ISSN 2544-7068
Pełen tekst
(2) ʹͷͶͶǦͲͺ. BEZPIECZNY. .
(3) No 2(71) 2018. ISSN 2544-7068. BEZPIECZNY. SAFE BANK.
(4) SAFE BANK ͳͻͻǤ
(5) ϐ ǡ Ǥ. EDITORIAL OFFICE Ǥ Ñ Ȃ ǤÏ
(6) Ǧ Ǥ Ñ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ÑǦÏ ĂÑȂ SCIENTIFIC AND PROGRAMME COUNCIL Ȃ ¦ Ǥ ǤǦ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǤÏ Ï ǤÏ Dz dzǤ ϐ . EDITOR PUBLISHER ǤǤ
(7) Ͷ ͲͲǦͷͶ SECRETARY ĂÑ ǣʹʹͷͺ͵Ͳͺͺ ǦǣǤ̷Ǥ.
(8) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ
(9) ǣͳͲǤʹ͵ͷͶȀǤǤʹǤͳǤʹͲͳͺ. Paweł Mikołajczak*. Ǧ. Abstract ϐ Ǥ ǡǦ Ǥϐϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ǦǤ Ǧ
(10) ǡ ͳͲͲͲ ǡ ǡǡǡ ǡǡ ǡ Ͷͳʹ Ǥϐ ϐ ϐ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ Ǥ ϐ Ǥ Key wordsǣ Ǣ Ǣ ǡ . 1. Introduction Ǧϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ ȗ. ÏÏ ǡ Ǥ. ͳͳ͵.
(11) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ
(12) ǡ ϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ϐ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡǦϐǡ ǡ Ȃ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ϐ Ǥ ȏʹͲͲȐϐ ϐ Ǥ
(13) ϐ ϐ Ǥϐ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǦǤ ϐ Ǥ ϐ ϐ ϐ Ǥ. 2. The concept of social economy – from non-proϐit to not-for-proϐit activity ȋ Ȍ Ǧ ǡ ϐ Ǥ ǡ ϐ Ǧϐ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ϐ ǡ. ͳͳͶ.
(14) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . ǡ ȏ ͳͻͻͻǡǤʹͶȂʹͺȐǤ ǡ ϐϐ Ǥ
(15) Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ϐ ϐ ǡ Ǧϐ ȏ ʹͲͲͻǡǤͻͶȂͻȐǤ ǡ ϐ ȏ ʹͲͳͳǡǤͳͷͳȂͳͶȐǤ ϐ ǡǡǡ Ǥ ϐ Ǧϐ ϐ ǡ ȏ ǤʹͲͲͷȐǤ ϐ ϐ Ǥ Ǧϐ ϐ ϐ ȏ ͳͻͻͶǡǤʹ͵ȂʹͻͲȐǤ ȏʹͲͲͳǡǤ͵Ȃ͵ͻʹȐϐ ǯ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ȏʹͲͲͻǡ Ǥ ͻͶȂͻȐ ϐ Ǥ. ȏʹͲͲʹǡ Ǥ ͳͻͻͻȂʹͳͲȐ Ǥ ȏʹͲͳͲǡǤͳͺ͵ȂʹͲʹȐϐ ϐ ϐǯ ǯǡ Ǥ
(16) ȏͳͻͻͻǡ Ǥ ʹͶȂʹͺȐ ϐ ϐ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧϐϐ ȏ ʹͲͲǡ Ǥ ͳͻͳȂʹʹʹǢ ʹͲͲͶǡ Ǥ ʹͻͲȂ͵ͳͲ ʹͲͲͶǡ. ͳͳͷ.
(17) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . Ǥ ͶͳͳȂͶʹͶȐ ȏ ͳͻͻͺǡ Ǥ ͷͶȂͻǢ ʹͲͲͶǡǤͳ͵ʹȂͳͶͲǢÑʹͲͲͺȐǤ ȏÏ ʹͲͳǡǤͳ͵ͷȂͳͶͶȐǤ
(18) Ǥ ϐ ȏÏ ʹͲͳͷǡǤͶʹͲȂͶ͵͵ȐǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ϐ ȏ Ǧ ǤʹͲͲͺȐǤ Ǧϐǡ ǡ Ǥ ȏʹͲͲͷǡǤͻʹȂͳͲͲȐ ϐ ǡǯǦϐ Ǥ Ǧϐ Ǥ
(19) ǡ ǡ ǤȏʹͲͲȐ ϐ ϐ Ǥ ǯ ǦϐǦǦϐȏ ǤʹͲͳͷǡǤͳ͵ȂͳͺȐǤ
(20) Ǥǡ Ǧ ϐ ȏ ʹͲͳͲǢ ʹͲͲͷǢ ʹͲͳʹǢÏ ʹͲͳǡǤͷȂͷȐǤ ϐ ǡ Ǧ ϐǤȏʹͲͲȐϐ ϐ Ǥ
(21) ϐϐ Ǥ ϐ Ǥ ǡ ϐ ǡ ϐ Ǧϐ ȏǤʹͲͳǡǤͶȂͺȐǤ ǡ ȏͳͻͻͺǡǤͷͶȂͻǢ ʹͲͲʹǢʹͲͲȐǡǡ. ͳͳ.
(22) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . ȏ ʹͲͳ͵ǡ Ǥ ͳʹͶȂͳ͵Ȑǡ
(23)
(24) Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Dz dzȏǯǤʹͲͳͲȐǤ Dz dz ȏ ʹͲͳͶȐǤ ǡ ǡ ǡǤǤǤ. 3. Data Dǡ Ǧ ǡϐ ǡ ǡ Ǥ D Ǧ Ǥ D Ǥǡ Ǧ ǡǡ Ǧ Ǥ
(25) ʹͲͳͷ ʹͲͳͷ D ͳͲͲͲ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ ϐ Ǧ ȏǤǤȐǤ Ȁ ǡ ͵ǡͺͲͲ ʹͲͳͷǤǡ Ȁ ǡ Ǥ ȋ ϐ Ȍȋ ʹͲͳͶȌǡ ϐȋȌ ǤǤ Ǥ ǡ ǣͳȌʹǡͻͷ
(26) ȋ ǡ ȌǡʹȌͺʹͷ
(27) ȋ ȌǤ
(28) ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡʹͲͳͶǡʹͶǦ Ǧ Ǥ. ͳͳ.
(29) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. .
(30) ͳͺ ȋ ϐ ȌǤ ǤǦǡǡ Ȃ ͵ͶΨǤ ͳͷΨǦ Ǥ ǣ ϐ ͳ͵Ψ ȏȀ ǡǤͳͷȐǤ ϐ Ǥ ʹͲͲͻ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ͳȀ͵ ȏ ʹͲͳͷǡǤȂʹͲȐǤ. 4. Assumptions and research process Ȁ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ ϐ Ǥϐ Ȃ ȏ Ǧ ʹͲͲͳǡǤ͵ʹͳȂ͵ʹ͵ȐǤ DzCondition of the third sector in Poland in 2015dzǡ Ȁ ǡ ȋ͵ͺͲͲȌ Ȃ ϐ ǤǡͶͳʹ Ǥʹͷ ʹͲͳͶǡǡ͵ͺ ǤǡȋΨȌ ǡ ϐ ǡϐǤ ϐ ϐ ʹǤ ǡ ǦǤ ϐ ǡ ϐ ϐ Ǥǡ ǡ ȋȌ ʹͲͳͶǤ. ͳͳͺ.
(31) . ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. 5. Findings and results Sources of ϔinancing D ʹͲͳͶ Ǥ
(32) ȋͶΨȌ ȋͶΨȌ ȋʹΨȌǤ
(33) ǡ ϐ Ǥ ϐ ϐ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ȋ͵ǤʹΨȌǡ ȋ͵ͷΨȌ ȋʹͻǤͷΨȌ ȋʹͺǤΨȌǤ ϐ Ȃ ȋͳͺǤͻΨȌ ȋʹͲǤͺΨȌ Ǥ ϐǡ ʹͳΨ ϐ Ǥ
(34) ǡ ǤʹΨǤ
(35) ǡ ǡ ǡ ϐ ʹͲͳͶȋͳʹǤͳΨǡ ͳͳǤͺΨͳͲǤ͵Ψ ȌǡȋͳǤΨȌǡ ȋͳǤΨȌ ȋͳȌǤ. Sources of ϐinancing. Hungary. Romania. Portugal. Russia. China. Germany. Sweden. Great Britain. Spain. Table 1. Sources of ϐinancing of social enterprises in chosen countries in 2014 (in %). . ʹ. ʹͺǤͷ. ͷͲǤͳ. ͲǤͶ. ͷ͵. Ͷ͵. ͷ͵. Ͷ. ͶǤͷ. ʹͷǤ͵. ʹǤͷ. ͵ͷ. ʹ͵Ǥͳ. ͳͺǤͻ. ʹͺǤ. ͵Ǥʹ. ʹͻǤͷ. ʹͲǤͺ. ʹ. ʹ. ʹ. ͵Ǥͻ. ʹͳ. Ǥͷ. ʹǤͳ. ͳǤͶ. ͲǤ. ͳǤ. ͳʹǤͳ. ͷǤ. ͳͳǤͺ. ͶǤ͵. ͳͲǤ͵. ͶǤʹ. ʹ. ͳǤ. . ͳ. Ȃ. ͲǤͷ. Ȃ. ͳ. ͵. Ͷ. ͳ. Ȃ. . ͵. ͳ. ͳ. Ȃ. Ͳ. ͳ. Ȃ. ͲǤͷ. ͳǤͷ. . ͷ. ͻ. . Ȃ. ʹ. . ͳ. ʹǤͷ. ͲǤͷ.
(36) . ǣ DȏǤǤȐǤ. ͳͳͻ.
(37) . ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. ǡʹͲͳͶͻΨ Ǥ ͶͲΨ Ǥ
(38) ǡͲΨ Ǥ ϐ Dzdz ͺΨ Ǥ ϐ ͳ ϐ Ǥ Table 2. Sources of ϐinancing social enterprises in Poland in 2014. Sources of ϐinancing. Share % (SE) number of SE Subsidies. . ͷͲ. ʹͲͺ. . ͵. ͳͷʹ. . ͳͳ. Ͷ. ȋ Ȍ. ͳͳ. Ͷ. . ͵. ͳʹ. . ͻ. ͵ʹͶ. ȋǦȌ. ʹͲ. ͺ͵. Ǧϐ . Ͷͷ. ͳͺͶ. Ǧϐ ǡ . ͵Ͷ. ͳͶͳ. ͳΨ . ʹͷ. ͳͲͷ. . ͳͶ. ͷͻ. Ǧ . ͳͳ. ͶͶ. Sales revenues. Donations/contributions. . ͺ. ͵͵. Ͷͳ. ͳͻ.
(39) ǡϐ ǡǡ . ͵ʹ. ͳ͵Ͳ. . ͳͻ. ͺͲ. . . ʹ͵. . ʹ. ͻ. Other. ǣȀ DzCondition of the third sector in Poland in 2015dzǤ. ͳʹͲ.
(40) . ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. Diagram 1. Categories of social enterprises ϐinancing in Poland in 2014 (in %) Seles revenues. 79. Subsidies. 42. Donations. 60. Members fees. 41. Other. 8. 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 60. 70. 80. 90%. ǣȀ DzCondition of the third sector in Poland in 2015dzǤ. ϐ Ǧǡ ʹͲͳͶ ϐ ǡ ȋͻΨȌǤ ǡ ϐ Ǥ ϐ ȋͶǤͷΨȌǤ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡȋ͵ǤʹΨȌȋ͵ͷΨȌ Ǥ ǡ ǡǡ ϐ ǡ ȋͲǤͷΨ͵ΨȂͶΨ ȌǤ
(41) ǡ ϐ Ǥ ǡʹͳΨ ǡ ϐ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ȂͻΨǤ. 6. Revenues ǡ ǡ ǡ ʹͲͳͶ ͳ ȋͷͷΨǡ ͶͶΨ Ͷ͵Ψ Ȍǡ ȂͷΨǤ ǡ ͺͲͲͲͲǡ Ȃ ͷʹΨǤ
(42) ǡ ͷΨ . ͳʹͳ.
(43) . ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. ȋȌ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ͺͲȂʹͲͲ ȋ͵͵ǤͷΨǡ ʹͶΨǡ ʹ͵Ψ ʹʹΨ ȌǤ ͷͲͲ ʹ͵Ψ ȋʹͲΨȌ Ǥ Ȃ ǤͳʹΨǡ ǡ ͲǡͷȂͳǤ ǡʹͲͳͶȋ ͳȌ ǡȋ ͺͲȌǤ
(44) ǡ Ǥ ȋ͵ȌǤ. Revenues (in 1000 EUR). Hungary. Romania. Portugal. Russia. China. Germany. Sweden. Great Britain. Spain. Table 3. Revenues of social enterprises in chosen European countries and world-wide in 2014 (in %). ͺͲ. ʹ. ͵͵. ʹͳ. ͷͻ. ͷʹ. ʹ. ͳͶ. ͷ. ʹͲ. ͺͲȂʹͲͲ. ʹ͵. ͳͺ. ͻǡͷ. ʹʹ. ʹͶ. ͺ. ͵͵Ǥͷ. ͺ. ͳ͵. ʹͲͲȂͷͲͲ. ʹ͵. ʹ͵. ͳͲǤͷ. ͻ. . ͳʹ. ͳͻ. ʹͲ. ͳ͵. ͷͲͲȂͳͲͲͲ. ͳ͵. ͳʹ. ͳͷ. ͷ. ͷ. ͳʹ. ͳʹ. ͳͳǤͷ. ͳͳ. ͳͲͲͲ. ͳͷ. ͳͶ. ͶͶ. ͷ. ͳʹ. Ͷͳ. ʹͳǤͷ. ͷͷǤͷ. Ͷ͵. ǣ DȏǤǤȐǤ. ǡʹͲͳͶ ȋͷͲǤΨȌ ͺͲǤͳͷǤͷΨ ʹͲͲǡͷͲͲ Ǥȋͳ͵ǤͶΨȌ ͺͲȂʹͲͲǤ
(45) ǡͺΨ ϐ ͲǤͷȂͳ Ǥ ȋ ͳȌ Ͷͺ ȋͳʹǤͶΨȌǤ Ǧ ȋͷͲǤΨȌ ȋͺͲȌ ȋ ͷʹΨͷͻΨȌǤǡȂͺΨȂ ͲǤͷȂͳǤ. ͳʹʹ.
(46) . ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. ȋͷΨȌǤ
(47) ǡ ͺͲȂʹͲͲʹͲͲȂͷͲͲ Ǥ Table 4. Revenues of social enterprises in Poland in 2014. Revenues (in 1000 EUR). number of SE. share of SE (in %). ͺͲ. ͳͻ. ͷͲǤ. ͺͲȂʹͲͲ. ͷʹ. ͳ͵ǤͶ. ʹͲͲȂͷͲͲ. Ͳ. ͳͷǤͷ. ͷͲͲȂͳͲͲͲ. ͵ͳ. ͺ. ͳͲͲͲ. Ͷͺ. ͳʹǤͶ. ȗ ȂͳαͶǤͳͺͶͷ ǣȀ DzCondition of the third sector in Poland in 2015dzǤ. 7. Conclusions Ǧϐ ǡ Ǥ ϐ Ǥ Ǥ ϐ ǯ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(48) ǡ ǡ ϐ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡǤǤ Ǥϐ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ȋͺͲȌǤ ͳ ǡ ǡǡǡ Ǥ Ǥ. ͳʹ͵.
(49) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . Bibliography ǡǤȋǤȌǤȋʹͲͳͲȌǤHybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policyǤ ǡǣ Ǥ ǡǤǡǡǤǤȋʹͲͳͶȌǤImpact Investment Portfolios: Including Social Risks and Returnsǡǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤǤǡǡǤ ǤȋʹͲͲͻȌǤRevenue diversiϔication in nonproϔit organizations: does it lead to ϔinancial stability? ǡͳͻȋͶȌǡͻͶȂͻǤ ǡǤ Ǥǡ ǡ ǤǤȋͳͻͻͶȌǤRevenue diversiϔication among nonproϔits.ǣ
(50) Ǧ ϐǡͷȋ͵Ȍǡʹ͵ȂʹͻͲǤ ǡǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǤBeing “business-like” in a nonproϔit organization: A grounded and inductive typologyǡϐ ǡ͵͵ǡʹͻͲȂ͵ͳͲǤ ǡǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǤThe legitimacy of social enterpriseǡϐƬǡ ͳͶǡͶͳͳȂͶʹͶǤ ǡ Ǥ ǤȋͳͻͻͺȌǤEnterprising nonproϔitsǡ ǡǡͷͶȂͻǤ ǡ ǤǡǡǤǡʹͲͲǡDeϔining social enterpriseǡ ǣ ǡ ǡǤ͵Ǥ ǡǤǤǡǡ ǤǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǤThe marketization of the nonproϔit sector: Civil society at risk?ǡ ǡͶȋʹȌǡͳ͵ʹȂͳͶͲǤ ǡǤȋʹͲͲʹȌǤThe commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway.Ǧ ϐ ǡ͵ͳȋ͵Ȍǡ͵ͷʹȂ͵Ǥ ǡǤȋʹͲͲͷȌǤǣ ǤInternational Journal of Public Administrationǡʹͺǡ͵ȂͶͺǤ ǡǤǡ ǡǤǡƬǡǤȋʹͲͲʹȌǤVon öffentlichen Einrichtungen zu sozialen Unternehmen ȏ ȐǤǡ ǣǤ ǡǤǡ ǡ ǤȋʹͲͲͷȌǤShould nonproϔits seek proϔits? ǡͻʹȂ ͳͲͲǤ Ǧ ǡǤǡ ǡǤȋʹͲͲͳȌǤMetody badawcze w naukach spoÏecznychǡǦ Ǧǡ
(51) ǡÑǤ ǡ ǤǤ ȋͳͻͻͻȌǤDiversiϔication of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonproϔit organizationsǤϐ ǡʹͺȋ͵ȌǡʹͶǦʹͺǤ ǡǤǡǡǤǤȋʹͲͳͳȌǤDiversiϔication reconsidered: The risks and rewards of revenue concentrationǤ ǡʹȋʹȌǡͳͷͳȂͳͶǤ. ǡǤǡǡǤȋʹͲͳ͵ȌǤLessons in operationalizing social ϔinance: the case of Vancouver City Savings Credit Unionǡ Ƭ
(52) ǡ͵ȋʹȌǤ. ǡǤǡȋʹͲͳʹȌǤHybrid Forms of Business: The Logic of Gift in the Commercial Worldǡ ǡǤͳͲͶǤ. ͳʹͶ.
(53) ʹȋͳȌʹͲͳͺ. . ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ Ƭ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ȋʹͲͳͷȌǤ
(54) Ǧ ǣ Ǧ ǤNonproϔit and voluntary sector quarterlyǡͶͶȋͳȌǡͳ͵ȂͳͺͲǤ ǡ Ǥ ȋʹͲͲͳȌǤ Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: A test of the Tuckman-Chang measures.ϐ ǡ͵ͲȋʹȌǡ͵Ȃ͵ͻʹǤ ǣȀȀǤǤȀϐȀ ǤǤȀ Ȁ Ȁ ʹͲͳͷǤǡ Ǥʹ͵Ͳȏ ǣʹͲ ʹͲͳȐǤ Ǧ ǡǤǡ ǡǤǡǡǤȋʹͲͲͺȌǤǷ ¦Ǧ Ȃ×ǡEkonomia SpoÏeczna TekstyǡͳͲǤ ǡǤǡ ǡǤǡ ǡǤǡ ǡ ǤȋʹͲͲͷȌǤAssessing ϔinancial vulnerability in the nonproϔit sector. ϐǡ Ǥ ǡ ǤǤǡǡǤȋʹͲͲȌǤNonproϔit commercial revenue: A replacement for declining government grants and private contributions? ǡ ǡǤ ǡǤȋʹͲͲȌǤPink ribbons, inc.: Breast cancer and the politics of philanthropyǡ ǡ ǡǤ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋʹͲͳȌǤ Nonproϔit Organizations Becoming Business-Like A Systematic Reviewǡϐ ǡͶͷȋͳȌǡͶȂͺǤ Ï ǡǤǡȋʹͲͳȌǤImportance of funding sources to the scale of activity of social enterprisesǡ ǡ ǡ ǡͶȀͺͺǤ Ï , ǤǡȋʹͲͳȌǤ}×Ï i instrumenty ϔinansowego wsparcia przedsi¸biorstw spoÏecznychǡ ǡÑǤ Ï ǡ Ǥǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋʹͲͳͷȌǤ Wspieranie rozwoju przedsi¸biorstw ekonomii spoÏecznej w Polsce przez fundusze europejskieǡ Ñǡ ÏǡǡÏ ä ¸ǡϐʹͲͳͷǡͶʹͲȂͶ͵ʹǤ ǯǡǤǡǡǤǡǡǤǡǦǡǤǡǡǤȋʹͲͳͲȌǤImpact Investments: An emerging asset classǡ ǡǤ ǡ Ǥǡ ȋʹͲͳͷȌǤ Finansowanie przedsi¸biorstw spoÏecznych w Polsceǡ Ǧ Ï ǡʹǡȂʹͲǤ ǡǤǡǡ ǤȋʹͲͲȌǤMarketization, participation, and communication within New Zealand retirement villages: A critical-rhetorical and discursive analysisǡ ƬǦ ǡͳǡͳͻͳȂʹʹʹǤ Ñǡ Ǥǡ ȋʹͲͲͺȌǤ Ekonomizacja organizacji posarz¦dowychǡ ¦ ǡ ͳȋ͵Ȍǡʹ͵ȂǤ. ͳʹͷ.
(55)
Powiązane dokumenty
The aim of the present paper is to quantitatively estimate the time required to fill a creep cavity by solute precipitation as a function of several key modelling parameters such as:
Dlatego wszyscy człon kow ie zakonu m arianów z miłości k u Bogu pow inni zachowywać przykazania Boże, ra d y ewangeliczne, zarządzenia Kościoła rzym
The factors that facilitate it are: the increase in the number of children who leave their foster families or childcare institutions and return to their biological families, the
W przeciwie«stwie do tego, w przypadku rozdzielonych pasm walencyjnych, zale»no±¢ mi¦dzy energi¡ wymiany a odlegªo±ci¡ pomi¦dzy kropkami jest dla tego zakresu odlegªo±ci
Sentences containing ‘God’ have a particular status: one cannot simply state that they have a mean- ing (since a complete description and with it a complete representation is
Nie zmienia to jednak faktu, iż króliczy obornik jest bardzo wartościowym nawozem naturalnym, a jego skład może być różny w zależności od wielu czynników. W związku z tym
The increase in expenditures on benefits for natural persons resulted primarily from the imple- mentation of the government programme “Family 500 Plus .” As a positive note,
We have outlined an analytical framework with some empirical analysis of the ratios between productivity of labour and remuneration and their respect- ive changes in relation to