas applied, and for
jome add.ttional cases also 0.02 rad/s frequency dif-ference weE used. The amplitudes of the wave
éouipo-nears veré cf the same order, but not necessarily
equal to each other..
P.XN
Test No..
Regular wave f rom 225 de;
Smplitude la)
---
8agular wave from-- ---Wave Freguenny L] Irad/el 135 dóg fragen-ny difference (red/ej PhÌ.ÒÖ between wave ankara (de;] Wave 1'xequency L-) (red/a) .8mplitude La] 659301 3. 0.500 1.58 7 0.500 2.46. 0.00 0 659901 3. 0.500 1,58 7 0.500 1.46 0.00 60 660202. 3. 0.500 1.58 7 0.500 1.46 0.00 120 660502. 2. 0.500 1.58 7 0.500 1.46 0.00 180 660801 1 0._500 1.58 '7 0.500 1.46 0.00 24Ö 661101 1 0.500 1,58 '7 0.500 1.46 0._00 300 659201 3. 0.500 1.58 8 0.540 1.24 0,04 0 658001 l.A 0.500 2.46 EA 0.-540 2.06 0.04 0 659101 2 0.575 1,14 10 0.595 1.69 0.02 658101 2Á 0.575 2.-03. lOA 0.595 2.65 0.02 659001 2 0.575 1.14 11 0.615 1.87 0.04 659401 3 0.600 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0.00 0 660001 3 0..6Ö0 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0.00 - 60 660301 3 0.600 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0.00 120 660601 3 b.600 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0.00 180 560901 3 0..6Ò0 ' 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0._00 - 240 663.201 3 0.600 1.46 12 0.600 1.82 0.00 300-658901 3 0.600 1.46 13 0.620 1.-75 0.02 0 658803. 3 0.600 1.46 - 14 0.640
ì93
0.04 0 658701 4 0.625 - 2.59 16 0645 1.77 0.02 0 658601 4 0.625 1.59 17 0.665 1.70 0.-04 O 659701 5 0 700 1 67 18 0 700 1 71 0 00 0 660101 5 0.700 1.67 18 0.700 1.71 0.00 60 660401 5 0.700 1.67 18 0.700 -1.11 . 0._00 2.20 660701 5 0.70Ö i.67 18 0.700 1,71 0.00 180 661001 5- 0.700 1.67 18 0.700 - 1_71 0.00 240 661301 5 Ó..700 1.67 18 0.700 1,71 0.00 - 300 658501 5 - 0.700 1.67 19 0.740 1.44 0.04 658301 5A Ò..700 2.88 19A 0.740 2.65 0.-04 658401 6 0.800 2.11 21 0.840 1.79 0.04 o 6$820i GA 0.800 2.82 23.1 0.840 2.56 0.Ö4 I)The above test conditions vere used as input to a
3- diffraction program, which allows one to determine
the first and second erdér forces actin& on a moored structure in long-crested and short-crested seas. Por this purpose the tanker is modeled with a sufficiently
large number of panels. Comparisons are ¿nade for the
surge drift force.
Three forces vere measured; FI, FT-PORE and fl-AU. The surge drift force is equal to PI, thé sway drift force is obtained by surnznatian of the two trans verse FT forces,. and the yaw moment is given by sum-ining the moments of FT about G.
Cross Vaves with Equal Frequencies
In cross-wave conditions vtth equal frequencies the mean drift force is a function of the phase angle betweho the two wave trains. Therefore, for each ¡et
of frequencies the phase angle between the two wave.
generators vas varied fron O to 360 degrees.
The measured surge and sway drift force, as veil
as the yaw moment, are sbovn as a fùnctian of the phase angle in Figs,. 4, 5 and -6 for ¿n .0.5, 0.6 and
0.7 radis, reàpéctively..
It is seen that the measured drift forces and yaw nouent contain a mean part and a part that ts a har-monic function of the phase angle differénce
(c11-c12), as vas observed by Pinkster, (1985).
PMS5AO5 DSTWnBI WAY ATRI I DOa
Fig.. 4 Measured mean drift forces and yaw moment. in cross waves with equal frequency (0.5 rad/s)
iAI1
-
maw
R_ama
mama_ama
w
n ii0
P14*25 ,am.s 25TWlvEIAyO5,, OEg
Pig. 5 MeaÉured mean drift forces and .yaú moinént in cross waves with equal frequency (0.6 rad/s)
FMA25AIIOLZarwam.WAVI 25' UWVI PI D5O
12
Fig. 6 Hèasured mean drift forces and yaw moment in cross waves with equal frequency (0.7 radis)
12' n
In this paper ve vil], focus on the surge
drift
force. The ensémble average of the Eleúured surge
dr.f t force is given together with the theoretical
mean value in lable 3, ivenby eq.. (-2J4). The com-parison between experiment and theory i.s shown grapKi-daily in Pig.. 7 and is qüite good for the freqüecries
considered..
lable 3 Ensemble average of measured and theoretical
surge
drift force iñ cross
waves with equal frequenciesYrequency
(rid/c) Measured
(tf)
TheoreticalC")20
o
Measured Theoretical
0 5
The theoretical average surge drift force and
ais-plitude are given by eqs (2 15) and (2 16),
respec-tively. These quantities are shown in brackets in
Ta-bles 4 and 5 The same results are shown graphacally
in Figs. 8 and 9,.
L s O.02 rada Measured, 4 si 0.02 red/s Theoretical 4 si -0.04 rad/s Meaved
4
0.04 ròd/e Theoretical80
Pig.. 8 Keäsured and theoretical values of meansurge
drift force
o
04 06 08
si[rad/sJ Fig.. 9 Measured and theoretical values
force amplitude of surge drift MEAN SURGE DRIFT PORC
04 O + o g o 06 r. frawsj
4
= 0.02 rad/e MeasuÑd o .Asi= 0.02 radis ThOoretical £ + 8 ci = 0.04 radis TheoretlhajSURGE DRIFT FORCE AMPUTUDE
50 £ s 0.8 07 0.9 e1rad]
Fig.. 7 amplitude of wean longitudinal drift force in
regular cross waves with equal frequencies
Cross waves with Unequal Frequencies
In the generation of waves with unequal f
reqiiec-cies a bound second order wave travels with the
first
order vaies.. Due to the discrepancy in boundary
condi-tions between the wave generators and fluid, free
second order waves have been kñòvn te occur in some
medal basins.. Suth long period oscillations can
influ-ence results significantly. Measurements in
the Wave
and Current gasta, however, have shown that under
typical test conditions (is in the present case) free
second order Úaves do not occur.
The measured drift terces contain amean ¡md
os-cillatory component The measured average surge drift force is shown in Table 4 as a function o wave
ampli-tude and frequency, and the drift
force amplitude is given iñ Table 5 fär the ¡aise cnditions.:
0.5 -45.1 -46.6
0.6 -79.. 9 -82.7
lable 4 Measured and theoretical average surge drift force in cross waves with unequal frequencies
10543.02 w. 04.. .135 dog - rgo..., ¿ud/O) 111t.d. t.)
-0 7-01 O .750 5,4' 0.500 a u. 0 500 2.52 50.0 110.0 (241.2) 40. 0 441.4) 04.-0 470 2)
lable 5 fleasured and theoretical anplitude of surge drift fotce iii
cross waves
02.4/.) Sog41tud.
with unequal frequencies
10goioz ou. fr...235 dog - 520qwcy ¿.j
0120.2.... 0 04 0 04 0 02 0 02 0 04 0 02 0 04 0 02 0 04 0 04 0 04 0 04 0 04 .I'...cy 3i.jt.do 0.540 0.540 0.555 0.505 0.02.5 0.020 0(40 0.045 0002 5.74ó 0 iII 0.40 0540 2 24 3.04 1.05 3.12 1.07 175 1.13 Irs. 2.70 144 2 02 3.70 3.54 0.300 34.0 3.30 (42 i) 0 500 43.0 2 40 (100.5) 100.02.4 -ti 4Th00015.1 - ti) 0 575 07.0 1 14 417 35 5.573 2.22.0 2 01 (230.5) 0 575 53.0 1054102 i 1m (47 0) 0.000 o 04.. 2 40 (555 225 dog 0. (00 020 2.40 (10.1) 0 125 i 50 (45.0)J, O 0. 025 2.50 -SS Q (45 S) dtiZ.z.... 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.54 Yosqosooy 1144O 0 5401.24 2.000 540 0.035105 0.1552(5 0.0251.07 0.0202.75 0 0401 03 0.4431.75 0 102170 5.7401.44 .2.020.740 0 0102.70 .0 040251 0 .500 30 O 1 5* (39 5) 0 500 3.44 (-123.0)-2.2.4. 0 (Th00r.tifri- ti- ti) 0. 575 -44:0 1.14 (-0 0) 0 075 -132.0 3.23 (-175.0) 0.575 -55.-0 1.14 (-04.0) 0 050 -12.0.4 fo 1.-41 (.70.0) 225 dog 0 000 -124. 0 2.40 (-70 0) 1.425 1.'9 o osi x_5, o :7,0 1.47 5.700 2 ¡0 0. 005 2.2.2 0.050 i SS -104.0 (-490) -205.0 (-45 0) -343 0 (-50 4) -234 0 -(-044 0) -153.1 -103.0 (-153.0)
Table 4 and Pig .8 chow that the théoretical and experimental average surge drift forces agree reason-ably véll for frequencies below 0.6 tad/s. The theore-tical average drift forces for freqùeñciès between 0.6
and O.8 radis tend to be significantly smaller than
thé .measüred values. Por the tests with 0.7 sTud 0.8
rad/s the agreement between measùrèments end theory is
significantly better when the wave amplitude is
in-creased (test No. 658301 and 658201).
The results in Table 5 and Fig. 9 show that the theoretical and measured amplitudes of the slowly
varying surge drift f rca are in reasonable agreement. This suggeCt.s that interaction effects are properly
accounted for in the theory; Heasured drift force
amplitudes tend to be 10 to 20% lower than theoretical
values The experimental technique used for measuring tine-dependent
drift
forces is promising. Research.efforts are continuing to improve the Kalman
filter
and mechanical conzpoüents used in the test setup.
5.. CONCLUSIONS
qave-induced
drift forces in
short-crested seasare investigated theoretically añd experimentally. A
brief overview is ptesented of the theory for
deter-mining the mean and time-varying secoud ôrder forces acting on a moored vessel in waves With directional spreading.. Surge and sway forces and yaw moments were
measured for a 200,000 DWT tanker subjected to cross waves in 82.5 e water depth..
In the case of regular cross Waves vith equal
cémponent frequencies the measured and theoretical
mean
drift
forcéaré in
reasonable agreement. Porcross waves with unequal frequencies the theoretical
amplitudes of 'the slowly varing drift force compare
quite well with the measured values; in some cases
large discrepancies exist with respect to the mean component of the drift force.
&efore this study no reliable method existed to
measure time-dependent
drift
forces Using complex mithematicá], models and Ka].man filtering to position avessel in waves,
it is
possible to experimentallydetermine slowly varying drift forces with reasonable accuracy..
A0VLEDGEHETS
I would like to thank LLE.. Huijsmans
for hs
valuable assistance in the expex'inents and
computa-tions, Furthermore I would like to express my
grati-tude to J.A. Pthkster, who provided useful advice
concerning this study..
REFERENCES
Kim, X.H. and Yue, D.LP. (1989), "Slòv1y-Va-ing
Drift Forces in Short-Crested Irregular Seas",
Applied Ocean Research, Vol.. 11, No.. 1, pp. 2-18..
K±okstad, J.R.. (1990), "Drift Fores,Moments and
Cor-responding Responses in Multi-Directional Seas. A
Theoretical and Experieentgl Study", IDEAN, Sym-posium on the Dynadics of Xarine Vehicles énd
Stiuctures in Waves, Brunel University, 24-27
Jude.
Nwogu, 0. and Isaacson, M..
(1991), "fljft
Motions ofa Floating Barge in Random Multi-Directional
Waves", Journal of Offshoreilechanjcs. and Artjc
Engiñeéring, Vol. 113, pp. 37-42.
Pinkster, J.A.. (1980), Lov Frequency Secénd Order
Wave Exciting Forces on floating Structures", MARIN Publication No. 650, Vageningen..
Pinkster, J.A. (1985), "Drift Forces in Directional Seas", Proc. KARflIEC CEINA '85 Shingha.i,Decem-ber 2-8T.
Vinje, T. (1988), "On the Effect of Short-Crestedness
Ön the Statistical Distribütion of Slowly
Vary-ing, Second Order Forces", Applied Ocean;Re