14-11-2014
1
What can we learn from the
British Housing Market?
Professor Mark Stephens I-SPHERE, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh Housing Conference, The Hague, 12 November 2014
Picture: Crown Street, Glasgow
First World War: • Rent control 1915 • 1919 Housing Act – first
Government subsidies • Housing provided by local
authorities
Quick overview of housing policy
Mass building programmes post 1945 • Era of “social democratic consensus” • Mass council house building programme • Big push to clear the slums and remove
shortage
• Worst of shortage over by early 1970s
Economic and
political turning
points
Right to Buy • Flagship Thatcherite policy • Possible due to erosion of housing debt • Contributed to the “residualisation” of the
sector
Public housing not replaced
• Decline in new build local authority housing began with IMF crisis in 1976
• Combined with Right to Buy this meant that the sector declined from its peak of housing around 33% of households in 1980
14-11-2014
2
1988: Housing associations chosen as the main providers of new social rented housing
• Capital grant from government (reduced over time) • Greater reliance on sourcing private finance:
• Mortgages from banks • Larger ones issued own bonds
• Government intermediary also used to access markets
• No govt. guarantee but rental stream “underwritten” by Housing Benefit.
Large Scale Voluntary Transfers (LSVTs) 1988 -2000s
• Local authorities permitted to transfer their entire stock to a housing association from 1988 (tenant ballot required).
• Valued at net present value of future rental income (“tenanted market value”)
• Where stock had low/ negative value, subsidy was required – Glasgow had almost £1bn debt written off to facilitate transfer of stock
• Since 1988:
• 1.2 million dwellings transferred in England • 182 = whole stock transfers
• 116 = partial transfers • £6.2 billion housing debt repaid
• £21.3 billion finance levered in to new associations
Housing association building up to the crisis
• Completions fall below 30,000 p.a.
• Use of planning system (s106) to subsidise 65% of affordable housing completions
• Cross-subsidy from shared equity products • Use of reserves
• Sector consolidates
2011-15 “Affordable Homes Programme” • Context = 60% cut in housing capital subsidy budget • Envisages 80,000 “affordable” homes over 4 years, mostly
provided by housing associations • Total subsidy = £1.8 billion
• Capital subsidy per unit will be cut to average of 14% • Much greater reliance on private finance
• Rents on new houses and on some relets will be higher – up to 80% of market rents
Housing Benefit
Housing Association sector today
• 2.4 million properties vs 1.6 million local authoritydwellings 10 largest HAs: • > 0.5 million units • 24% of HA total • 14% of all social housing • Largest LA = Birmingham = 64,000 properties
14-11-2014
3
Key issues in future of Housing Associations
• Demanding greater freedom over rent setting and allocations
• Want more liberal valuation model to facilitate gearing of more private finance
• Wider activities – e.g. “employment commitments” • Preparing for era with no financial subsidy? • Charitable status?
Private renting
• Decline bottomed out at 10%in mid 1990s
• Deregulation 1989 • Market rents • Insecure
• Rise of Buy-to-Let landlord • Now overtaken social renting • Diverse composition • Housing Benefit cuts
• Reluctance of institutional investors –
• role for HAs?
Assessment
• Housing system largely broke the link between income poverty and housing deprivation
• Market and policy now suggest: • Falling owner occupation • Higher rents in social housing • Less social housing (relative) • More private renting at market rents • Less support from Housing Benefit
• Implies strengthening of link between income poverty and housing deprivation.
And finally…. Some Do’s and
Don’ts
• Do make sure overall supply is adequate. • Do re-invest the proceeds from social housing sales. • Do make sure housing associations are accountable • Don’t shift subsidies too far to housing allowance – it pushes
rents up and has to be paid forever. • Don’t exclude the poor from social housing