• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

Pseudo-Riemannien metric of the signature (n,n) associated with a symplectic formon a 2n-dimensional manifold

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Pseudo-Riemannien metric of the signature (n,n) associated with a symplectic formon a 2n-dimensional manifold"

Copied!
4
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

Scientific Researchof the Instituteof Mathematicsand Computer Science

PSEUDO-RIEMANNIEN METRIC OF THE SIGNATURE (n,n) ASSOCIATED WITH A SYMPLECTIC FORM

ON A 2n-DIMENSIONAL MANIFOLD

Jerzy Grochulski

Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland email: jerzy.grochulski@wp.pl

Abstract. In the paper the pseudo-Riemannien structure of the signature (n, n) has been applied a connection of this symplectic structure.

Let M be a 2n-dimensional smooth differentiable manifold. By F(M) we denote the ring of all smooth real functions on M and by (M ) we denote the F(M) - mo- dule of all smooth vector fields tangent to M. Next, let TM be the tangent bundle of M and T

X

M be the tangent space to M at the point xM .

As it is well known, a skew-symmetric two-form ω on M is called an almost - symplectic structure on M if the mapping

for X ∈ ℵ (M ) , X a l

X

ω = ω ( X , ⋅ ) ∈ ℵ

*

( M )

is an isomorphism, where ℵ

*

( M ) is F(M) - module dual to (M ) . Moreover, if ω

d = 0, then ω is called a symplectic manifold. Now let ( M , ω ) be a symplectic manifold and l : LM be an immersion. Then L is called ω -Lagrangian sub- manifold if

1. ∀ xL l

x

( T

X

L ) ⊂ T

X

M is ω - isotropic subspace, 2. there exists subbudle ETLE .

One can prove

Proposition 1. Let ( M , ω ) be a symplectic manifold and LM submanifold of M if any only if

(1) dim L = 2

1 dim M,

(2) L is ω - isotropic submanifold, that means ∀ xL l ( T

X

L ) ω

X

- isotropic sub-

budle of T

X

M .

(2)

J. Grochulski 66

Evidently if L is ω -Lagrangian submanifold of ( M , ω ) then TL is a ω -Lagrangian of TM submanifold that means ω ( v , u ) = 0 for any vuTL , as well as dim TL

= 2

1 dim TM.

Let ( M , ω ) be a 2n-dimensional symplectic manifold and let U

W

TM = ⊕ (1)

be decomposition into the direct sum of ω -Lagrangian submanifolds W and U.

Denote by

W TM

P : → and Q : TMU (2)

the projections of TM onto the submanifolds W and U parallel to the complemen- tary submanifolds U and W respectively.

Obviously P and Q are smooth tensor fields of type (1) on M satisfying the follow- ing conditions

P

P

2

= Q

2

= Q and P + Q = id

In consequence the tensor field t = P – Q on M is an almost product structure on M.

One can easily to prove the identity

)) ( , ( ) ), ( ( ) ,

( X Y ω P X Y ω X P Y

ω = + (3)

Now let us put

) ), ( ( 2 ) ,

( X Y P X Y

T = ω (4)

for any X , Y ∈ ℵ ( M ) . Hence by definitions T is a smooth tensor field of type (2,0) on M of rank n, that means rank T

X

= n for any xM .

From (3) and (4) it follows the identity

{ ( , ) ( , ) }

2 ) 1 ,

( X Y = T X YT Y X

ω (5)

with shows us that ω is equal to the skew-symmetric part T, that means ω = A (T ) . Let now

{ ( , ) ( , ) }

2 ) 1 ,

( X Y T X Y T Y X

g = + (6)

for arbitrary X , Y ∈ ℵ ( M ) . So, by definition g = S (T ) is a smooth symmetric

tensor field on M, of type (2,0). We will show that g is a pseudo-Riemannien met-

ric on M of the signature (n,n).

(3)

Pseudo-Riemannien metric of the signature (n,n) associated with a symplectic form ... 67

Really, let x be an arbitrary point of M. Then there exists an open neighbour- hood V of x and smooth vector fields X

1

,..., X

n

, Y

1

,..., Y

n

on V such that

( ) x X ( ) x

X

W

x

=

1

,...,

n

and U

x

= Y

1

( ) x ,..., Y

n

( ) x

Now it is easy to show that the matrix of the symplectic form ω ( ) x with respect to the basis X

1

( ) x ,..., X

n

( ) x , Y

1

( ) x ,..., Y

n

( ) x has the form

( )  

 

≈ −

0 0

A

t

A

ω x (7)

where A = ( ω ( X

i

( ) ( ) x , Y

j

x ) ) , i, j = 1,2,….n. Evidently det A ≠ 0 .

Using now (4) one can show that the matrix of the tensor T with respect to

x

the basis has the from

 

 

≈  0 0

2

0 A

T

X

(8)

Next from (6) and (8) it follows that the matrix of the form g with respect to

x

the considerable basis has the form

 

 

≈ −

0 0

x t

A A

g (9)

Evidently from (9) it follows that g is of maximal rank.

Therefore g is pseudo-Rimannien metric on M. Furthermore on can show that the signature of g is (n, n).

Hence we have

Theorem 1. Let ( M , ω ) be a 2n-dimensional symplectic manifold. Then for every decomposition TM = WU of the tangent bundle into the direct sum of

ω -Lagrangian submanifold there exists exactly one smoot tensor field T on M, of type (2,0), defined by (4) such that

(1) ω = A (T )

(2) g = S (T ) is a pseudo-Rimannien metric on M of the signature (n, n).

Evidently T = ω + g . Hence by definition (4) we get the identity

( X Y )

Y X P Y

X

g ( , ) = 2 ω ( ( ), ) − ω , and consequently the identity

( ) ( P X Y )

Y X P

g ( ( ), ) = ω ,

(4)

J. Grochulski 68

Using the last identity one can easily verify that the ω -Lagrangian submanifold W and U in (1) are at the same time g-isotropic subbundles.

From Theorem (1) it follows

Corollary 1. Let ( M , ω ) be a 2n-dimensional symplectic manifold. Then there exists one-to-one correspondence between almost product structures t of rank n on M, on the hand, and the tensor fields T on M defined By (4) on the other hand.

References

[1] Abraham R., Marsden J.E., Foundations of Mechanics, Benjamin, New York 1967.

[2] Gancarzewicz J., Geometria róŜniczkowa, PWN, Warszawa 1987.

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

However, the methods developed for the derivation of the results above can be applied to the problem of existence of 4 linearly independent sections and 4-dimensional subbundles

[11] —, Examples of four-dimensional Riemannian manifolds satisfying some pseu- dosymmetry curvature conditions, in: Geometry and Topology of Submanifolds, II, Avignon, May 1988,

Next, we replace the translations by the free generators with a free family of operators and prove inequalities of the same type.. It was shown

The problem of the existence of a union of independent cycles of prescribed lengths in a graph was considered by many authors (see [1, 5, 6, 8, 10]).. Theorem 1 implies easily

It follows from the proof that in order to estimate the norms of powers of A it suffices to estimate the dimension and norm of the eigenprojection on the subspace spanned

Moreover, observe that in the multivalued case even if F is affine in the control we cannot use the argument employed in the proof of ([2], Theorem 3 p. 49) in order to prove

[r]

The stage of events filtering is based on the ontology engine that automatically, with the use of the knowledge base and a set of rules, defines if the registered event is