ThGHNISCHE utIvZITT
bum vo
3_oS
AhIef
Meketweg.2, 2828 CD Deift
Tel.: 015- 786373 -Fax: 015-781838
HYDRODYNANIC LOAD MODELS OF SLENDER MARINE STRUCTURES
by
Erling Huse
MARINTEK, Norway
Summary of WEGEMT lecture, Trondheim 1991
The Morison equation is the basis of all commonly used
engineering calculations of hydrodynainic ioad
on slender
marine structures.
It is simple, and it is efficient in terms
of computer capacity requirement.
However, when used with
constant coefficients it represents a severe
over-simplification of the true nature of the flow around such
structures
The choice of coefficients thus tends to become
somewhat arbitrary, and the reliability of the results
correspondingly poor.
(For more information, see Appendix 1)
On the other hand, a very extensive effort has been spent in
recent years on developing vortex methods, i.e. procedures
based on numerical modeling of the individual vortices being
shed from the structure..
This represents a much more detailed
and accurate representation of the real flow.
Considerable
progress has been achieved by this line of approach.
However,
such methods tend to become very expensive in terms of
computer capacity reqirernents. Furthermore, present-day
understanding of the physical process by which the individual
vortices transform into a turbulent wake. field is limited and
hard to modél numerically.
So far the application of such
methods has been limited to very simple geometries, and only
to research activities.
Extensive application of such, methods
in engineering calculations can at the best be considered as
music of a distant future.
(Appendix 2 shows a survey of the
very latest literature on the subject)
Between the above twö extremes with respect to complexity
there is the possibility of describing the wake, not by
individual vortices, but by a turbulent shear flow field.
The
momentum of the wake immediately behind the body is determined
by the instantaneous drag force on the body.
Further
development of the wake in time and space. takes place
according to relatively simple mathematical formulae.
The
instantaneous drag, force. on the body is calculated. by the
Morison formula, using the drag coefficient in stationary
flow, but correcting. the irif low. velOcity for the wake
generated by all previous oscillations of the body.
This line
of approach has proved very fruitful in describing and
predicting the drag force on different types of bodies.
A.
-518 wegemtl.rep
oov mMaioJ
a
e ibupon the drag coefficient. (or more
-,
details, see Appendix 3)
A simple but efficient improvement
is to substitute the
quadratic
drag force in the Morison formula by the sum of a
linear plus a quadratic force.
In this way one can by a set
of constant coefficients obtain a reasonably
correct drag
APPENDIX i
L4,
£.
, $
'E-
J,,
(
,
7
VISCOUS WAVE LOADS AND
DAMPING
Viscous flow phenomena are of importance in several problems related to
wave loads on ships and offshore structures. Examples are wave loads on
jackets, risers, tethers and pipelines, roll damping of ships and barges,
slow-drift oscillation damping of moored structures in irregular sea
and
wind, anchor line damping, and 'ringing' or 'springing' damping of
TLPs.
The main factors influencing the flow are:
Reynolds number Rn = CD/v (U = characteristic free stream
velocity, D = characteristic length of the body, y = kinematic
viscosity coefficient
,Roughness number = k/D (k = characteristic cross-sectional
dimension of the roughness on the body surface),
KeuleganCarpenter number KC) (= U
T1
D for ambient
oscillatory planar flow with velocity U sirn.(2t/T)t +
E'
past
a ftxed bodv,
Relative current number (=UJU when the current velocity
U is in the same direction as the oscillatory flow velocity
sin((2r/ T)t
+ E)),
Body form,
Free-surfisce effects,
Sea-floor effects,
Nature of ambient flow relative to the structure's orientation,
Reduced velocity (UR = U/fD) for an elastically mounted
cylinder with natural frequencyf).
Sometimes /3 = Rn/KC = D2/(vT) is also used to characterize the flow.
Detailed discussions of many of the factors mentioned above can
be
found in Sarpkaya & Isàacson (1981). For harmonically oscillating
flow
around a fixed circular cylinder of diameter D, we may write
KG =
22tA/D, where A is the amplitude of oscillation of the fluid far away
from
the body. We then see that KG expresses the distance a free stream
fluid
particle moves relative to the body diameter.
MORISON'S EQUATION
Morison's equation (Morison et al. 1950) is often used to calculate wave
loads on circular cylindrical structural members of flxd offshore
' iuu. V it Vt
LOADS
ANI) DAMI'! NG
structures when viscous forces matter. Morison's equation tells us that
the horizontal force dF on a strip of length dz of a vertical rigid circülar
cylinder (see Fig. 3.14) can be written as
írD
dF=p 4dzCAfaI+CDDdzIuIu
(7.1)
Positive force direction is in the wave propagation direction.
p is the
mass density of the water, D is the cylinder diameter, u and a are the
horizontal undisturbed fluid velocity and acceleration at the midpoint of
the strip. The mass and drag coefficients CM and CD have to be
empirically determined and are dependent on the parameters mentioned
in the beginning of the chapter.
Considering deep water regular sinusoidal incident waves (see Table
2.1) and assuming CM and C1- to be constant with depth (which might
not be realistic), we may easily show that the mass-force decays with
depth like
The drag force decays like e4
and is even more
concentrated in the free-surface zone. When there is a wave node at the
cylinder axis the mass-force will have a maximum absolute value and the
drag-force will then be zero. The drag-force on a submerged strip will
have a maximum absolute value when there is a wave crest or a wave
trough at the cylinder axis. If viscous effects are negligible, it is possible
to show analytically that Morison's equation is the correct asymptotic
solution for large AID-values (see discussion of equation (3.34'). The
C-value should then be two for a circular cross-section.
If fluid
acceleration can be neglected, Morison's equation
is
a
reasonable
empirical formulation for the time average force. Typical CD- and
C-vaIues for transcritical flow past a smooth circular cylinder at
KC> 40 are 0.7 and 1.8. A roughness number
kID
of 0.02 can
represent more than 100°o increase in CD relative to the CD-value for a
smooth circular cylinder (Sarpkaya, 1985). This means the effect of
roughness is more significant in oscillatory ambient flow than in steady
incident flow.
The application of Morison's equation
in the
free-surface zone
requires accurate estimates of the undisturbed velocity distribution under
a wave crest. The prediction of the velocity distribution based on linear
wave theory was discussed in connection with Fig. 2.2. A straightforward
application of Morison's equation implies that the absolute value of the
force per unit length is largest at the free-surface. This is unphysical
since the pressure is constant on the free-surface. This means the force
per unit length has to go to zero at the free-surface. It should also be
noted that the position of the free-surface at the cylinder is affected by
wave run up on the upstream side of the cylinder and a wave depression
on the downstream side. The vertical position of the maximum absolute
value of the local force has to be experimentally determined. The order
MORISON'S EQUATION
225
of magnitude of the position may be 25% of the wave amplitude down in
the fluid from the free-surface. We should note that Morison'sequatiqfl,
cannot predict at all the oscillatory forces due to voñex shedding in.
the
lift direction, i.e. forces orthogonal to the wave propagation direction and..
in the cross-sectional plane.
Morison's equation can be modified
cylinder. Consider a vertical cylinder
body motion of a strip of length dz by
hydrodynamic force on the cylinder as
dF = PCDD dz(u i1) lu
-+pC.fdzaI-p(CM-1)dZI
(7.2)
Dot stands for time derivative. Both u and a1 are position-dependent. It
should be noted that the inertia term does not depend on the relative
acceleration term. The reason for this can be found by studying the
analytical solution in the potential flow case.
The FroudeKrilod force
(i.e.
undisturbed wave pressure force) results
in a horizontal force
pL-rD-/4; dz a1 which is independent
of the rigid body motion (See
chapter 3'. The
CD-
and C%-values in equation (7.2) are not
necessarily
the same as in equation (7.1).
Morison's equation can also be applied to inclined members. To
demonstrate this let us consider a cylinder inclined in a plane parallel to
the wave propagation direction. The approach would be to decompose
the undisturbed velocity and
acceleration into components normal to the
cylinder axis and components parallel to
the cylinder axis. and then use
Morison's equation with normal components of velocity and acceleration.
The force direction vill be normal to the cylinder axis. In the potential
flow case, it can be proven that this is the correct expression. In the
viscous case it means that we use the 'cross-flow' principle (see chapter
6). Actually what we are proposing to do for an inclined cylinder is not
different from the vertical cylinder case. In the latter case there is also an
undisturbed tangential velocity and acceleration component in the fluid.
The effect of this was neglected in
equation (7. 1).
When the cylinder axis is not in the
plane of the wave propagation
direction, there exist different possibilities for formulations. Let us
illustrate this using a submerged horizontal circular cylinder in waves
where the wave propagation direction is orthogonal to the cylinder axis.
A straightforward generalization
of Morison's equation would be to write
the horizontal and vertical force on a
strip of length dy as
dF1=p
dyCMaI+CDDdyu(u2+W2)
dF = p
dy GMa3 +
CDD
dy w(u2 + w2)
(7.4)
in the case of a moving tircular
and denote the horizontal rigid
We can write the horizontal
226
VISCOUS WAVE LOADS AND DAMPING
Here w and a3 are vertical undisturbed
fluid velocity and acce1eration
components at the midpoint of the strip. Chaplin (1988) has shown that
improved correlation with
experiments can be obtained. if djfferent
CM
and CD coefficients
are
assigned
to
the
horizontal and
vertical
components .
When waves and currents are acting simultaneously, the combined
effect should be considered. The normal approach is to add vectorially
the wave-induced velocity and the current velocity in the velocity term of
the Morison's equation. As mentioned in the beginning of the chapter,
one should be aware that CM- and CD-values
are also influenced by the
presence of a current.
The design wave approach
is
often
used
in combination with
Morison's equation. This
means one analyses the load effect of
a regular
wave system. Often non-linear wave theories
are used. A short
term-statistical approach
may also be applied (Vinje, 1980). However,
more
has to be learned about CM- and CD-Values in this context. For instance,
is it right to use just
one CM- and one CD-value to represent a sea state?
If so, is it then sufficient to use a characteristic KeuleganCarpenter
number, Reynolds number, roughness ratio
etc. to estimate the CM- and
CD-value? The answer is probably
yes if the characteristic KC-number
is large and the flow is not in a critical flow regime. What we mean by a
large characteristic KG-number has
to be precisely defined. In the
case
of extreme wave loads
on a strip of a vertical circular cylinder close to the
free surface 7rHmax/D is
a characteristic KG-number, where Hmax is the
most probable largest wave height. If 7tHmaJD >
40 we could consider
the KG-number to be large. A typical
CD-value for a smooth surface is
then 0.7. It is of course easy to criticize Morison's equation. However,
there is nothing better from a practical point of view. The reason for this
is the ver complicated flow picture that
occurs for separated flow around
marine structures.
Many attempts have been made to solve separated flow around marine
structures numerically. Examples of methods used
are
Single vortex method (Brown & Michael, 1955; Faltinsen &
Sortland, 1987)
Vortex sheet model (Faltinsen & Pettersen,
1987)
Discrete vortex method (Sarpkava & Shoaff,
1979)
Combination of Ghorin's method and vortex-in-cell method
(Chorin, 1973; Smith & Stansby, 1988)
NavierStokes solvers (Lecointe & Piquet,
1985)
A general description of the
state of the art is that the methods
are
generally limited to two-dimensional flow,
that
the methods have
documented satisfactory
agreement in some cases, but that they
are
presently not robust enough to be applied with
confidence in
omp1etely
new problems, where there is no guidance from experiments. Due
to
MARINT EK
IIYDRODYNAMIC DATA
2-D circular cylinder
Flow regimes and drag in steady flow
Page:
3.
Fig.:
Des. 1990
100 80 60 40 co 20 10 8 6 4 2 0.8 0.6 0.4 02 0.7Fig. 3.la. Incompressible flow regimes and their consequences.
io-'
2 6 6 8100 2 48iv 2
46 62 2
Fig. 3.lb. Drag coefficient for circulai cylinders as a function of Reynolds number Schlicht-ing 1968).
i;
Hl
_Li1 Io
H
II!!
..
0.7 0.3 7.0 M,J2WN 7.9 4.ezeisoe;j,
4Z.0 800Jx.0.
¡ .Tflçjda,ef to"b o .3.0 r I IX-
VFig. 1.4. Drag anefficient for circular cylinders as a function of the Reynoldsnumber
Sarpkaya &
Isaacsofl
Schlichting
(1968)
ASi.crtticol
BCritical
C Suoercrlticol DPost-sercrlticai
Bou.mdory loyerSa tian
Shear loyer near separation Strouhal matter Woke Anoroxicinte Re range turbulent laninar about l2deg. transition transition turbulent 120 - 130 deg. lOEltinar sepa-ration, bubble turbulent reattacFsnent 0.35 - 0.'i5 5x105-
3x106 turbulent about 120 deg. turbulent about 0.29 3x106 lOEninar S0.212_j1
Re60 lninor
'503
vortex street Re 5000 ,5 < 2x1u transitionioic
2x105 to 5x1A
BFC--jD
(1981)
100C
10 0.1 4 444 4.I
Il
ttill
Iiii!
if1
IIII
III,
IIl
-...\
III
I 101 100 101 102 iO iORe
lO 106 iQ-.68,2 468,2
MARINTEK
e
L.ii.ur separation
Li. ar ....
Turh,jttflt 5e,.lrat tun
HYDRODYNAMIC DATA
2-D circular cylinder
Flow regimes
Laminar urt sees
Luotnur separat icr R ¿tta.hm.nt
i.nc separat ¡on
Cross 3-dlmensuonaiacv gen.'rs tur5oi,gt was. tUflut..;iL vart ..r,. J.fl.nst ream
Rd
R=10-40
L, bscreases with RR3O-50
Unstable downstreamR50-15O
Castie.,! won kSrmin rane.Isneral wrbir :enr i.Jk. down .1 ream
transcrit ¡cal
risi..
- P3x1O6
Fig. i. Sketches of the flow past a circular cylinder for various
ranges of Reynolds nûsober.
R:300-2x1 O
wbcritca1 rector
Cru ccii regime
P2-6x105
Sipercrttical reas..RxO5-3x1O6
Page: 3.3.
Fig.:
1990
Ver].y (1980)
MARINTEK
Figure 14. Drag coefficient ut çy1indei (19.a) having various degrees of surface
(sand-grain size
k as against diameter "d.
HYDRODYNAMIC DATA
2-D circular cylinder
Drag in steady flow
Effect of roughness
REYNOtDS 5UER. e
Fig. 35. Drag coefficient for rougicylinders as a function of Reynolds number.
C0=1 .19
C114
CD.'lO4 1-03C.106
Hoerner
(1958)
Sarpkaya &
Isaacson
(1981)
Hoe me r
(1958)
MARINTEK
[l1LïTii
2
-è-\
.._.L
..- .-,- -.
4---t î
..6 --i .-,-.
'
.4 -
-.
..L_---i-.
'i
-t-
.t-(a) r/b0 0.02!
HYDRODYNAMIC DATA
2-D cylinders, different shapes
Drag in steady flow
Nominal
size. inches
o12
L o4
3/
---Ret 3
(b) ,/b:0.I67
.1234 68!O
23
Reynolds numbe'. R
(c) r/LtO.333
Figure 8Variation
of d,ag coefficient
and Slrc'uhol number
..ith ReiOWS
,vmber for
me I:! fineness
ratio rectangular
cylinders.
Page: .3.'
Fig.:
Des. 1990
DelaflY &
Sorensen
(1953)
I
MARINTEK
1.5 I.0 I I1111F
i I i I11111
_Cd.
se » .5..' 2=497"e.f
aL3830e GG»
t
JI!eS15.'S l_?.
8 L a 3 M - 1107:
La 34 . Ltat
tt1985
hi'
3123 0.5 K 04 I I i IIII
I i I iliti
0.5 4HYDRODYNAMIC DATA
Fig. 3.17. Cd versus K for various values of the frequency parameter (Sarpkaya 1976a).
3.0 2.0 a
-a¶"r
atLóaI107
aJ:-'" ...
S...
. : Là S L S5 IO 20 30Fig. 3.18. Cm versus K for various values of the frequency parameter tSa.rpkaya 1976a).
2-D circular cylinder
Drag and mass coefficients
Oscillatory flow
so ioo 150 200
Fig. 3.21. Cd versus Reynolds number for various values of K (Sarpkaya 1976a).
Page: ..
/ i
Fig.:
Des. 1990
Sarpkaya &
Isaacson
(1981)
3 4 5 10 20 30 40 50 100 'So 3.0 2.0 LS 1.0MARINT EK
e., e., I.. i.' e. IO Io a'C.,
I I t 0.0HYDRODYNAMIC DATA
2-D circular cylinder
Drag and mass coefficients
Oscillatory flow
Effect of roughness
F.. 3.28e. Cd oera,,o Re for oecythdcea. K 20 iSaspkaye 1976b).
a_000_ -3
z-.-....
0' 0.0
Fig. 3.28b. C., .eraua Re (nr 000g)e cybodon. K 20 tSezpkaye ¡976b1.
i/On/tOO
7
'a
0.3 o.s e
a., .
Fig. 329e. ( ,enea Re for tou0 C)tifldOfI. K Iflfl eSt,pka 96u
8.010
t I t
s Io ti
FIg. 3.29b. C., reno. R. for rough cytjn&rs. IC lOO (Seopkeya 1976b).
Page: 3.iz
Fig.:
Des. 1990
Sarpkaya &
Isaacson
(1981)
i
il
0.4 Iliii
I i I Ijill
i 3 4 5 6 78 9 lO
20 30 40 50 100 150 200KC
Fig. 6.16.
CA, vs. KC number for various values of RL'
(or ß
Re/KC) for smooth
circular cylinder [Sarpkaya
(1976)]
I I ¡ J i I I- ¡ I = 497
3
...
RezlO =10
Th
20-:::-
-_ .30
-C 2 ...\
.N
N
p784
N
1107=
-_a80
70 10.
1985 ..1 50 -I I , I I I II
I i 10 15 20 30 ¿0 50 100 150 200KC
Fig. 6.17.
CD vs. KC number for various values of
Re
(or ß =
Re/KC)
for smooth
circular cylinder [Sarpkaya
(1976)]
6.4. HydrodYflami
Coefficients
60 80 205
Re, xIO
Fig. 6.20.
Lift coefficient vs.
Reynolds numbcr for various
values of KC for smooth
circular cylinder [SarpkaYa
(1976)]
201
0.5
0.'
-0.3 I I I I I 25 3 4 5 o 7 8 9 3.0 I I III
2.0 1.5 3.0 2.0 1.5 CM 1.0 0.5 C0 1.0345
Iois
6.4 Hydrodynamic
Coefficients
CD
4
3
2
i
o
i
BEARMANI et OU 1984)
TANAKA, Ct ol. (1983)
10
20
30
40
50
6Ò
70
80
KC
FIg, 6.23.
Mean values of C%f and CD vs.
KC forsmoöthçylinderS of square section
[Bearman, er al. (1984)
and Tanaka,
t al. (1983)]
3.0
2.0
1.0
o
Ocean Test
Structure Doto
GULF 0F MXIC0
Mean voluefòt
,"ròuçhenad member
-
Mean value
tôr
clean member
-I- Io
2030
40
70
KC.
Fig 6.40.
Mean CD valües vs. KC
for smöoth and rough cylinders from Qcean.
Test Structure Data [Heideman.
et aL (1979)]
203
CN4
MARINTEK
HYDRODYNAPVHC DATA
2-D circular cylinders
Mass-, drag- and lift coefficients
Oscillatory flow
Interaction and shielding effects
Fig. 6.36.
CM, C0. and CL values vs. KC and spacing parameters for the
shaded
cylinder in a vertical live-cylinder array in tandem in a wave tank
Chakrabarti (1987)
The lift coefficient, CL, refers to the transverse
force.
Page:
3.2Ç
Fig.:
Des. 1990
I-::=
N
0t1
0?1QT
j
-
-.----e-S.e0L 110 33 00 200 ''Qe--
--\
r
* o 'o 20 40 50 60I
u o 3 o -k o 3 2 o o 20 30 40o
60 (ccAPPENDIX 2
8
NUMERICAL
MODELLINGOF
FLOW
AROUNÒ CYLINDERS
81
.nthuctión
Hydrodynamic forces due to Unsteady vortex shedding, play
an important role
inprediting the hydrodynamic fotces
onriser
tubes and mOOring
lines,wave excitation
andstudying the problems associated with the resulting
motionsof offshore structUres in waves.
An extensive
review
of
both the numerical methods.thainly
discrete
vottex
methods availableor
Underdevelopment
an4
itnerestiñg
experimental
studies weregiven iñ the previous
reports of the Ocean Engineering
Committee.
However, there is still a long way to go before xiumerical
modelling could be
implemented
in the design añdanalysis of oceañ structures.
In this report an. áttCmpt is made to moñitor the research
in numerical modelling of separated flow
arOund cylinders
and to give anovetview of some
of the interestingexperimental
results which can be used to validatenumerical methods.
81
Numerical Simulation
f
Separated Flow Around
Cylinders
8.2.1
General.
During the last five years. or so there
has been a considerable increase in the number of
uper
conputers, which played a vital role
in the development
of Computational.
luidDynamics (CFD)
Nowadays,besides
discrete
vortex
methods,
direct
methods. andturbulent
modelmethods
are
available to solveNavier-Stokes (NS) equations.
While Considerable progress has been madó ¡n
this. fièld,
the numerical tools developed have
not been suitable for
use in analysing practical. design problems.
Therefore it
ro
is important that the researchers in this field should give
emphasis to simplifying these numerical techniques so that
they can be applied to design problems.
8.2.2
Discrete Vortex Method.
The previous report
of the Ocean Engineering Committee introduced a detailed
description
of
the discrete vortexmethods
whichare
referred
to asthe:
point vortexmethod, shear layer
method,
vortex blob method, and Chorin's scheine which
can be applied to steady and oscillating
flow.There
are
alsoother methods, which include
viscous diffusiontechnique,
determination
ofpoint
ofseparation
usingSchlichting's
unsteadyboundary
layertheory,
andthe
vortex-in-cell method.
Tiernroth
[8.11 applied theChorin's scheme
to simulateflow over a circular cylinder in a wave field
withcurrent.
Smith and Stansby[8.2],
Hansen et al[8.3,8.4]
and Stansby and Smith
[8.5] also appliedthe
Chorin's method
inorder
todetermine the separation
point.
Smith and Startsby [8.21 treated the impulsively
started
flowaround
a circular cylÍnder by usingthe
so-called
vortex-in-cell
method,
that
is, the discretevortex method. Hansen
et
al[8.3,8.4]
presented
anumerical method to calculate the integrated hydrodynamic
loading and structural response
interaction
of
marinerisers.
The numerical method
is the discrete vortexmethod
based on operator
splitting, randomwalk and
vortex-in-cell method.
Stansby and Smith (8.5] treated
flow around a cylinder by the random vortex method.
Sakata et al
[8.6] used the vortex distribution method for
rectangular and circular cylinders in a uniform flow with
varied angle of attack
topredict CD and CL and the
Strouhal number.
The predictions agreed well with the
corresponding experimental, results.
Dahong and Xuegeng
[8.7] used the same method to simulate flow around a
circular cylinder with a mirror image.
Both of tiese
investigations solved
the
boundarylayer
equation
todetermine the separation point.
1Jan [8.8] applied the thin shear layer method to simulate
separated
flow around
afiat
plate and bilge
keels inoscillating flow.
van der Vegt [8.9] presented a formulation based on the
3-D
discretevortex
method.
He
rust
derived
aLagrangian formulation of the inviscid vorticity transport
equation which was then converted
into
a Hamiltonian
description.
8.2.3
The
Direct
SimulationMethod.
Asthe
Reynolds numbers increase
itbecomes difficult to apply
finite
difference
or
finiteelement
methods
to
the
simulation of separated flow around cylinders.
Kawamura [8.10]explained
the main reasons
for this as
follows.The
Non-linear
terms
inthe
NSequation
generate
components of short wave length disturbance.
These
components of short wave length are unlikely to diffuse.
However, the components whose wave lengths are shorter
than
the
lengthof
the
gridof
finitedifference
are
apparently
interpreted
asbeing components with
longer
wave lengths in
the
numerical
procedure.
This
phenomenon
iscalled
"aliasingerror";
which leads to instabilityof
numerical
calculations and
gives divergingsolutions.
Therefore, in order to make the numerical
scheme
stable,
it is always necessary toeliminate
the
components whose wave lengths are shorter than the grid
length of finite difference.
It ispossible to
realise thisby introducing an appropriate differentiation with
respect
to
the non-linear terms uduldx, vdu/dy, etc.
in the NS
equation.Kawamura [8.10] applied
thismethod to separated flow
around a
circular cylinder
in uniform flow. In thisstudy the Reynolds numbers varied from 2000 to 40000
and the finite
difference
solutions werecarried
out
utilising 80 x 80 grids.
Baba
and
Miyata [8.11]applied
the
finitedifference
method to separated flow around a circular cylinder in
oscillating flow.
In this study the Reynolds number was
1000 and the Keulegan-Carpenter number was 5.
The
results werein good agreement with
the' corresponding
results of flow visualisation.
Murashiget aI [8.12] and
Kinoshita et
al[8.131 applied the same method to the
flow around an oscillating circular cylinder using the body
fitted co-ordinates, the moving mesh' technique
and the
marker-and-cell method at the Reynolds number of 10000
498
and the
Keulegan-Carpenter numbers of 5,
7 and
10.The computed. results simulate the effect of the
Keulegan-Carpenter number on
the
flow fieldwith an excellent
agreement
withthe
corresponding
measured
data.
Lecointe and Piguet [8.14,8.15]. Graham and
Djahansouzi
[8.161 and Braza and Minh [8.171 also applied the finite
difference method to simulate flow around
cylinders.
Instead of the finite difference technique, the FEM (finite
element
method)
cari also beapplied
provided
theReynolds number is less than 1000.
This condition has
to be satisfied
for
achievingsubie
calculations.Triantafyllou and Karniadakis [8.18] combined the spectral
element
method
withthe
finiteelement
method
andcalculated
theforces on a
vibrating cylinder in steadycross-flow.
In this case the Reynolds n'imber
was 100.
In
the
caseof flow around a submerged cylinder with
free surface, Miyata et al [8.19] and Esposito et al [8.20]
successfully used the finite
difference
method
andcalculated breaking waves.
8.2.4
Turbulent Model Method.
Important information
about
turbulent
flow may bethe
global averagecharactenjsti of flow rather than
the localinstantaneous
information.
Therefore the velocity and
pressure
fieldare divided into
an average and
flucttiatingpart and,
moreover, the fluctuating term (so called
Reynolds stress)
is obtained by averaging the NS equation - the equation
to model
turbulent
flow is then derived. Variousequations to model turbulent flow are derived according to
averaging of time or space.
The time
averaging model
is also calledthe turbulent
transport model or K-E model.
The turbulent flow in
boundary layer
is wellmodelled so
far,
and numericalresults. for flow
around
a
wing sectionare
in gOodagreement
with thecorresponding
experimental
results.Murakami and Mochida [8.211 applied this method to
flow-around
arectangular
cylinder in uniform flow andsimulated wind flow around a building.
This method
. is apractical
enginering
technique.rather
than
a
puretheoretical method,
since it requires 5 to 10 empiricalparameters for its formulation.
This K-E model has not
yet been applied to oscillating flow problems.
The space
averaging method, which
is also calledthe
Large
Eddy
Ssmulation (LES)method,
requires oneparameter
only
for
the
modelling
of
flow. The.fundamental equation reduces -to
the NS equation when
the length of the grid of the finite element
tends to zero.
This
method
attracted
attention
recently for thefundamental research on turbulent flow.
Horiuti [8.22]
applied this LES method to turbulent
flow simulation of
inner duct flow between
paraïlel plates.
The results
show the transient - process from laminar to turbulent flow
and the fully turbulent condition in which
the Reynolds
number is 27500.
The LES method has not yet been
applied to outer flow
such as
separated
flow around
cylinders in uniform oroscillating flow.
8.2.5
Approximate Solution of NS Equation.
Beasho
[8.23] proposed an approximate solution method in which
the. non-linear terms of NS equation
were considered
asthe non-homogeneous term of the
Oseen equation.
Thismethod
isapplied
to oscillatingflow around a
circular cylinder.The predicted added mass coefficient for the
Keulegan-Carpenter number Kc less
than 12 agrees
wellwith the
corresponding
experimental
results, but thepredicted drag coefficent
is ingood agreement with
themeasurements only
inthe lower Kc number
range, lessthan 1.5. Moshkin et al [8.24] obtained numerical
results from the NS equation
assuming flow of very low
Reynolds number, that is, Stokes
system.8.2.6
Practical
Methods, Huse and Muren [8.25]presented and evaluated a principle
for interpreting drag
forces
on
bodies in oscillatory flow, based onthe
assumption
that
the
drag
coefficient
is. the
same inoscillatory flow as:
in' stationary
flow, provided wake velocitiesare
properly corrected
for.
GOod correlation
with
experimental
data
for
rectangular
sections wasobtained over a Keulegan-carpenter
number. range from
less than unity and up to infinity.
For circular' cylinders
a reasonably
correct-
trend
wasachieved: - at high
completely when the Keulegan-CarPenter number range
isbelow 20.
8.2.7
Future
Development.
The
progress
of
development
of
numerical modelsfor
flowaround
cylinders is almost
the same as
it wasin ITTC 87.
The number of examples
giving numerical results
is stilllimited.
A thorough validation over a wide range of
values of Rn and Kc
has yet to be carried out.
Nosimulation method has been
developed for the separated
flow around cylinders in combined current,
oscillating and
wave flow conditions.
No numerical
results have yet
( been
reported on the effect of
surfaceroughness of a
cylinder.
8.3
Experimental Studies
Refined
experimental
studies8.3.1
General.
concerning
pressuremeasurements and flow
visualisatiOnon cylinders in
different flow conditions
have been carried
out for the validation
of numerical modelling
techniques.
in
addition
tO measurementS forthe
determination
forces
acting on full-scale
structures. However,number of papers
published is still limited. Significantdevelopments
inexperimental
methods and
increase
experimental measurements
based on these methods
expected in the coming years.
t8.3.2
Review of Recent Experimental Work.
Experi-ments
involving flow visualization werereported
byRockwell et al [8.261, Grass
et al [8.27], Teng
and Na.th
[8.22] and Ongoren and
Rockwell [8.29,8.301.
Onoren
and
Rockwell [8.29] conductedthe
flow visualizationexperimentS of
controlled
oscillations ina
direction
transverse to the
incident flow around circular,
triangular
and square cylinders.
In these experiments the
Reynoldsnumber range
of 584-1300 was rather
low.They
observed the characteristics
ofthe
phase of the
shed
vortex with respect to
the cylinder displacement.
whichdepend on the cylinder
geometry.These results
are
very useful for the validation of the CFD.
of the
in
[8.32], Wolfram and TheophanatoS [8.41] and Wolfram et
are
al 8.42].
Pressure
measurements
were
conducted
by Borthwick(8.31).
Chaplin[8.32] and Kato and
Ohmatsu (8.33).
ICato and Ohniatsu In Ref. (8.331 presents the results
of
an experimental investigation of hydrodynaifliC forces
and
pressure distribution acting on a
vertical circular cylinder
oscillating
at low frequencies
in stillwater.
These
forced
oscillation testscan
be
usedto
validate
the
coresponding CFD.
The investigators
of Ref.
(8.331obtained the
followingresults:
The flow around an
oscillating
cylinder
is3-D,
and
the
in-line
force
coefficients vary
along
the
direction
ofthe
axis.Therefore, the Morison
formula should be interpreted as
the one that holds for forces
averaged along the direction
of an axis.
The lift force oscillates irregularly with the
double frequency of the oscillation.
The lift force can
be described by a
deterministic dynamical system
with a
small degree of freedom and it suggests that the system
of the lift force may be
transposed to a chaotic system.
The range of the Reynolds
number in
this investigationwas 14400 and
the
Keulegan-CarPenter number varied
from I to 15.
Large scale
experiments were conducted by Humphries
and
Walker(8.34], Grass
et
al[8.27),
Kasahara
et
al[8.35). Nath
[8.36],
HumphrieS [8.37], Bearman
[8.38),
Blick
and
Klopman[8.39].
Justesen
[8.40),
Chaplin
9.
THEORETICAL
METHODS
FOR
PREDICTING NON-UNEAR
PHENOMENA
9.1
Introduction
In the last decade an
increasing interest bas been
shownby hydrodynamics
researchers in the
investigation of the
influence
of
non-linear
effects
on
the
behaviour
ofoffshore structures.
These efforts were first devoted tO the study
of vessels
which showed, in moderate
sea conditionS,
resonances out
of the typical range
of wave periods.
Classic examples.
are the slow-drift
horizontal motions of moored vessels,
the long-period vertical motions of
floating platforms with
small water-plane area, and the higil-frequency
springingforces on Tension Leg
Platforms (TLP5).
[7.8]
Demirbilek,
z.,
Moe,
G.
and
Yttervoil,p.0.: aorjn3
FoñflUla Relative Velocity VSlndepefldeslt Flow
Fields
Formulations
for
a Case gepresentiflgFluid Damping".
Symposium on Offshore
Mechan1C and ArctiC Engineering.
vol. lI, p. 25, 1987..
(7.91
Huse, E.
and Muren,
P.: "Drag
in OscillatorYFlow interpreted from Wake Con
ideratiofls".Paper No.
5373. Offshore Technology Conference,
HoustOn, 1987.
[7.101
FaltinSen, O.M. and
Sortland,
B.: "Slow
Drift
Eddy-ma
Damping
of
a
Ship",
AppliedOcean
Research, vol. 9, nO.
1, JaflUaT)V 1987. [7.111Cotter,
D.C. and Chakrabarti,
S.K.:
"Effect
ofCurrent and
Waves on
the Damping
Coefficient of
a
Moored Tanker".
Paper No. 6138,
Offshore Technology
onfereflCei HoustOn, 1989.[7.12]
Standing,
R.G.,
Brendling,
W.J.
and Wilson,D.: "Recent Developments
inthe Analysis of Wave
Drift
Forces, Low-Frequency Damping änd Response".
Paper
No. 5456,
Offshore
Technology
Conference,,Houston,
1987.
17.131
Hearn,
G.E.,
Tong.
K.C. and Lau,S.M.:
"Sensitivity of Wave Drift Damping Coefficient Predictions
tothe Hydrodynamic Analysis
Models Used in the Added
Resistance
Gradient Method".
Symposium on Offshore
Mechanics and Arctic Eiigineering,
vol.11, p. 213, 1987.
[7.14]
Hearn.
G.E..
Tong,
K.C. andRamzan,
F.A.: "Wave Drift Damping
Coefficient
Predictions andTheir
Influenceon
the
Motionsof
Moored Semi-SubmerSibles".Paper No. 5455.
Offshore Technology Conference, Hòuston, 1987.
[7.151
Ream, G.E.. Lau, S.M.
and Tongs K.C.: "Wave
Drift Damping
Influences
Upon
the
Time
Domainimulatións
of Moored
Structures".
Paper
No. 5632,Offshore Technology Conference, HoustOn, 1988.
[7.16] Heamn,
G.E.
andTong,
K.C.. "A
Comparative
Study
of
Experimentally
Measured andTheoretically
Predicted Wave Drift Damping
Coefficient.s".Paper No.
6136, Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, 1989.
[7.17] Kaplan, P. and SankarariaraYaflan,
K.:
'Prediction
of
LowFrequency
WaveDamping:
A Simplified
Approach".
Paper
No. 6135,Offshore
Technology
Conference, Houston, 1989.
[7.181 Wichers,
J.W.E.: "WaveCurrent
Interaction
Effects on Moored Tankers in
High Seas",
Paper No.
5631, Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, 1988.
[7.19] Saito, K.
and Takagi.
M.: "On
the
Increased
Damping' for a Moored
Semi_Submersible Platform During
Low-FrequencY
Motion
in. Waves". Symposiumon
Offshore,
Mechanics
and. Arctic
Engineeering,
vo.Il,
p. 147.
1988.(7.20] IGnoshita,
T.
and' Takaiwa,
K.: "Slow
MotionForced Oscillation Tests in Waves of Floating Bodies
-Wave Drift Damping and
Added Mass". Symposium on
Offshore Mechanics and
ArcticEngineering,
vol. II, p.139, 1988.
[7.21]
HelvaciOglu, I.H. and Incecik,
A.: Second-Order
andShort'CreSt1'
WaveEffects
in
Predicting
the
Behaviour
of
aCompliant
Structure",
Symposium on
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, vol.
II, The
Hague, 1989.
(7.22]
Wichers,
.I.W.E. : "A
Simulation
Modelfor
aSingle
Point
MooredTanker",
Publication
No. 797,MARIN, Wageningen, 1988.
[7.23]
Pinkster,
J.A.
and
Wichers,
.LE,W.: "The
Statistical
Properties.
of
Low-Frequency
Motionsof
Non-Linearly
MooredTankers"
Paper
No. 5457,Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1987.
[7.241
Tèla, Y.S.D. et al: "A
Rational Dynamic Ma1YÇ
Procedure
forTurrent Mooring Systems".
Paper
No.5527, Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston. 1987.
[7.25]
Ruse, E.. Yu, B.K. and
Oydvin. A.: "Transient
Rig Motions
and
Mooring LineTensions
Alter
LineBreakage".
Symposium OflOffshore MecbaiüCs and
ArcticEngineering, vol. II, p. 367.
1987.(7.26]
Zhao,
R. and Faltinsen,
O.M.: "A Comparative
Study of Theoretical Models for Slòwdrift Sway Motion
ofa Marine Structure".
Symposium on Offshore
Mechanicsand Arctic Engineering. vol.
II, p. 153, 1988.
(7.271
Marchand,
E.
le.
Berhault,
C.
and
Mohn,B.: "Low Frequency Heave Damping of Semi-Submersible
Platforms:Some Experimental Results".
Conference on
Behaviour
of
Offshore
Structures,
vol.Ii,
Trondheim,
1988.
[7.28] Huse,
E.: "Motion
Reduction of OffshoreStructures
byDamping Tanks".
3rd
Symposium onPractical Design of Ships and
Mobile Units, Trondheiin,
1987.
[7.29]
Gabrielsen,
P.
and
BjordaL.B.N.: "Exact
Installation of 'Concrete Platforms Over Pre-drilled Wells".
Paper
No. 5604.Offshore
Technology
Conference,
Houston, 1987.
(7.30] Lokna,
T.
and
Nyhus,K.A.: "Damping
andNatural Frequencies During Towout and Installation of the
Guilfaks
'A'
Platform".
Paper
No. 5786,Offshore
Technology Conference. Houston,
1988.[7.311
Pinkster,
J.: "Aspects
'of
Positioning LargeTankers.
Offshore".
4th
Conference
on FloatingProduction Systems, 1BC Tecithical Services Ltd., London.
December 1988.
[8.11
Tieniroth, E.C.: "Simulation of the' Viscous Flow
Over
aCylinder
ina
Wave Field16th ONR
Symposium. .1986.
(8.2]
Smith,
P.A.
and
Statisby,P.K.:
"Impulsively'Started Flow Around a Circular Cylinder by the Vortex
Method".
J.Flùid Mech., vol. 194, pp
45-77, 1988.
(8.31
Hansen, 1LT., Skornedal,. N.G.
and Vada, T: "A
Method
for
Computation
of Integrated
VortexInduced'
Fluid Loading and. Response- Interaction of Mar ne Risers
in Weave and Current". hit!
BOSS COnference, 1988..
18.41
Hansen.
H.T..
Skomedal,N.G.
T.: "Computation of Vortex Inzced Fluid
Response
Interaction
of Marine Risers".Symposium. The Hague. 1989.
[8.51
Stansby, P.K. and Smith, P.A.:
"Flow Around a
Cylinder by the Random Vortex
Method".
8th OMAE
Symposium, The Hague, 1989.
[8.61
Sakata,
H.,
Machi, T.
andInarnuro,
T.: "A
Numerical Analysis
of Flow Aroun4
Structùres
bythe
Discrete Vortex Method",
Tech.
Repoñ
of MitsubishiHeavy Industries, vol. 20, no. 2, 1983.
[8.7]
Dahong. O. and Xuegeng, W.:
"Vortex Shedding
from a Horizontal Circular Cylinder in Oscillatory Flow".
6th OMAE Symposium. Houston, 1987.
Numerical Study
of
Two-Flow Plast Bluff Bodies
at
Applied Ocean Research,
vol. [8.81 Lian,W.: "A
Dimensional
Separated
Môderate KC-Numbers".
10, no 3, 1988.
ES.91
van der Vegt. J.J.W.: "A
Variauonally Optimised
Vortex Tracing
Algorithm for Three=DimeflSiOflal FlowsAround Solid
Bodies". Doctoral Thesisof The Delft
Technical University. 1988.
[8.10] Kawamura,
T.: "Numerical
Studyof
HighReynolds Number Flów Around a Circular
Cylinder".
PhD Thesis of University of Tokyo.
1983.[8.11] Baba, . and Miyata,
H.: "Higher-Order
Accurate Difference Solutions of Vortex Generation from
a Circular Cylinder in an
Oscillatory Flow".
Journal of
Computational Physics. no. 69. 1987.
[8.121 Murashige,
S.,
Kinoshita.T.
and Hinatsu,M.: "Direçt Calculations of Navier Stokes Equations for
Forces Acting on a Cylinder
in Oscillatory Flow".
8thOMAE Symposium. The Hague.
1989.[8.13] Kinoshita,
T.,
Hinatsu, M. and Murashige,S.: "Simulations
of
Forces Actingon
aCylinder
inOscillatory Flow by
Direct
Calculationof
theNavirStoke5 Equations".
4thInternational
Symposiumon Numerical Ship
HydrodynamicS. 1989.[8.14] Lecointe, Y. and Piquet.
J.: "Periodic
andMultiple Periodic Behavior of
Locked-In
VortexShedding".
16th ONR Symposium, 1986.
[8.15]
Lecointe, Y. and Piqüet.
J.: "Computation of the
Wake Past an Oscillating Cylinder".
International BOSS
Conference. 1988.
[8.16]
Graham,
J.M.R.
andDjahansouzi,
B.:Hydrodyfla!fliC Damping of
StructuralElements".
8thOMAE Symposium. The Hague,
1989;
[8.17)
Braza. M. and
Minh. H.H.: "Dìrect
NumericalSimulation
of
Certain 2-D Transition
Features
of the
Flow Past a Circular Cylinder".
8th OMAE Symposium,
The Hague, 1989.
[8.18]
TriantafylløU, OS. and Karniadakis, G.E. "Forces
on aVibfating Cylinder
inSteady, Cross-Flow".
8th
OMAE Symposium. The Hague,
1989.520
and
Vada,
Loading and
8th OMAE
[8.19]
Miyata, H., Kajitani, H., Zhu, M., Kawano,
T.
and Takai, M. "Numerical Study of Som
Wave-Breaking.
Problems by a
Finite
Difference
Method".
J.Kansai
Society Naval Architects. Japan, no. 207,
December 1987.
[8.20]
Esposito.
P.O.,
Graziani,
O.and
Orlandi,
P. "Numerical Solution of Viscous
Flows About Submerged
andPartly
Submerged
Bodies". 4thInternational
Symposium on Numerical Ship-hydrodynamicS,
1989.[8.211
Murakami. S. and Mochida, A.: "3-D
Numerical
Simulation of Airflow Around a Cübic Model by Means of
the K-c
Model".Journal
of Wind Engineering and
Industrial AerodynamiCs, 31,
Elsevier Science
Publishers,
1988.
[8.22]
Horiuti,
K. "Comparison
of Conservative andRotational Forms in large Eddy Simulation of Turbuler.t
Channel Flow".
Journal Computing Physics, 71, 2, 1987.
[8.23]
Bessho, M.: "Study of Viscous Flow by
Oseen's
Scheme (Fourth Report, Two-Dimensional Oscillating
FlowWithout Uniform Velocity)"
Journal óf Society of Naval
Architects of Japan, 161, 1987.
[8.24]
Moshkin, N.P., Pukhnachov, V.V. and Sennitskii,
V.L.: "Numerical
and Analytical Investigations of aStauonaTy Flow Past a Self-Pr9pelled
Body".4th
IntlSymposium on Numerical ShiphydrodynamiCs. 1989.
[8.25] Huse, E. and
Muren,
P.: "Drag
in Osçillatory FlowInterpreted
From
Wake ConsideraUônS".OTC
Paper 5370, Houston. 1987.
[8.26] Rockwell,
D.,
Gurnas,C..
Kerstens,P.,
Backestose,
J.,
Ongoren, A.,
Chen.J.
and Lusseyran,D. "Computer-Aided
Flow Visualisation". 16th ONRSymposium, 1986.
[8.27]
Grass,
A.J..
Simons. R.R.and
Cavanagh.
N.J.: "Vortex-Induced
VelocityEnhancement
inthe
Wave-Flow
Field Around Cylinders".6th
OMAE
Symposium. Houston, 1987.
8.28]
Teng. C-D. and Nath, J;H.: "Periodic Waves on
Horizontal Cylinders".
7th OMAE Symposium, Houston
1.988.
[8.29)
Ongoren,
A.and Rockwell, D: "Flow Structure
From
an
Oscillating CylinderPart
1: Mechanismsof
Phase Shift and Recovery in the Near Wake".
Journal
of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 191.. pp 197-223, 1988.
[8.30]
Ongoren, A. and Rockwell, D.: "Flow Structure
From ari Oscillating Cylinder Part 2: Mode Competition
in the Near Wäke".
Journal of Fluid Mechanics,
vol.191, pp 225-245, 198S.
[8.31) Borthwick,
A.:: "Orbital. Flow Past a Cylinder
Experimental Work".
6th OMAE Symposium. Houston;
1987.[8.32]
Chaplin
J.R.: "Loading on a Cylinder in Uniform
OsciUatory Flow
:Part
I- Planar
Oscillatory
Flow".Applied Ocean Research, vol. 10, no. 3. 1988.
(8.331 Kato
S. and Ohrnatsu, S.:
"Hydrodyflarnic Forces
and
pressure
Distributions Ofl aVertical
Cylinder
Oscillating in Low
Frequencies".
8th OMAE Symposium,
The Hague, 1989.
[8.34] HumphrieS,
J.A.
and Walker1D.H.:
"VortexExcited Response of Large
Scale Cylinders inSheared
Flow".6th OMAE Symposium, Houston.
1987.[8.351
Kasahara,
Y.,Koterayama,
W.,and
Shimazaki,
K.: "Wave Forces Acting on Rough Circular
Cylinders at
High Reynolds Numbers".
OTC Paper 5372, Houston,
1987.[8.361
Nath,
J.H.: "On
WaveForce
Coefficient
Variability".
Transactions
of the ASME. vol. 109,November 1987.
[8.37]
Humphries.
.J.A. and Walker,D.H.:
"VortexExcited Response of
Large-Scale
Cylinders inSheared
Flow".
Transactions of the ASME, vol. 110,
May 1988.
[8.38]Bearman. P.W.: "Wave Loading Experiments on
Circular Cylinders at Large Scale" Intl BOSS
Conference. 1988.
[8.39] Blick, A. and Klopman.
G.: "Non-Linear
Frequency Modelling of Wave
Forces on Large
Verticaland Horizontal Cylinders in
Random Waves".
Intl BOSS
Conference, 198E.
[8.40) .Iustesen,
P.: "Hydmodynamic
Forces
on
Large Cylinders in HighReynolds Number. Oscillatory
Flow".
Intl. BOSS Conference, 1988.
[8.41)
Wolfram, J. and Theophanatos. A.: "The Loading
ofHeavily Roughened Cylinders
in Waves and
LinearOscillatory Flow".
8th OMAE Symposium. The Hague,
1989.
[8.42] Wolfram,
J.,
Javidan.
P. andTheophanatoS.
A.: "Vortex
Sheddingand
LiftForces
on
HeavilyRoughened Cylinders
of. Various Aspect Ratios
in Planar
Oscillatory Flow".
8th OMAE Symposium. The
Hague,1989.
[9.11
Faltinsen, O.M. and Michelsen,
F.C.: "Motions of
Large
Structures
in Wavesat
Zero Froude
Numbers".
DnV, PubI. N.90, Oslo, 1975.
[92]
Salvesen,N.: "Second-Order Steady
State
Forces
and Moments
on. Surface
Ships inOblique
RegularWäves".
Intl Syrup. on the Dynamics of Marine Vehicles
and Offshore Structures in
Waves, London, 1974.
[9.3]
Mohn. B. and Hairault,
J.P.:
"On Second-Order
Motion
and
VerticalDrift
Force
for
the
Three-Dimensional
Bodiesin
Regular Waves". IntlWorkshop on Ship and Platform
Motions. Berkeley, 1983.
[9.4) MavrachoS, S'.A.. Bardis,
C.: "Horizontal'
'and VerticalAxi-syrnnletrC
Bodies in RegularVarna, 1987.
,1
L.
and
Balaska.s,Drift
Forces
on
Waves". IMAEM,
[P.5]
Pinkster,
LA;: "Low
Frequency
Second-Order
Wave Exciting' Forces on
Floating. Structures".
NSMB,pubi. No. 650, Wageningen. 1980.
[9.61
PapanikolaOU. A. and
ZaraphonitiS, G.: "On an
Improved
Near
FieldMethod
for
the
Evaluation
of
Second-Order Forces
Acting on 3-D Bodies
in Waves".
IMAEM. yama. 1987.
' .[9.7]
Kyozuka. Y. and moue, R.:
"SecondOrdem Wave
Forces Acting on a
Semi-Submersible".
PRADS, 1987.
[9.8]
Krokstad. i.R.: "Drift Forces and Moment on an
Efliptinal Shaped Vertical
Cylinder Computed by Panel
Methods and exact Function
Representation".
Intl Conf.
on Num Ship Hydrod.,
Hiroshima. 1989
[9.9]
Maoxiang, G. and
Beqi,S.: "Numerical Method
fOr Second-Order Mean Forces and Slowly Varying
Forces
on a Floating
Structure".
CSSRC. 1987.
[9.10] Richer,
J.P.,
Lenoir,
M. arid Mechiche Alami,O.: "A New Approach
inDiffraction
of Second-Order
Surface Waves by Floating
Bodies".Computer Modelling
in Ocean Engineering,
Rotterdam, 1988.
[9.11] Kim, M.H. and
Yue,D.K.P.: "The Non-Linear
Sum-Frequency
WaveExcitation
and
Response of aTension Leg Platform".
BOSS. 1988.
[9.121 Sclavounos.
P.D.: "Radiation
and Diffractionof
Second-Order
Surface
Waves by Floating Bodies".J.Fluid Mech.. vol. 196.
1988.[9.13] Mohn, B. and Marion, A.: "Etude au Deuxieme
Ordre du Comportement des Corps Flottants en Houle
Reguhiere"
IFP, Ref. N. 33031, Paiis,
1985.[9l4] Extock Taylor, R. and Hung. S.M. Second-Order
Diffraction
Forces
on
a Vertical Cylinder in Regular Waves".Applied Ocean Research, PubI. N.1, 1987.
[9.15] Matsul,
T.: "Computation
of Slowly VaryingSecond-Order Hydrodynamic Forces' on
Floating Structures
in Irregular Waves".
OMAE, 1988.
(9.161 Dogliani,
M.: "Forces
Due. toSecond-Order
Potential".
Registro Italiano Navale, Tech.
Report N. TR
022/89 - RIS, Genoa 1989.
(9.17] Sebastian'.
L..
Sansalone,
M.and
DoghianiM. "Numerical
Algorithmsfor
the
Evaluation
ofthe
Forces Due to Second-Order
.Potential"CETENA Tec.
Rep. N.3689. Genoa, 1989.
[9.18] Benschop,
A.,
Herinans.
A.J.
andHuijsmans,
R.H.M. "Second-Order Diffraction
Forces on a Ship in
Irregular Waves"
Applied Ocean Research, PubL
N.2,
1987.
[9.191 Chen,
X.B;: "Second-Order
Forces
on
a
Three-Dimensional Body in BichroniatiC
Waves".Com-puter' Modelling in Ocean Enginering, Rotterdam. 1988.
K. and Thanos, I.
.'Second-Order
[9.201 KokkinowraChOS,
Forces
on
Arbitrary
Vertical
AxisyninietricBodies.
OMAE, 1989.
[9.211' Masuda, K.
and
Nagai,I.: "Non-Linear
. WaveForces on a Pair of Vertical
Cylinders".OMAE, 1989.
APPENDIX 3
OTC 5370
Drag in Oscillatory Flow Interpreted From Wake Considerations
by E. Huse,' Marintek NS, and P. Muren, Norwegian Inst. of Technölbgy
Copyright 1987 Offshore Technology Conference
This paper was presented atthe 19th Annual OTC in HÒuston, Texas, April 27-30. 1987. The material is subject to correction by the author. Permission
to copyis restricted to an abstract ot not more than 300 wordS,
MMARY
The paper presents and evaluates a principle for interpreting forces on bodies in oscillatory flow, based on assuming that the drag coefficient
is the same as In stationary flow, provided wake
velocities are prOperly corrected for. The
resulting formulae describe general trends
correctly, and can in some cases also be used for quantitative calculation of oscillatory flow phenomena.
INTRÒOUCTIÓN
For many types of offshore structures drag
for-cesare a major part of the design loads, or they can, be of decisive importance t° the operational
performance of the structures The drag forces can be due to current, to the orbital motion in the waves, tO the oscillatory motions of the structure itself, or to various combinations of these. effects. Until
now normal design procedures have been based on
.l .ulation of drag forces by the wellknown Mori son
rmùlation, using drag coefficients determined
experimentally for each structure, or taken from
empirical data.
The present paper introduces and discusses an alternative way of dealing with drag forces in oscillatory flow. It is based on assuming that the
drag coefficient itself is the. same as in stationary
flow, provided the correct relative velocity is
applied. Thi.s means tát the flow velocity has to be
cOrrected for the effect of the wake generated by the previous ôscillàtions. This correction can be done on the basis of momentum considerations and turbülent mixing theory. Based on these principles
one can now calculate how drag forces in oscillatory
flow are influenced by for instance
Keulegan-Carpenter number, geomètry of motion pattern, effect of superposed currént, effect of interaction between several bodies etc.
'eferences and illustrations at end. of paper.
SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The scope of the present investigation is': To develop analytical foñnulae for practical
calcùlations of drag in oscillatory flow
based on wake considerations, momentum
balánce and turbulent mixing theory. To develop computer programs for more exten-sive calculations.
To investigate ranges of applicability of the
theory by verification against published
experimental data, and by means of new
experiments.
To discuss possible practical applications of thê theory.
STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY
In practical design and analysis' of offshore
structures the hydrodynamic fOrces acting on a
well submerged, oscillating body are calculated by
the Morison formula.
F = - pVC - ACdjVIV
where the mass coefficient Cm and the drag
coef-ficient Cd depend on:
- the geometry of the body
- the Reynolds number
The Keulegán-Carpenter nûmber.