• Nie Znaleziono Wyników

On the order of a group of automorphisms of a compact bordered Klein surface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "On the order of a group of automorphisms of a compact bordered Klein surface"

Copied!
6
0
0

Pełen tekst

(1)

11 (1989), 3 - 8

On the order of a group of

automorphisms of a compact bordered

Klein surface

Grzegorz G rom adzki

We will prove the announced results by means of NEC groups. An

NEC-group is a discrete subgroup T of the group of isometries Q of

the hyperbolic piane C+ (including those which reverse orientation— reflections and glide reflections) with compact ąuotient space C+/T . Let Q+ denote the subgroup of index 2 in Q consisting of orientation preserving isometries. An NEC group T contained in Q+ is called a

Fuchsian group, and a proper NEC-group in the other case. In what

follows r + = T fi Q+ is the canonical Fuchsian subgroup of an NEC group T.

M acbeath [7] and Wilkie [13] associated to every NEC group a sig- nature th a t has the form

(1)

(g\

± ; [wii,. • • , m r] , {(n,-i,. . . fc} )

and determines the algebraic structure of the group. The numbers m,- are called proper periods, the brackets ( n a , • • . , n,Sl) period cycles and g > 0 is called orbit genus. The group with signature 1 has the presentation with the following generators

(2) X i , i = l , . . . , r ,

C i j, t 1, • • • , k , J 0 ,. . . , S i,

e,-, t 1 , . . . , h )

cii, b , i = 1 , . . . ,g (if the sign is + ) d{, i = 1 , . . . , g (if the sign is —)

(2)

4 G. G rom adzki

subject to the relations

1. x™' = 1, i = l , . . . , r ,

2* ^isi ^ 1? . . . , A-,

3. c?j _1 = cC = (c ,j_ ic tj )nij = 1, i = 1 , . . . , k; j = 1 , . . . , a,-, 4. X\ . . . x re\ . . . e ^ a i^ a j" 1^ 1 . . . cigbga^b^1 = 1 if the sign is + ,

X\ . . . x re\ .. . &kd\ ■.. d2g — 1 if the sign is —. In what follows these generators are saicl to be the canonical gener- ators of T. It is known th a t the only elements of finite order in T are those th a t are conjugate to powers of cp-, l5 X{. Every NEC group has a fundamental region associated, whose area depends only on the group. It is given by

(3) , . ( 0 = 2* (a g + k -2 + g ( l - i - ) + i Y .(l - ^ - ) ) .

where a = 1 if the sign is — and a = 2 in the other case.

It is known th a t the necessary and sufficient condition for a group T with presentation 2 to be realized as an NEC group with signature 1 is th a t the right hand side of 3 is greater than 0.

If T is a subgroup of finite index in an NEC group A, then it is an NEC group itself and the following Hurwitz-Riemann formuła holds

(4)

[a : r] = /i(r)//<(A).

An NEC group with signature

(5) [ - ] ; { ( - ) > •*•>(-)})

(k > 1) is said to be a bordered surface group of genus g with k boundary

components orientable or non-orientable according as the sign is + or —. The number p = ag + k — 1 is called the algebraic genus of T and it ecjuals the algebraic genus of the corresponding Klein surface

x

= c+/r.

It is known [11] th a t a compact bordered Klein surface of algebraic genus p > 2 can be represented as C+ /T, where T is a bordered surface

(3)

group of algebraic genus p. Moreover given a surface so represented, a fmite group G is a group of its automorphisms if and only if there exists a proper NEC group A containing F as a normal subgroup such th a t G = A / r [8].

L e m m a 1 The only proper N E C groups with area sm aller than 7r/6

are those which have a signature (0 ;+ ; [—]; { ( n i , n2,U3)}), where 5/6 <

l/7?.i+ 1/??.2 + 1/h3 < 1 o / '(0;+;[???]; {(77)}), where 5/6 < 2 / 7 7 7 + 1 / 7 7 < 1.

P r o o f . Straiglitforward verification.

L e m m a 2 Nonę o f the groups listed in the preuious lemma adm it a

bordered surface gro up as a normal subgroup o f finite index.

P r o o f . Notice th a t a canonical Fuchsian subgronp F + of a bordered surface group F is torsion lree.

It is easy to check th a t an NEC group A with a signature (°; +; [-]; {(»i,»2,»3)})

is generated by three reflections Co, ci and c2 obeying the relations

(c0c ,)ni = (c,c2p = (c0c2 ) n 3 = 1.

Assume th a t a group A contains a bordered surface group F as a normal subgroup. Thcn a reflection c of A belongs to F. Reflection c is conjugate to one of the canonical ones, say to co and sińce F is normal in A co itself belongs to F. Now sińce //(A) > 0. ??i or 7/3 is greater tlian

2. But then (coCi) 2 or (coc-2 ) 2 is a nontrivial element of finite order in

F+ which is torsion-free as we alrcady mentioned, a contradiction. Now assume th a t A has a signature of the second type. Then A is generated by c0, Ci, and e subject to the relations

cg = c? = (cbc1)B = 1,

em = 1,

cc0e~‘ = C\ .

As in the precious case we argne th a t one of c,- belongs to F. But then the other one does. So cqCi, being an element of order 77 belongs to F+ ,

(4)

6 G. G rom adzki

C o r o lla ry The order o f a group o f autom orphism s o f a bordered com­ pact Klein surface o f algebraic genus p > 2 is bounded aboue by 12(p—1). P ro o f. If a finite group G is a group of automorphisms of a bordered

Klein surface of algebraic genus p > 2 then G — A/T, where F is a bordered surface group of area 27r(p — 1) and by lemma 1 p(A) > 7r/6. Thus

|G| =

A

r)/,,(A ) <

M l 7 f ] =

12

(p

-

1).

R e m a r k 1 It turns out that an NEC-group T with signature

( 0 , + ; [ - ] , { ( 3 , 2 , 2 , 2 ) } )

and area 7r/6 is the group which admits bordered surface groups as nor­ mal subgroups o f a finite index [3], [9] and it was shown in m any papers that the bound 12(p — 1) is attained fo r infinitely m any groups [3], [f],

[5], [6], [9], [10], [12].

R e m a r k 2 Recently it was shown in [2] that the necessary and suffi- cient condition fo r an N E C group A to admit a bordered surface group

F as a norm al subgroup o f finite index is that A has a signature with, an

em pty period cycle or with a period cycle with two consecutiue periods equal to 2. A n N E C group A with an em pty period cycle has clearly area > 7t/ 3 while it is easy to obserue that a period cycle with two con­ secutiue periods equal to 2 in an N E C group willi area < 7t/3 has length fo u r and then p(A) > 7t/6. This giues one more proof o f the result in

question.

A c k n o w le d g e m e n t. This paper was written in D epartam ento de

M atem aticas Fundamentales of UNED in Madrid, when the author was the fellow of a Spanish Government postdoctoral grant. The author would like to thank a referee for several helpful remarks and sugges- tions.

R e fe r e n c e s

[1] E. Bujalance, Norm al subgroups o f N E C groups, M ath. Z. 178 (1981), 331-341

(5)

[2] E. Bujalance, E. Martinez, A remark on N E C groups o f surfaces

with boundary, Buli. London Math. Soc. 21 (1989), 263-266

[3] J. J. Etayo Gordejuela, Klein surfaces with m axim al sym m etry

and their groups o f autom orphism s, Math. Ann. 268 (1984),

533-538

[4] J. J. Etayo Gordejuela, C. Perez-Chirinos, Bordered and unbor-

dered surfaces with m azim al sym m etry, J. Pure App. Algebra 42

(1986), 29-35

[5] N. Greenleaf, C. L. May, Bordered Klein surfaces with m azim al

sym m etry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 274 (1982), 265-283

[6] G. Gromadzki, On supersoluable M*-groups, Preprint UNED Mad- rid 1987

[7] A. M. M acbeath, The classification o f non-euclidean crystallo-

graphic groups, Gan. J. Math. 19 (1967), 1192-1205

[8] C. L. May, A utom orphism s o f compact Klein surfaces with bound­

ary, Pacific J. Math. 59 (1975), 199-210

[9] C. L. May, Large autom orphism groups o f compact Klein surfaces

with boundary, I, Glasgow Math. J. 18 (1977), 1-10

[10] C. L. May, A fa m ily o f M*-groups, Gan. J. Math. 38 (1986), 1094-1109

[11] R. Preston, Projectwe structures and fundam ental domains on

compact Klein surfaces, Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Texas

(1975)

[12] D. Singerman, PSL(2,q) as an image o f the eztended modular

group with application to group actions on surfaces, Proc. Edinb.

(6)

8 G. G rom adzki

[13] H. C. Wilkie, On non-Euclidean crystallographic groups, M ath. Z. 91 (1966), 87-102 W Y Ż S Z A S Z K O Ł A P E D A G O G I C Z N A I N S T Y T U T M A T E M A T Y K I Chodkiewicza 30 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland Received before 23.12.1988

Cytaty

Powiązane dokumenty

Moreover, a direct proof of the well-known fact that the set of ergodic automorphisms is nowhere dense in the strong topology is given.. Notations and

Finally, the fundamental domains associated to an increasing sequence of subgroups behave in some sense like the rectangles in B n, and Section 4 is devoted to the

The proof is founded on the following essentially known lemma:..

This implies the existence of 0-dimensional compact T 2 spaces whose cardinality and weight spectra omit lots of singular cardinals of “small” cofinality.. In particular, the weight

For the group D(4) find the set of generators containing possibly least elements.. Is this

We study the properties of the group Aut(D) of all biholomorphic trans- formations of a bounded circular domain D in C n containing the origin.. We characterize the set of all

The main aim of this paper is to give an elementary and self-contained proof of the following classical result.. Theorem (Weitzenb¨

The Christensen measurable solutions of a generalization of the Go l¸ ab–Schinzel functional equation.. by Janusz Brzde ¸k