by
Hironori YASUKAWA. Member
TECHNISC}E WIVEa$ITET L.aboratorium vaor Scheepshydromechan(ca Arohef Mekeiweg 2, 2628 CD De!ft TL 015-. 786873- Fax 015- 78183 z]7 ll/..
--XE8i'i'J
Repnnted from TRANSACTIONS OFTHE WEST-JAPAN SOCIETY OF
NAVAL ARCHITECTS
Bank Effect on Ship Maneuverability in a Channel with Varying Width
by
Hironori YASUKAWA*,
MemberSummary
Theoretical investigation is made into bank effect on ship maneuverability in a channel
with varying width. First. a method to calculate asymmetric forces such as lateral force
and yawing moment acting on a ship in the proximity of arbitrary shaped bank is
introduced. Calculation is made by use of the present method and comparison s made with the experiments. And it is confirmed that the present method is a useful mean for obtaining
the characteristics of the asymmetric forces. Next, simulation study is made in order to investigate the bank effect on the ship maneuvering motion in the channel with varying
width. As a result, it is shown that in the channel with varying width course.keeping is relatively difficult due to the effect of the asymmetric forces, and potential hazards of collision and grounding are considerably large.
Nagasaki Experimental Tank, Mitsubishi Heary Industries. Ltd. 1.
Introduction
When a ship moves parallel to a bank it experiences a lateral force toward and a turning momentaway
from the bank[1j. The forces and moments (we call them hereafter asymmetric forces) arise from the asymmetric flow around the ship hull due to the presence of the hank. 1f the length of the bank is short in comparing with the ship length, transient forces occur when the ship passes the ends of the bank. These
transients may be larger than the resultant steady state forces obtained near an infinitely long bank [9] [10]. Therefore in restricted water such as a channel with varying width, the hazards of collision and grounding
will increase.
A brief review of the past analytical work on the transient asymmetric forces will be given first. In 1980,
Yeung and Tan presented a method to calculate the asymmetric forces acting on a ship moving near an irregular shaped bank[16J by extending a method for interaction forces between ships[15]. Similar work
was also given by Davis[2]. Thereafter, by applying the Yeungs method. Tan and Hsiung et al. calculated
the asymmetric forces acting on ships in the proximity of various shaped bank[12][6]. Further, Kijima and Qing investigated bank effect on maneuvering motion for a ship moving near a wedged shaped bank by a simulation taking the asymmetric forces into account[7]. In the Yeungs method the bank shape is dealt with theoretically by applying the conformal mapping method. However, it is difficult to obtain explicitly the mapping function for a complicated shaped bank such as a channel with varying width.
In this paper, first, a method to calculate the asymmetric forces is introduced by a combination with slender body theory and panel method. In the present method the bank is represented by source (or sink) panels which are distributed on the bank surface. Therefore the arbitrary shaped bank can be dealt with
as a channel with varying width, simulation study is made taking the effect of the asymmetric forces into
account. As a result, it is shown that in the channel with varying width course-keeping is relatively difficult due to the effect of the asymmetric forces, and potential hazards of collision and grounding are considerably large.
2.
Asymmetric Forces on a Ship moving in the Proximity of Arbitrary Shaped Bank
2. 1 Problem formulation
Let us consider the problem of a ship moving in a straight course with constant speed U in the proximity
of arbitrary shaped bank as shown in Fig. 1. It is assumed that the bank wall is vertical and water depth h
is constant. Two coordinate systems, Oo-XoyoZo fixed with respect to the space and o-xyz in steady translation
with the forward velocity of the ship are employed. The x-axis coincides with the positive direction of the ship's forward velocity. The z = O and ¿o = O planes coincide with the undisturbed free-surface, and the a-axis is taken positive upward. The ship direction O is taken between Xo- and x-axes.
In order to simplify the problem, the following assumptions are made regarding the order of magnitude:
The breadth of the ship B and the draft a' are small relative to the ship length L:
d/L = O(e), B/L = O(e),
where e is slenderness parameter. The water depth h is shallow:
h/L = O(e).
(c) The bank is a large distance away from the ship:
YO -X0
N
Ship Wakex7U
oFig. i Coordinate systems
\
S/L = 0(1).
where Sp means the distance between ship center line and the bank wall.
On the above assumptions. the governing equation in flow field far away from the ship (far-field) is
expressed as[13]
(1_Fnh)2+
=0, (1)where represents velocity potential for far-field, F,h the Froude number based on the water depth. Fh is
assumed to be small since the ship speed is not high in the restricted water. Then eq. (1) is expressed as two-dimensional Laplace's equation:
a2a2
=0.
(2)ox_
ay-Thus, the problem in the far field can be dealt with as the two-dimensional problem with respect to x-y plane.
The velocity potential can be represented by distribution of source (or sink) and vortex along the ship
center line, and source on the bank line as:
'L12
£12
(P, t) =
c(Q. t)G(P. Q)d+J
(Q, t)Gv(P.Q)dE+f(Q t)G(P. Q)dc.
-L12
(3)
Here. and ;' represent the strengths of source and vortex along the ship center line respectively, and p the
where P means field point (xo. yo), Q the source or vortex point along the ship center line (Ea,27o) and Q the
source point ori the bank line (E, .
Making a Taylor expansion of for small value of y and neglecting the higher order terms, the inner solution of eq. (3) can be obtained as:
lit =
2fLI2'
t)logxjd
t)Od LfLJ2 t)d
I ír12
r(. t)
-'dEl
i1y1--oix, t)IyI
+-f(Q. t)G(P', Q)dc
'fui, t)&(P', Qc)a'c}y
(7)where P' means the point on the ship center line n space fixed coordinate.
On the other hand, the outer solution for the inner problem has been obtained as [14] [161 strength of source on the bank line. G, Gv and G are represented respectively as follows:
C(P, Q) = lOg(xo_o)2±(yo_o)2, (4)
(5)
G(P, Q) = tan'( :I:)
= 4h
Iy+ V*(y±Ca)f(x, t),
(8)where 0 means velocity potential for inner region, S the double body sectional area, C,5 the blockage
coefficient [12], V* the cross flow velocity between the ship hull and sea bottom, f the arbitrary constant in
the two-dimensional problem formulation.
The outer solution for the inner problem and the inner solution for the outer problem are required to match in the intermediate region. By matching terms of similar nature in egs. (7) and (8). the following equations are obtained:
UdS
2h
1 (LI2
V*CaJ
ï(E,t)de, (lo)= t)
-(QC, t)-KP', Q)dc.
(11)Eliminating V" from egs. (10) and (11), and substituting eq. (9), the following integral equation can be obtained
as:
2C8
L?'
t)d_-f'(E. t)
= t)oGC(p Q)dc.
(12)
Further, the solution of eq. (12) should be augmented by the additional conditions that the pressure is
continuous across the wake vortex, and that Kelvin's theorem is satisfied as follows:
y(x, t) = 7(x) for
-
<x < L/2.
(13)L [2
t)d
= 0. (14)The boundary condition of the bank wall is expressed as:
t) =0,
(15)where n denotes outward normal of the bank surface and P the value on the bank line. Substituting eq. (3) into eq. (15). the following condition is obtained as:
2
fL/Z(Q
t)°2(P. Q)dEf 7(Q, t) oGv(p Q)dE+
Í(Q,
t)°(P, Q)dc
=0. (16)LYfl Ic üfl
IL12 Ofl
By solving eqs. (12)(14) and (16), where ' and are unknown values, the asymmetric forces can be calculated at each time steps. In this paper, eqs. (12)(14) and (16) are solved numerically by a method combined with vortex lattice [6] and panel method [3]. The detailed numerical procedure is explained in
the Appendix.
The asymmetric forces acting on a ship can be calculated from following equations. By applying
Bernoulli's theorem, the linearized pressure is given by
p=
(17)(x, t)
fL2
t)d.
Therefore the pressure jump J across the ship center line is obtained as:
L!2
Jp(x. t) =
-{7f y(, t)d-- Uy(x, t)}.
Integrating eq. (19) over the length of ship, lateral force Y and yawing moment N are obtained as:
Y(t) = _hfp(x. t)dx.
N(t) = hf
t)d.
In this paper, the non-dimensional asymmetric forces for Y and N are defined as: Cy = Y/(l/2pU2Bd),
C, = N/(l/2pU2LBd).
2. 2
Verification of the Present Method
Calculation was made for a 280.000tdw ore/oil carrier, which was used by Norrbin for studying bank effects on ships [9] [101. Table i shows principal particulars of the ship
blockage coefficient C8 was estimated by using a
small-keel-clearance formula by Taylor [12].
For verification of the present method the
asym-metric forces were calculated in the proximity of a
circular obstacle. Fig. 3 shows the notations for the circular obstacle problem. This calculation has been
performed by applying the conformal mapping method by Tan[11]. In the present method the circular obstacle is divided into line segments of finite numbers. Effect
of the segment numbers on the numerical solution was
it X XX XX X. X
Fig. 2 Body plan of a ship [9]
and Fig. 2 the body plan. The
Table i Principal particulars of a ship
ui
.-_f
LLIU
11L__1IN
N
IUI1.IID1
Full Scale Model Lpp (m) 321.56 5.024 B (ml 54.56 0.852 d (m) 21.67 0.339 17 (m3) 1.192 312.200 Cb 0.8213 Cp 0.8231 Cm 0.9978
SP
yo
Ship Trajectory
/ Ship
Fig. 3 Notations for circular obstacle problem
0.010 0.005 0.000 0.005 h/d = 1.1 S0/L = 0.5 r0/L = 1.0 Attraction
1
Bow-Out Present O Conformal Maoping Bow-In S1! LFig. 4 Variation of calculated results due to panel numbers
examined first for calculating with three different segment numbers as .V = 16. 36 and 72. The water-depth
ratio was chosen to be h / d = 1. 1. the separation Sp ¡ L = 0.5 and the radius of the circular obstacle r0 / L = 1. 0. Fig. 4 shows the variation of calculated results due to panel numbers. The solution for N = 36 and 72 shows good agreement with that by conformal mapping method. However, in the solution for \c = 16,
oscillations occur due to lack of the segment numbers. Thus it is confirmed that by use of the present method
reasonable solution can be obtained when the panel numbers are sufficient.
Next, the asymmetric forces were calculated when a ship moves parallel to a protruded bank (as
illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6). and were compared with Norrbin's experiments[10]. Figs. 5 and 6 show the comparison of the asymmetric forces acting on the ship in transient motion past short and long bank. The
lengths of the banks were equal to 3L and 6L respectively. The calculated results are indicated in relation
to an infinitely long bank steady-state values of the asymmetric forces. The present calculations show that at the ends of the bank the transient asymmetric forces are larger than the steady-state forces. Qualitative tendency of hamp as ®, ®, ® in the force curve and ® in the moment curve, and hollow as ® in the moment curve shows good agreement with the experiments. However, it seems that the fluctuation of the calculated
transient forces at the ends of the bank is larger than the experiments.
Fig. 7 shows the comparison of variation of pressure load distributions in transient motion past short bank with Norrbin's experiment [10]. It is noted that Norrbin measured the distributions of lateral force
acting on a "waterline cylinder" of the 280.000tdw ore/oil carrier [10]. The calculated results are
quantita-tively about three times smaller than the experiments (scaling ratio of the calculated results is different from
that of the experiments in Fig. 7). However, qualitative tendency of the variation of the pressure load
2
2
i
o
- Cal.
I2
X0/L
X0/L
hId =2.31
Sp/L = 0.145
Lb/L =3.0
Bb/L = 1.0
. 2\i4
6
8Fig. 5 Comparison of asymmetric forces acting on a ship in transient motion past a short bank
(above : experiment by Norrbin. below : present calculation)
It
Lb7
/////////////////////////////
4-J o
/
2CaL
2X0/L
h/d =2.31
S/L = 0.145
Lb/L=6.0
,I\ Bb/L=1.0
\\
L®A
'\
I I®I\'
24
8Fig. 6 Comoarision of symmetric forces acting on a ship in transient motion past a long bank
(above : experiment by Norrbin. below: present calculation)
Experiment by Norrbin
(i)
+LICp (0.15)Present
Calculation
(3)
(4)
>
(2)-(4)
.t,/,,/t,///I///e/t/'/ ,,(,/J/Jt//,,//JJJfl//,/ li''t'. 'J , J -J 'er 'Ji 'J''('IJJtt ((e 'eel
ti e,,,JJ,Jt
(6)
(7)
-(8)
(7)
JF,/J/,(JfJ,eJ#/JJ/JJJJ,nI JJJJPFIJ (8)-/ e' /,J//,///,Ji/t,,/,,,,,JJ//; //J//JJJ/e'ZJJJ(/fJJJFJJJJ,'"JJ?JJJJJ'JJJJ/JJJ/JJJ/JJ,
r J//JJJJJJJJ/J/ (Je'/J''JJ''J'J//''J/JJJ//JFig. 7 Comparison of change of pressure load distributions in transient motion past a short bank
distributions shows good agreement with the experiments. lt may be said that the present method is a useful
mean for understanding the features of the asymmetric forces.
2. 3 Asymmetric Foi-ces in a Channel with Varying Width
Using the present method, the characteristics of the asymmetric forces acting on a ship moving in a channel with varying width were theoretically examined. Calculations were made for three cases.
when left side bank only exists (Cal. L),
when right side bank only exists (Cal. R),
when both left and right side banks exist (Cal. B).
The bank geometry is illustrated in Fig. 8. The nallowest channel width is O.5L (about 2.95 B) in Cal. B. Fig. 8 shows the asymmetric forces acting on a ship moving in a channel with varying width. In Cal. L
the ship experiences attractive force and bow.out moment rejecting her toward the left hank, and this tendency is basically same with the asymmetric forces in case of an infinitely long bank [i]. The force and moment have almost constant values except near the ends of the protruded bank (xo/L = O and 4). In Cal. R the ship experiences attractive force and bowout moment rejecting her toward the right bank. lt is shown
that when the midship is just about at the tip of the right bank (xo/L = 1). the force and moment become
maximum. In Cal. B while the ship approaches to entrance of the channel (xo/L
= Ol). it experiences
attractive force and bow-in moment pulling her toward the right bank. This patten of the asymmetric forces
indicates that the ship has a dangerous tendency to move toward the right bank during the approach. After
the transit when the midship is just about at the tip of the right bank (xo/L = 1), the force quickly reaches a maximum value of a repulsive nature with respect to the right bank. Thus, the calculated results of the
asymmetric forces indicate that the ship must be handled carefully when the ship approachesto the entrance of the channel with varying width.
3.
Ship Maneuverability in a Channel with Varying Width
3. 1
Outline of Srnulation Method
Next, effect of the asymmetric forces on ship maneuvering motion was investigated by a simulation study. A ship maneuvering motion in the proximity of a wedged shaped bank wall has been investigated by
Kijima and Qing [7]. In this paper, therefore, emphasis is placed on maneuvering motion in a channel with varying width. Outline will be first shown of the simulation method where the effect of the asymmetric
forces has been taken into account. Force and moment (X5, Y5, N5) acting on a ship moving near the irregular bank is expressed as:
Ks =XK+XR±XP+XB,
Ys= Y+YR+Yp+Y8, (24)
N5 = NH ±NR+ N + N3.
Here. subscript H, R, P, and B means ship hull, a rudder, a propeller and component of the asymmetric forces respectively. Mutual interaction between the terms with the subscript H, R. and P, and with subscript B is assumed to be small. Then, a mathematical model for the simulation in infinite water region can be used for
0.15
0.10
0.05
>-ci
0.05
0.10
0.15
1
L)
C0O
E
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.02--
-0.04---U.0-1
Ye
N O Yoh/d = 1.3
y-'
1/"U
///////I//////////////////////////////////////////////////4
i
2
3Xo / L
--
Left Bank
(CaL L)
Right Bank (Cal R)
Both Banks (Cal. B)
/''
I I0
12
3
X0/L
7
JFig. S Asymmetric forces acting on a ship moving in a channel with varying width
5
6
5 6
where 0 and 0-2 are gain constants, and Uo denotes
initial velocity.
Fig. 10 shows the simulation results of the ship
and steered motions through in the channel. The
gain constants were chosen to be 0 10 and 02 = 2(Cal.1), and C = 3 and 02= 2(Cal.2). The
water-depth ratio was chosen to be h/d = 1.3 and initial
velocity U0 = 1.Oknot. Despite the rudder control is made for course keeping, it approaches to the right bank due to the action of bow-in moment pulling her
toward the right bank around the entrance of the channel (x0/L = 0-2). When the midship is just
around the
tip of the right bank
(x0/L 2), herdirection changes toward the left bank. After that,
n Cal. 1 the ship can move near the center line of the
channel. but in Cal. 2 it approaches to the left bank gradually around .ro/L 3--5. The maximum
rud-o Present Calculation Experiment by Norrbin h/d= 2.31 Spa / L 0.24 S00/LsC 0 1 2 x0/L
Fig. 9 Comparison of ship motion between
present simulation and experiment
model [8] was employed.
The terms with subscript B, X8, Y8 and N8. are assumed to be expressed as follows
X8 1/2p BC/U2 k1C(x0, yo) sinO,
Y8 = 1/2p BC/Li" k1Cy(xo. Yo) cosO, (25)
N8 = l/2p BdLU k2C(x0.yo).
where Cr and C are the non-dimensional asymmetric forces when the ship moves straight with constant
speed in the channel, k1 and k2 the correction factors of Cr and Cv. TheCr and C can be predicted using the present method described above. However, for saving the computational time, the Cr and C.-, were estimated from their tables which are provided using the present method in advance.
3. 2
Ship Maneuvering motion in a Channel with Varying Width
For verification of the present method, a simulation was made of the maneuvering motion for an
unsteered ship in response to the interference with the protruded short bank as illustrated in Fig. 5, and compared with free'running model test result performed by Norrbin [101. Maneuvering forces such as hydrodynamic derivatives, added masses and rudder force were estimated from the model test results with
various water depth for Esso Osaka ship hull form [41. Fig. 9 shows the comparison of ship motion between
present simulation and experiment. The present simulation result shows good agreement with the experi ment for ship trajectory, heading angle O and drifting angle . Thus, it was confirmed that the present
simulation has sufficient accracy from the practical view point.
Next, a simulation of maneuvering motion for a ship moving in a channel with varying width was made.
For steering in the channel the automatic control of a rudder angle J is made according to the formula
40 30 20
20
30
40
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 I I h/d = 1.3Cal. i: G =10, G2=2
CaL2 : G1=3, G2=2
6x0/L
Fig. lo Simulation results of ship and steered motions through a channel with varying width der angle in Cal. i becomes larger than 30 (deg). Larger rudder angle than conventional operation may be
necessary for the safety navigation in the channel. Thus, it is shown that in the channel with varying width
course-keeping is difficult due to the effect of the asymmetric forces in any case, and potential hazards of
collision and grounding are considerably large.
4. Concluding Remarks
In this paper, theoretical investingation is made into bank effect on ship maneuverability in a channel
with varying width. First, a method to calculate asymmetric forces such as lateral force and yawing moment
acting on a ship in the proximity of arbitrary shaped bank is introduced. Calculation vas made by use of the present method and comparison was made with experiments. The present calculations show good
agreement with the experiments for qualitative tendency of the asymmetric force and moment curves, and it
is confirmed that the present method is a useful mean for obtaining the characteristics of the asymmetric
forces. Further, using the present method, theoretical examinations were made of the behavior of the
asymmetric forces in the channel with varying width. The calculated results of the asymmetric forces indicate that the ship must be handled carefully when the ship approaches to the entrance of the channel.
Next. simulation study was made in order to investigate the bank effect on ship manevering motion in
the channel. As a result, it is shown that conrse-keeping is difficult due to the effect of the asymmetric forces, and potential hazards of collision and grounding are considerably large in the channel with varying
width.
For improvement of the prediction accuracy of the asymmetric forces, further study on the effect of the
ship's thickness may be needed, since the thickness effect is not exactly taken into consideration in the present method, which is based on two-dimensional thin wing theory. Such improvement will be left to the future wo r k
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to Prof. K. Kijima of Kvushu University for his
continuous encouragement and guidance. Thanks are also due to Mr, H. Kasai. Senior Project Manager of Ship and Ocean Engineering Laboratory of Nagasaki Research and Development Center, MHI for his
valuable discussion. Thanks are also extended to all the members of the Nagasaki Experimental Tank for
their cooperation.
References
Beck. R. F.: Forces and Moment on a Ship Moving in a Shallow Channel, Journal of Ship Research,
Vol. 21, No. 2 (1977), pp. 107-119.
Davis, A. M. J.: Hydrodynamic Effects of Fixed Obstacles on Ship in Shallow Water. Journal of Ship
Research. Vol. 30, No. 2 (1986), pp. 94-102.
Hess, J. H. and Smith. A. M. O.: Calculation of Potential Flow about Arbitrary Bodies. Progress in
Aeronautical Science. Vol.8. Pergamon Press 1966).
Hirano, M., Yumuro, A., Nonaka, K. and Kobayashi, H.: Bulletin of the Society of Naval Architects
of Japan. Vol. 668 (1985), pp. 45-57.
Hsiung, C. C. and Gui, Q.: Computing Interaction Forces and Moments on a Ship in Restricted
Waterway, I. 5. P. , Vol. 35, No. 403 (1988), pp. 219-254.
James, R. M.: On the Remarkable Accuracy of the Vortex Lattice Method. Computer Methods in
Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1972), pp. 59-79.
Kijima. K. and Qing, H.: Maneuvering Motion of a Ship in the Proximity of Bank Wall, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan. Vol. 162 (1987), pp. 125-132.
Kobayashi. E. and Asai, S.: A Simulation Study on Ship Maneuverability at Low Speeds, Proc. RINA mt. Conf. on Ship Maneuverability-Prediction and Achievement, London (1987), Paper No. 10.
Norrbin, N. H.: Bank Effects on a Ship Moving Through a Short Dredged Channel. Proc. 10th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Cambridge. Mass. (1974), pp. 52-63.
[io] Norrbin, N. H.: A Method for the Prediction of the Maneuvering Lane of a Ship in a Channel of
Varying Width, Symposium on Aspects of Navigability of Constraint Waterways, including Harbor
Entrances. Delft (1978). pp. 1-16.
[ii] Tan, W. T.: Unsteady l-Ivdrodynamic Interaction of Ships in the Proximity of Fixed Obstacles. MIT
Report 79-1 (1979).
Taylor, P. J.: The Blockage Coefficient for Flow about an Arbitrary Body Immersed in a Channel. Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 17, No. 2 (1973), pp. 97-105.
where
points respectively.
forE > x,
(A-3)
(1966). pp. 81-95.
Yasukawa. H.: A Theoretical Study of HydrodynamicDerivatives on Ship Maneuvering in Restricted Water, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 163 (1988), pp. 119-129.
Yeung, R. W.: On the Interactions of Slender Ships in Shallow Water. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol.
85. Part 1 (1978). pp. 143-159.
Yeung, R. W. and Tan, W. T.: Hydrodynamic Interactions of Ships with Fixed Obstacles, Journal of
Ship Research. Vol. 24. No. 1 (1980), pp. 50-59.
Appendix Numerical Procedure
A ship is first divided into M segments of equal length.zix. and the ship's moving distance for one time
step is defined as i.. Bank surface is also divided into Nd segments. Within each of these segments the
vortex and source strengths are assumed to be constant.
Using these discretedistribution assumptions, eqs. (12) and (16) can be transformed into a system of linear
simultaneous equations as:
M
-
kß(k) y.ik)±= 0, (A-1)
M k
Er.ik 7,1(k) + Fmj y(k) +
IImn,
= G,n. (A-2)J=t
i=1.2
,Mm=1,2.
,N
xi -forE < x,
=f
aGcQ)dc,
(A-S) = 2k 0.,C8(Pcm, Qc)z1x}. (A-9)Here, the vortex strength within the jth element of the ship at time tk is denoted by
y1,
j = 1, 2. , M,and the vortex strength in the wake element i = 1, 2. . k, where
j = k
corresponds to the wakeelement nearest the trailing edge of the ship. Further, the source strength within the n'th segment of the bank wall is denoted by n = 1. 2, , N. The - and - mean the value of the wake and the source
The additional equations (13) and (14) can be written in discretized form as follows:
ik) ik-i) for
i=1,2.
ki
k = 2, 3,
M k
E7k.Jx±E
k)J = 0.tjsing eq. (A-10), eqs. (A-1), (A-2) and (A-li) are rewritten as follows:
i! Vc k-i
E A1 yik+Bik),c
±E D,(pk> = -
E B1I (k_l) n=I J=I if Vc k-t E Emj' 7(k) + F,kk '(kt1+ E [2r,,,(k)1(k) 0,,,tkt- E
(k-l1 flL M k-tEytixi 7k1X =
-1=1,2,
.M m = 1, 2, . _Vc k = 2, 3.From eqs. (A-12)--(A-14) the matrix of linear equations for ;' (M+1 numbers) and p, (N numbers) can be
constructed. By solving the matrix at each time step, the asymmetric forces on a ship can be calculated. In
the present calculations, the vortex and control points on the ship hull were chosen to be 1/4 and 3/4 of the
segment length respectively.
(A-10>
(A-11)